Words that carry explosive Meanings

It is time to tell it like it is even if facing the brutal truth will hurt some people initially. It is that American veterans are killing themselves at an alarming rate not because they are mentally ill but because they can no longer live with their conscience even if they were only “following orders.” These veterans are, in effect, pulling a Timothy McVeigh – not against the American government that sent them to kill innocent people in foreign lands – but against themselves who volunteered to serve in America's military.

What makes it imperative to face up to the truth, however painful it may be, are statements such as the one given by Charles Krauthammer in the following form ... Obama's petulant response was: “The prime minister didn't offer any viable alternatives.” But he just did: conditional sunset, smaller infrastructure. And if the Iranians walk away, then you ratchet up sanctions, as Congress is urging.

This is the same sort of demonic trick that the Jews play when no one suspects they are up to something. If they succeed, they celebrate with triumphalist joy for pulling it off. They celebrate because to them, the success is proof that they are superior to the race which let them get away with it. A similar trick that the Palestinians were smart enough to foil came in the form of Netanyahu asking them – as a precondition to signing a peace deal – to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. No, said the Palestinians, after which the Israelis themselves told Netanyahu they would not call Israel a Jewish state.

As for the Iranian situation, to propose a conditional sunset on them entails that they agree in writing before anything happens that they are evil people doing evil things which they will strive to correct. But they recognize they may not be able to stop being the evil ones that they are, by the time that the sunset clause will have come into effect. Thus, with the signing of this agreement – containing a condition for the sunset clause – they signal their acceptance of the punishment that will be inflicted on them in the future.

The Krauthammer article carrying his arguments and more, came under the title: “Netanyahu's Churchllian Warning,” and was published on March 5, 2015 in National Review Online. Three other articles written by Jews on the same subject and published at about the same time give a full picture as to how the Jews maintain control over America while spewing words of useless value. These are empty words that pretend to enlist America in the effort to stop evil abroad and defend the homeland when the only evil abroad and in America is the Jewish cult of Armageddon and of death; the one that has been ravaging the Planet for nearly four thousand years.

The other articles are Harsanyi's: “Is 2015 like 1938?” also published in National Review Online. As to the Weekly Standard, it published two articles, one that was written by William Kristol under the title: “Speaking of Israel – and America,” the other written by Ruth R. Wisse under the title: “Rising to the Occasion” and the subtitle: “Bibi Netanyahu's heroic speech.” This is how these people motivate young impressionable Americans to volunteer serving in the military.

What the Jews do not take up in these articles or any other, is that upon the return home of the combatants that survive the war, they get gripped with a crisis of conscience that tears them apart internally. Worse, they get neglected by the Veterans Affairs which has no money to try understanding what they are going through, let alone strive to treat them appropriately. This happens at a time when Jewish American kids serve in the Israeli military; the one that receives a gift of two hundred million dollars from the American Congress of useless dogs. They receive the money for murdering two thousand Palestinian women and children in their homes – a sum that amounts to a hundred thousand dollars reward per murder they commit in cold blood.

It is time for America to face up to the reality that a critical mass is gathering, not in the nuclear bombs that do not exist in Iran, but in the collective conscience of the American people whose sons and daughters can no longer live with what is tearing them to shreds internally, and what is destroying their country to serve the wellspring of all evil on the planet; a Jewish ideology that has been hurting humanity since the beginning of time.

The words of the relentless Jews who forever incite America to start a new war against someone, are words that explode not when they are uttered, but explode under the feet of the American foot soldiers who innocently enlist to fight what they think is a just war, but find themselves committing horrible crimes against innocent people only to serve the Jewish masters of their representatives in the Washington congress of sheer uselessness.

Strength as Weakness in the Beholder's Eye

Walking the worn out path of a victimized race of saintly people, the Jews are again taking that path to reach not one goal but reach two of them. On the one hand, they have for a number of decades, attacked each of their neighbors in the middle of the night … suddenly and unexpectedly. They did it to grab a piece of land they said was necessary to give them an added measure of security. They ended being kicked out from most of those lands except from the Western Golan Heights and the West Bank of the Jordan where they continue to play the role of colonial power.

