It Happened One Christmas Eve

We went to the same schools in Egypt and were the best of friends. I came to Canada and we corresponded. I told him how good life was in this country but he never wished to pursue the discussion any further. Not once did he ask me to elaborate on my description of life in my adopted country until one day I received a fairly long letter from him in which he asked a number of questions about Canada. I was convinced he finally decided to come and live here.

Eventually he did come to Canada but without his parents. He explained that his father had business to clear up in Egypt and that he will be coming with the rest of the family when this was taken care of. I knew his father's business well because he was the man who bought the content of our estate when we left the country. The father dealt with new and used furniture and just about everything that is bought and sold.

New in Canada and without a car, my friend spent most of his free time with me. One Christmas Eve in the late Nineteen Sixties when motorists were not afraid to pick up hitchhikers, I was flagged by three youngsters who looked cold standing by the highway. I was running around the city delivering presents to family and friends and had my friend with me in the car. After a quick consultation with him I stopped the car to pick up the hitchhikers but, being hundreds of feet ahead of them, I decided to back up.

As I was doing that, I encountered a patch of slippery ice upon which one rear wheel skidded and went down a ditch running alongside the highway. I tried with my friend to push the car out but could not. A little help from the hitchhikers would have done it but instead of helping, the three flagged another car and went away in a hurry.

My friend commented that I never told him about the attitude of the people like we just saw. I said they are not all like that. And sure enough, a car came along and stopped in front of us. A priest came out of the car and after a short greeting, pulled a chain from his trunk, tied it to my car and pulled it out of the ditch. He got into his car without saying another word and drove away. It all happened so fast, I did not have the time to thank him.

Like me, my friend was stunned and he asked if that was the attire of a priest. I said he looked like a catholic priest even though he was wearing pants. In Egypt, my friend and I first went to a school run by catholic brothers and then one run by priests. Those people always wore a robe and never a pair of pants. Also, my friend who is Jewish was renting a basement apartment in the Jewish district of Toronto and there too, he noticed a difference between the way that Jewish clerics dressed in Canada and the way they dressed in Egypt.

Once out of the ditch, we got back into the car and I drove out of the highway at the first exit. I opted to drive the rest of the way through the city where the traffic was light given that it was Christmas Eve. After a long silence my friend asked a question that baffled me for a moment. Knowing that I am catholic he asked what it was like to make a confession. For a moment I thought he wanted to convert but was not sure about that confession thing, a ritual that intrigues non-catholics. As I groped for a nice way to explain the thing, he told me what he was after.

He wanted to confess to me something that has been weighing on his conscience for some time. I swallowed hard and told him to go ahead. He said he used me once to do something I may not have approved of without telling me ahead of time and this was beginning to bother him. To understand what he did, I must explain something first.

Jews have a worldwide network to help each other move money around. My friend's father had money in Egypt where there was currency restriction at the time. Also, the man owed taxes for which he would be audited going back a number of years before the authorities would allow him to leave the country. I knew such thing was happening to everyone because it happened to my father who was Christian as we were getting ready to emigrate.

But contrary to the current lies by Jewish organizations to the effect that Jews were pushed out of the Arab countries, the rant at the time went like this: "Let my people go," precisely because the authorities were taking time to audit the people who wanted to leave the country and were catching those who cheated on their taxes. What tipped the authorities was that a few who were cleared by the tax man rushed to the bank and tried to exchange money by the millions when they were declaring minimal income and were paying little or no taxes year after year.

Learning from those lessons, my friend had to find someone in Canada who normally sends money to Egypt, perhaps to his family or associates. Instead of doing that, my friend would offer that his own father in Egypt give money to the family in there and that he collect an equivalent amount from the would-be sender here. This will have the effect of getting money out of the country and thus beat the currency restriction. If my friend could not find someone here who was sending money there, the Jewish organizations would find one for him.

In this way, having no money or little of it to convert and take out of the country, the father will have an easy time convincing the tax collector he was not earning much. With a scheme like this, Jews were able to kill two birds with one stone; they avoided paying taxes and got the money out of the country.

But I was not sending money to Egypt and I failed to understand how my friend could have used me to implement such a scheme. He said his scheme was more elaborate than that and then reminded me of the note he asked me to write in Arabic a while ago. This happened when he handed me a sheet of paper with markings on it that clearly showed it was of Egyptian origin. The sheet was otherwise blank and was sent here for the purpose I was unwittingly recruited.

My friend had asked me to write a letter that should speed up the process of his parents obtaining an exit visa in Egypt. I was happy to do that but was taken aback when he told me what he wanted me to say in the letter until he assured me there was nothing to it. He wanted a letter informing his father that so and so had died leaving no money to pay the debt he owes him. I did not know who the dead man was and I did not know the person whose name I was to sign. My friend said both were fictitious characters but the letter will explain to the tax collector why his father cannot pay more taxes. Trusting my friend, I naively accepted the explanation.

Well, as my friend confessed to me in the car, the dead man was real but he did not owe money to his father. As to the letter I wrote, it was not meant to be seen by the tax collector in Egypt but was presented to the dead man's son here in Canada who ran a business importing goods from Egypt. I was assured that no money was asked of the businessman; only a favor in lieu of the debt. The man was asked to let my friend's father pay the suppliers in Egypt next time he imported goods from there upon which he would pay an equivalent amount to my friend here.

But why would a businessman take the chance of doing something illegal and run the risk of getting into trouble with the Egyptian authorities? To understand the reason why the man accepted to go along with the scheme, my friend told me something I did not know about Islam which he, as a Jew, knew more about than I, the Christian. After all, my friend was born in Egypt and lived there until he came here whereas I lived in Egypt less than two years as an infant and then seven years as a teenager and a young adult. On the other hand, I learned to read and write Arabic in that short period of time and he only spoke it.

My friend explained to me that if a Muslim dies owing money and his son is in a position to pay the debt, the son has the obligation to pay up or the soul of the father will not rest. A scheme to beat the currency restriction was offered to the son in lieu of paying his father's debt and the businessman took the deal because the amount involved would have nearly bankrupted him.

With a scheme like this, everyone got something except that I was duped by my "best" friend. Also the country of his birth and mine was cheated out of tax money and had its laws violated at a time when rants were chanted throughout the Western World to the effect that the Jews only wanted to see their "people" let go out of the Arab countries.

Still, I considered it a miracle that a confession was made on Christmas Eve as a result of a priest appearing out of nowhere and pulling my car out of the ditch.

Merry Christmas everyone. See you in the new year.

When The US Congress Speaks Yiddish

I do not speak Yiddish but I have a number of friends and acquaintances who do and they tell me that half the words and expressions in that language are meant to put down someone. All those people I know speak several languages themselves and they assure me that Yiddish is like no other because it is the language of insult par excellence; and as such it stands alone among all the other languages.

I take these people at their word if only because they all agree on this one issue which has been an unusual occurrence in my experience with them. However, every one of them has a different historical version as to why Yiddish was invented in the first place and how it came to be this insulting. And so, when I venture into this part of the discussion, I do so cautiously and I urge the reader to do the same; and maybe do research of their own as well.

I mean to discuss the non-binding resolutions that the Congress of the United States passes from time to time in conjunction with what I have learned about the Yiddish phenomenon. I do so because I see in these resolutions the influence of the language and I hear in them an echo of the Yiddish culture given that the resolutions are a form of insult and considering who is behind them. Indeed, the resolutions are usually initiated by a Jewish member of the Congress or they are brought about by some lobby operating on behalf of Israel or another Jewish cause.

An insult is a moral hurt you inflict on someone who is beyond your immediate ability to injure physically. Thus, to insult someone is to declare that you wish you could injure the target of the insult but that you are unable to do so at this time. And so the question poses itself: why insult someone at all if it seems to be a useless exercise?

Well, you do it because you hope to scare the target of the insult enough so that they bow to your demand. The response you hope to elicit from them will be one motivated by the fear that you may one day develop the wherewithal to inflict a more serious injury on them. In short, the insult serves as a warning or even a threat you send in the direction of your target.

And this is exactly what the Congressional non-binding resolutions hope to accomplish. They are meant to insult other countries so as to warn them or threaten them. When the Congress passes resolutions on behalf of the Jewish, the Zionists or the Israeli causes, it puts the World on notice that America does not have the wherewithal to hurt everyone it wishes to hurt on behalf of the aforementioned parties but watch out because America may someday garner the political will and the means to hurt the countries that refuse to bow to Israel and to the Jews on whose behalf these resolutions are passed.

You do not need a Ph.D. in political science to see that this is a poor way to do politics. In fact, two big mistakes jump at you when you see this manner of conducting international diplomacy.
First, you announce your desire and your intent to hurt someone physically, an act that will make them suspicious of every move you will make from here on. And second, you actually hurt them verbally which will make them angry enough to want to hurt you even before you garner the will and the means to tackle them first.

And because what does not kill them makes them stronger, your action will create enemies who will grow stronger with time. The result will be that by the time you develop the means to go against them in a more serious way they will have developed the backbone and the means to stand up to you more robustly and more resolutely.

So why does the Zionist lobby ask the US Congress to pass such resolutions in the first place? The answer lies in the understanding of a culture that existed thousands of years ago and that is being revived for reasons that baffle the mind and cry out for an explanation.

But here is one tentative explanation. When you look at the pivotal moments in the narrative of the Old Testament, you find them to be marked by personalities who refused to bow to someone. This is how the stories of Joseph, Moses, Esther and many others were constructed, recounted over the ages and passed on down the generations.

In the culture of Biblical Judaism bowing to someone meant submitting to that one. It also meant giving up enough of your rights to turn your human condition into one of servitude. This is what happened to those who found themselves without the means to feed themselves because of one reason or another and to those who got involved in a war and lost.

