The oblivious sailor and the turbulent sea

 Suppose you learned that in a once-in-a-lifetime phenomenon, a turbulent kind of sea was about to happen, and that people were booking for a place on the ship that will go through the turbulence. You convinced yourself you were as brave as any of these people, and booked for a trip to go with them.

 

When the day of departure came, the sea looked calm for a while, the ship set sail, then the sea began to look agitated but there was no turning back. You visited the captain in his cabin and found him going over charts while drinking hard alcohol. You asked what provisions were there on the ship to save the passengers in case something bad happened. He ignored your question but pointed to an iceberg that was coming right at the ship. And he advised: Look how we’ll get around this one before it can hit us.

 

The ship avoided the iceberg, the captain steered it towards a gorge, and sailed between what looked like two mountainous chains. Rocks were sliding down from both mountains but the captain avoided being hit by any of them as he traced a snake-like evasive trajectory. A few miles of that, and the ship came to the end of the gorge. It now faced a wide open sea that was no less hostile, however.

 

In fact, islands were forming in three places ahead of the ship, to the left of it and to the right. In the formation of those islands, volcanic lava billowed way up in the air coming from the belly of the Earth, and falling into the sea near the ship. However, being experienced at guessing where the balls of fire will fall, the captain managed to protect the ship from being hit but failed to shield you from being scared.

 

Finally, the ship was transported by a tsunami that returned to port. You went home and sat down to write about your experience. The first two questions you asked were these: Why do some people do this? Was it worth it? Well, my friend, we can speculate as we try to answer these questions, or we can look at an actual case, and analyze it to see if it will yield useful answers.

 

In fact, we do have a case that may turn out to be useful. It came under the title: “No alternative to ‘peace through strength’ is preferrable to robust deterrence,” written by Clifford D. May, and published on March 28, 2023 in The Washington Times. Looking at the article with the critical eye of an analyst, we detect two separate narratives running parallel to each other. One narrative goes like this: There is a job we can do or ignore doing. The other goes like this: We may not be able to do the job, but no matter.

 

Here is what Clifford May says is the job that needs to be done:

 

“A policy of peace through strength means doing what is necessary to instill fear in our enemies. Peace through strength also means we have the power to defeat them decisively. US troops in the region have come under attack from Tehran-backed groups 78 times since the beginning of 2021. If you’re a proponent of peace through strength, the conclusion you draw is that deterrence has failed and that reestablishing deterrence must now be a top priority. Those who don’t see the situation this way are calling for a retreat from Syria — the response Iran’s theocrats intended to elicit. A US economy-of-force deployment in Syria enables America’s Kurdish and Arab allies to suppress the Islamic State. Abandon those allies, and the Islamic State revives”.

 

And so, Clifford May is suggesting that in the same way that people are challenged to climb a mountain because it is there, other people sail a sea because it is angry, and still others feel challenged by a rival that threatens their authority. And all these people respond as they see fit against circumstances that challenge them. But here is why Clifford May believes that America’s job may never be done:

 

“Tehran-backed militias attacked a US military outpost in Syria, killing one American contractor and wounding another, as well as wounding five US service members. US troops in the region have come under attack from Tehran-backed groups. The strategic error President Biden made in 2021 when he surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban. President Barack Obama made the same mistake when he withdrew from Iraq in 2011, giving rise to the Islamic State. Iran’s rulers are allied with Vladimir Putin. He’s giving them cyber weapons and dangling the possibility of fighter aircraft sales. Moscow and Tehran are also allied with China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping. He’s a man with a plan to replace the post-World War II Pax Americana with a Pax Sinica — a new world order with rules made in Beijing. Mr. Xi met with Mr. Putin in Moscow. They issued a statement warning the US to stop undermining international and regional security and global strategic stability in order to maintain its own unilateral military superiority. The Chinese Communist Party’s influence has been growing in Latin America and Africa as well. Mr. Xi’s brokering of detente between Iran and Saudi Arabia demonstrates that he’s successfully competing against the US in the Middle East too”.

 

What is puzzling about this passage is that Clifford May is demonstrating that America is losing in the game of rivalry it is playing against China. But instead of repudiating what he said was a job America needed to do — and seeking a “live and let live” accommodation with China — he let stand the rivalry that may well doom America.

 

What kind of logic is this?

Once Upon a Time there Was a True Story

 Those who are old enough to go back a decade or so with their memory, will remember a character named Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. A Jewish House Representative from Florida, she climbed on everyone’s back to finally occupy the Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. And that’s when she pulled her very Jewish stunt.

 

Growing up with the notion that to be Jewish is to instantly own what you covet, she concluded that since Israel coveted the money which America paid to other countries, Israel had the divine right to get that money instead. She had her eyes on Egypt that nevertheless was receiving very little from America in return for the great deal it was doing for America.

 

And so, abusing her position as Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen suggested that the money sent to Egypt should be sent to Israel instead. Fortunately for America and the world, there was someone sane in the Republican Party at the time, and they worked to kick Ros-Lehtinen out of her Chair, out of the GOP caucus, out of the Congress and out of politics altogether.

 

This being the best way to treat every similar case, it is unfortunate that there does not seem to be any sign pointing in that direction at this moment. In fact, in an ongoing case where the Jews and their coconspirators have already robbed me of my adult life — 20,000 days all together — they continue to work on robbing me of the compensation that may be due to me.

 

Information about that work started leaking out when, to buttress their case that I should be getting no compensation, the Jews launched a massive fearmongering campaign to scare people about what I am likely to do with the money if and when I receive it. They calculated a thousand dollars for every day that I was persecuted, would entitle me to 20 million dollars in compensation — which would be in line with a precedent that was set at 11 million dollars a few years back, awarded to a victim that the RCMP treated even less shabbily than myself.

 

To make sure I do not get that kind of compensation or any portion of it, or even a hint that I’m owed anything at all, the big honcho of superpower America came to Canada where he huddled with the Jews who masterminded the persecution plan that was imposed on me by the Canadian Government and the RCMP over the decades.

 

The American honcho and his huddled groupies decided that while mining the tangible ideas I’ll come up with as I attempt to break through the wall of silence that’s keeping me trapped — and use them to advance their other arguments — they will consider me “intangible” therefore non-existent. This being the case, they have a convincing excuse as to why they cannot give me what is owed to me. It is that, according to their modes of thinking, whereas you can take something out of nothing, you cannot give something to a nothing.

 

And so goes the true story of the Jews who managed to hypnotize the North American Continent, turning the subject of Human Rights into a game by which they try to intimidate others in the world, and seek to exploit each other at home.

 

As to those of us they wish to make disappear, they turned our Human Rights into a rotting corpse on which they feed like starving magots that haven’t eaten in centuries.

No longer in the interest of America

 Up until recently, anyone that wanted America to do something for them, would claim it was in the interest of America to do it.

 

For example, when it was good for Israel that a Liberal Democratic American administration cozy up to a right wing Brazilian Government, the Jews said it was good for America to cozy up to Brazil, and America did just that.