On the other hand, the Jews took advantage of the Soviet Union's demise to develop the goal of setting America, and by extension the West, against the Muslim World. They scored a few initial successes in this realm but got bogged down when it came to inciting America to attack and destroy Iran, having done it to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya with disastrous consequences.

The Jews are not relenting in their incitement to have America destroy Iran, however. At first they used the excuse that Iran was threatening the existence of Israel, then ratcheted the claim to a threat that Iran poses to the stability of the region which, ironically, is something that Israel has been doing for decades. When this did not work on America, the Jews started saying that Iran is threatening the existence of America herself. And they found enough Americans who would join them in a whine you may call: wail of the victims in waiting.

Victor Davis Hanson has now gone one step further than that to nudge the Americans to attack Iran. He is doing it by attacking President Barack Obama who is the commander in chief of the armed forces and the ultimate decider on the subject of war. Hanson wrote: “The Audacity of Weakness,” an article that was published on March 5, 2015 in National Review Online.

He begins the article with a direct attack on the American President while raising the profile of the Israeli Prime Minister: “Obama's morally confused foreign policy is making the world more dangerous by the day. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned of the anti-Western threats from the – likely to soon be nuclear – Iran.”

Hanson goes on to explain that Netanyahu knows of the “Iranian plan to remake the Middle East,” which is something that is obvious to everyone, he admits. Yet, he goes on to say, it earned Netanyahu a standing ovation. But who were the nincompoops that gave a standing ovation upon hearing the obvious? Who were the people that Hanson preferred not to mention? The American Congress, you say? Ah! That says it all.

If in the contest to influence people and win friends, Iran is winning against the Jewish formulated American foreign policy, the evil player in this game is not Iran but the Jews who convinced America to drink from their KOOL Aid. And if ... like Hanson says: “Teheran now has de facto control over four Middle East nations,” Iran has the Jews and Israel to thank because it could not have done it without them.

Instead of stating these obvious facts and urging Israel and the Jews to put themselves in the “lie low and keep quiet mode,” Hanson does the very Jewish thing of mutilating the recent history of the Middle East so as to put the failures on Obama. Thus, while the stated goal of the Jewish dominated Congress has been all along to paralyze the Obama administration and make it a one-term presidency, Hanson now says this: “The Obama administration's paralysis is not just rhetorical. For the first time since 2001, defense spending will dip below 4 percent of GDP.”

From this point to the end of the article, Hanson – who is usually lucid when it comes to expanding on his views – writes a number of paragraphs that would shame the parents of a twelve year old who would write at a level that is this low. His aim being to end with this: “leaders who have appeared weary have invited chaos [that] encourages war,” he could not navigate a way from the mention of 4 percent of GDP … to encouraging war by inviting chaos.

This being the chaos he attributes to Obama when, in reality, the President stood strong and resolute in the face of a Jewish and Israeli stated purpose to see regime changes in the Middle Eastern nations so as to rebuild the region according to secret plans they drew up long ago.

The Jewish misery continues while the universe unfolds as it should. Thank you Desiderata for reminding us.

The Lipstick on the Pig looks piggish

There is an English saying to the effect that putting lipstick on a pig does not make the pig look better. As it happens, this saying applies 'right-on' to the editorial page, and to the op-ed one that came in the March 5, 2015 edition of the Wall Street Journal. Three opinion pieces were published on that day, all having to do with Iran's nuclear installations, and with Netanyahu's reaction to them.

What happened is that Netanyahu the stud turned out to be the eunuch who promised to grace America with an explosive Churchillian sort of speech, but mortified the nation with a speech that turned out to be a dud. And so, to repair the damage that resulted from the fiasco, Netanyahu's admirers who were too dumb to realize they were buying a pig in the poke, are now trying to embellish the pig with lots of lipstick.

Daniel Henninger who is an editor of the Journal obviously believes that the best defense is the offense. Thus, instead of coming right out and defending Netanyahu, he chose to attack President Obama … making this whole episode sound like it is a contest between the two men. Henninger wrote: “Obama's Iran Entitlement,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “What has Obama done to earn trust for this unilateral deal?”

But how to attack a President who, unlike his predecessor who was called a war criminal, won the Nobel Peace Prize? The answer is that you write the following: “Mr. Obama has eroded the trust that the political world normally concedes to the U.S. president.” Worse, Henninger goes on to say: “A principle reason domestic policy is at a standstill in the U.S. is that congressional Republicans no longer believe Mr. Obama will keep his word on any legislative commitment.”