We must remember that slavery as we define it today did not exist in the ancient world. What existed was a form of servitude that may be compared to today’s domesticity and that carried a time limit after which the “domestic” was released from his or her obligation to resume a free life, even acquire domestics of their own.

A few centuries later Rabbinical Judaism replaced Biblical Judaism and the setting shifted from the Middle East to Europe. Full fledged slavery as we define it today was then practiced in Europe, and bowing to someone meant that you were a slave to that one, owned by them as would be an animal or a piece of furniture. To be in this situation was dreaded by the Jews, as indeed it was by everyone else.

Those were the reasons why it entered into the Judaic culture that to have money and to win wars meant to be a free person. The opposite of that, to be poor or to loose a war meant to be a domestic or a slave, or to have the potential to become one. And so the Jew went through life flaunting the wealth he has and bragging about war victories that may have been real or may have been imagined. In this way, the Jew demonstrated that he was a free person and if persuasive enough, even the descendant of free lineage.

The saying that was passed down the generations was this: accumulate wealth when you can and pile up war victories where you can. But if you cannot start a hot war against your neighbor or win it when you do, unleash a verbal war against him in a language he does not understand but one that carries a threatening tone. Put the neighbor down with your tongue as if it were the fight of your life using every insult you know and every one you invent on the spot.

This is how and why Yiddish was born according to my friends and the research that I did. Whether or not it is true, partially true or totally false, there is no denying that the trouble with this approach to modern life and to international diplomacy is that it drags America into the darkness of the Stone Age.

Seeing that the approach was beginning to cause a backlash against the handling by the Administration and the Congress of the issues relating to Jewish and Israeli interests, the Zionist lobby came up with a response. It called the approach the courage to be modern.

This is meant to hide the fact that when the Americans commit themselves to insulting someone, they close the door to any sort of give and take. They, in effect, tell the world they only see things one way; the Jewish-Israeli way. The signal that the Americans send to the world is this: “It is the Jewish way or the highway. You do as they say or you deal with America's might. You are either with Israel or against her. Love Israel or get off the Planet.”

When this happens, negotiations and compromises are difficult to formulate. The feeling is created that the American hegemon is trying to dictate to the world; also the deep seated suspicion that the hegemon is manipulated by the Zionist Lobby whose aim is to turn the clock back 4000 years to a Biblical era that no miracle can bring back to life.

This is not the courage to be modern; it is the cowardice to run away from the reality of the situation.

A Joke Not Worth Laughing At

They are out and in force again saying that Iran, like Germany of the Nineteen Thirties, is about to launch an offensive in a quest to conquer the World and establish a dictatorship. If this sounds familiar it is because we heard it before. We heard it when they said the same thing about Iraq and were successful in mobilizing enough support in the United Stated and Great Britain to launch the disastrous war that messed up the Middle East and exposed the so-called American democracy as a joke not worth laughing at anymore.

And yet, it would have taken only a minimum amount of thinking for these people to realize that neither Iraq nor Iran can be compared to Germany because of a number of reasons. One reason is so glaring it cannot be missed even by a child who plays war games on a video machine. It is that since the Industrial Revolution, warfare has increasingly depended on the high quality weapons only a nation that is advanced in science, technology and industry can mass produce.

This is not to say the size of the military does not count, it does. But where two helicopters can fight better than one, a lone helicopter gunship can overwhelm a hundred soldiers armed only with hand guns. Thus a modern war machine depends on the quality of its equipment as much as it does on the size of its military.

The Industrial Revolution started in Germany at the same time as in the other nations of Europe. With it came the scientific and technological revolutions because all three revolutions are naturally linked together. In the Nineteen Thirties Germany was as advanced as any nation in the World and in some areas more advanced than all the others.

Moreover, Germany had an industrial base that equaled any in the World and a scientific establishment that surpassed them all. In short, the country was equal to its neighbors, and was even regarded as first among equals. It was therefore realistic to think of Germany as a possible menace to the World in the event that it was taken over and ruled by a deranged dictator.

By contrast, Iran does not come close to being equal to a single European nation of size let alone to the combined might of Europe, the United States and the rest of the World. Iran, like every country that remained behind when the Industrial Revolution was roaring ahead has a two hundred year gap to fill before it reaches the level of Europe.

The name given to the nations that were left behind by the Industrial Revolution is Third World. The name given to those that rode the train of the Revolution since the beginning is West. It so happens that during the past few decades a number of Third World nations seemed to leapfrog the West but this only happened at the superficial level. Yes, the so-called Tigers of Asia and a handful of other nations managed to industrialize their territory at a fairly quick pace but they did not leapfrog the West in the development of their institutions.

This is not to say that industry is the domain of one race and not the other. In fact, it so happens that Japan, which is an Asian nation, managed to close the gap with the West because the country jumped on the modernization bandwagon a century before any other nation in Asia. By the mid Twentieth Century the Japanese were still very much an Asian culture but were thinking and behaving like a Western nation, warts and all. They made themselves equal to the West in many ways and then chose to challenge it. And this is when the Japanese learned they were close to the West but were not completely there yet.

To industrialize a nation is to grow it horizontally but this is not sufficient to make it rival the West because while the launching of factories will expand the industrial horizon, it will not grow the scientific and technological institutions that are needed to move the nation forward. To do the latter, you will need to grow vertically. I call the human and cultural infrastructure that which is necessary to mobilize a nation and remodel it so as to grow vertically. This is what the Third World needs to catch up with the West but this is also where you cannot race against time.

To construct a scientific, technological and industrial powerhouse, you need the time that it takes to raise a child and teach it science, technology and the other subjects. But more than that, you need two or more generations to change the habits and the mindset of human beings. And what makes this task even more difficult is that human beings are steeped in one culture or another and they do not relinquish old habits to pick up new ones on demand.

A Third World country can assemble a team of its own nationals who studied abroad and maybe recruit a few foreigners to build a nuclear bomb in one generation. But it will not be possible for such country to develop the scientific, technological and industrial base as well as the human and cultural infrastructure to threaten the West within that time frame. Having one bomb or a number of them and challenging the West without the logistical support that will sustain a war against it for any length of time will therefore be suicidal. The attempt will look as pathetic as a lone gunman challenging an armored division.

Consider these examples. China, India and Pakistan have experienced an accelerated economic growth for nearly a generation and have produced nuclear bombs yet they still remain at Third World levels because a large part of their societies did not develop in tandem with the rest of the country, let alone attain Western levels. If there is to be an all out war between them and the West, their combined might will not match the developed nations. Argentina has learned this lesson during the Falkland war of 1982 when, as a country fighting near its own shores, it was defeated by a flotilla of British warships fighting thousands of miles away from home.

To understand how something like this can happen, we must know something about economic growth. This word means that a fraction of the population produces enough food and other goods and services to supply the whole nation. It allows the rest of the society to go to school, do research, make scientific breakthroughs, produce art and literature, discover cures and so on. In short, growth creates the surplus that allows the vertical infrastructure to develop which in turn helps to raise the nation to a higher level.

Let us now look at some numbers. To ask the families of a nation to save 30% for their income is to ask them to live on 70% of their annual revenue which is the most they will do on a sustained basis. If they hand you their savings to invest year after year, you can grow the economy of the country by 10% a year. Repeat this performance seven years in a row and you will double the size of your national economy therefore double the per capita income.

This is impressive but if a Third World nation starts an industrialization program when it is at one twentieth the per capita income of the West, it will take it more than 30 years to catch up with the West. However, the West will not stand still and will most likely grow at the moderate rate of 4% a year if only to help the Third World realize its own 10% growth. In this case, it will take the developing nation more than 50 years to catch up with the West and that is equal to two generations already.

But this is not all because in that context, catch up means to catch up with the level of industrial production that exists in the West. It means having a number of machine operators working on the assembly line comparable to the numbers in the West. What is not taken into account is the fact that the assembly line is made of machines which are produced by journeymen, technicians and engineers with levels of education, skills and experience that are higher than those of the machine operators. As a developing nation you will need another two generations or more to educate and train a pool of these people large enough to run your industrial establishment.

And there is still more. There is a layer on top of all that called Research and Development. It is an activity done by a community of exceptional people called inventors, scientists and engineers, and they are found in the colleges, universities, institutes of higher learning, research labs as well as their own garages, study rooms and basements where they think and where they tinker. These people invent new products and they design the machines that produce those new products. Here too, you will need a generation or more to develop such a community, and a few more generations after that to see it attain a world class status. Finally, this is what a country like Iran must develop before it can build a fighting machine that will defy the West and not look pathetic.

What this boils down to is that the 200 years head start the West has had over the World is not going to be filled overnight by a Third World nation anytime soon. It is therefore insulting to our intelligence for someone to pull the ghost of Germany out of the past and say that Iran will have the wherewithal to conquer the World in a few years time.

A Zionist speechwriter may impress the President of the United States by inserting such nonsense in his speech but there are nearly seven billion people on this planet who are smart enough to dismiss the claim off hand. Whatever their form of government, these people can take comfort in the knowledge that they have not sunk to a level where their President would stand in front of the legislature and shamelessly puke the garbage that an imported Zionist riffraff has inserted in his speech.

No doctrine of theirs is ever going to be formulated in this manner and this is why no children of theirs will be sent to die thousands of miles away, taking the treasury of the nation with them, so that a foreign speechwriter may write a book afterward and brag about putting words in the mouth of their President. In this sense these seemingly backward people remain light years ahead of the United States of America, democracy or no stupid democracy.

