Thursday, May 9, 2019

He pretends to see and gauge what's not there

Hate is a sentiment that cannot be gauged or quantified. Contrast that with most things in life which can be measured with a yardstick or weighed on a scale, thus assigned a number.

For example, if two things of a kind are assigned numbers such as 4 and 7, we immediately recognize that 7 is bigger than 4. We move from there to passing judgment as to what these numbers represent, and what conclusions we can draw. But this is something we cannot do with a sentiment such as hate. And yet, it is something the Jews pretend they can do, as you'll see in what Jonathan S. Tobin has just published.

He wrote: “Omar, Tlaib refuse to see Hamas' hate is same as the synagogue shooter's,” an article that was published on May 6, 2019 in the New York Post. What follows is a condensed version of how he explains that sameness or lack of it:

“Reps Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib rationalized and defended Hamas's responses. The reaction to synagogue shootings in America and rocket barrages in Israel shows the common thread of anti-Semitic hate linking white nationalists in the US to Mideast militants. The BDS movement, which Omar and Tlaib support, have the goal of destroying Israel. Omar asserted a moral equivalence between Israel's killing of little kids and the jihadist rockets. The blockade that both Egypt and Israel maintain on Gaza is quarantine on a terrorist entity that threatens the region”.

It is obvious from that passage that there is no way by which to ascertain if there is any kind of equivalence between the motivations animating the various parties in this multifaceted conflict. The only thing we can be certain of is that Jonathan Tobin has done the very thing for which the Jews have been gassed and incinerated throughout space and time. What he said that's odious, is that Egypt got together with Israel to maintain a blockade on Gaza, a jurisdiction he called a terrorist entity. But the truth is that Egypt did not get together with Israel on anything, and did not maintain an air or naval blockade on Gaza. What happened was something entirely different.

It had been the Jewish dream since 1967 to empty Gaza of its population by terrorizing its inhabitants. The end game of the criminal Jewish scheme was to force the people of Gaza to flee across the border into Egypt. That's when the Egyptians began to speak of Israel (not Gaza) as a terrorist entity. To make sure that the Judeo-Satanic scheme does not succeed, Egypt changed what used to be a lax border control with Gaza into a normal international level of border control. In fact, given the worldwide rise in acts of cross-border terrorism, Egypt has instituted border control measures with Libya, Sudan and Israel that are stricter than those with Gaza. And this does not constitute a land blockade on anyone.

So then, how can we evaluate hate, given that it has no tangible existence we can weigh or measure? Well, to assign a number to a manifestation of hate, we can do what scientists do when they know something is there, but they cannot see it. They do it by quantifying the effect it exerts on the things they can measure or weigh. For example, a black hole cannot be seen, but its mass can be determined mathematically by the effect it has on the stars and the other objects that wander near it.

Likewise, when it comes to hate, we know that it has an effect on human beings. There are two ways by which this effect manifests itself. There is the natural reflexive response––attributed to our animal instinct––which lasts a short period of time. And there is the longer lasting response––attributed to the manner of our nurture––which can take time to erase depending on the culture that nurtured it.

The hate that is manifested by a natural reflexive response, varies very little from one individual to another; from one ethnic group to another. As to the longer lasting culturally nurtured hate, it varies greatly from one culture to another. In fact, we find that Christians are the most forgiving people. Some go as far as instantly pray for those who did them wrong. The Muslims insist that some justice, even if it's only nominal, be done. But wait a year or two, and they will have forgotten all about the incident. As to the Jews, they maintain hate in their hearts forever. When you see them clamor for taking revenge on someone that's past the age of ninety years, because he stood guard at the gate of a concentration camp far away from here, three quarters of a century ago, you know they are motivated by hate that is infinite in intensity, and infinity in duration.

In short, you have the Christian hate that hovers around the zero mark, the Jewish hate that hovers around the infinity mark, and the Muslim hate that hovers around the 50/50 mark.

Now you know what the answer will be when you inquire: Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the most hateful of them all?