Genocide is a two-way street. To ignore one way is in-itself genocidal

 There is the saying: Human Rights for me but not for thee. It is used to indicate the selfish ascription of rights to the self while denying it to others. It also happens that the principle is often flipped, resulting in the ascription of wrongdoing to others but not the self. This condition may be put succinctly as follows: “Genocide by thee but not by me”.

 

If you want to see an example of this that’s so glaring it will pierce your eyes, read the article that came under the title: “South Africa and other antisemitic genocidaires accuse Israel of genocide,” and the subtitle: “Blood libel in The Hague.” It was written by Clifford D. May, and published on January 16, 2023 in The Washington Times. It is where the author accuses others of the sins they may or may not have committed while ignoring those committed by the group he is protecting.

 

But in choosing the title that he did, Clifford May does not realize that he reminds the readers of the old saying: “It takes a thief to catch a thief.” Yes, it would take a genocidaire to recognize and point the finger at a genocidaire, but that does not mean South Africa is in the same boat as Israel. The fact is that South Africa has rejected its sordid past, choosing instead to adopt a civilized way of life.

 

By contrast, the Jews who stole Palestine and renamed it Israel, are now engaging in the genocide of the Palestinian people because – like it was said to Golda Meir in her face, and she never objected – the Jews want Palestine without the Palestinian people, which is an extreme form of genocide that has never been the case in the White South Africa of an earlier era.

 

The following is how Clifford May makes the case he has tried to sell to the world, but has been rejected by the world to his profound chagrin, time after time after time.

 

May’s words: Israel was founded in part of the ancient Jewish homeland that for centuries had been under foreign imperialist rule. It is the only state in the world where Jews constitute a majority.

 

Commentary: The truth is that the imperialists were the Jews who first massacred the babies of Egypt, looted the country and ran looking for more victims to kill and rob. They found them in Palestine – known at the time as the Land of Milk and Honey – and engaged these helpless people in the merciless battles of Jerusalem, Ephraim, Ai, Gibeon, Jericho, Megiddo, Gideon, Midianites and Jebus.

 

The fact is that Palestine is now occupied by a majority of Jewish settlers who were paid and armed by the new imperialists of the world, to come and replace the indigenous Palestinians that have been in place since the beginning of time. This, in itself, is proof that the Jewish genocide of Palestinians has been happening, and continues to happen unabated.

 

And here is how Clifford May justifies the unjustifiable:

 

May’s words: Hamas is a client of Iran, whose rulers have been threatening and inciting genocide against Israel for 45 years. Under the Genocide Convention, doing so is “a crime in and of itself,” as often noted by Irwin Cotler.

 

Commentary: Perhaps Clifford May was never informed who Irwin Cotler may be. The reality is that he and Alan Dershowitz do not form “Two Peas in a pod.” Rather, they form two clowns in the Human Rights circus. Let me tell you how I know that:

 

There was a time when the Wall Street Journal would let the readers access its content without having to pay for the privilege. I took advantage of that privilege as long as it lasted, and told the truth as I knew it regarding the issues of the day.

 

At some point during that time, the two clowns, who did not like my opinions, teamed up and co-authored an article they thought will corner me in such a way as to force me shooting myself in the foot, after which they hoped they could institute legal action and have me silenced for good.

 

Needless to say I considered the idea so juvenile, I did not bother replying to their sneaky invitation.

 

Make what you will of this.

The difference between a failed democracy and a benevolent autocracy

 

Shortly after the end of the Second World War, the idea of the world being divided into a half that’s led by democratic America that won the war, and a dictatorship half that’s led by the Soviet Union that may have lost the war (sort of) but remained as dangerous as ever.

 

People such as Winston Churchill and many other warmongers saw in this occurrence the opportunity to lead the democratic half of the world by engaging in a brand of demagoguery that made those who experienced the war, drink from the Churchillian cup of poison with passion. They feared the Soviet Union and its allies, the nations whom Churchill labelled dictators.