They Are Not Done Playing Games

The intelligence agencies in the United States put out a report to the effect that Iran had ceased to work on its nuclear weapons program a number of years ago and this changed the tone of the debate dramatically. What the report demonstrates is that the agencies caught the drift of the latest Israeli Zionist game, and the disclosure helped to put the brakes on it. This happened just in time as the game was promising to mushroom into a calamity that would have threatened the World and ended America's standing as a First World nation.

The game that the Zionists were playing was a repeat of the one they played with regard to the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The aim this time was the same as before in that the Zionists wanted to drag America into another war in the Middle East where the end result would have been another American made disaster for mankind to clean up.

There were, however, a few differences, one being that the target this time was Iran and not Iraq. Again, the Israeli agents and their non-Jewish cohorts in the media and the think tanks of America started to circulate stories, opinions and fake findings about nuclear weapons being made in Iran. And again, the Jewish-Zionist fear mongering machine was put into high gear as to the potential threat that the fictitious Iranian project represents for the region, Europe, America and the World.

And the moment it began to look like the idea had caught enough traction in America to move forward propelled by its own inertia, the Zionist lobby began to lay the groundwork for taking credit in the event that the war succeeded or blaming the Arabs if it failed.

In that regard, the Zionists were motivated by the memory of what happened with the Iraq fiasco where they took the blame for the failure of the war because they had neglected to lay the groundwork for blaming someone else. What happened instead was that the moment the fiasco became apparent, the Zionists fashioned the argument by which to blame the failure on the Commander in Chief and the Armed Forces of the United States. But the ploy did not sit well with the Americans and this prompted the Zionists to vow being prepared next time.

And so this time, the Zionists started early to lay the groundwork for blaming the Arabs in the event of a failure. They did so by peddling the big lie about the Arabs, who are mostly Sunny Muslims, being afraid of Iran which is mostly Shia. The plan was to the effect that if the war started to go bad, the Zionists would say the Arabs asked America to destroy Iran but things went bad and America paid the price. So go ahead and blame the Arabs.

What makes this game typically a Judeo-Zionist one is that it dealt with fear and hate, the two legs upon which demagoguery stands. In fact, anyone who has followed those characters would know the rule of thumb by now: It is that these people are so devoid of imagination they boil down every argument to one of fear and hate, a trick they lifted out of the Nazi book of cheap propaganda.

In addition to the American intelligence agencies catching the drift of all that and putting out their report, a few developments in the Middle East conspired to expose the Zionist big lie. One development was the meeting that took place in Qatar which brought together Iran's President with the leaders of the Gulf Co-operation Council. These were the leaders of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Iran and the six Arab nations voiced their desire for a peaceful solution to the stand-off regarding the nuclear issue. The joint communiqué they issued at the end of the meeting said that the Arabs understand Iran's views and will gladly examine that country's offer for a mutual security arrangement and economic co-operation among the seven nations.

Such deal would include Iran into a common market that will improve the negotiating position of the Gulf countries on the international scene. Among the many provisions of the deal there is one stipulating that citizens of every member state will have the right to live and to do business in all the other states. And this will be done in the spirit of strengthening the security and stability of the region which is the desire of all those who live there.

Another development in the Middle East that has been brewing for some time and has matured recently was that Egypt and Iran achieved a thaw in their relationship. That relationship was frozen since the time of the Iranian revolution when the deposed Shah fled to Egypt and was granted asylum there. Political and economic relations which were severed then were renegotiated over the past few months and were sealed last week. These are comprehensive deals that go as far as to set up a jointly owned auto plant in Egypt among a host of other projects. It is worth noting that all this happened during the week that the Cairo-Alexandria Stock Exchange (CASE 30) passed the 10,000 mark, having experienced a phenomenal growth over the past 3 years and growing by more than 40% this year alone.

To avoid developing a morbid fear of each other is the norm to the peoples of the region. In fact, it so happened that while the Zionist and American propaganda machines were calling Iraq a menace to the region and to the World, the people who live there tried to dissuade America from launching a war they did not believe was necessary.

But instead of listening to the Arabs and to the Iranians, the Americans went ahead with the Zionist plan and attacked Iraq in 2003. The result was a mistake that wounded mankind, one that the Americans will have to live with for decades to come.

This is not to say that the Arabs are Pollyannaish about everything regarding their neighborhood. In fact, they were the ones who called upon the reluctant Americans to come and dislodge their friend and protégé, Saddam Hussein from Kuwait, a call that resulted in the first Gulf War at the beginning of the Nineteen Nineties.

This was by all accounts the most successful war in which the Americans had participated, one that brought them into a coalition with the major Arab countries. Not only that but the war cost the Americans very little in terms of lives lost and was paid for by the Arabs who covered the entire financial cost.

When looking at the historical record of the region, future students of history will not fail to see that from the middle of the Twentieth Century onward, America was pulled by two opposite forces concerning the position to take vis-à-vis the Middle East. One force was the influence of the Arabs who tried to persuade the Americans from outside the country, and the other force was the influence of the Israeli Zionist lobby which operated inside the country.

It will be clear to those students that what Israel and the Zionists wanted from America was unconditional and absolute support for Israel without a question being asked. What the Arabs wanted was an America that was less submissive when dealing with Israel and the Zionist lobby. And the result was clear for everyone to see. It was glory and respect for America the world over when the country listened to the Arabs, disaster and contempt for America the world over when the country listened to Israel and the Zionist lobby.

This was inevitable because since the beginning of recorded history, the Arabs have been satisfied with what they had and thus wanted nothing but to be left alone to do commerce and to develop socially and economically at their own pace. They lived with that principle for thousands of years and were extremely successful in everything they did.

On the other hand, the Zionists who rightly or wrongly trace their roots to the landless nomadic tribes of ancient times have always wanted something from someone else and thus raided their neighbors or siphoned off what they could from those they came into contact with.

In this sense, America is no exception; she is just another someone from whom to siphon off what they can. But more than that, they want to use America as a tool to pulverize the Middle East so that Israel can get in there and feed on the resulting bite size pieces. These modern-day Radical Judaists have been evil incarnate since the dawn of history and they have not changed one bit.

Given this history, the safe prediction to make at this point is that the Zionist lobby will lay dormant for a while until the effect of the report from the intelligence agencies is forgotten. After that, the sleeper cells will wake up and try to drag America into another ill fated adventure where the country will lose lives, money and prestige. This will go on until America will have lost everything there is to loose. At this point the Zionist will look for another big power where to peddle their lies and live at the expense of yet another sucker.

The World will say here we go again, and future students of history will ask how could they have been so stupid?

Judaism Is The Problem Not Islam

Some people say that the threat to World peace comes from radical Islam moving into a state that is failing and turning it into a new home for itself where it starts a regime of terror. When the home front is fully secured, those in charge export the terror to neighboring states then go on to far away states where they repeat the performance. And this prompts us to ask the burning question: what is a failing state?

If we define a failing state as one that does not respond to the needs of its people but works for the benefit of a small group of activists operating within its borders then we must conclude that America too is a failing state. And if we define a failing state as one that works for the benefit of a foreign country at the expense of its own people, then we must conclude that America too is a failing state.

This is the reality that the American people face today as they see their country being governed by an Administration and a Congress who do not respond to their needs even when they are hit by a storm with the destructive power of a Katrina. In fact, the American people have gotten used to the idea that their leaders respond only to the needs of a foreign country called Israel, and to the dictates of the Jewish Zionist lobby located within America’s borders. Yet neither Israel nor the Zionists belong to radical Islam and so we ask, what is going on?

To answer that question we must begin by studying the mentality of the Zionist and Israeli actors who figure so prominently in the governance of America. The study will help us develop a clear picture as to what implications may exist in the event that America experiences a catastrophic failure of governance which may be the outcome of the present trend. The study will also help us assess the repercussions that such an event may heap on the rest of the World. And it will help us understand why Islam is seen as the threat by some people when the threat is really Judaism.

It has long been a definition of the Jew that he is one who will attribute to himself the qualities he sees in you and to you the evil that he sees in himself. Psychiatrists have identified a phenomenon that is closely related to this and they called it projection because it begins to manifest itself with the projection of one’s thoughts into someone else.

Well, let the psychiatrists deal with what they see at the individual level in their clinics but let us, who live in the real world, deal with the broad phenomenon we see at the political and cultural levels which is the domain of our daily lives.

From my observation, I have concluded that projection takes place when someone is raised with the notion that he belongs to a group that is absolutely perfect or a one that is absolutely evil. But for something like this to take hold inside someone’s head, two things must happen beforehand. The person’s capacity to have a balanced view of life and his capacity to develop a personal perspective must have been wiped out early on in life.

When the wiping out is completed, the person is educated as to his place in the world. This is done by indoctrinating him with one extreme view or another. But whatever the view, it will be portrayed as a good thing and all the other views will be portrayed as bad.

Because the person is never trained to regard himself as a rounded human being possessing qualities and shortcomings, he will attribute to himself only good qualities and to others only shortcomings. But more than that, he will project into others the evil he sees in himself and into himself the qualities he sees in others. When this happens the projection becomes a total reversal of reality.

However it can happen that an individual experiences a backlash and stops believing he is a perfect human being. But because he can only fathom himself as being totally good or totally evil, he will come to the view that he is totally evil. In other words, he will move from one extreme view to the other and not imagine the possibility that he may be a rounded person possessing good qualities and bad habits at the same time. All of that can also happen to a group of people who are banded together as a collective, not just to an individual.

Having collectively embraced the Zionist ideology, Jewish and Israeli activists have developed and have embraced a forceful system of beliefs that covers the full spectrum with regards to the self, from the narcissistic to the self-hating Jew. And considering the immense range of activities that these people pursue in several fields, their mood swing reflects the state of the American Union more accurately than what the US President tells the Congress in his State of the Union Address.