The fact is that even before his inauguration – the first time that Obama was elected President – the congressional Republicans that Henninger is talking about, had come out and declared they will do their utmost to make this man a one-term President. And they kept repeating the refrain. This has had a profound effect on both the domestic policy, and the trust that the political world concedes to an American president. As time passed, the foreigners saw that the Republicans meant what they said, and were engaged in sabotaging the work of their country's administration. Whatever they thought of Obama, they knew that the traitors in the other branch of government were going to spoil whatever he tries to accomplish … and they pulled back.

As to Karl Rove, his article came under the title: “How the White House Botched Bibi's Speech” and the subtitle: “The public relations assault on an ally gave the address far more attention and import.” You can see right there what the man is trying to do. He says that if the thing looks like a pig, it's because the White House gave it that look. He adds that there is a silver lining to all of this, however, because the effort gave the speech more significance than it would have garnered on its own. Well, it can only be said that Karl Rove must have used tons of sticks as he tried to make the pig's lips look attractive … but he accomplished a doubtful result.

Rove made three mistakes. First, he chided Kerry for making the subtle “confession” that as senator, he listened to the advice of Netanyahu, and made the mistake of voting for the war on Iraq … something he does not want to see other legislators repeat. Second, Rove says that Netanyahu demolished Obama's arguments one by one. Hey Karl, how did he do that when he did not even take up Obama's arguments? Third, Rove called Israel “a vibrant nation that is a champion of liberty and human rights.” He can get away saying this in America where all the megaphones are ordered to sing the same refrain. But to a world that saw the brutal inhumanity of apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia, and now sees the murderous horror of Israel, Rove looks much like a mental case.

To top it all off, the editors of the Wall Street Journal came up with a piece of their own in which they smothered lipstick on the Netanyahu pig by attacking Nancy Pelosi. They wrote: “Pelosi's Netanyahu Complaint,” which also came under the subtitle: “The Democratic leader wasn't 'near tears' when she courted Assad.”

They picked on her who said she was near tears during Netanyahu's speech, and they tried to draw a parallel between that moment and the time when Pelosi visited Assad of Syria. It was a time, they say, she was not near tears. But where are the parallels? The fact is that she did not break protocol to go to Syria. And she did not listen to an Assad speech insulting the intelligence of Americans. Also, Assad did not condescend toward the knowledge that America had with regard to the situation in the Middle East. There are no parallels, WSJ.

Can these people ever demonstrate – at least once – that they know what they are talking about?

The Mountain that begot no Mouse

There is no way that anyone who is familiar with the subject matter taken up here, would believe that Netanyahu of Israel is not familiar with the work of the outfit of clowns calling itself defender of the democracies or some such comical name.

One of the pet projects preoccupying the members of that outfit is to whine about the fact that Iran is treated in world forums as well as any top tier country can be, and better than most average countries. This is happening, they say, at a time when virtually every nation on the planet is avoiding Israel like the plague; and doing so despite America's relentless pressure on those nations to be nice to Israel.

Now look what Netanyahu said in his speech to the US Congress on March 3, 2015: “If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country, let it act like a normal country.” Well, in view of the fact that Iran is already getting what it wants, what did Netanyahu mean by that statement? You get an idea what he meant when you examine another statement he made in the same speech. It is this: “At a time when many hope that Iran will join the community of nations, Iran is busy gobbling up nations.”

This demonstrates that what he meant to say was not done consciously. It was a response that came out of Netanyahu's subconscious mind without him realizing it. This is because the truth is that Iran is not gobbling up nations; those nations are joining Iran freely and willingly. By contrast, it is Israel that has been trying to gobble up nations; places from which it was kicked out except for the Western Golan Heights and the West Bank of the Jordan which Israel continues to occupy.

This is why Iran is treated like a normal nation in world forums while Israel is treated like a pariah. But Netanyahu being a Jew, processed the information in a mind that grew up thinking in terms of Jewish logic. And so, he could do no better than project into Iran the sins of Israel, and attribute to Israel the virtues he sees in Iran. This is a classic Jewish reversal; a dyslexia of the moral compass that has plagued the Jews since the beginning of time.