 

The result of this development has been a Cold War that lasted about half a century between America and its “Western allies,” and the Soviet Union with its “Eastern Allies.” The Cold War quieted down for a while, but then flared up again – played out this time by both the same old players and new ones.

 

What we have today is a reformed Soviet Union that took up the name Russia. Though one of the two pre-war superpowers, it is ceding its top position to its old ally China, thus allowing the world to be dominated by a rising old ally, and by America, its now fading old rival.

 

Because we live in “interesting times” as the Chinese would remark, people around the globe have their attention taken by the new drama that’s unfolding as they see it with their own eyes on television and the screens of the newly invented social media. And lost in this hullabaloo is the reality that there existed, and still exists a sizeable majority of countries whose political system remains non-aligned, refusing to dwell in the orbit of any superpower.

 

It is among these nations that you find the non-fanatic populations and leaders who just want to lead a normal life; one that may not reflect the exact image of a dictatorship or a democracy but remains pleasant to those who have adopted it. And yet, it is among these nations that the superpowers are exerting great effort, aiming to recruit into their own political systems if not their way of life as well.

 

For a while, America and its Western Allies seemed to win the heart and soul of the those countries, but then something changed. It is not that they flipped and endorsed the rival system. It is that they reverted back to their non-aligned status having tried and rejected the Western approach. In so doing, these countries are showing the rest of humanity how countries can adopt a system that neither fears the other nations nor scares them.

 

Even more than being ideal in their interaction with other nations, these countries provide a model as to how a governing body should deal with its own population. A contentious Area where the value of a system is gauged, happens to be the Human Rights field. In fact, where the West used to hammer the East using Human Rights as a weapon, the East is now responding by pointing out the failings which are displayed at every level of life in the Western countries, especially the United States of America.

 

Where permissiveness used to count as a triumph of the Western system of governance, it is now seen as the scourge for which the political leaders cannot even begin to postulate a possible solution. In fact, killing others and committing suicide have made America look like a slow burning but expanded civil war in which even the children are killing their classmates.

 

And when it comes to committing everyday sort of crimes, the situation has gone so far out of hand that store owners now punish their own employees for trying to stop the looters, than help in this endeavor by calling the police who may engage in a shoot out that has the potential to ruin the reputation of the store.

 

It is important to  note that this new culture of America is so contagious, it spread not only throughout the United States, but also across the border to Canada. From being keen at projecting the image of the sinless virgin, Canada now insists on being treated with respect despite its shortcomings.

 

And whereas the Eastern countries that used to govern with a tight fist to protect the country, they have gained enough confidence in themselves that they are now loosening their grip on the population. Not only that, but they feel they owe the West a taste of its old medicine. And so the Easterners are interfering with the Western system, so much so that it is the West which now cries uncle.

 

The trouble with Canada in this melee is that it fails to realise how short its shortcomings are, especially in the Human Rights field where it used to preach to the world what an ideal treatment of their citizens would look like, now seen to treat its own citizens like a magot that joined other magots in a criminal syndicate that kills and feasts on the rotting cadavers of its citizens.

Canada, a police state protected by Western hypocritical code of silence

 Long ago, when I was in college, I took a course that required the reading of a book which came under the title “Individualism Reconsidered” — if my memory serves. — The book contrasted the philosophy of life as pursued by the Western societies, against the philosophy of the Oriental societies, and concluded that perhaps there is a need for the West to adapt to the new world where individualism no longer has the appeal it used to have.

 

Well then, seeing what I see today, and what I am forced to live through, it must be said that Western Individualism has been Reconsidered with a vengeance. It did so by adopting – not a better philosophy of life – but one that is immeasurably worse. In fact, whereas in the past, individuals strove to stand out and be noticed by bucking the crowd, they now seek to be trendy therefore non-controversial by adopting the crowd-pleasing fashion of the moment.

 

The trouble is that in trying to blend with the crowd, most individuals are forced to step on their individual preferences. They may listen to the same music as the rest, eat the same foods, wear the same style of clothes and pretend to love them all when in reality they hate them all. And so, they cannot wait to get home where they live the life that suits them away from the eyes of the crowd.