To be sure these people are up to no good but they are not alone in this category. In fact, the World has been visited by evildoers since the beginning of time, the Nazis being one of the most recent and the nastiest. But there is a difference between the Nazis and the Zionists. It is that the Nazis used to say: We are superior to everyone and the proof is in our scientific, technological and cultural accomplishments. Let someone beat us in these fields and we shall relinquish the title to them.

By contrast, the Zionists say: We are superior to everyone because God says we are his chosen people. We have special privileges and we need not prove anything to hold on to them. The privileges are handed down to our children and they cannot be transferred to someone outside the religion. We have the divine right to take anything we want and you have the duty to hand it to us without question. To do otherwise is to commit an act of terror.

To make sure that those beliefs are understood by everyone and implemented by all, the Zionists have deputized America to police the World. It is useful to recall at this point that during the Vietnam war, a debate was sparked concerning America’s role as policeman of the World. It was decided then that America had neither the right nor the means to do the job.

That right has now been revived by the Zionists and the task was shifted from policing South East Asia to destroying the Middle East. In other words, the task has moved from the idea of deterring the Yellow Peril which was thought to execute a domino game in Asia to the idea of destroying Islam which is thought to execute a plan for World domination.

The glaring flaw in this concept is that no one has put together a plausible scenario as to how a handful of Muslim kids who once were trained by the United States to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan will manage to take over the Arab and Muslim nations where they are despised, and from there move on to take over the whole World.

By contrast, we have a real case study where the sole superpower, America, has become a virtual colony of the Zionists who went past the ambition of merely owning the country, which they now do, all the way to the development of a plan they call Pax Americana in which they openly discuss the take over of the World.

In the pursuit of that dream, the Zionists have dragged the country into endless wars and military commitments that are killing people in may places and bankrupting America. This has left future generations with a bill that can potentially reach four times the present Gross Domestic Product. It is like a family having a combined income of 100,000 dollars a year and carrying 400,000 dollars worth of debts on their credit cards to pay for the habits of their Zionist neighbor.

This is proof enough that the Zionists have projected what they see in Judaism onto Islam, thus effectuating a complete reversal of reality. If at some point in the past a handful of Muslim kids, while backed by America, have turned Afghanistan into a failed state armed with primitive weapons, the Zionists have turned America into an Afghanistan armed with weapons of mass destruction.

The threat was never Islam but has always been Judaism.

Annapolis At The Crossroads

The Annapolis covenant which was signed less than a week ago finds itself at the crossroads already with one of two possible outcomes to choose from. The first outcome is the optimistic one and the second is the pessimistic one. The Arabs who want to be left alone to develop their economies and their societies have brought into the process a great deal of magnanimity and optimism. On the other side, there is the Israeli Zionist lobby which started to sabotage the covenant even as it was being signed.

This trend became apparent when upon the urging of Israel, the United States withdrew the draft resolution that sought support for the agreement only hours after the US had asked the Security Counsel of the UN to endorse it. And it is this silly and self-defeating hesitation on the part of the United States which demonstrates the determination and the power of the Israeli Zionist lobby to paralyze the ability of the Americans to govern themselves as an independent nation and thus disrupt the Annapolis process.

Luckily, the United States of America is not the only big power in this endeavor. There are the other members of the Quartet, mainly Europe, Russia and the UN. And so, while it is the view of the Zionist lobby that America is a tool in their hands and a means to an end, the countries of Russia and most of Europe see themselves as having contributed to a World Civilization that started in North Africa and the Middle East thousands of years ago.

Those countries feel a certain kinship with the peoples of the region and an obligation towards their wellbeing which may well transcend, even neutralize the servile responses that America will display again and again every time Israel will command her to do something silly and self defeating.

It is therefore not surprising to see the symbols of that history boil up to the surface when we look at the forces that move the present events in this part of the World. I shall restrict my discussion to what has come to be known as the Fertile Crescent, a stretch of land that comprises Mesopotamia, Palestine and Egypt.

Palestine is the concern of the Annapolis process, Egypt is the place where the quest for peace in the Middle began in earnest 30 years ago, and Iraq of Mesopotamia is the dark cloud that has forced the United States of America to finally realize that Pax Americana was a failed idea which must be replaced by something else, something like the Annapolis process.

The force that has powered the Egyptian Civilization for thousands of years has been optimism. Flanked by protective deserts on both sides of the Nile, the Egyptians felt secure in their homeland and they developed a love of life so powerful, they imagined the good life to continue unabated after death. To this day, no matter what disaster befalls them, the Egyptians quickly rebound, wear anew their optimistic nature and pursue their usual zest for life. Peace being the most important ingredient for fashioning an enjoyable life and for maintaining it, the Egyptians have adopted an eternal quest for peace.

Mesopotamia, on the other hand, has been the favorite route or destination of every trader, invader or intruder who lived or who came near to that part of the world and who coveted someone else’s possession. It has been a place where the inhabitants suffered at the hands of everyone and so they developed a sense of pessimism unparalleled in the ancient and modern worlds. To this day, the Iraqis adhere to that sense of pessimism when it comes to their personal lot and to their national situation. To them, the calamity they live at present under American occupation is part and parcel of this condition.

As to the influence that the ancient World has had on Europe, there has been several attempts to define the roots of Western Civilization but the one that stood the test of time was the fact that Western Civilization stands on two pillars. They are: one, the optimism of Egypt as represented by the immortality of the soul which then became the bedrock of Christian doctrine. And two, the pessimism of Mesopotamia as represented by the Code of Hammurabi, a document that aims at controlling the dark side of human nature by relying on a system of laws.

Thus, the forces that will power the Annapolis process from now on will be: First, the generosity of the Arabs who feel satisfied with their lot, their kismet as it is often referred to. Second, the hunger of the Israelis for what belongs to someone else given that they have a difficult time putting together one Jewish state when the Arabs have twenty two of them. Third, the opportunism of the Jewish and non-Jewish Zionists who will fish in dirty waters and try to monetize every event that promises to swell their bank accounts. Fourth, the Europeans who will be motivated on the one hand by the optimism inherent in the Egyptian efforts and on the other hand by the pessimism that flows out of the current situation in Iraq. Fifth, the hesitation of the Americans as the nation convulses trying to free itself from the Zionist yoke and to give itself the look if not the substance of a self-respecting great power.

At this stage of the game, America still remains the most important player in that saga. For this reason, we must understand what forces within it make the country act the way it does, and nothing tells this story better than what got America involved in Iraq some years back. Here, in brief, is that sad story.

It has been established that those in America who started the war against Iraq knew there were no weapons of mass destruction in that country when they launched the offensive in 2003. It has also been established that they were planning to invade Iraq since they were out of power a dozen years before that.

This raises two serious questions. How did these people convince the intelligence agencies in several countries of the lie that such weapons existed? How were they certain that the American public will buy the lie long enough to take the war to the point of no return before someone asks the relevant questions?

To answer these questions, we observe that the people who planned the war in the early Nineteen Nineties were comrades in what has come to be known as the neo-conservative or neocon movement. We also observe that the people who deceived the intelligence agencies in several countries were agents of the Israeli government. And we observe that the people who deceived the American public were neocon warriors strategically placed in the media, in the think tanks and in high public places.

This is how it all went: Agents of the Israeli government used a well known technique of disinformation to pull the scam. They started the rumors and fed the same false information to a handful of European agencies about uranium being purchased by Iraq in Niger. This trick established several sources for the same information. When other agencies checked the rumors, they found that several sources had the same information and concluded that it must be correct.

Given the high degree of coordination that was necessary to pull a feat of this nature, we must ask if Israel and the neocons belonged to one and the same organization. The answer is that they have always been one and the same organization. If so, then the war in Iraq and the numerous excuses which were given to justify it were part of an elaborate conspiracy that goes back to the early Nineteen Nineties if not before. This leads to the question: what was the conspiracy about?

We can answer this question by studying the excuses that were given to justify the war. When the excuse about the existence of weapons of mass destruction proved to be bogus, there came the one about the need to democratize the Middle East. It was said that democracy is a good thing because it operates in a transparent manner. Transparency places the public in a position to evaluate the choices that are available and to pick what is suitable. Called the rule of law, this is what America sought to shove down the throat of the Iraqis, homeland of Hammurabi the first lawmaler in history.

The trouble is that nobody but the Americans believe they still adhere to the rule of law at home or internationally. A cursory look at what is going on in that country leads to the conclusion that America is owned and operated by special interest groups, the most powerful being the Israeli-Zionist-Neocon group whose not-so-hidden agenda is world domination by any means, legal or illegal.

The only safe conclusion to draw from the above is that the fate of the Annapolis process depends on the outcome of the struggle now raging in America to free the country from the grip of the Israeli-Zionist lobby. If America wins the process will move forward to completion; if America looses the process will die.

To this the Egyptians would say there is hope. The Iraqis would say not in this life. The Europeans would say we have to give it a try. The Russians would say let the World see how trivial America really is. The United Nations would ask what else is there to do? The Americans would say never underestimate the genius of America to rebound after a setback. Stay tuned, folks.

Why American Zionists Fear Annapolis

Judging by the reaction of some North American commentators with regard to what transpired at Annapolis earlier this week, we are in for a year of vitriol against the very concept of peace in the Middle East. The usual suspects who write in publications ranging from the two-bit rags to the prestigious came out in force to denounce with all the eloquence or the shrill they can muster the idea of normalcy returning to that part of the World.

The interesting part is that the commentators in the Middle East, including most Israelis, were in favor of what is hoped will be achieved during the coming year of negotiations between the two sides. Only a few extremists on both sides of the divide out there rejected the idea completely thus echoing the sounds that emanated from the usual suspects here.