And when someone is so cursed as to be controlled by the Jewish ideology, everything that comes to him, comes upside down – and everything that leaves him, leaves upside down. This is why Netanyahu believes that when Jews speak on behalf of Israel and say that Israel has submarines carrying nuclear weapons capable of obliterating Iran, America should reward Israel for saying the right things. He also believes that when Iran responds by saying: Try that, Israel, and we'll deal with you appropriately – America should destroy Iran because this is a threat that must never be made against a UN member. Go figure.

And that is not all for, despite the half-century history of Jewish agitation in America urging those who would listen that the Middle East and North Africa need to see their regimes changed, Netanyahu ignored the role that the Jews have played in turning the place into the hell that it is today, and chided Iran for doing what it can to stabilize it. Here is how he put it to the people of the Congress who collaborated with the Jews and brought chaos to the region: “As states are collapsing across the Middle East, Iran is charging into the void.”

Having painting the backgrounder of the situation as he sees it, Netanyahu went on to tell his audience how he would fix the problem of Iran's nuclear installations. He says, maintain the sanctions till Iran does three things. First, stop attacking the neighbors in the Middle East. Second, stop supporting terrorism around the world. Third, stop threatening to annihilate Israel. This done, the sanctions can be lifted, he advised.

There are a few problems though, and they have to do with the Jewish moral dyslexia. It is that first, nobody is attacking the neighbors in the Middle East but Israel. Second, the only terrorist state in the Middle East is Israel, and the American Congress is keeping it afloat. Third, it is Israel that regularly threatens to annihilate its neighbors with the hundred or so nuclear bombs it wants the world to believe it has.

The fact is that Netanyahu had nothing to say to America or to the world. He is, however, a megalomaniac that cannot live without being engulfed by the periodic outbursts of approval which he elicits from the feeble minds and the emotionally rattled Americans.

And so, like the mountain that went into labor and gave birth to a mouse, he created the brouhaha that resulted in nothing. In fact, his mountain did not even beget a mouse this time.

The intercultural Family that never made it

The prime minister of Israel who goes by the name of Benjamin Netanyahu gave a speech at an AIPAC meeting on March 2, 2015 in which he brought up a point he thought will buttress his argument; but the point did the opposite. This happened because the record that Netanyahu failed to mention is known to many people, and it speaks for itself.

Netanyahu said this: “Israel and the United States are more than friends. We're like family … Disagreements in the family are always uncomfortable, but we must always remember that we are family.” But the record is to the effect that the Jews have tried for something like four thousand years to form a family with someone – anyone – and failed. In fact, they failed so miserably that the marriages they wished to have did worse than break-up; they caused the would-be partners to burn the Jews alive, pogrom them or give them the full holocaust treatment before kicking out of the country those that managed to survive.

Even now … in the very speech that Netanyahu spoke of family, he attacked Iran and said horrible things about it despite the fact that only a few years ago, the Jews were doing their utmost to “marry” Israel and Iran. The intent then was to set-up an alliance that would oppose an Arab-Sunni world, described by the Jews at the time the way that they now describe Iran. And because the Jews hated the Arabs, they also aligned themselves with the Turks about whom they said they had so much in common; you would think they were all Netanyahus describing Israel's relationship with America.

More broadly, the record shows that when it comes to interracial and interdenominational marriages, these seem to work reasonably well for all sorts of people, including individual Jews. When it comes to intercultural marriages between societies, however, the record is less cheerful. As can be observed, the tension between the cultures can range in intensity from the “partners” ignoring one another such as the Canada-Quebec situation, to the genocidal attempts that have developed in places like Rwanda and the Balkans.

What has added to trouble for the Jews is that they only “loved” someone because they hated someone else and needed someone to love them back, and to stand with them against those they hated. In short, the Jews always sought comrades in hatred, cultivating them as they needed them. Right now, the Jews hate virtually the whole world, and this is why they need someone the size of America to stand with them, hate the world with them and protect them at every venue ... physically, morally, emotionally and psychologically.

