The editors of the Wall Street Journal want to convince you and me that Unesco is on its way back to the future without first attempting to convince themselves that America is on its way back to the past, taken there by a never ending stream of proposals dropped in its lap by characters like the editors of the Wall Street Journal no less. In fact, these people have hurled their latest proposal at America on November 1, 2011 in a piece of writing they titled: “Back to Unesco's Future” and subtitled: “What the U.S. gets for its money at the U.N.”
The story behind it all is that the people of Palestine are the victims of an ongoing home invasion that has lasted several generations already; and they had it up to here with the beastly savagery of the intruder. He is one of two siblings in a family that has feuded in Europe for centuries where the two competed for supremacy and for dominion over the Continent. At some point in the Twentieth Century, the Nazi sibling turned extremely violent against the one calling himself the Chosen, and forced him to go look for a new home elsewhere in the world. Now calling himself Judeo-Yiddish and swearing he only wants to secure a small enclave where he can live in peace and quiet as a Jew, the former Chosen schemed with the mischief maker of the day that was Britain, and they both looked at places in East Africa and Palestine for the outcast sibling to occupy, choosing ultimately to invade and to settle in the latter.
He started to describe his group as being the Chosen Judeo-Europeans and thought of himself as being a unique breed now living in a neighborhood of Christian and Muslim non-Europeans. He changed the name of the homestead he invaded from Palestine to Israel and proceeded to terrorize the local inhabitants, pushing them out of the places that had been their homes since the beginning of time. To justify a behavior deemed as savage as that of the Nazi sibling he left behind, the Jewish sibling claimed that the neighborhood was a tough one, necessitating his kind of response. But this being contrary to the promises he made at the start to the effect that he only wanted a small enclave where he will live in hiding, his abrupt reversal made it clear he had an elaborate secret agenda in mind all along.
The appearance of this agenda may have come as a surprise to some people but not to those who knew him well and knew how he operates. And by the time several decades had passed following the original invasion, it became clear to everyone that the demonic plan of this sibling had always been to ethnic cleanse the land he stole and to acquire more of it so as to realize a supremacy of some kind and have absolute control over a dominion of some sort. Here we go again repeating in the Middle East the tragedy he authored and played out in Europe. And you know that tragedy will be the ultimate outcome because when the plan is completed, it will represent but the first step on the way to scoring greater conquests, the kind that will rival the mythological conquests of the Old Testament. To the people who had an inkling as to what was transpiring in the Middle East, the plan began to look like the dream that has lived among the disciples of the movement for a thousand years, a dream that the diehard among them now believe is within their grasp.
But the combination of beastly behavior and satanic trickery employed by the squatting invaders of what was once a peaceful Palestine convinced the rest of the world that the Chosen was not chosen to be a saint but chosen to be the incarnation of evil itself. It is now becoming clearer by the day that he exists for one reason and one reason only; to keep humanity from progressing steadily on the path to a civilized coexistence where everyone was going to adhere to the philosophy of live and let live. It was meant to be that Planet Earth was going to transform into a place where people learned from each other, picked up the best of practices from one another and worked together to advance the human species in the fields of education, science and culture. But because this proved to be a receding dream at least for now, the UN Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was called upon to play a role in the debacle and do what it can to mitigate the damage caused by the sibling that outlived the Nazis; the one that picked up the mantle of prince of darkness and became sole owner of it.
Yes, it was the Palestinians who went to the Unesco and asked for the recognition that was due to them. Having tried for decades to reason with the beastly savage in a never ending series of so-called negotiations, there came a point when they had it up to here with his trickery and his bad faith. They decided to cut loose from him and cut loose from a setup that was never meant to go anywhere but meant to buy the beast enough time to implement his demonic agenda for the region and satanic agenda for the world. And the UNESCO spoke in the name of the civilized part of that world saying yes to the request to admit Palestine as a full member of the organization. To paraphrase the first human who walked on the moon, Neil Armstrong, this was a small step for Palestine but a giant leap for mankind.
Rather than see this development as a metaphor for the progress of mankind in the same way that the landing on the moon was a triumph for humanity, the editors of the Journal used another metaphor to express the meanness of their spirit and the pettiness of their character. Lucky for us, however, it turned out they did not know what they were talking about, and their rumination backfired. Here is their problem. “Back to the Future” which is paraphrased in the title of their piece, is actually the title of a 1985 science fiction movie in which a scientist modified a car and turned it into a time machine.
He traveled to the future, came back to the present and decided at the end of the movie to go back to the future again, hence the title of the movie and the hint that a sequel was in the offing. And this is what happened, in fact, not once but twice because a sequel came out in 1989 and another sequel in 1990. But ever since that time, some people have used the expression “back to the future” in a negative sense to mean moving forward in time while looking backward in spirit. And this is how the editors of the Journal are using it; a confusion that weakens their presentation.
What these people are trying to present is a distorted image of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas who, they say, took his “statehood road show” to Unesco where he won a “symbolic fillip for Palestinian aspirations,” having previously made the fateful decision of “grandstanding at the UN halls”. Well, my friend, this style of writing tells you right away that the piece was written by the Jewish faction at the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal. And you know this to be true because the language seeks to trivialize the holocaust being inflicted on the people of Palestine at this very moment by the Jewish hordes that invaded their homes. Having monetized and trivialized the holocaust which the Nazis inflicted on the Jews of Europe nearly a century ago, these people are now laboring to trivialize the Palestinian Holocaust because it is in the nature of their religion to pick the most evil thing to do and do it as if it were God's command to them. And when it comes to doing evil, they can be a very pious bunch.