Upon a closer look at those usual suspects, we find them to be the Zionist lobbyists and their lackeys who pretend to come from every faith but whose true religion is to submit to the one who has a deep pocket and carries a big stick. To understand the implication of all this and to anticipate what can happen over the coming year, we need to understand what went on in North America over the past generation or two.

Only a few decades ago the Jewish population in North America and by extension the Jewish lobby had no more clout than any other population of comparable size or any lobby with an axe to grind. Today, however, the Jewish population and the lobby have accumulated so much power that they almost exclusively steer the most important institutions on the Continent as if they operated them with their own personnel. And this begs the question: How were they able to accomplish this much this fast?

If there is one word that can answer the question, the word will have to be capital. However, we must keep in mind that there are different forms of capital. Three of these in particular are relevant to this discussion and they are the following: political capital, financial capital and a capital which goes under the name goodwill. Understanding how the Jewish lobby was able to accumulate and then dispense of these capitals will help us understand how the lobby was able to propel itself to such a level of dominance.

There is the honorable way to accumulate capital and there is the dishonorable way to doing it. Also, there is an honorable way to dispense the capital and there is the dishonorable way to doing it. The honorable ways to doing anything are spelled out everywhere because they are the moral imperatives that everyone preaches and there is no shortage of that. As for the dishonorable ways to doing things, they are a little complicated to discuss and to understand. This is because games are played to hide the rough edges of those ways and of course, the games are played in secret whenever possible.

To accumulate political capital the dishonorable way is to play people against each other. This is the game that the weak have played since the stone age of Biblical times when they faced more powerful rivals. Unable to go against someone by themselves, the weak played dirty pool to drive a wedge between the other parties. The trick they employed was to frame one party, to then produce fake proof of culpability and then incite the aggrieved party to attack.

Of all those who played this game, the Hebrews mastered it so well, they played it repeatedly and they played it flawlessly. Each time, they were able to get parties to fight each other to the point where the parties became so weak, they were considered as good as dead.

And when you get this far, the old rule applies. The rule says that: if you manage to get everybody killed, you become king. Thus, like the ancient Hebrews, he who plays the dishonorable game of turning people against each other and scores a few victories is crowned king. He takes the spoils of a war he did not fight and wastes no time preparing the field for sparking the next war.

The spoils that the king takes is the political capital which used to be diffused among everyone else. The king ads the capital to a chest of monopolies which keeps on growing after every adventure of the kind.

When played in modern times, the game looks much the same as in the old days. The result, however, can be as stark as the difference between the spear of ancient times and the destructive power of modern weaponry. An example of this is what happened in Iraq. Here the Jewish lobby faked the evidence about weapons of mass destruction and incited America to launch a war against the Arabs and against Islam.

Because the invasion of Iraq went well in the first few days, the Jewish lobbyists amassed so much political capital, they could have told the folks in Washington to emasculate themselves in public so as to breed like rabbits, and the folks in Washington would have fallen over each other to reach for the knife.

Well, things did not happen exactly this way but they came close. What actually happened was that on advice from the Jewish lobby, the folks in Washington ordered the "debaathification" of Iraq which was a long held dream of Israel. This act alone was sufficient to emasculate the American military in Iraq and to make it impossible for the most powerful army in history to carry out an operation that should have taken it a few weeks to complete.

The end result has been the calamitous devastation that was heaped on both sides in the war. This was to be expected but the surprise was the fact that the Jewish lobby did not get away with it. When no weapons of mass destruction were found, enough good people mustered the courage to reject the Zionist claim that they were against the Iraq war from the beginning and that responsibility should fall on someone else’s shoulder.

The stand taken by those good people made it impossible for the Lobby to play the second part of the game. This is where the king was supposed to have started the process of dispensing the spoils of war. He would have promised to be good to those who would out-Zionist the Zionists and proved they were friendly to Israel. Instead, the contrary happened in that the lobby began to loose the political capital it was beginning to accumulate at the start of the war.

So much for political capital, now to the financial capital. You accumulate this capital the dishonorable way by playing what has come to be known as the salami method. This game is played somewhat differently in different sectors of the economy but one example that is stark enough to shed light on the method is the way that the game is played in the credit sector.

What you do here is that you encourage all sorts of shaky enterprises to set up an operation of sort. These enterprises issue commercial papers against which you lend them money. To hide the shakiness of the enterprises, you stuff those commercial papers into one envelope as you would when making a salami. You then issue bonds or securities against this salami, each of them being a slice of the whole salami.

You sell those slices to unsuspecting customers who are already sold on the idea that they cannot go wrong because they are buying into a diversified portfolio. But what they ignore is that while diversified, the portfolio is far from being sound because every ingredient in the salami is as rotten as the next.

The result has been a disaster that struck America at least twice in the past twenty years. Something went wrong with schemes of this kind in the Nineteen Eighties and again in 2007. America as a nation lost hundreds of billions of dollars each time, so did several dozen enterprises and thousands of individuals who saw their dreams, careers and future crushed in one short instant. All the while, those who played the salami game stuffed their wallets with riches beyond imagination, riches they launder through Israeli banks.

Then came the time to dispense those riches the dishonorable way. Some of the money was returned to the Unites States where the Zionist lobby used it to pay back the US Congress for making the feat possible and to purchase the Congress anew so as to maintain the system viable for future operations.

And now the part about goodwill which is the simplest one to describe and to comprehend. Having won the game on the political and financial stages, you accumulate goodwill without having to do anything. This is because you will have gained the reputation that you win every time you get into something.

People flock to you and offer their services the moment you mention that you desire something because people seek to be on the side of the winner. And you never run out of foot soldiers who will be eager to march to your tune wherever you lead them.

To be dishonorable in the way that you dispense your goodwill largess, you set up a system of smoke and mirrors so as to keep moving the illusion that events are following each other when in fact you are doing no more than peddling and recycling stone age ideas wrapped in a modern day envelope. It’s not old wine in a new bottle but vinegar in a Champagne bottle.

Thus, if the Annapolis process manages to bring peace to the Middle East, Israel will be integrated into the fabric of the region and the Zionist lobby along with its lackeys will be out of business. Therefore, it is to be expected that the Zionists will attempt to disrupt the process with savage fury the more it becomes apparent that progress is being made towards a final and durable settlement.

Those who emasculated America before will try to do so again. They did not get away with it completely the last time and they are hungry for a big victory now. They are especially adept at buying the US Congress and getting it to do the dumb things, and they will use the Congress again to do dumber things still aimed at disrupting Annapolis.

We should be on the look out for those attempts, should analyze them, discuss them and unmask them whenever we can.

Alan Dershowitz Is Confused Again

In an Article published by FrontPage Magazine, Alan Dershowitz calls Norman Finklestein sexist because the latter said that someone he knew might have called a certain woman a whore. The quarrel between these two gentlemen is really not my concern. But what concerns me is the low level of comprehension that Dershowitz brings to the World scene and the analytical disabilities that power his midget intellect because the repercussions here are enormous given the breadth of activities that Dershowitz has engaged in on the international stage.

What makes the scene all the more alarming is that the man depends on his affiliation with a prestigious university like Harvard to pull off feats that belong to the gutter, not the realm of academe or world affairs.

Let us look at what this character has done now. The term whore as used in the context of this discussion means a prostitute. Finklestein used the term figuratively and gave a definition of what he meant. Dershowitz himself quoted that definition and here it is: "Because she's an Eichmann-like bureaucrat currying favor with the powerful while blandly following orders."

To say that only women are capable of prostituting themselves is to be sexist. That’s what Alan Deshowitz did, not Norman Finklestein. In fact, Finklestein wrote about Eichmann who was a male, and thus proved beyond any doubt that he believes both sexes are capable of committing the act of prostitution.

By contrast, the moment that Dershowitz read the word whore, he automatically associated it with women. He accused Finklestein of being what he is himself and thus proved that in addition to being sexist, he lacks the brainpower to realize what he is revealing about himself every time he insults someone.

In fact, the World is full of male and female whores according to the definition given by Finklestein. Dershowitz ought to know this because many of both sexes prostituted themselves to him when he was thought to be powerful. But then Finklestein deflating him by pointing out that the king was naked and people ceased to curry favor with him as a result. It is not difficult to imagine that Dershowitz then cursed one or two of them in the secrecy of his own mind.

When it comes to intellectual rigor, Dershowitz is a nobody and he shows it every time he reaches for his pen. Maybe this is why he is teaching Law at Harvard but this is something that the University will have to explain. As an intellectual midget though, Dershowitz cannot distinguish between a metaphor that is used figuratively and a language that is used at face value. If this deficiency does not prevent him from teaching at Harvard, it should prevent the rest of us from taking him seriously when he opines on World affairs.

This reality comes to the fore when Deshowitz says that Israel has the right to do to the Palestinians what Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and other monsters have done to their victims. This is real stuff because oppressing and killing the innocent is happening everyday in Palestine where people are dying partly because of the influence that Dershowitz had over the Congress and the American Administration who took his words at face value.

And yet Dershowitz complains about Finklestein speculating that a dead woman might have wanted to tell someone she is a whore to her face and then throttle her. Dershowitz laments the violence that is implied in this statement and thus demonstrates that he has no sense of proportion. And so I ask: Does this man have the mental capacity to tell whether a horizontal bar is above his bellybutton or below it? If he cannot, why is he still teaching to future barristers at Harvard? Will Dershowitz now appreciate this metaphor and recognize a figurative speech for what it is?

If I were still an active teacher and not a retired one, and if a student had given me a piece of writing in the caliber of the Dershowitz article, I would have tried to get inside the head of the student to search for the source of his confusion and thus put my finger on the deficiency that is reducing his analytic capability.