 

Apparently, this is beginning to change now, and the establishment of a more normal relationship between America and the rest of the world, promises to take place, even accelerate with the passage of time.

 

This development has the potential to become reality in the near future because the American President Joe Biden inadvertently opened the door for it to happen. What he did was play the traditional American game of waiting for Canada to find itself under duress, at which time he offered consolation in return for concessions in the other outstanding issues between the two countries.

 

The issue that has been bringing Canada under duress from time to time, was the traditional “Sword of Damocles” better known as Human Rights. Whereas most people believe that America uses that weapon only against its traditional foes, the reality is that America benefitted even more, using it against Canada.

 

Here is how events unfolded this time. I happened to mention that the late Queen of Britain snubbed Canada by refusing to read the Speech from the Throne in response to Canada refusing to end its persecution of me — as demanded by Jewish Central. That’s when Biden jumped into the fray and offered himself as a consolation prize to Canada’s parliamentarians. He would come to Canada, he said, and give a speech to its lawmakers.

 

Little did he know he was opening the door to a new era in America’s relationship with Canada, and potentially with the rest of the world. It is that America who could rely on the conspiracy of silence to blackmail Canada into offering concessions – or the wall of silence will be breached – can no longer use that weapon against Canada. Why is that, you ask? Because in speaking to Parliament, Biden gave every member of the Canadian Parliament the right to breach the wall of silence. And that include members of the opposition parties.

 

Thus, Joe Biden has made it possible for every Canadian member of Parliament to look in the eye of Jewish Central and say they are no longer bound to abide by the Jewish dogma to keep silent. In fact, no member even need to speak in Parliament about this matter. All they need to do is advise the Prime Minister that unless the Government of Canada ends its persecution of me within 3 days, he or she will raise the issue in Parliament, thus make it a permanent record of Canada’s history. And you’ll see the Prime Minister rush to cover his rear end.

 

This was not done before because Canada was truly a police state governed, not by a parliament, but an RCMP force that destroyed those who dared to disobey the Jewish dogma. But the RCMP has now been destroyed and rendered harmless, leaving Canada a little closer to being a normal country like any other.

 

Until recently, the thinking was that Canada, the rotting cadaver that’s consumed by the Jewish magots who killed it — could only rid itself of the scourge which compelled it to pretend being the most immaculate of virgins when it came to respecting Human Rights — by having an election and choosing a new government.

 

But this has suddenly changed because Joe Biden inadvertently made it possible for every member of the Canadian Parliament to act on this subject if they feel they were suckered for too long already by the Americans, and they wish to see the situation end once and for all.

 

Rather than being fixated on what’s in the interest of America, these Parliamentarians should begin to think in terms of what’s in the interest of Canada. It’s their duty; what they were elected to do.

Once lost, can moral authority be regained?

 You’ll find in many languages a variation on the saying which goes as follows: “The truth comes out the mouths of children.” What it means to convey is that we are all endowed at birth with a valuable gift, that of telling he truth and avoid telling what’s false.

 

But when a child is reprimanded for doing something that adults find objectionable, the child will not hesitate to lie, which he’ll do by protesting he did not commit the act he is accused of committing. It is obvious therefore that the instinct for self-preservation is stronger in a child than the gift of telling the truth.

 

Because moral authority is acquired by telling the truth no matter what consequences will result from being morally upright, that authority can be lost by telling a single lie or by repeating it in an effort to embellish it. And so, the question is this: Can moral authority be regained once it has been squandered?

 

We may be about to encounter the answer to that question because a situational windfall was handed to us not long ago. It happened that a Tweddle Dee and a Tweddle Dum of the North American political scene, who used to go around preaching the virtues of respecting the Human Rights of others, proved to have been squandering their moral authority by doing worse than lie. They went around trampling on the Human Rights of others like there was no tomorrow.

 

It happened that in building on a long tradition of stealing from the talented the ideas that augment their meager talent, the Tweddle pair tripped themselves this time by making the move that gave them away. Having the mathematical acumen of a toddler, they failed to see that 20,000 is 20 times larger than 1,000, which means 20 times more important. And yet, what the mathematical illiterates did was rebuke the Government of China for stealing a 1,000 days from the life of some people while ignoring the 20,000 days they themselves have been stealing from the life of someone they envy.

 

As a result of encountering that the Tweddle pair are more ignorant than they are malicious, can their slip be forgiven, and their moral authority restored to them out of pity for their mental deficiency? The answer is that we must not do that because if we do, we’ll discourage them from working on acquiring the knowledge that’s necessary for them to stand by the communities they were elected to serve. It is that 20,000 is bigger than 1,000, and they must have this reality drummed into their heads before they can rely on any level of authority before ordering that things be done the way they see fit.

 

This is not mere conjecture because the evidence is in to the effect that the people who were referred to as the Eastern Europeans, are growing restless about their being drawn into an alliance that turned out to be a lie. They were told that the Western Alliance stood on the rule of law but found it to be standing on the principle of getting around the law. They were told this was an alliance that stood for meritocracy but found it standing on the principle of stealing from the talented to augment the deficiencies of the untalented and enrich them at the expense of others. They were told this was an alliance that stood on the truth but found it to be the mother of all lies.

 

And while the restlessness of the newly recruited members, is working itself into a movement that does not bode well for the future of the Western Alliance, an alternative Eastern Alliance, made of the previous Third World countries, is coalescing into a formidable group. It is doing all that’s needed to attract to its side the disappointed members of the Western Alliance, succeeding slowly but surely at growing at the expense of the latter. And the latter is visibly reducing from being all of the Western Alliance to becoming a mere Anglo Alliance comprising the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and no more.

 

There was a time when the NATO Alliance was opposed by the Warsaw Pact Bloc. The situation was not ideal, but the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction maintained the peace till the dissolution of that setup. What we have now is an expanding NATO with a vast appetite, and a warring Russia that keeps gobbling the small countries surrounding it to deny them to NATO. So the question that we need to ask: Is there a way to reverse this trend and return the world to the bipolar state it enjoyed during the Cold War?

 

The answer is that we need not return to the status quo ante to feel secure again. What we can do is impress upon the dwellers of the Anglosphere that if they insist on stretching their hypocritical wings and exploiting every situation to serve their interests at the expense of others, their days as a power to be reckoned with will be numbered.

 

The East is rising, and like the old days, it will again serve to orient the West, taking it onto the path of moral rectitude.

A Democracy of Exploitation still on the Roll

 I was 13 years of age at the time, of Egyptian origin living in a French colony at a time when France had teamed up with other jurisdictions to fight against Egypt.

 

All I knew from my earlier experiences, was that wars were bad things, having watched the expression of horror on the faces of adults as they reacted to the Korean and Vietnam wars. Was I supposed to feel sadder now that Egypt, which I left at the age of 20 months of age, was involved in a war? Or was I supposed to sing the songs taught in school, proclaiming that Alsace and Lorrain were French territories that the German are trying to steal?

