Imagine this unlikely scenario: A regime comes into being in Mexico and turns the place into a hellhole for the people who live there and they flee in droves across the border to the United States. The American government stops calling the newcomers illegal immigrants and calls them refugees. It sets up camps for them in a few Southern States and works with the United Nations to find a solution for the crisis because it no longer maintains diplomatic relations with the regime in Mexico City.
Years pass and the problem has gotten worse. In fact, the situation has transformed into one where the laws of the United States had to be modified to accommodate the new realities and avoid a potentially explosive social problem from rearing its head. One such move was the repeal of Amendment 14 of the Constitution whereby everyone born in the United States was automatically considered a US citizen. The repeal of this amendment was done because while the older Mexicans were dying off, the younger ones were reaching adulthood, were marrying and were having children of their own, born on American soil. But deprived of American citizenship and unable to obtain Mexican papers, these people now make up a generation that is stateless yet calls itself Mexicans of the diaspora. To live in dignity, they set up businesses in the refugee camps to give themselves and each other jobs, and they run an economy that is modest but one that helps them raise their standard of living which is something they prefer to do rather than rely solely on the handouts distributed by the United Nations and the other relief organizations.
In the meantime, the American legislators refuse to make laws that will absorb these people into the American society for fear of the social consequences and to avoid erasing the responsibilities of the regime in Mexico City which the Americans say must be held accountable for the crimes it has committed and those it continues to commit without respite. On the other hand, the regime repeatedly calls on the American nation to absorb the refugees thus solve the problem once and for all. The regime makes these calls while at the same time making matters worse by continuing to render life miserable for the remaining Mexicans in the country. Worse, the regime does what it does in the style of the in-your-face gesture which it throws at the whole world like a deliberately provocative affront that defies logic - when you think of it - because it makes no sense to behave like this under the rules of civilized conduct or even the rules of uncivilized conduct for that matter.
As for the American military, it has tried halfheartedly to resolve the matter with force on several occasions but was unable to convince the regime in Mexico City to change its ways. The only option available to it at this point is to launch an all out massive attack that will most certainly result in wiping out a good part of Mexico where the population is now largely made of ethnic Chinese. These people first came into Mexico in stealth; they massacred and looted the Mexican population, took up residence and multiplied. They did so by breeding and by taking in ethnic Chinese immigrants and only ethnic Chinese. Eventually, the current regime was set up and was gradually fortified with the backing it received from the Chinese government. It turned Mexico into a hellhole for the remaining Mexicans who started fleeing the country. Given this fait accompli, a large American assault on Mexico would most likely trigger an all out war with the government of China which now runs the largest economy in the world and has military bases and naval fleets all over the planet. And a war with China is what the Americans want to avoid.
This, my dear reader, is not an exact analogy of the situation in the Middle East but a close approximation of what happened when the Jews came in stealth, massacred and looted the Palestinian population that had been living there since the beginning of time. They took up residence and multiplied by breeding and by taking in Jewish immigrants and only Jewish immigrants. They renamed the place Israel where a new regime was installed and was fortified with the backing it received from foreign governments. The regime in Israel turned the place into a hellhole for the remaining Palestinians who fled to the neighboring countries. It did what it did and continues to do it in the style of the in-your-face gesture which it throws at the whole world like a deliberately provocative affront that defies logic because it makes no sense - when you think of it - to behave like this under the rules of civilized conduct or even the rules of uncivilized conduct for that matter. But given this fait accompli, an all out massive assault on Israel is likely to trigger a confrontation with the foreign powers that back Israel, something the neighbors of that entity want to avoid.
The reason why I set up this near-analogy is because I want to discuss an article written by Danny Ayalon who is currently the deputy minister of foreign affairs in Israel. He wrote the article under the title: “The Flotilla Farce” which was published in the Wall Street Journal on July 29, 2010. He introduces the article by describing a confrontation that took place in Lebanon between the Lebanese army and a few armed Palestinians living in a refugee camp there. At first, Ayalon does not say what it is he is describing but he deliberately exaggerates the responses of the army to give the impression that he is describing a confrontation between the Israeli army - which always responds with biblical savagery - and the Palestinians. These latter confrontations are those that occur almost on a daily basis in Gaza and the West Bank between an Israeli military that comes in with tanks and armored carriers to battle a Palestinian civilian population that would be lucky to find a stone to throw at the tanks. But after his introduction, Ayalon surprises you by saying that the confrontation he is describing did not take place between the Israelis and the Palestinians but took place - this one time - between the Lebanese army and the Palestinians who were forced to live in the diaspora when the Jews massacred many of them and looted their homes in Palestine.
In the article, Ayalon goes on to discuss the flotilla that was to bring humanitarian supplies to Gaza by calling it a dishonest and hypocritical exercise. And why is that? Well, let's hear him say why: “There are currently 100 armed conflicts and dozens of territorial disputes around the world. There have been millions of people killed and hundreds of millions live in abject poverty without access to basic staples. And yet hundreds of high-minded humanitarian activists are spending millions of dollars to reach Gaza...” Danny Ayalon is here exhibiting a mentality that has come to be called the Alan Dershowitz doctrine. It says basically that anything horrible done to someone in the past or in the present by someone else or by circumstances gives Israel the right to do the same thing to the Palestinians. At least this is how the doctrine was originally formulated some three decades ago but it has evolved by successive Israeli precedents to now mean that Israel can inflict the horror on anyone who happens to be unarmed and incapable of defending themselves, be they in Palestine or in Lebanon or they are Turks, Irish or Americans sailing the high seas. The modified doctrine also says that Israel can inflict not just an equal amount of pain but hundred of times as much pain as any devil can inflict. And Israel can do so as long as America will keep supplying it with money and weapons and will keep protecting it from condemnation in World forums with that dastard American veto of shame and dishonor.