In the case of Dershowitz, I see that the man may have been thrown off by the following passage in the Finklestein writing: "Were [she] still around, I am quite sure - I mean this literally - she would have … as she did with the Nazi guards … called [her] a whore to her face and then throttled her." It could well be that the four words "I mean this literally" were the ones that confused Dershowitz.

As a teacher I would tell student Dershowitz that author Finklestein could only speculate what a woman who is now dead would have done based on what he saw her do before. Finklestein did not say, let alone threaten to commit a violent act, he only speculated what someone might have done. The words "I mean this literally" do not refer to Norman Finklestein doing something, they refer to the fact that the woman did so literally when she confronted the Nazis who were responsible for the Holocaust she was made to endure.

Dershowitz goes beyond proving that he is intellectually weak and proves that he is intellectually dishonest as well. He does this when he adds the following to the mix: This sounds very similar to the threat made by [a] Finkelstein admirer … when he threatened to come to Cambridge and perpetrate violence on me.

First of all, we don’t know what that so-called admirer said to threaten violence because Dershowitz has not quoted his words. But this does not matter now as it has been vitiated by the fact that Dershowitz used the incident to reinforce the idea that Finklestein made a threat which he did not.

Apparently in the miniature intellect of the Harvard Law Professor, two falsehoods make a truth. This is where the thing blew in his face and the face of the Harvard Administration. There is no doubt something stinks out there and everyone is nauseated except the Harvard folks who have gotten used to the foul smell if not have learned to enjoy it.

What we are left with is a man who has proven to be intellectually weak and dishonest at the same time. This makes Dershowitz just another dinosaur relic fossilized in the Harvard Jurassic Park of Academic Lawlessness and we must now cease to expect the institution to do the right thing. Instead, there are two possibilities out of which good may yet come.

First, good people will soon meet at Annapolis to repair the damage that Dershowitz and others like him have heaped on the World as they sat in the ivory towers of once great institutions. May the people at Annapolis look at the Dershowitz sort of gutter material that brought the Middle East to the present sorry state and say to themselves and to each other: "Never again will we listen to the emotionally unbalanced and the mentally challenged who emulate by the power of their fantasies the crimes that the ogres of the past have heaped on mankind in their own era."

Second, despite the fact that Dershowitz has made it his business to belittle the pain of the woman mentioned by Norman Finklestein, the latter never harbored enough vengeance in his heart to want to lay a finger on Dershowitz. This, despite the fact that the woman in question was none other than Norman’s own mother. This is what separates the mouthy idiots of Harvard from the quiet grace of those who suffer in silence then devote time and energy to alleviate the suffering of their fellow human beings.

Still, we must hope that if anything, Dershowitz is afraid of his own shadow because his conscience is beginning to wake up to the horror that he has perpetuated on the Palestinian people and those who feel their pain.

Here, there is a ray of hope that the consciousness of Dershowitz will do what Harvard has not done. Maybe now, like John Newton says, the man will be touched by the sweet sound of grace, will remove his wretched self from the World of academe, realize he was once lost but now is found, was blind and now he sees. And then go on from there to alleviate some of the suffering he has heaped on the many for such a long time.

Those Demons Play For Keeps

Between the planning for something and the implementation of the thing there can be a gap so wide that only the Zionist dream to control the world is big enough to get in there and fill it. This is the backdrop against which a real life drama is now gripping the "Anglosphere." This last word is a product of the Christopher Hitchens imagination now taken up and discussed by thinkers in the caliber of Walter Russell Mead.

My article does not pick up the thread of that debate. Rather, I try to describe over the next few paragraphs how the Zionist demons are playing a new game which they hope will help them secure a tight control over the English speaking societies. I try to show that when the game is played, the Zionists hope to have the tools by which to control the Anglo societies with a tightness greater than what Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin put together ever had over their own societies.

In practical terms, the Zionists expect to have the power to determine who is competent, who is scholarly, who is fit to do one thing or another and so on. We can expect that the next thing they will want is to entrench into law who can work in certain professions and who cannot. After that, they will want to be in a situation where they will have sole authority to license who can speak on what subject. Next thing they will want is the power to decree who has the right to work and to earn a living and who must be left out to die of starvation.

The Zionists are, in fact, doing all of this right now to one degree or another but they are doing it in a subtle way and by operating under the radar, so to speak. What they seek to accomplish beyond that is to legitimize the process, institutionalize it and give it the force of law. They are playing for keeps and they are not relenting one iota because in the end, they will want everyone to talk like John Hagee and to act like Pat Robertson. In their view, to realize their vision is worth sacrificing the lives and careers of all the suckers in the Anglo World who will let them operate freely and help them realize their dream.

Pastor John Hagee, as he calls himself, wants us to believe he is still a Christian even though he does not open his mouth but to say that every Jew alive today is a God onto himself whom we must worship as if he were Jesus Christ in flesh and in blood. Given that there are 14 million Jews in the world and just about 14 million families in the United States who adhere to the Christian Fundamentalist faith, Hagee has a God for everyone of those families. Imagine an interactive God in every family they can wake up to every morning, praise Him, pray to Him, bring Him breakfast in bed, kiss His feet, scrub His back and so on.

Hagee says he derives knowledge as to what is good for humanity from the Scripture which he ascertains describes a series of Kingdoms each being represented by a different metal or a part of an animal body or something like that. I must apologize for being unable to give more details about Hagee’s understanding of the Universe and of Heaven because the moment this clown starts to describe the thing, I crack up laughing and I stop listening to his words. Check him out yourself; you will at least get a good laugh.

As for Pat Robertson, A TV channel in Buffalo, New York used to carry his show every morning when a friend called me one day some three or four years ago to say I should take a look at this guy. I looked for a few days in a row and marveled at the double standard that is practiced by those who regulate these things. Here was a guy telling the audience he had the power to prevent the approaching storm from causing damage to the East Coast of the United States which he would do if people donated generously to his show.

Well, there used to be a Jamaican woman and a French Canadian woman who made a living reading cards and telling fortune on television. They were yanked off the air because someone thought they committed fraud by making false representations and false promises to people who were in despair and who looked for a straw to latch on to.

But what about that guy Robertson, does he not do worse than that? If the two women were yanked off the air, justice demands that Pat Robertson be stripped naked and have his bum rapped on the air before being tossed out kicking and screaming. He should be out of there not only because he commits fraud every time he opens his mouth but because he is fraud itself.

While the aforementioned may not be reason enough to jail Pat Robertson, the following is. The authorities should look at his inciting the people to commit fraud. I remember him saying something about the law of reciprocity whereby God will do to you what you do to Pat Robertson. That is, he promised that if people donated to his show, God will repay them handsomely.

But that’s not all, the human faced talking bipedal fraud went further and incited those who receive welfare money, those who receive student assistance money or any kind of assistance from a government at any level to send him part or all of the money they receive, promising that God will pay them back several times what they send him.

But the law of the land says to use assistance money for a purpose other than why it was given is to defraud the public purse. This may not send you to jail because intent must still be proven but to incite defrauding the public purse is a crime that is punishable by a jail term because the intent to commit a felony is clearly demonstrated here. Therefore, in doing what he did, Pat Robertson committed a demonstrable criminal act and he should be sent to jail.

And there is more, folks. One of those mornings Oliver North appeared on the show. He had written a novel and Robertson brought up the subject. In the novel it is mentioned that Israel has nuclear bombs mounted on missiles. Upon learning that Israel may actually have such a weapon, Robertson lit up like a nuclear bomb himself. And he expressed the wish to see a couple of those sent to detonate over Cairo, a city of 12 million people including 2 million Christians. Would Hitler, Mussolini or Stalin have done this?

This man Pat Robertson ran for the Presidency of the United States of America, he now heads a religious ministry rich enough to have its own television network and he pretends to have influence over 50 million Americans, a flock large enough to make a sizeable nation. He expresses on television his wish to "nuke" Cairo and what happens?

Well, what happens is that officials of the American government, pundits and journalists come out of hiding and express concern about an 8 year old Arab girl who "danced in the street" upon learning that her brothers and sisters attacked with their bare hands the people who blew up her mother and her father to smithereens with a laser guided missile launched from a helicopter. Look how nasty those little Arab girls are and look how sweet Pat Robertson is. Why can they not gather up all those nasty little girls into their nasty little Madrassas and teach them to be sweet like Pat Robertson!

Who says there is no justice in this World! In fact, you need not wait to die and go to Heaven to see justice done, just leave it to the great Western Liberal Democracies and watch justice descend on humanity like a force of goodness promising to wipe out everything evil and redeem us all, Christians and non Christians.

Now, when we get past this crap, we realize that if we let the Zionists have it their way, Hagee and Robertson will be the models by which everyone in the Anglo World (or Anglosphere) will be judged and licensed to speak or not to speak, to earn a living or be left to die of starvation.

We know this is not farfetched because we see the proof when we look at the Congress and the Administration. In the first case they vote 98% to 100% in favor of everything that the Jewish lobby wants. In the second case, the Administration is always prepared to break the hearts of a million Americans to inject a little joy in the hearts of a handful of Israelis. When you see this you know that America is in a worse shape than Rome was when Caesar gave his horse the right to vote. And that’s not what Hitler, Mussolini or Stalin ever dreamt of doing.

The trouble with the Anglo culture is that it is a pushover for someone who would sweet talk it into surrender. The Zionists are good at charming those they plan to sucker into submission and when this is achieved, the charm ends. You must then watch out for what comes next because the Zionists consider the charm offensive an investment they expect to see pay off. In other words, there is no free lunch. Today they charm you, tomorrow you hand over your soul and everything that goes with it. Just look at Hagee and Robertson and see what they have been reduced to. Worse, look at the Congress and the Administration and see what they have been reduced to. Worse still, look at America and see what it has been reduced to.