But is this a relationship that is more real than what the Jews have forged throughout the centuries and were kicked in the teeth for? To answer the question, look what Netanyahu said in his speech: “I appreciate what Obama has done for Israel … some things that I cannot even divulge to you because it remains in the realm of the confidences...” Anyone watching him speak and knowing what the Jews are like, would have known this is blackmail delivered publicly to Obama. And sure enough, John Kerry came out shortly after the speech and warned Netanyahu not to reveal any secrets. With friends like these who needs enemies?

There is no doubt this is a relationship that is based on abuse and mutual hatred. You can see this in the history of what Netanyahu has said were the disagreements which Israel had with America in decades past. It was a time when the Jewish leaders worked hard to overcome the difficulties, managing in the end to put back on track a relationship that looks normal on the surface – but only on the surface.

Netanyahu cited incidences that happened in 1948, 1967, 1981and 2002 at which times the same Israel that has come into existence with American support, and has been maintained afloat with American largess – defied the will of its benefactor. It did so by committing acts that cost America dearly in the past, and continue to cost it dearly now in terms of standing in the world … even financially and in lives lost.

This in mind, it is vexing to hear Netanyahu end the speech describing the American-Israeli relationship the way that he did: “Rooted in a common heritage, upholding common values, sharing a common destiny … that's the message I came to tell you today … our alliance is sound. Our friendship is strong. And with your efforts it will get even stronger in the years to come.”

This is what the Jews said to the Iranians and the Turks before they turned against them and started to abuse them verbally. It is also what they said to the ancient Egyptians, Persians and Romans; and more recently to the European countries – Feudal, Communist and Capitalist alike – till the European rank and file had enough of the Jews and decided to holocaust them, and to throw them out of the Continent.

These people never learn because their leaders never have the intention to let them learn.

The new Masada Jim-Jones Syndrome

Better known by the nicknames chickenshit and rug-pissing-dog, the prime minister of Israel – who at times goes by the name Bibi the Netanyahu – is a Jewish leader who will soon be preaching to a bunch of American idiots calling themselves legislators, as they huddle together at a site they call the American Congress; a place that is better known to others as the Netanyahu private shit-house.

Netanyahu the Bibi will tell them about the most fundamental precept in the ideology he is proselytizing without revealing it is a death cult that will cause them to want to kill or be killed … not knowing why they are doing it, and not worrying about it one bit. But for us to understand how this situation came about, we need to know something about the evolution of organic life on Planet Earth.

Where organisms live, disputes always arise which are then resolved by one of several means, ranging from the flight of one opponent to the fight that may end up crippling or killing one of them. The remarkable thing is that no organism on Planet Earth has demonstrated the inclination to deliberately fight to the death if it has a way out and the chance to escape. This is certainly true of the human species, which is why it has been so successful at reproducing itself and multiplying its ranks.

But humanity has its exceptions. It can happen that something may affect the psychology of an individual, causing him to want to fight till he kills the opponent or dies trying. Whatever it is that has this effect on some individuals, the leaders of the cult calling itself Jewish, seem to have reproduced it with success, and made it a fundamental precept in the ideology they have fashioned under the Jewish name.

They proselytize their product without mentioning the doom scenario that is built into it. People convert to it not knowing what awaits them, and then wake up to the idea that they have been recruited into a death cult where they are contributing to a simmering fight that will end up killing them or killing their offspring. They realize this will be the inevitable outcome because the Jews will never achieve the alternative … which is to kill everyone on Earth in the Armageddon that the Jewish leaders never stop organizing.

To kill or be killed even when there is a more peaceful alternative is not a new concept to the Judaic cult. Its adherents have lived and died by that precept since before the modern era. A known case, based on a true story, came under the name of Masada Complex, as it unfolded at a place in Palestine called Masada.

That was a time when the Jews had formed several groups antagonistic to each other and to the Romans who were occupying the land. One group specialized in murdering defenseless women and children in nearby villages for no reason than it gave them pleasure to do so. They also managed to occupy the top of a mountain that was called Masada, and where the Romans had a garrison. When the Roman soldiers counter-attacked to retake the garrison, the Jewish leader of the group convinced his followers to set the place ablaze; to kill each other and to kill themselves … which they did.

Since that time, something resembling that performance has unfolded in places where mental stability is known to be rare and getting rarer with the passage of time. The most notorious of those cases happened in Texas, California, Montreal, and in South America where a Californian by the name of Jim Jones took his followers and told them to drink the KOOL AID that ended their lives.