 

No matter. I was too young to think of these things at the time, but the trouble with me, is that many of the things which left an impression on me as a youngster, lingered on in my memory and kept nagging me as I grew older, as if determined that I should find an explanation for them by a more developed intellect.

 

One of those things were the rumors that circulated among the French adults, to the effect that the Americans were happy to see the Egyptians blockade the Suez Canal on the advice of the Soviets. This delayed the business of the Western European nations which suited the Soviets just fine. But what about the Americans? Why were they happy? Were they not allied with the Western Europeans?

 

Yes, they were. But what I learned as an adult was that alliances of convenience do form on the basis of both sides hating a third party. The two will remain loyal to each other on the surface, but will rejoice to see the other guy (moral sibling) suffer a mishap that will reduce his “competitive edge.” Thus, while the Americans were denouncing the blockading of the Canal, they were applauding the move.

 

And then I came to Canada, and saw time after time how that reality played itself in the everyday life of nations.

 

It all began with the speechwriters of Ronald Reagan. I found them to be the most prolific at mining what I wrote, and attributing the ideas to their boss. But the old man himself did not shy away from using me to exploit the situation, deriving benefits for America at Canadian expense. Reagan did it by telling the Canadian Government he will soften his demands with regard to the contentious issues of softwood lumber only if Canada ended the problem of my persecution, knowing that Canada will not do it.

 

It happened again when the issue of packaging meat, and the trade thereof between the two countries, came up. There too, America won the dispute because Canada refused to end its persecution of me in return for a softening of America’s demand. In fact, things got so bad in Western Canada, desperate people began to commit suicide, and the honchos of the Canadian Government did not care. Here too, America derived benefits for itself at the expense of Canada.

 

And then, it happened one more time with the dairy industries. This time it was the farmers of Quebec and Ontario who were most affected. They were so desperate in Quebec, several committed suicide, and others shot their cows in the head in plain view of journalists. But the Canadian Government refused to end its persecution of me in return for the lives of farmers and their cows. Here again, America derived benefits for itself at the expense of Canada.

 

A while ago I asked if advocating for human rights by those who call themselves Liberal Democrats, was not a stunt meant to misinform and disinform the normal world as to what was really going on inside the loops of silence that shield those jurisdictions. Well, that question has been answered now. The whole thing has been one giant hoax, and so it remains to this day.

Guess who is slated to win this time.

They were confused then. They deny it today

 How do Americans see themselves and others in the new world that’s shaping in front of them?

 

To answer that question, we may consult a number of articles, all published recently, that paint a near comprehensive picture of what preoccupies the elites of that country at this time.

 

Jed Babbin, whose interest is America’s place in the world, wrote about: “China’s Saudi-Iran gambit,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “The Saudi-Iranian deal brokered by China is in conflict with the Abraham Accords.” It was published on March 18, 2023 in The Washington Times. Here, in condensed form, is what Babbin thinks:

 

“China has established itself as a major player in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia and Iran agreed to recommence diplomatic relations after a four-day summit meeting in Beijing. Iran remains the world’s biggest sponsor of terrorism. China’s Saudi-Iran deal is a direct reflection of Mr. Biden’s weakness. China isn’t done interfering in the Middle East. China is also seeking to increase its influence in South America. If Mr. Biden were a strong leader, he would be answering China’s overheated rhetoric in calm, strong words. But Mr. Biden is not a strong leader. China will continue to increase its Middle East influence without American opposition while Mr. Biden sleepwalks to war with China”.

 

Clearly, what Jed Babbin wants to see is a firmer if not more aggressive American foreign policy. It is one that will make China—America’s current rival if not adversary—think twice before going deep into places which America considers vital to its interests. But Babbin reminds the readers that according to him and others like him, Iran is the world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism. When China teams with it; when it seeks to increase its influence in South America and when its leaders encounter a weak American President, bad thinks can result. How bad would that be? As bad as start a war with China, he goes on to explain.

 

Thomas Lifson is even harsher on President Joe Biden. He wrote an article that came under the title: “Calamity Joe,” and the subtitle: “Geopolitical Catastrophes Multiply as American Power and Influence Crash to New Postwar Lows.” It was published on March19, 2023 in the American Thinker. Here, in condensed form, is how Lifson sees things:

 

“In two years, Joe Biden has produced multiple catastrophes. Domestically, we see the banking system teetering on insolvency as a rapid escalation in interest rates was triggered by his jihad against domestic oil, gas, and coal production. The potential for serious damage to the American people from the military and diplomatic policies is even worse. The administration is flirting with a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China. And as the potential increases, resources for America to counter the threat are diminishing. In addition, Xi Jinping is visiting Moscow, the two being opposed to American hegemony. They seek to replace the dollar as the world reserve currency by other rising powers. And there is the insane drawdown of our stocks of ammunition, missiles, and other weapons of war, sent to a dictator in Ukraine. This denuding of critical resources continues, even as China and Russia strengthen their positions, and China openly continues a massive military buildup aimed at conquering Taiwan”.

 

Thus, Thomas Lifson sees nothing that’s redeeming in the character of his President Joe Biden or in the work that he is doing. On the contrary, Lifson sees Biden as being such a catastrophic figure, he ruined the banking system, at the domestic level. As to the international level, Lifson sees Biden as having opened the door for China and Russia to replace the dollar at being the world’s reserve currency. Worse, Biden has allowed America’s arsenals to be depleted at a time when Russia and China are replenishing theirs, says Thomas Lifson.

 

As to Daniel R. DePetris, he looked at things from a different angle. He wrote an article which came under the title: “The Iraq Campaign,” and the subtitle: “The public was given talking points and PR before the war.” It was published on March 16, 2023 in National Review Online. Here, in condensed form, is what Daniel DePetris has in mind:

 

“Driven by sensationalism, fear, hubris, and naïveté in the making of policy,” President of the United States George W. Bush was snookered into believing that the President of Iraq Saddam Hussein had developed weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Bush’s speech on the eve of the war was the culmination of a monthslong, highly disciplined public-relations strategy to convince the American public and the international community that Saddam was an imminent threat to US interests. At a time when the American people deserved a rigorous debate about whether war was necessary, the mainstream media repeated what they deemed credible, irrefutable administration talking points. Advocates of the war in Iraq defend the misadventure to this day. But the record is clear: The regime-change campaign was the worst US foreign-policy mistake since Lyndon Johnson’s Vietnam troop surge nearly four decades earlier”.

 

Thus, it is clear that Daniel DePetris believes that the Iraq War was committed as a result of malicious advocates orchestrating a highly disciplined public-relations strategy to convince the American public that Saddam was an imminent threat to US interests. And these advocates defend the misadventure to this day despite the record which shows it was the worst US foreign-policy mistake since Lyndon Johnson’s Vietnam troop surge nearly four decades earlier, says DePetris.