Actually when Ayalon earlier mentioned the high-minded activists that were trying to help the Palestinians, he tried to discredit them by saying they were spending millions of dollars to reach Gaza to do something bad which according to him is this: “...hand money to Hamas that will never reach the innocent civilians of Gaza.” This is a euphemism to mean that the leaders will do one or more of the following things: (a) send the money outside of Gaza into secret bank accounts for their later use, (b) they will use the money to buy property in Gaza and gate it to keep the civilians out, (c) they will use the money to import luxury goods for their personal enjoyment and (d) they will use the money to buy weapons to continue the struggle against the collective punishment inflicted by Israel on the Palestinian civilian population, a crime against humanity that is the hallmark of Israel's establishment and continued existence. But then like every so-called great Jewish intellectual, Danny Ayalon does it to himself because, in trying to have it both ways, he contradicts himself - and brutally so. This is how this poor idiot puts it:
“This is the same Gaza that just opened a sparkling new shopping mall that would not look out of place in any capital in Europe. Gaza, where a new Olympic-sized swimming pool was recently inaugurated and five-star hotels and restaurants offer luxurious fare … Markets brimming with all manner of foods dot the landscape of Gaza, where Lauren Booth, journalist and human rights activist, was pictured buying chocolate and luxurious items from a well-stocked supermarket … No one claims that the situation in Gaza is perfect." Of course, you would not expect that a Jewish intellectual, however capable he may be, to venture explaining how it is that so much gets built in Gaza when the money is kept from the civilian population and used for other purposes.
Which brings us to this very serious consideration. I do not know what led the Nazi doctor Josef Mengele to conclude that the Jews are an inferior race when it is obvious they are neither of one race nor of one religion. But something happened decades ago that prompted me to probe a similar sort of question. It all began when the respected CBS commentator Eric Sevareid took up the subject of the mafia one evening and made the point that crime seems to have become a part of the gene pool of the mafia families given the intensity of their criminal culture and their habit of inbreeding. Taking the idea further and combining it with what I knew was the ability of the brain to make the glands secrete chemicals, I wondered if this could not cause a modification of the genetic code in a fashion we now know is possible and call gene therapy. If this is so, could it be that the intense Jewish cultural trait to always want to have it both ways has made it possible to override the genetic instructions of the Jews and has crippled their ability to formulate a simple thought that is not contradictory? Could this be the reason why almost every article written by a Jew looks like a cesspool of contradictions? Do the writings of Danny Ayalon and all those like him who get published in the Wall Street Journal prove that Josef Mengele and Eric Sevareid were onto something?
Whatever the answers may be to those questions, there is a saying attributed to Abraham Lincoln to the effect that you can fool some people all the time; you can fool all the people some of the time but you cannot fool all the people all the time, a saying that should apply to the success that the Jewish organizations have had so far in America but hopefully not for much longer. The people of these organizations made amazing progress despite their inability to put a simple thought together without sounding like a child just learning to think. They managed to make all that progress using the trick of calling every opposition to themselves and to Israel an act of antisemitism thus have silenced their critics more effectively than Stalin, Hitler Mussolini and all the dictators before them and after them put together could ever hope to do. And they were able to capitalize on the pain suffered by people unrelated to them in a country they never set foot at a time when not one of them was yet born. As a result, they received money to compensate them for the pain of others, power to compensate them for the helplessness of others, respect to compensate them for the humiliation of others and, like a child that is spoiled by its parents, they managed to control the American seats of political, financial and military powers turning them into something like toilet seats to which they alone hold the keys. All of which has transformed America in less than a generation from the status of a superpower to that of a sick and laughable little joke. The view now is that all the fooling that can be done has been done, and the expectation is that this delirious situation will come to an end sooner or later. Cross your fingers and keep them crossed until that happens.
In the meantime you must know that a child is a child and you don't blame it for doing what comes naturally to a child however difficult this one may be. You blame the parents because they are the ones who would have failed to properly raise the child in question. You blame them for being unwilling or unable to carry out their duties and for denying that there was a problem in the first place. This sort of thing has been going on for too long in America despite the fact that everywhere in the world, people are disgusted by the pornographic sight of the American institutions being treated like the private toilet bowls and the private urinals of the Jewish activists who hold the key to the Executive toilet, the Legislative toilet and the Military toilet of America.
Furthermore, the people of the world are sickened by the sight of puppets representing the American government being sent around the world attached to a Jewish string for the purpose of spreading the message that all nations must let their people express themselves freely and without fear. And the puppets do so with a straight face and without a hint of shame at a time when the American Constitution is treated like a Jewish toilet paper when invoked to defend the right of the American people who wish to express themselves freely and without fear. Instead, these Americans are blacklisted and destroyed personally and professionally by that thing which calls itself Anti-Defamation League but is, in reality, the murderous execution arm of the worldwide terror organization calling itself World Jewish Congress.
The behavior of the American government in teaming up with the Jewish organizations to silence internal American opposition to Jewish and Israeli matters while running around the world to threaten everyone they falsely accuse of depriving their people from speaking freely, point to a government that is afflicted with a severe bout of criminal insanity and that is out of control. The world is now demanding that this nauseating situation come to an end here and now because the stink it gives off is beginning to smell like the spray of a sick skunk, and it is becoming too unbearable. It is affecting a world that is saying loudly and clearly: enough is enough America; we've had it up to here with you and your Jewish masters.
Cross your fingers, dear reader; it may work. If and when it does and America comes to its senses, Israel will stop behaving like a skunk in the garden of the Middle East, and there will be no need for the Danny Ayalons of this world to show us how handicapped Jewish intellectuals have become by the culture that is gripping them. They may even get cured by some miracle and we'll all be better off for it.