The point to keep in mind is that if you have not learned how to generate streams of cash for Israel by the time you are called upon to pay back what the Zionists will estimate you owe them, they will turn you into a John Hagee or a Pat Robertson. And this is something you will not be proud to include in your resume when the time comes to meet your Maker. You will not be proud for many reasons, one of them being that the Big Guy up there has different ideas about who is a God and who is not.

What this shows is that once a society submits to a Zionist demand, it opens the door for the never ending stream of demands that will keep on coming. To see how this works in practice look at how the Israeli Zionists are digging in the graves of the Holocaust dead looking for more payments from Germany half a century after they signed an agreement never to come back for more. They are now asking for another half a billion dollars and the expectation is that they will be back for more and more, again and again for ever and ever.

The stories of Hagee and Robertson show that a shortcut to damnation is the surrender to the Zionist evil at least once. You will be charmed into making a first step then sucked into handing over everything you own, everything that you are and everything that you can be. All this because the Zionists don’t play for fun but play for keeps.

But there is a piece of good news in all of this and here it is. The more the Zionists play the game the more their subtleties disappear and the more the game is shown for what it is. Even someone as submissive as the Anglo-Saxons will be inclined to reject this whole enterprise and go for something more seemly than genuflect to a Zionist master. Hopefully someday.

They Are Not Ten Feet Tall

Trained professional soldiers go on a tour of duty for a few months and return with mental illnesses that require treatment. And this is said to be understandable given that war is hell. But the civilians whose families, homes neighborhoods, country and way of life are obliterated before their eyes are expected to stand tall and not be shaken by what happens to them according to the pundits who pontificate on subjects they ought to be careful about.

Time and again we hear of soldiers who come home from the front a changed person. The change can be slight or it can be a complete reversal of personality. They are affected as individuals and this in turn affects their family life and the way they interact with society. Some can function without treatment, others need treatment before they can reintegrate into society and a few descend into a personal hell that sometimes leads to homicide or suicide.

Now pretend for a moment that the civilians who are expected to stand ten feet tall are really not that tall but are made of the same DNA stock as the soldiers who experience those difficulties. Now imagine these people as they see their families, homes, neighborhoods, country and way of life being obliterated before their eyes and you will accept the notion that they may not behave like gentlemen or nice ladies all the time. And neither will you be shocked to learn that a few of them will want to inflict damage on the foreign soldiers who brought the horrendous calamity to them.

Most of the time a soldier from the invading army will develop difficulties after seeing a buddy of his being killed. If the buddy is killed by a civilian, the soldier will want to exact revenge by punishing the population that his army has invaded. By the same token, when a civilian of the invaded country sees a member of his family being killed by a foreign soldier, he will want to exact revenge by punishing the soldiers of the foreign army.

When the soldiers do what they do, they call that a military operation and it is how things are described in the communiqué that is issued. Sometimes, however, the reality is different from what is put into the communiqué because the operation would have more to do with a personal quest for revenge than it is a military necessity.

In fact, in some cases the soldiers throw a party after committing a gruesome act of revenge as when the Americans raped a 14 year old Iraqi girl and murdered her family before setting the house in which they lived on fire. This was without a doubt the display of a strange sort of behavior but it was treated as if totally understandable by the reporters and the pundits who took up the issue. At least in one instance, the age of the girl was made fun of when a female reporter snickered that the girl was probably more like 25.

Yet, these same reporters and pundits find it hard to understand why an eight year old or a ten year old girl who saw her family blown up by a laser guided missile would want to "dance in the street" upon learning that her people have inflicted damage on the soldiers of the invading army. The pundits point to such behavior and say: look how violent these people are. Do you not feel gratified that our soldiers are over there keeping them in check?

The troubling part about this performance is not the apparent double standard which would imply a run of the mill kind of hypocrisy on the part of the pundits. No, the world is used to that. The troubling part is that the pundits are sincere in expressing what they feel. Look at it closely and be horrified because this says something very serious about us.

What the performance says is that the pundits expect an eight year old Palestinian girl or a ten year old Iraqi girl to have more class, more humanity, more backbone and more culture than the American army, the Israeli army or the political and cultural establishments that pitted the society from which the soldiers came against the society from which the girls came. That performance says a great deal more about the pundits and about us who listen to them than it says about the Arab girls or their culture. We should be horrified about what it says.

We often admit to ourselves that our young grow up in an environment that is so demeaning to them, they develop a diminished sense of self worth. However, most of the time people cannot describe what this means, how it is manifested or why it is a bad thing in the first place. Well, the preceding example is one that answers all three questions with enough clarity to chill the bones in our bodies. It is that we left it to the dubious among us to define us, and they do so by telling us we must hate and fear someone else because we are so inadequate.

In fact, the problem is not just how we treat each other at home or how we treat the foreigners when we invade their countries. The problem goes deeper than that, it goes to the root of the culture we have developed in the recent past and have shielded from criticism by attacking the integrity of those who blow the whistle when they see something alarming.

On the one hand we think of our culture as being the result of divine revelation; on the other we fear that it may be inferior to someone else’s. The result has been the creation of a refrain that our kids never cease to hear as they grow up. It goes like this: You are useless but look how much better off than the Arabs and the Muslims you are thanks to what I do for you. And by the way look how perfect the Jews and the Israelis are but don’t try to be like them because their portrayal is propaganda hogwash, not the real thing.

The reality, however, is that kids almost never feel worthless because someone tells them they are worthless. In fact, if you keep telling a kid that he or she is worthless, the chances are the kid will develop the backbone to improve themselves so as to prove you wrong. What really makes a kid develop a sense of worthlessness is their subtle treatment as a worthless being.

A kid will over time develop a perception of himself or herself by comparing the way that he or she is treated relative to someone else. For example, a parent or a teacher who treats everybody harshly does less damage than a parent or a teacher who treats everyone nicely but treats some kids more nicely than others. Favoritism damages the kids that are left out more than a harsh treatment that is equally applied.

In fact, this observation is so universal, it is found in the adult population as well. People of all ages get furious when they are treated less well than someone else even as they accept a harsh treatment that is equally applied. In recognition of this fact, the Human Right laws address the issue of equality among the people more extensively than they do the treatment of the society as a whole.

Knowing this, we can tell that to fix some of the ills in our society, we must stop playing the game of favoritism. This, however, is going to be a difficult thing to do in a culture where democracy has been so distorted, it is impossible to curry favor with one group without doing it at the expense of another. Democracy has many drawbacks but this fact alone is the Achilles’ heel. Yet, if we do not find a way to improve our performance, we shall be taken out of the game and everyone else will look ten feet tall relative to us.

Behold A Cosmic Anti-Semitic Conspiracy

Finally it has been established once and for all during the first week of November 2007 that there is an anti-Semitic conspiracy operating on a scale so large it can only be classified as a cosmic conspiracy. Just look at the evidence and marvel at the way that the Universe is unfolding because, in effect, the Universe is unfolding as it should to quote the famous Desiderata.

Here is what happened. It was around one and the same week that David Horowitz wrote an article to decry: "The End of the University As We Know It" and something remarkable happened almost simultaneously. The remarkable thing is that they caught on tape a Jewish student at George Washington University in the act of drawing swastikas on the door of her own dormitory.

Well, let me tell you something dear reader, anyone with half a brain must conclude that this cannot be a mere coincidence and must, therefore, see it as a conspiracy of cosmic proportion designed to give Jews a bad name and to throw into doubt many of their pet accusations.

Swastikas on her door was something that the girl had complained about to which the security people at the University responded by installing a hidden camera to nail the culprit and haul the mischievous man to justice. But the camera never blinks like says Dan Rather, and that thing caught the Jewish girl doing it to herself instead of catching some wild eyed neo-Nazi doing it to her. And so now, like says David Horowitz, it is going to be the end of the university as we know it if not the end of the Universe itself, Desiderata notwithstanding.

Yeah the end of the university as we know it, but what is it exactly that we know about the university? Did we ever suspect that Jews were doing it to themselves? And why would the Jews do something bad to themselves then frame someone else for the crime? Should we now revisit the notion that Jews may have brought down the Twin Towers in New York on 9/11 to frame the Arabs? That’s not what Rudy Giuliani says, or is it?

And what about the anthrax crime, did they catch someone yet? People died by that criminal act; is this why it was swept under the carpet? Would it have been swept under the carpet had the culprit been an Arab as the frame was meant to show?

I shall let Giuliani, the prosecutor, deal with those questions and discuss instead something I know a thing or two about. I finished writing a manuscript for a book more than eight months ago and sent it out to be considered for publication. The reaction has been what it has been for 40 years, no dice because everyone is knuckling under the Jewish blackmail.

But I am used to that because it happened to me dozens of times over the past 40 years, and so I shift the discussion to something else. There is one paragraph in the book where I describe what happened at a Montreal university in the early to mid 1990s. Here is that passage:

"I also heard from several sources that Jews were counseling each other on how to deal with the Palestinian students who write and distribute leaflets that promote the Palestinian causes. The sources say that Jewish students tell each other they must not sit and talk with the Palestinian students but should get busy filling the washroom walls with graffiti in a manner that suggests the authors of the graffiti are the same who write the pro-Palestinian leaflets. In this way, those who write the leaflets will be suspected of writing the graffiti and will be embarrassed. Hopefully, they will stop writing and distributing the leaflets and the Jewish camp wins."

Although the book was not published, the manuscript was circulated widely and many people were made aware of its content. As a result, I received several communications from people who wanted me to know that dirty trick washroom graffiti done to frame innocent people has been going on in several universities in Quebec and Ontario for a long time.