 

But who were those malicious advocates? And are they still the same today? We meet them when we read the article that came under the title: “Why the Iraq War Felt Right,” and the subtitle: “On the distorting influence of the ‘manly virtues.’” It was written by Tanner Greer and published on March 16, 2023 in National Review Online. Here, in condensed form, is what Greer had to say:

 

“The Left never found it difficult to explain the catastrophe of Iraq. They are free to blame the disastrous course of our war on deception and malice. Younger rightists dodge the war-taint by blaming everything on a ghoulish cabal of neoconservatives. This is a comforting narrative. Blaming the neocons leaves a crucial question unasked: How could dreamers convince the rest of us that this venture was worth it? The place to start is the late 1990s. For intellectuals, this was an age of sterile prosperity. The picture was particularly glum for men. For conservative intellectuals, politics offered no reprieve from humdrum modernity. The American Right began this century adrift. Conservatives yearned for something — anything — that would ground their politics and their manhood in something more meaningful than the stock ticker. For a brief, shining moment it felt as if the War on Terror might provide that grounding. Here was an escape hatch from unwelcome modernity”.

 

As can be seen, Tanner Greer agrees that the Iraq War was a catastrophe. But who was to blame for it? Well, without any of the other writers blaming the neocons, Tanner Greer came out bellowing that it was not the neocons. He thus proved that it was the neocons through and through. In fact, he named a few individuals who made up the neocon cabal at the time.

 

They were: Paul Wolfowitz, Irving Kristol, David Brooks and Max Boot among others. They may not all be there now, but they were at the time, and they made the catastrophe happen.

The Fable behind the Story

 Imagine we’re standing facing each other and you slap my face for no apparent reason. I instinctively insult you calling you an animal, and then characterize you as being a blind bat.

 

Three things happened here: There was the slap, the insult and the characterization. Which one of the three would you say hurt the most? There is no doubt about it, the slap hurt the most.

 

This is an analogy of what has been going on during the last three months. First, my Human Rights had been raped for 20,000 days prior, and continues to be raped by a gang that’s composed of the Canadian Government and what may be called Jewish Central. Second, I insulted the culprits, calling them primitives among other such names. Third, I characterized the Jews as being the magots who killed my Human Rights to feed on the resulting cadaver.

 

Which of the three approaches would you say hurt the most? Was it the 20,000 days of psychological torture? Or was it my calling primitive both the Canadian Government and the Jews? Or was it my characterization of the Jews as being magots? There is no doubt about it, the torture hurt the most.

 

Word has reached me to the effect that “the world” is so incensed about my calling the Jews magots, the act has earned me the denial of justice I would have been eligible to receive for what the Jews, in cahoots with the Canadian Government, have inflicted on me when they robbed me of my entire adult life.

 

What’s that about? It’s about the Jewish philosophy of life which says that they, being the chosen children of God, can do anything they want and be forgiven for it however outrageous it may be. Not only are the Jews discharged from being reprimanded, they are owed the love of humanity for who they are, and no questions asked.

 

As to the rest of us inferior beings, we call each other, hawks and doves. Mad dogs and tender pussycats. Foxes and crazy foxes. Snakes and weasels … and you get the idea. But what does that mean? It means that we use these analogies to convey to the listener the idea that the human being we are characterizing has taken on the character that’s normally attributed to the animal we just mentioned. Giving one such image saves us a great deal of explanation.

 

It must be said, however, that whereas some people use that approach to express themselves, other people lack the talent to create the “fable” by which to express what they have on their mind.

 

I happen to have the talent that helps me devise a story by which to express the most intricate of situations. I was born with it, I studied it at the college level, and I have been practicing it during my entire adult life even though I was deprived from earning a living doing so, by the activities of the Canadian Government and Jewish Central.

 

Continuing to create stories in my head even when I had no hope of seeing them published, took on an inordinate urgency due to the circumstances in which I found myself. You see, my friend, in the same way that people who find themselves in similar circumstances — and they take up a solitary hobby such as playing chess on both sides of the board to keep themselves sane — I kept myself from falling into the trap of committing a crazy act to draw attention to my plight or whatever.

 

In fact, this is precisely what the RCMP was pushing me to do on advice from the Jews who wanted to be vindicated. And they would have been because they wanted to claim they maintained the torture of me for that length of time because they knew I was capable of committing such act given enough time.

 

I beat them at their game, and kept sane by making fables about them in my head – fables that involved sometimes vicious animals, and sometimes less vicious ones.

What did not kill them made them stronger

 Imagine a Rambo kind of character standing on the dead bodies of the innocent multitude he and his clan massacred. He tells the world how magnificently virtuous his clan has been and will continue to be whereas everyone else in the world has been rotten to the core, and planning to get worse. So you ask, who is that character?

 

He is the Jewish American who succeeded in hypnotizing America’s elites, especially those in charge of governance, be they in politics and having their hands on the levers of power, or be they in journalism and having the leverage by which to pressure the politicians, and tell them what to do.

 

 America’s triumph in World War II gave the Jews  the opportunity to dominate that country in a way that was not foreseen at the time. It is that, elated by victories in Europe and the Pacific, the Americans felt so confident, they dropped their guards not thinking that the enemy within will turn out to be more destructive than the enemy without whom they just defeated.

 

Sure enough, the Jews proceeded to infiltrate America the way they did other nations over the centuries, and started to work on preventing the elites from working to serve their own people, devoting their attention instead to serve the interests of Israel — the occupied land of Palestine that the so-called Jewish people stole and turned into a base of operation out of which they work to realize the dream of conquering the world.

 

But while the Jews got busy working to build Israel into a fortress that can realize the dream for them, the world that used to be bipolar and became multipolar began to turn bipolar again. This happened when the war in Ukraine brought the Western Alliance tightly together on the one hand, and brought the opposing forces of Russia and China together into an Eastern Alliance on the other hand. Other nations, such as Iran, that were mistreated by the West, began to rally to the side of the Eastern Alliance.

 

Clifford D. May teamed up with Walter R. Newell to offer a shared point of view with regard to those developments. They wrote an article that came under the title: “China, Russia and Iran,” and the subtitle: “Axis of Tyrannies presents enormous challenge to free nations.” The article was published on March 14, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

After a short introduction that invoked historical events having to do with the birth of the word “axis”, Newell and May concluded that: “Today, a new axis has emerged. We might call it the Axis of Tyrannies.” And they went on to report that The Russian and Chinese leaders signed an agreement tying their countries into an ironclad strategic cooperation.

 

But given that this is a mirror image of the Western Alliance — in fact, one that was prompted if not necessitated by the emergence and strengthening of the Western Alliance — what’s the beef according to Newell and May? Well, we look for an answer to that question in their article, and find the following passage, reprinted here in condensed form:

 

“While differing, these tyrants subscribe to an authoritarian and collectivist vision of society. They are hostile to America and to Enlightenment values of individual rights and democratic governance. Modern tyrants, like ancient tyrants, wage war to win glory. But modern tyrants also have an ideological mission. They require the submergence of the individual in the collective through the progressive transformation of human nature. That is why Mussolini, a fascist dictator, praised communist dictator Vladimir Lenin as a ‘sculptor of men’”.