This is the feat that the Netanyahu of Israel is coming to duplicate in America. He plans to meet with the most unstable minds in the Republic, at which time he will tell them about a KOOL Aid formulation he has prepared and named Nuclear Proliferation.

He will tell them to drink his KOOL Aid, and will instruct them to march headlong; first to ram into their President, and then to take the country into a military adventure against Islam. But America will fail to kill all the Muslims, and thus risk being killed as a regime once and for all. In fact, this is what happened to Nazism and Fascism almost eight decades ago, and it can happen again.

So, let’s say it in advance: RIP American regime of exceptional devotion to the Jewish cult of death.

Anything you do, they can do as well

There is grace and dignity in growing to a mature age; even growing to old age. This applies to individuals, to institutions and even to a society. People respect the wisdom that must have accumulated under that gray hair, even if no effort is made to display the wisdom. What a gray lady or a gray gentleman need to do to distinguish themselves is to maintain a self respecting posture and to show respect for others.

This is what the English speaking world looked like until a while ago. People around the world sensed that in Britain, America, Canada and Australia a level of eminence was attained by individuals and their institutions such that the nation as a whole deserved to see bestowed on it the highest esteem that humanity could dispense on someone. But then the English speaking world was infiltrated by Jews, and that view was shattered. It happened because those nations were maneuvered by the Jews into losing their self respecting posture, and were made to display disrespect for others.

From a governing apparatus in America swarming with individuals who could not wait to jump in front of a television camera where they insulted the Middle Eastern nations that did nothing worse than sell them the petroleum they asked to buy, and from a British Broadcasting Corporation which handed its facilities to the Jewish propaganda machine where Israel was portrayed as a heavenly patch in the middle of an Arab Islamic hell – came a new attitude that turned the gray look of the English speaking world into the mark of senility, replacing what used to be the look of eminence and wisdom.

But that's not all because along with this, the Jews taught the English speaking nations to see something spectacular in everything they do; however insignificant these things may be … and to see nothing impressive in what the others do; however significant they may be. Thus, when in 1993 some foreign kids tried to blow up the World Trade Center and were caught, America's officials bragged that ingenuity made it possible to catch one of the culprits because he left his DNA on a stamp that he licked. Well, the next group of kids heard the bragging, licked no stamp, and in 2001 brought down that same World Trade Center.

And the Jews who think of themselves as being the chosen children of God … well, these people taught the Americans to think of themselves as being the exceptional nation that the world cannot do without. To prove it, they offered that the young around the world love America's culture; its music, films, dance, sports, clothes, fast foods and what have you. The trouble is that they never though someone would want to challenge this contention, thus failed to prepare themselves for the response which came from a most unexpected source.

You can read all about it in the Wall Street Journal editorial which came under the title: “Britain's Lost Girls” and the subtitle: “The 'ISIS brides knew what they were doing. That's the problem,” published on February 25, 2015. The editors explain what happened in this case the following way: “The girls were probably bombarded with messages about the supposed religious utopia awaiting them, coupled with denigration of the Western societies in which they lived.” Yes, this is sophisticated.

But does it sound familiar? Ask the kids and the adults out there in the world who are constantly bombarded with messages about the supposed utopia they are missing because their governments refuse to hand the country to the Jewish organizations, the way that America handed the Congress to the Jews. And so the kids of ISIS took it upon themselves to respond. Anything you can do, we can do as well if not better, they said. And they proved it.

Two days later, on February 27, 2015, the same Wall Street Journal editors wrote: “Iran on the Nuclear Edge,” a piece that also came under the subtitle: “Official leaks suggest the U.S. is making ever more concessions.”

Whether Iran intends to have the bomb; whether it will or will not have it eventually is beside the point at this time. The thing is that for more than a quarter century, Israel has signaled it has the bomb, and the Iranians responded: Anything you can do, we can do as well if not better. And they proved it.

Besides that, the Journal editors lament: “This week [Iran] blew up a mock U.S. aircraft carrier in naval exercises near the Strait of Hormuz.” They do so, having failed to see that it is Iran's response to America's: “Everything is on the table.” The Iranians are simply saying: Anything you can field against us, we can blow up to kingdom come.