A great deal was made in the North American media about the spontaneous celebration that erupted in Gaza not long ago. The celebrators were the victims of Israel's rampage in Gaza when more than a hundred Palestinians were slaughtered and hundreds more wounded. These were the kids who witnessed the murder of their parents, brothers, sisters, friends and neighbors only a few days prior.
The survivors erupted in a celebratory outburst as they were told that some semblance of justice was done when a youngster like themselves took to heart the American adage: "Live free or die" and did what he believed was an act that will contribute to the freedom of his people or at least alleviate their pain. He killed eight Israelis in retaliation for Israel's murderous rampage and was shot dead for his effort. War is a cruel enterprise when conducted between equal powers and a crime against humanity when launched by a modern army against the unarmed children of an impoverished people.
Upon hearing the news, the kids in Gaza who could only shake a frustrated fist at the helicopter gunships that came for the sole purpose of committing a premeditated genocide against their people in full view of their young eyes liberated their pent up frustration in a spontaneous outburst of relief that lasted a few minutes then dissolved into the quiet of the night.
That incident, though trivial in itself, was used by the Zionist propaganda machine to argue that the difference between the Palestinians and the Israelis is that the Palestinians kill for the sake of killing while the Israelis kill because they are compelled to do so. And this is the old and worn out refrain that the Zionist propaganda machine has inflicted on mankind for too long now to polish the image of the Israelis and tarnish that of the Palestinians.
I dispute the premise on which stands that Zionist effort in a book whose publication was blocked by none other than those who own and operate the Zionist propaganda machine. I reprint below three excerpts from that book where the true face of Israel and her supporters is revealed. But first, I set the stage as to how and why I wrote the book in the first place.
I was blacklisted sometime in the late Nineteen Sixties after scoring a few successes at a time when the number of Arabs who ventured to articulate the Arab cause were counted on the fingers of one hand. This brought the Canadian Jewish Congress into my house where they told me I was too good not to go under their wing where they wish manage my career as author and journalist.
When I refused the offer, I was told that the only way I shall see any of my writings published again was to write something damning to my race or my religion or both. They knew I was of Egyptian origin and they automatically assumed I was a Muslim which I am not. But I told them off in no uncertain terms and I did not reveal that I was a Christian because my contempt for them was too unbounded to bother.
I did many things after that to survive but I always managed to publish something in one or the other of the small publications including one that I started myself. Then the internet came along and I knew I was going to get on it eventually but I took my time for a reason that shall be discussed at another occasion.
I knew that at some point I was going to need material to start me off and so, for a few months, I took notes of the things that shocked me on television. I compiled these notes into a book and sent it off for publication to see if the blacklist was still in force. I went through this ritual from time to time over the past forty years. I discovered this time as I did every time before that I was still blacklisted as they promised I would be for the rest of my life unless I fulfilled their condition of slandering my race, my religion or both. And so I turned to the internet even sooner than I thought I would.
Here are three excerpts from that book.
First Excerpt
Modern technology offers several new ways to create the noise that distorts the message. In the world of the audio visuals, there are two ways to make noise; there is the audio part and there is the visual part. I offer the following to show how this works.
During the Spring of the year 2006 when things were going badly for Israel, the Jews of North America hungered to hear good news. To respond to this need, the Jewish leaders came up with a new approach to presenting the news. They had the announcer on the radio tell of a Palestinian operation and Israel’s response to it. The announcer would read the news at the regular pitch of his or her voice, and when they get to the reporting of Israel’s response, the voice shifts to a higher pitch so as to convey a gradual build up of joy and excitement. This continues until the announcer ends with the words “aaand theeen” ... and then the sound of a massive explosion follows so as to suggest the blowing up of a house or a building. They even did it on Canadian and American television where the audio part was the same as on the radio, and the visual part was the display of the house or the building as it blew up.
There is no doubt that this new approach to the delivery of the news was invented to cheer up somebody. In adopting it, the Jewish Establishment confirmed it is made of sadists whose amusement can only be satisfied by an orgy of destruction, something they offered as gift to their bankrollers, the Jews of North America. Given the history of that Establishment, the invention and its purpose are not surprising. What is surprising is that Canadian and American radio and television went along without as much as asking for an explanation by any authority.
Second Excerpt
But, who are the people who carry water for the rabbis and spread their hatred around, anyway? To answer the question we look at this example: on September 10, 2006 Richard Landau had his first Behind the Story show of the season and he discussed the stories that unfolded during the Summer. One panelist gloated as he said that by murdering 1,200 Lebanese civilians, Israel made Hezbollah think twice about kidnapping Israeli soldiers again. And Landau said not one word to dissociate himself from this monstrosity.