 

But beside being a hollow diatribe attacking those who are hostile to America, what does that say to enlighten the readers on matters that pertain to “authoritarian and collectivist vision,” to “individual rights and democratic governance,” and to “submergence of the individual in the collective”? It says nothing. These are pompous words meant to impress without informing.

 

Without elaborating on what those stances in governance do to the citizens that live under them, Newell and May went on to tell what they suspect such leaders as Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping seek to accomplish. Here is what they wrote in this regard:

 

“For Mr. Putin, the goal is the ‘new world’ of a Eurasianist empire; for Mr. Xi, the ceaseless extension of his totalitarian ‘social credit blueprint and the replacement of the American-led liberal international order with one that is illiberal and whose rules are made in Beijing; for Mr. Khamenei, the restoration of a powerful new Islamic empire. We believe today’s Allies have no more important mission than to stand up to today’s Axis and prevent it from achieving its goals. Whether Allied leaders and those who vote them into office will see that as their priority is difficult to predict”.

 

The Newell and May discussion is a typical example of the Jewish haggling that’s done with a captive audience. It allows the presenters to empty what weighs on their chests while ignoring the audience’s concerns. Thus, instead of addressing the many problems plaguing America today, Newell and May took up the favorite subject of the Jews: Iran.

 

But all that the coauthors could do in the rest of their long article, was to show that it was Israel’s antics that forced Iran to transform itself into a technological and military colossus.

Canada’s rape of a powerless citizen continues

Canada’s rape of its citizens will continue as long as the Jewish hypnosis machine will remain in operation telling it what to do. It is therefore important to understand how that machine rose, and how its demise can be brought about, thus end the rape and make Canada a normal country worthy of membership in the family of nations.

 

It all begins with surveillance. From Campus Watch to watching Canada perform on the international scene, Jewish Central has eyes on every rookie that has the potential to rise within the group or the institution with which he or she is affiliated. Getting detailed information about the individual, Jewish Central puts together a program to recruit them or destroy them if they reject being recruited by the Jews.

 

I know this to be true because it happened to me both at the journalistic and political levels. In fact, when I first wrote a letter to the editor of a major newspaper, I was visited at home by a member of the Jewish Congress who warned me against contacting the media. And when I continued to do so anyway, my case got involved in the kind of politics that renders everything unworkable.

 

When much later on, I started a newspaper in a small town, I was visited by a Jew who made sure I understood he was speaking in the name of a rabbi. In fact, he told me that if I got into trouble I could contact his organization, and it will bail me out. But for this to happen I must write him a letter as soon as possible asking him to design the layout of my newspaper to make it look professional, and print it for me. I never contacted him, but got praises from everywhere for my own design of my newspaper.

 

After 15 years of blogging on this site, I sent out articles to various publications to see if their editors were still obeying the Jewish order to keep me on the blacklist — and I found them to be as complying as a well trained dog whose sole purpose in life is to make his master happy.

 

Whereas most of the publishers say they will print the article in a week or so if they are interested, otherwise I’m free to consider another publication, there were two exceptions to this rule. One responded by telling me never to contact them again because they are not interested in my work. Another publication considered me a potential donor, and spammed me with their articles at the end of each of which they asked me to donate money. But they never commissioned me to write an article for them to publish.

 

In addition, during the time that I had the newspaper, I was both visited by Jews who didn’t know who I was, and I visited Jewish business owners who were advertising in other newspapers. They too didn’t know who I was at first and so, we discussed doing an advertising campaign for them. Having heard from other advertisers about the added business they were getting from advertising in my paper, they took the deal on the spot or promised to discuss the matter with their partners, and call me back later.

 

What they all did right after talking to me, was contact the rabbi in the nearest synagogue to check if it would be kosher to do business me. They were told absolutely not. Those that had not agreed on anything on the spot did not call back, whereas those that had agreed, called to cancel the agreement. This reminded me of what happened years earlier in Montreal, but that’s another story to be discussed at another time.

 

And so, while my name remains on the blacklist, the wall of silence is maintained by those who describe themselves as being defenders of free speech. That would be the venerated journalists who ring out the alarm about the sounds of distress they say they hear coming from victims in foreign countries, yet hear nothing but lovely music when their ears are pierced with the groaning of local victims.

 

This is when the politicians run to cover their asses. Instead of working to solve the problem from which they are trying to protect themselves in case it becomes a cause célèbre, they start blaming others, which they did in my case by kicking the Israeli ambassador out of Canada, and by firing the Commissioner of the RCMP. They also worked to embellish their image. In fact, this is what they have been doing since I broke the story inside the loop where I am trapped.

 

As to the big honcho who goes by the name Justin Trudeau – the one supposed to run the Canadian Government – he is still going around touting Canada’s superior Human Rights record when in fact, it is nothing more than a cadaver killed by the Jewish magots who feed on it now.

 

Thus, Trudeau announced that he earmarked billions of dollars to compensate the native tribes for what Canada has done to them. And he told of the new projects that were to open soon in Mississauga, a region that encompasses the district where I live. But nothing was said about what he is doing or will do with regard to my case.

 

One recent development: It was announced that President Joe Biden of the United States will soon visit Ottawa and speak to the Canadian Parliament. If this is a stunt meant to mimic what the late Queen of England had done when she tried to coax Jean Chretien to end the madness, Joe Biden will have made a great service if he convinced Trudeau to end the madness before he gets to Ottawa. But he will have given his blessings to an ongoing criminal act if he gave the speech and nothing happened. The Queen avoided falling into this trap by cancelling her appearance in Parliament and going home.

 

Where does Joe Biden stand? Promoting crimes against Human Rights? Or standing for morality?

The insane repetition of what keeps failing

 I was a freshman in college at the start of the era during which the Personal Computer (PC) proliferated.

 

This was the time when I learned what experiment you can do to determine the level of intelligence enjoyed by whatever it is you’re assessing.

 

What you did was count the number of times that the subject whose intelligence you’re measuring would repeat an action that does not change anything – before abandoning it.

 

I learned that the computer sits at the bottom rung because it is devoid of indigenous intelligence. The proof is that if you program it to display a sequence and replay it, the computer will do so indefinitely.

 

At a higher step sit the birds that make nests with mud and straws. If, while the bird is away fetching building material, you break a piece of the nest, the bird will repair the damage before doing anything else. And if you keep breaking that same piece, the bird will keep repairing it — but not forever. It will get tired eventually and abandon the repair job, if not the nest itself.

 

At a step higher than the bird, sits the human being. If he tries something and fails, he may try it once or twice more to make sure he’s going about it the right way. If that does not yield a different result, the human will summon the full force of his intellect to find out why this is happening, then works on fixing what’s there to be fixed or change his approach entirely.

 

There is however one small exception to that last case. It is that a group of humans calling themselves Jews respond to something that repeats itself the way that a computer-controlled robot does. In fact, Jews keep repeating the same mistake an insane number of times. They get the same catastrophic response each time and never relent.