It would be natural at this point for you to be perplexed by what you see and thus seek the answer to several questions that may have popped up in your head. Consequently, you make the effort to understand what powers the mentality of the Journal editors. To this end, you read their piece several times over and you notice two passages that say something about that mentality.
First, you encounter this passage: “Unesco has never changed. Six years ago … it adopted a 'convention' … that gives countries … cover to close their borders to Hollywood imports or California wines. The U.S. made clear … that either the PA would get a seat or the U.S will … defund Unesco. The Obama Administration should … cancel the U.S. check.” The immediate impression you get from the passage is the fact that two ideas – one about import of American products and one about recognizing Palestine -- were juxtaposed for a reason. But unclear about what the reason may be, you hold back on your judgment for now.
Then, you encounter this second passage: “Under American law … the U.S. can't fund any U.N.-affiliated body that accepts a Palestinian member … The U.S. provides $80 million a year to Unesco … [whose] … decision means that the PA can now automatically join three other agencies, so American support for those outfits is also in jeopardy.” The idea here is clear; it means to say that there is an American law against funding Unesco and all the UN agencies that may follow suit and recognize Palestine. And this law must be followed to the letter, say the editors of the Journal.
You now put two and two together; you come up with a complete picture of what these people are saying and you get a glimpse as to what powers their mentality. They are saying the only laws the world must obey are those made by Jews. The Unesco “convention” being a non-Jewish law, it should be treated like a toilet paper. But since the world treats it with respect, America should go it alone and treat it with contempt. Although they do not say it outright, you know they mean to convey a notion they have advocated on previous occasions which is that where possible, the Americans who do business with the French should circumvent that convention by getting Hollywood products and California wines into France through loopholes they see and loopholes they may create for the occasion.
As to the law pertaining to the defunding of Unesco, this is a Jewish law that was shoved down the throat of the American people in the middle of the night by an American Congress of pimps and prostitutes, madams and gigolos you find in abundance inside both parties. The law must, therefore, be respected and obeyed, but since it is enforceable only in America, its effect will be inflicted on the American people alone. Too bad for these people but then again – like they say -- you get to be governed by the regime you deserve until you change the entire regime not just replace the governing party by another of a different color and the same ilk.
What is not lost on anyone in the world is the reality that the Israeli beast has become a pariah to be shunned on this Earth. And because of its close association with that beast, America too is becoming a pariah that people are beginning to shun. But you ask: Why is this allowed to happen to America? And the answer is that it is happening because there are people who never stop hurling proposals at that country; proposals that aim to achieve the wrong thing. These are writings such as those regularly published in the Wall Street Journal by the Jewish faction of its editorial board and by contributors of think tanks who contribute nothing really but the stuff that septic tanks are full of.
To see this phenomenon at work, look what closing arguments these people have put together to give the American regime a reason to remain in the camp of pariahs. They begin like this: “The [Unesco] vote … carries unfortunate consequences for the U.S., the U.N. and the Palestinians.” A little later on, they say this: “[The] vote is in fact a rebuke to America's efforts to engage with the U.N.” So here you have it my friend; they are saying that America is so good it wants to engage with the UN but the world is so bad it keeps rebuking America's efforts and thus hurt the US, the UN and even the Palestinians.
And using the editorial comment as vehicle, they pretend to remind the world of the historical reasons why: “Ronald Reagan pulled the U.S. out of Unesco in 1984 after it became a byword for corruption and anti-Americanism.” As you can see, they invoke the name of Ronald Reagan to make a point he never intended to make. While he responded honestly to a situation in the way that he saw it, the point they are making is that if the world refuses to do what the Jews want it to do, it must be that the world is corrupt and also anti-American. The old man must be turning in his grave.
As to the Palestinians, wait till you see what they say about them. Here it is: “The Palestinians know the U.S. will block any Security Council bid, yet they continue … to force Washington to wield a veto … Mr. Abbas ... has expressly tried to embarrass the U.S.” You know what this means, dear reader? Let me tell you what it means. It means the editors of the Wall Street Journal believe that America is such a weakling, Washington can be forced by Abbas of Palestine to do something it would not normally do. Also, America is such a crybaby, it must feel embarrassed by the UNESCO vote and must cry like a baby.
Is this it? No, not yet; there is more. Now think of this, my friend: If Abbas -- who is the head of a powerless political authority under occupation -- can do this to America, think of what these people believe the God-like Netanyahu can do to a Congress that has been certified several times over to be made of pimps and prostitutes, madams and gigolos. Think about it and weep.
But they still have the temerity to remind the world that they hold the trump card. Well, it is not exactly they, but their alter egos. Here is how they put it: “Yet Mr. Abbas needs both Israel and the U.S. to gain independence.” Alas, they go on to lament that while Israel would have done the right thing to keep America entrenched in the column of pariahs, the Administration in Washington will be reluctant to do so. They put it this way: “None of this will shake the … conviction that the U.N. is the forum to solve … problems...”
And so they make a final appeal, one that sounds more like a distress call. They appeal to the American people to go against their own government, and keep their country in the column of pariahs. They put it this way: “[this] should show Americans what they are getting for their money at Turtle Bay.”
It is said that misery seeks company. You can add to it that pariah seeks the company of pariah.