Just think about this for a moment: Someone feeble minded like the British or American soldiers who carried out the atrocities in Iraq and Guantanamo listening to this sort of talk one day then finding themselves in a war situation the next day. How do you think they would react but the way that they did in those places?
And that is not all, there can be feeble minded individuals on the other side too. Imagine how an Arab or a Muslim youngster or even a British youngster of Arab or Muslim descent would react to a talk like this when he is himself forbidden from being on radio or on television to speak his mind? Imagine the feeble minded youngster thinking to himself if it is okay for Israel to murder 1,200 Arab civilians and make Hezbollah think twice, what should be inflicted on Israel for murdering 1,200 Arab civilians and make her think twice?
For that matter, what should be inflicted on those who support Israel then please their Jewish masters by denying the Arabs and the Muslims the right to express their outrage in the media?
Third Excerpt
Their current mission being that of serving the interests of Israel, the Jewish leaders worked out different strategies to deal with the variety of circumstances they meet around the globe. In North America, the strategy has been to set up a hierarchy of tools they use to persuade the public of their point of view and to attack their enemies. Television being the most powerful tool in the hand of the Jewish propaganda machine, the directors and producers of the machine have set up a hierarchy for the type of reporters they prefer to engage to tell their stories.
According to that list, the least persuasive reporter or commentator on television is the older White male. Above him comes the younger White male. Doing better are the older and younger White females respectively. Above that comes the Black male, whether young or old. Above that comes the older Black female and above her the younger Black female. As for the Latinos and the other colored reporters and commentators, they have not been included in the list as yet but individual reporters have been rated individually and they are given assignments accordingly.
On June 13, 2006 Marci Ien [of African origin] was at her post reading the news when she reported about a second accident that happened in Afghanistan involving American military vehicles plowing into Afghan civilians and killing innocent people. The Jewish Establishment had Ien opine at the end of the piece: “A few weeks ago a similar accident sparked vicious riots.” Since the Americans did not have a reason to riot, it must have been the Afghans who did, and this means they were the vicious ones according to this Jewish style newscast.
Now imagine a White male reporter saying in essence that the Afghans are a vicious race of people because they rioted once before when their people were plowed into and were killed by American military vehicles. He would have been kicked out of the studio before he had the time to finish the sentence. Only Marci Ien had the credibility to pull it off and remain standing in the studio at the end of the newscast.
Commentary
What I did not include in that book is the history of open savagery which used to be committed by the Israelis in full view of the cameras and the microphones. The Israelis were criticized for their behavior and this prompted the government to impose a military censorship on everything that could damage Israel's image abroad. For example, mobs chanting kill the Arabs were commonplace both in Israel and in the occupied territories as were scenes of Israeli mobs mutilating the bodies of dead Palestinian commandos who were killed in action. By the way, they were not called terrorists then; they were called commandos just like the Israelis who carried out missions beyond their borders. After that, the Palestinians were called guerillas then terrorists.
It has been shown and argued many times before that the first generation of Palestinians under occupation was docile and did nothing more than demonstrate against the occupation; especially against the brutal activities of the settlers in their midst. This angered the Israelis so much that they armed the settlers and provided them with military protection. In turn, this prompted the Palestinians of the second generation under occupation to throw stones at the Israeli tanks but this infuriated the Israelis who began to demolish the homes of the Palestinians. And this is what got the third generation of Palestinians under occupation to fight fire with fire. So, what happened next? The tea called the kettle black. The victimized Palestinians were portrayed as the aggressors and the aggressive Israelis were portrayed as the victims.
Of course, it happens all the time in North America that when a serial killer is given a harsh sentence such as life in prison or the death penalty, the families of the victims express relief that justice was finally done. And the reason why prisoners who commit crimes of magnitude are given protection as they are moved around is because it happened more than once that someone administered justice their own way by killing the suspect before the trial had even begun.
Thus to express relief that someone has paid for their crime before anything was proven is not something that is alien to human beings. This says something that is not flattering about our species but it is reality. It is also why cultures have developed ways to manage the dark side of our character and thus minimize its effect. However, what is alien and incomprehensible is that someone be as savage as the Israelis yet expect to be loved and be treated like angels by the simple act of swapping their image with that of their victims.
.
Not even the Nazis went this far in their self-delusion. You have to be very sick to demand that you be loved more intensely, the more evil you become. And this habit of yours is what proves that you shall forever remain the incorrigible ones.