 

Two recent articles that were written by Jews, highlight that reality. One article came under the title: “I’ve Been Asked to Help Tackle Antisemitism at George Washington University,” and the subtitle: “Here’s What I Plan to Do.” It was written by Sabrina Soffer and published on March 13, 2023 in Algemeiner. The other article came under the title: “The Biden White House Drove the Saudis into China’s Arms” and the subtitle: “Now the Saudis have fully repaid Biden for his spitefulness, and then some.” It was written by Noah Rothman and published on March 13, 2023 in National Review Online.

 

Reading the two articles, you get deeply disappointed because of what they show and what they fail to show. What the articles show, is that the Jews have not changed their approach in centuries. What they fail to show is that the Jews are not even disposed to change despite a long history of insanely repeating the same mistakes and getting the same catastrophic responses.

 

Sabrina Soffer begins her presentation by quoting others – with whom she agrees – who said that “political debates” are self-defeating. Why is that, you ask? She explains that “the emotional and often-times ‘uncritical’ approach aggravates partisan divides.” But the reality is that what Soffer has called “debate” is no debate. It is the haggling of interlocuters, disguised as debate. It is talking past each other without addressing the concerns of the other interlocuter.

 

Unable to differentiate between civilized debate and Jewish haggling, Sabrina Soffer proceeded with her presentation. She did so, not by sticking to the rules of debate but sticking to those of the haggle. That is, she did not take into account the concerns of humanity with regard to the Jewish attitude of constantly projecting the supremacist image of Jews and Israel as being perfect. This makes them the envy of an imperfect world — they insidiously intimate — a world that needs the Jew who will impose on it the Hebrew tikkun olam, thus make it safer for the Jews, and better for all of humanity.

 

In fact, it is this Jewish attitude that called on her to get involved and tackle antisemitism at the university where she and other “campus watchers” do more than watch what the students say and do. They also watch the professors in the classrooms, and do not hesitate to interrupt them if they feel that the professors did not paise Israel enough or did not condemn Israel’s chosen enemy of the day.

 

As to Noah Rothman, his advice to President Biden is that he should stick to the Jewish tried an proven to fail strategy of repeating the ballistic approach of ploughing his way in the realm of foreign policy with no plan B, and no course correction in case Plan A proves inadequate. His article is nothing more than a dissertation that voices the Jewish lamentation about a Biden administration being hostile to Saudi Arabia at a time when the Jews of Israel would give an arm and a leg to get access to that country using the American institutions that work for Israel pretending to work for America.

 

The following is a condensed version of what Rothman says which shows that his ultimate concern is the suppression of the Palestinian effort to regain some form of control over their stolen homeland:

 

“Foreign-policy analysts are concerned by the setback to America’s strategic efforts to foster the development of an anti-Iranian bloc of nations in the Middle East. From Day One, the White House made it a priority to alienate the Saudi government. Biden leaned into the notion that there could be no enduring peace in the region without a resolution to the many outstanding issues in the Palestinian territories. ‘While we support normalization between Israel and countries in the Arab world,’ State Department spokesman Ned Price clarified, ‘it’s also not a substitute for Israeli–Palestinian peace’’’.

 

No matter what disguise these people use to pretend they work for America, something about them gives them away, showing them to be disloyal agents working for Israel, their number one priority.

Doubling down on the crime hurts the alliance

What can be more dangerous than a horrific crime committed by a jurisdiction that claims to live by the system of Liberal Democracy?

 

Well, what can be more dangerous is the aftermath of the crime because the expectation at the start would have been that the crime will be kept hidden behind a wall of silence, never to be revealed to the public.

 

However, it can happen that rumors of a possible leak, and hints that someone is about to punch a hole in the wall of silence, sends the shiver down the spine of the perpetrators. The bigger the crime committed, the bigger the shiver that shakes and chills their spines. The gang rape (physical, moral, of Human Rights or some such), being among the most horrific of crimes, the gang also worries that the victim, which is both the witness and living proof that a crime was committed, will tell the world what happened.

 

This being the moment when the rapists think deeply, and they seriously debate whether or not they should kill the victim to bury the secret with it, is the moment that was reached by the unspeakable gang of criminals who continue to maintain their persecution of me. They are the Justin Trudeau Government of Canada, its security apparatus and the worldwide syndicate calling itself World Jewry — all in cahoots with those who claim to adhere to the highest level of moral standard established by Western ideals, and codified to ascertain the respect of everyone’s Human Rights.

 

Apparently that multitude of “Western Liberal Democrats” in politics and the media, believes that to hunker down and wait for the problem to go away by itself, can be as virtuous as standing up for the rights of those being victimized under their noses and in plain view of the world. But the reality is that the gang of criminals is engaged in doubling down on the rape of my Human Rights.

 

If so, how does the horror manifest itself? It does when I make the case that the omerta must end, but instead of reacting in a way that would respond to my presentation, you see Justin Trudeau run around and attack China’s government, accusing it of committing SERIOUS breaches of protocol when, in fact, such breaches are known to have been made for decades but considered so minor, were shrugged off as of no consequence.

 

When a scene of this sort is repeated, people describe it as being “interlocuters talking past each other.” It happens to be the model of haggling which the Jews follow to appear as being more democratic than the Western democrats thus claim they are the envy of the world. But the reality is that when haggling replaces true democracy, the Western Alliance weakens, and the competition strengthens.

 

To get a sense of all this, look around. The pillars of a civilization being the rule of law and the equitable distribution of the wealth, you’ll find that the parliamentarians of Democracies who make the laws are outnumbered exponentially by the accountants who work – not to respect the law but to get around it, thus avoid or minimize the amount of taxes paid. Similarly, top notch lawyers train – not to respect the law but to get around it, thus secure favorable verdicts for their clients. This boils down to the public being caught in a “talk past each other” match involving (1) the ineffective lawmakers, (2) the accounting professionals who turn their profession into a tool they use to subvert the law, and (3) the legal professionals who also turn their profession into a tool they use to subvert the law — activities in which they are allowed to engage yet remain “legal”.

 

Nothing says more about this state of affairs than the scene of an America which sends its young men and women abroad to kill and be killed in the name of installing regimes of Liberal Democracy around the world. This in itself is so immoral, America has no right to engage in it and must stop. Worse still, is that the surviving boys and girls of America’s wars return home to a life of destitution, living on the streets of big cities, often wallowing in their own defecation, and alleviating the pain of their existence by gobbling and injecting drugs that worsen their situation and hasten their ultimate demise.

 

As to the effect on Canada of the democratic debate being replaced by the Jewish style haggling, the recent bursting of the blimp — which Canada has been inflating for decades with talk of being the most immaculate of the virtuous — has exposed the reality of the situation. It is that of a government that’s engaged in the business of persecuting its own citizens to please a foreign crime syndicate. It exposed rotting Canadian entrails being consumed by foreign magots; an image that is no less revolting than America’s homeless veterans wallowing in their own defecations.