This information was useful to me because one tool in the kit that I employ to do intelligence work is the study of events that seem to duplicate themselves in several places. If all or most of the duplications bear the same "signature," I conclude that they have the same origin. In the case of the university washroom graffiti, I could not escape the conclusion that the signature was that of the Zionist lobby where the technique was developed to stab free speech in the back and stab democracy in the heart.

But this is not all there is to the story because when you look at what happened next with regard to the girl at George Washington University, you realize how elaborate and how advanced such a plan can be. So let us look at what the girl said when she was confronted with the evidence: "I wasn't looking to create this … insanity … I wasn't looking to become a media darling. I was just looking for acknowledgment from [the] University that someone drew a swastika on [my] door."

No one had accused the girl of trying to become a media darling. All they did was confront her with the evidence and asked her to explain. But the girl was coached beforehand as to how she should react in the event that she got caught. The coaching would have gone something like this: "Make it look like you wanted media attention by denying you wanted media attention even if no one asks what you were trying to accomplish."

In other words, they asked the girl to be the scapegoat by playing the role of the foolish little thing who did something on her own to satisfy some girlish need. This is how they hoped to confuse the public and hide the Zionist design to accomplish their demonic objectives. In the meantime, foolishness on the part of the girl being a smaller offence than conspiracy, the reaction will have to be mitigated.

This idea together with appeals for clemency from several sources which the Zionists will organize for the girl will net her a light punishment if not outright forgiveness. This scenario will also protect the Zionist organization that planned the whole thing and set it to do more of the same, and get away with it all over again.

Still, we must ask: what media attention? As well as being a student at the university, the girl worked as a reporter for the local newspaper and she had all the attention she could ever want. Being the story was not going to make her a media darling because another reporter would have to handle the story and take the credit for breaking it. And that’s what happened ultimately except that it happened in a way that exposed the Zionist conspiracy as well as the cosmic one.

And so, we now have a clear view of the inner workings of the most evil of lobbies as it labors to destroy the last pillar of American power, the universities and colleges of the nation. The plot is so elaborate it has more than one godfather. There is Alan Dershowitz who goes after the professors. David Horowitz whose job is to turn the institutions of learning into museums of washroom graffiti. And Norman Podhoretz who delights in turning the think tanks of America into the septic tanks of the World.

There is only one way left to stop the destruction of America by those charlatans. Place them all in one category and call it Basket of the Usual Suspects (BUS). Every time something shity happens on campus, grab the BUS and throw it in jail until someone comes forward and tells the complete story as to how it was done. Do this a few times, and the stinkos will eventually stop stinking. We shall then breathe the fresh air of academic freedom and free speech like we used to in the good old days before Zionism came along and messed the thing up for everyone.

When Misery Seeks Company

New expressions like "ticking time bomb" and old ideas like "simulated drowning" or "water-boarding" have crept into the modern lexicon. People are asking if this is the natural evolution of a language and the natural unfolding of history or if something artificial was injected into the way they are asked to think and the way they are forced to live their lives.

Some people are still looking for answers but some have concluded that because misery seeks company, misery has targeted a fertile ground in which to search for a suitable company. The ground is right here in North America where most of the changes are first introduced then made to radiate to the rest of the World by the various means of communication.

The people who reached the conclusion did so upon the discovery that a group of activists were behind those changes. So they asked: Who are these activists anyway? Are they Canadians and Americans who happen to adhere to the Jewish religion? Or Zionists whose mission is to mobilize the North American Continent and to put it in the service of a foreign country called Israel? These two questions were asked on this Continent but there is no doubt that similar ones were asked in other places around the world as well.

People were baffled as to why the questions should be asked in the first place and they spoke of their confusion at what they saw happen here in relation to what happened in the Middle East. They were detecting what looked like an action-reaction sort of phenomenon unfolding under their noses and they wanted an explanation.

People also wondered if the Jewish Lobby and the Zionist Lobby were one and the same. Eventually they surmised that a multi-headed lobby of some kind must be working on behalf of Israel on two fronts. On the political front they saw the lobby dominate the corridors of power in the legislatures of the nation while on the media front they saw the lobby spread its Zionist colors in the television studios and the editorial rooms of the print publications.

What puzzled the people at first was the manner in which the supporters of Israel manipulated the media. The people read the editorials that accused the Arabs of bringing the Middle East wars to Canada but what the people witnessed was a continuous and relentless typhoon of propaganda that accentuated the positives about Israel and masked the negatives about her. Concurrent to that, they saw a continuous and relentless typhoon of propaganda that did the exact opposite in relation to the Arabs and the Muslims.

Moreover, the people were told openly through everyday discussions conducted in the media that they must hate the Arabs and fear the Muslims with every word that was spoken and every sentence that was written on the Middle East. Not only that but this sort of calls went out even when the discussion was entirely about something else. What happened in these instances more often than not was that the commentators would fly off on a tangent and drag the name of an Arab country out of nowhere to deliver a below the belt cowardly kick then return to the original topic again.

This sort of thing happened time after time throughout the decades without someone being there to counter the falsehoods that were frothed out the Zionist mouths or someone being there to point out that another disgrace of the Zionist kind has just been committed on American radio or Canadian television. All the while, the Arab journalists were banned from the media, be they private media or publicly funded ones on orders from the Israel-Zionist lobby.

On another front, when people attended a political gathering they saw the candidates who ran for office being badgered incessantly and forcefully by supporters of Israel who asked for nothing but that the candidate be good to Israel if he or she is elected. In effect then, the activists acted as if they believed Canada and the United States were the political and cultural provinces of Israel put on Earth for one purpose only, to serve the interests of that foreign country.

Those who probed into the phenomenon a little deeper discovered that the supporters of Israel did not adhere to the Jewish religion as much as they followed an ideological agenda which had more to do with Israel being a political and economic entity in which they invested their own money rather than a sanctuary for those who sought to live a Jewish life in peace and serenity which was the fraudulent claim that led to the founding of the state of Israel in the first place.

And then the people made the big discovery. They discovered that despite the fantasy that was whipped up after the sneak attack of 1967 which brought fame to Israel and the promise that time was on her side, the country had been slipping into misery ever since. Her supporters realized they had to do something to pull her out of that misery but there was only one way to do it and that was to find company for the Jewish state. This will be company that may have to be sacrificed at some point so that Israel keep her supremacist standing in the Middle East.

What raised eyebrows and still does to this day is the way that the Zionists do their thing in North America. It has become obvious to those who study their methods that the Zionists watch Israel operate in the Middle East then duplicate her ways here. The result is clearly seen in that the Zionists have unleashed a cold war against the Arabs and the Muslims on this Continent to mirror the hot wars that Israel has unleashed against her neighbors.

When this spectacle is coupled with the scene of candidates being badgered until they promise to be good to Israel, the perception is reinforced that the Zionists believe the inhabitants of this Continent are considered incidental to a scheme created in the imagination of the Zionists, a scheme that hit a snag on the road to implementation.

In fact, that snag was encountered a long time ago but did not become apparent until much later. It all started in the middle of the Twentieth Century when Israel bit more than she could chew at a time when the Arabs looked like a helpless and easy prey.

That was a time when every move that the Arabs made to improve their condition was countered by the former colonial powers with a swift and punishing adventure as when Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal and was invaded by Britain and France who brought Israel along in 1956 to show her how to do things.

Israel did her thing in 1967 and this was the last time she succeeded in anything military because it was the bite that broke her jaw. And this was the snag that started the process of demolishing the Zionist dream of an Israel extending from the Nile to the Euphrates.

And despite the massive help that Israel received from the United States over forty years following that fatal bite, the Jewish state found herself in a situation where to survive as a supremacist state, she must keep destroying what the Arabs and the Muslims did to rebuild their economies and develop their societies.

This turned out to be a job that nobody could do alone. And so, the Israeli saying: "Give us the tools and we’ll do the job," meaning give us the weapons and we’ll do the killing was replaced with: "Come fight them here or you will have to fight them at home," meaning come and join the killing spree because we cannot kill enough of them alone. America said yes and this is how misery found the perfect sucker to keep it company.

This being a plan for the Middle East, the Zionists unleashed one to match it here and run parallel with it. They invented something they called Islamofascism then launched a holy war to fight the citizens of Arab and Muslim heritage on this Continent. This war is now ongoing and its purpose is to tie together the two opposite and least compatible of religions, Judaism and Christianity.

The idea of the Zionists is to get the Christian majority to join the Jewish minority and together descend into the misery they call a "Clash of Civilizations" which would pit them against Islam. But the reality is that the Arab Civilization is the foundation upon which Western Civilization was built. Also Islam is the continuation of Christianity both of which emphasize altruism and both of which are the natural antidotes to the selfish and quarrelsome teachings of Judaism.

They are the antidotes because the peace of the New Testament replaces the blood and gore of the Old Testament, while submission to God as taught in the Koran replaces the quarrels with God that pepper the Old Testament.

This is where things stand now and here is what I predict for the future. The World will someday speak of an Islamo-Christian civilization that identified the Original Sin as being the claim by one group of people to have been chosen by God to stand above everyone else. This being the sin that spawned all other sins and all the miseries that plagued humanity from the beginning of time, doing away with it did away with all the ills in one fell swoop.

And from that day on, the idea of a supremacist state existing anywhere was legislated out of existence everywhere on Earth while any movement that would work toward that ideology was outlawed. Zionism was buried alongside Nazism and the supremacist regime in Israel was dismantled for ever. This was the miracle that mankind had dreamt about for millennia, the miracle that Islamo-Christianity has turned into reality. Salvation was finally delivered to the human race as promised.