 

The two North American scenes being caused by the same worldwide crime syndicate, we must ask the question: What will it take to fix a situation that’s already untenable yet further degrades day after day? In so doing, it risks to implode with a force so destructive, it will raze the neighborhood and cause more damage well beyond it.

 

The answer to that question is that transparency is what’s needed at this time because it will vanquish the wall of silence and bury the Jewish haggling. This will bring back the authentic democratic debate; that which guided its adherents for a period of two centuries with great success.

 

What happened subsequently, was that Democracy succumbed to the hypnotic appeal of the Jewish haggling which infected it with a paralyzing disease. In time, the entire Western Alliance was brought down to its knees, to a scene in which one government is observed to persecute its own citizens, and another scene in which returning war veterans wallow in their defecation, having bombed innocent families in far away places.

 

The time is now to reverse that trend, or the opportunity to do so will vanish forever taking with it every vestige of Western Civilization.

 

Do you have the brains to grasp any of that, Justin Trudeau?

Forecast of reversal begun by the new Cold War

 Lawrence J. Korb and Stephen Cimbala cowrote an article whose title asks the question: “Has a New Cold War Already Begun?” The subtitle goes on to make this assertion: “Who prevails in the Ukraine war will determine whether international law, consensual government, and human decency will thrive and succeed.” The article was published on March 10, 2023 in The National Interest.

 

It is obvious that “rule of law” and “decency,” which are invoked in the subtitle, are meant to apply to what’s now called the “Western Democracies.” By implication, it also means that in the opinion of the writers, most if not all of the other jurisdictions are lawless and indecent. Can this be true or has there been a reversal in the supposed account of the reality that’s unfolding at this time?

 

To argue their point, Korb and Cimbala begin the discussion by offering the following account of history as to what has transpired up to now. It is here reproduced in condensed form:

 

“During the Cold War, some anticipated a third world war that could involve a global nuclear holocaust between Russians and Americans. A failure of deterrence between the two sides, would have put at risk the entirety of human civilization. Ronald Reagan then seized the moment to work with the Soviet Union. But the Russian response to the US-led Western support of Ukraine today has increased the risk of a broader conflict”.

 

The writers further claim that consensual government prevails in a region that is now free but was once part of the former Soviet Union. It is currently under attack, they say, by a Russia that’s carrying on with a war which risks to destroy political legitimacy and human rights in those countries. Korb and Cimbala go on to ascertain that the war has attracted warriors from around the globe, who come to do battle with ideas, economic strategies, and kinetic weapons.

 

The writers reveal that what concerns them most, are the intentions of Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, and what they speculate could be the grand design he is entertaining in his imagination for restructuring the global order. It is that for this to happen, the Western system of Liberal Democracy will have to be destroyed thus make room for Putin’s concoction.

 

Added to these worries, are those of a rising China that’s now forming a long term strategic alliance with Russia. Korb and Cimbala explain that the synergy which will be generated by this coming together, will more than compensate for the failure of the former Soviet Union to dominate the world economically, therefore its failure to dominate militarily as well. This was due, say the writers, to the reality that the Soviet system closed itself to the world and stagnated in isolation.

 

By contrast, say Korb and Cimbala, the rulers of China opened their country to the world. Having suffered a century of humiliation at the hands of the Western powers, they launched the Cultural Revolution of the 1950s during which time they filled their people with the limitless ambition to catch up with and surpass those who suppressed them and kept them backward. The result of this effort is that the Chinese trajectory into the future now looks like the flawless flight of a rocket racing its way toward the firmament of a promising new tomorrow — not only for the Chinese themselves but also for those, like Russia’s Vladimir Putin, who now share their vision.

 

But why is that project bound to succeed at a time when the Western Powers who oppose it—tightly united as they are in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)—seem to have the upper hand in the war that’s unfolding in Ukraine? The answer to that question jumps at you when you read the juxtaposed two paragraphs that follow. They are the condensed version of excerpts lifted from the Korb and Cimbala article. Here is the first paragraph:

 

“Putin sees the democratic West as offering to the world a decadent set of political and moral guidelines and guardrails. China has developed strategic dependencies on Beijing via the Belt and Road Initiative to the control of global infrastructure. Russia’s war against Ukraine is supported by Iran and North Korea. Their leaders, like all autocracies and authoritarian regimes, when challenged by dissident forces within their own societies, place blame for their failures on foreign influence”.

 

As to you, my dear reader, what you need to do is focus on the claim that when challenged by dissenting forces within their own societies, the autocratic leaders of authoritarian regimes place blame for their failures on foreign influence. This done, look at what Korb and Cimbala say is happening in the so-called democracies of the West:

 

“Proponents of anti-democratic ideas are finding audiences in the US and elsewhere because of the ubiquitous means of global communication made available by modern technology. Some ‘apps’ offer seductive political content and messaging that can divide people against one another based on ideology, nationality, ethnicity, or other characteristics. A flood of divisive philosophical sewerage spills over from the basements of hatemongers into the higher reaches of foreign offices. The ability to create nearly instantaneous mobs of rage over misdescribed or sensationalized versions of events can create civil strife that places political order in imminent jeopardy”.

 

Do I need to say anything more to convince you that what these people believe is strong by virtue of its moral rectitude, is in reality a fragile construct that’s breaking under the weight of an authentic morality now rising and by which humanity shall live in harmony to the end of time?

Liberal Democracy in the Hands of Illiberals

 Something went wrong. It is that the old regimes, be they ancient empires or Medieval feudal constructs, lived in a stable condition for centuries, even millennia before dissolving and vanishing.

 

By contrast, the so-called modern democracies have been around only two centuries, and they are beginning to melt like Snowman on a hot Summer day. Why is that?

 

To answer that question, we examine an important aspect in the daily unfurling of a modern jurisdiction. It is the way that business is conducted between the various parties, and how those parties relate to the rulers. The latter part happens through legal measures that take the form of taxation — and this is precisely where the nature of the regime is revealed.

 

A glance at the taxation scene in a modern day jurisdiction even without the need to get into a deep analysis of what transpires beneath the surface, is sufficient to tell the story of how much the regime called Liberal Democracy, has deteriorated with regard to financial matters. Extrapolated to the rest of the governing system, the discovery tells a great deal about the functioning of the jurisdiction and its stability.

 

So then, what is it that so glaringly jumps to the eye of an observer who is watching a modern taxation scene? Well, the observer will see a massive industry that is staffed by amateurs, bookkeepers, accountants and economists who command a high honorarium — all of them advising on how to get around the law so as to minimize the tax that’s payable to the government, whether or not legal loopholes were embedded into the law.

 

In fact, skirting the law in the so-called democracies, not just in taxation but in every aspect of getting on with the day’s work, consumes a great deal of time and effort, leaving very little with which to do useful work. And this is why those democracies accomplish little, thus earn the designation inefficient.

 

How did all this develop?

 

Studying an ongoing example is the best way to understand how things must have developed to reach the current condition. In fact, it is an example I am familiar with because it affects my life even now, as it has for several decades. The story comes down to my own Canadian Government persecuting me for several decades as commanded by a foreign criminal syndicate I displeased by refusing to trash my own people and praising theirs.

 

Now that I reached an advanced age, I asked the Government to fulfill the promise of holding itself accountable, and suggest a remedy we can both live with. More than two and a half months have passed and I have not heard from the government. And while this is the reality on the ground, rumors of all kinds are swirling around the reasons why the Government, headed by one Justin Trudeau, is not responding to my appeal one way or the other.

 

Simply stated, the speculation is that Trudeau believes he has bigger fish to fry than spend time resolving my case. That’s because a resolution will break the story behind the case into the mainstream media, thus hurt his chances at getting reelected. And so, Trudeau will delay looking into the case till after the election; an event that may not take pace for several months. This tells a great deal about the priorities that the Liberal Democratic rulers assign to the cases that cross their desks.

 

Here, the stakes on one side consist of reelecting a person, and on the other upholding the moral imperative of doing justice to someone that suffered for several decades under the very government which holds the key to resolving the problem it has itself created. And in the same way that there exists an entire industry to deal with the idea of minimizing the taxes owed to the government, there exists an entire industry made up of lawyers and paralegals who will work for a high honorarium on seeking justice for those who feel they were treated unjustly.

 

But the nature of the Liberal Democratic system of governance being that you can skirt the law all you want as long as you do not break it, people take advantage of every situation that opens to them, and run  with it as far as they can. This holds true also when it comes to the speculation that’s generated when the government withholds information that may do it electoral damage if revealed to the general public. And without that transparency, justice is lost behind the wall of silence that’s erected by those who adhere to the adage: You scratch my back and I scratch yours.

 

So then, how far has the speculation gone as to how much more some people believe Justin Trudeau will sacrifice to make sure the case at hand will not get in the way of his reelection?

 

The answer to this question lies in the telling of a story that’s so far fetched, it is difficult to believe even by those who hold that the system of liberal democracy is so rotten, nothing can be too debased for it to allow. And so, the story goes as follows:

 

Justin Trudeau is sacrificing not only the principles of high morality and justice to protect his chances at getting reelected, he is also risking the breakup of an alliance that was teetering on the breakup but recovered when Ukraine was invaded. Now, Trudeau will take the alliance back to the bad old days when the new members from Eastern Europe discovered that Liberal Democracy was sold to them as a moralistic system but turned out to be as demonic as it can ever get.

 

Helpless at first to do anything about it, the unfolding of my story gave them the opportunity at long last to register their discontent. They did so by denying Sweden and Finland the right to gain membership in the NATO alliance till Canada honors its word and resolves my case. And so far, Justin Trudeau has continued to prioritized his personal interests over those of the Western Alliance.

 

True accounts or rumors, this is the filth to which Liberal Democracy has sunk in Canada and throughout the Western Alliance. Make of it what you want.

The daydream that never seems to end

 The daydream of the 1960s flower-power generation was that someone will fill an airplane with lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and spray it around the globe thus render everyone harmless to their neighbors.

 

That’s gone now but what’s not gone is the idea of daydreaming a universal sort of happening that would change the existing status quo if not reverse it. Most of the time such topics are not talked about openly or nostalgically as the hippies of the 1960s used to do when fantasizing about LSD. Rather it is now incorporated in the discourses of the day with some subtlety.

 

One such discourse is offered by Clifford D. May who wrote: “China’s global supremacists,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “Communists in Beijing have grand ambitions.” It was published on March 7, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

Clifford May who founded FDD (Foundation for Defense of Democracies) brags about having produced, and now maintains disciples such stalwarts of the American war culture as (1) Rep. Mile Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who served seven years of active duty in the Marine Corps including two deployments to Iraq, and holds a doctorate in international relations from Georgetown; (2) Matt Pottinger, a China expert who served as deputy national security adviser in the Trump administration; and (3) retired Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster who served as national security adviser to then-President Donald, and now chairs the board of advisers of FDD’s Center on Military and Political Power.

 

So then, what’s the daydream that’s occupying these dudes? It is that of creating a Soviet Union kind of boogeyman whose threat they can invoke every time they think up an effort to pressure the government on granting them funds and legislation. What they want is a regime that will help them prepare war plans behind closed doors and away from the consent of the population.

 

Given that there is now a growing universal opposition to such plans, Clifford May started his column by denouncing one such opposing group. It calls itself Code Pink (also known as Women for Peace.) It is composed of hundreds of organizations from around the globe; organizations whose aim is to bring peace and social justice to the world primarily by ending the US-funded wars and occupations. Here, in condensed form is how Clifford May formulated his thoughts:

 

“Code Pink, attempted to disrupt a hearing of a House Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Protesters held up signs and wore T-shirts reading, “China is not our enemy.” Committee members did not seem to disagree. China’s Communist rulers regard America as their enemy. The protesters held up a sign that read “Stop Asian Hate.” If Code Pink has a plan to stop the CCP’s persecution of Tibetans and Uyghurs, its erasure of the freedoms once enjoyed by the people of Hong Kong, and its threats to Taiwan, I’m confident House members would be all ears”.

 

Perhaps. But by the same token, if the proxies that America recruits in the name of a false democracy and funds them to inflict murderous wars and indefinite occupations in such places as East Asia, the Middle East and Palestine — if these proxies would end their criminal activities, the likelihood is that the world will again embrace the American ideal the way it did in the aftermath of the Second World War. It was a beautiful relationship between America and the world, but one that began to erode half a century ago, and seems intent to vanish for good.

 

What happened? What happened that caused such a sad ending to what promised will be a new beginning for the human race; a race that had gone through half a century of horror exemplified by two world wars of unbelievable human suffering and property destruction?

 

Simply stated, the answer to that question, is that people of the Clifford May sort, and organizations of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) sort began to crop up in America at the end of the Second World War, and they turned the Doctor Jekyll that America was into the Mr. Hyde that America became.

 

But that’s not the history that the FDD people cite. They have a version that is truncated, mutilated, and distorted all at once. Here is how it goes: “The United States and other nations across the free world underwrote the erosion of their competitive advantages through the transfer of capital and technology to a strategic competitor, determined to gain preponderant economic and military power”.

 

The truth of the matter is that the determination of the Chinese was not to gain preponderant economic or military power. It was to undergo the Cultural Revolution that raised hundreds of millions of their people from the level of abject poverty to an acceptable standard of living. The Chinese began to succeed as did their North Korean allies who also began to look like a modern country. This happened at a time when South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan – who were under Western influence – continued to look like backward and delipidated Third World countries.

 

It was only then that the United States and Britain panicked, thus quickly determined it was important to prop up their client states lest their people revolt and agitate in favor of the Communist causes. These countries prospered alright but could not eclipse the progress that the Chinese Cultural Revolution was accomplishing for Mainland China.

 

To say otherwise is to be dishonest with the self, and will not help America get ahead of China in the competition that was started, not by the Chinese, but started by people like Clifford D. May and Company whose modern daydream exceeds in psychedelic imagery anything that was known to or experienced by the generation of the 1960s.