 

A life that unfolds behind the veil of a hypocrisy pushed to that level of intolerance, is troublesome for sure. But worse than all this, is the retreat to a conformity that is hammered onto the psyche – not just of the individual – but the society as a collective. And when the society happens to be the group that’s in charge of governing the country, unfathomed calamities can result.

 

To understand what follows, a reminder to those of a certain age and others — of what Eric Severeid once said — will be helpful. It happened during the era of the Watergate Scandal that commentators expressed frustration at their inability to get truthful information from government officials. Severeid explained the phenomenon by saying something to the effect that the bigger the crime, the bigger the tendency to hide it.

 

This makes it so that in our contemporary age of conformity, banding together in a gang, and joyfully rape the Civil Rights of someone that has no means to protect themselves, can easily grow to become a Western crime against humanity that is so massive, everyone will keep silent about it. This is because to unveil a horror of this magnitude will also expose a level of hypocrisy that can dissolve the glue which keeps together all parts of the Western Alliance.

 

In fact, this is how Canada was protected by a wall of silence that lasted many decades. It was a time during which the leaders of the country forgot that they were supposed to protect their own citizens against foreigners who might want to use them to exploit Canada. Thus, instead of discharging their duties as they should, the Canadian leaders allowed the foreigners — foremost among them the Jews — to infiltrate the system of governance, and use the country’s artificially propped up good name to turn it into a Jewish plantation that serves the diplomatic and propaganda needs of Israel.

 

One of the victims that probably suffered the most under the rule of this depraved mentality, is yours truly. Advanced in age and in need of much help that counts as Assisted Living, I urgently need a resolution of my case so that I may go on and live the rest of my life in relative comfort and peace of mind.

 

When my requests in Canada got nowhere, I appealed to the leaders of the Western Alliance to intervene and pressure the Canadian Government to resolve the case as soon as possible, thus save me and protect the good name of Western Civilization.

 

It has been a while now, and I see no indication that something is in the working.

 

Has the entire Western Alliance lost its soul?

Arab countries will reject the next Sykes-Picot

 

To explain the recent events in the Middle East and predict where they might lead, Clifford D. May started telling the history of the region as seen from the Jewish point of view. And so, he began his account by citing the events of October 7, 2023.

 

To that effect, Clifford May wrote an article that came under the title “The long war,” and the subtitle: “Israel won’t cease firing until Iran’s Hezbollah does.” The article was published on January 9, 2024 in the Washington Times.

 

But because it has always been deceptive to start telling history from a point in time that is most convenient for the Jews, it was necessary to go back to the beginning of the story each time, and remind the audiences of the root causes that contributed to making the situation what it is today. This time is no exception and so, here is what must be known before embarking on the historical voyage of Clifford May.

 

The sad truth is that the world was in turmoil at the end of the Nineteenth Century and the start of the Twentieth Century as it had been for a while: The Ottoman Empire was crumbling, the Zionist movement was gaining strength, and the European powers were fighting each other or conspired together in an effort to divide the world among themselves.

 

Sitting on the sideline and salivating at what they were witnessing, were the Jewish leaders of the Zionist movement who lost no time making themselves useful to one side as well as the other among the European combatants. In so doing and playing the game deftly, they obtained promises from both sides as to how the Jews will be rewarded when the war will be over.

 

It all came to a conclusion with the signing of the Sykes-Picot Agreement between France and England. This is when the two divided the former Mideastern Ottoman Empire between themselves, giving a piece of territory for each to occupy and exploit, and a peace of mind in which to bask triumphantly for decades to come. As to the Zionist minds, they experienced anything but peace. In fact, they went into a frenzy akin to that of chicken when fed by a farmer that is throwing grain at them.

 

Easy to grab and hoard, and more delicious than manna falling from the sky, the Jews spent the next half-century feasting on the territorial morsels that used to make up 80% of Palestine. When done with that, the Jews went for the neighboring Arab lands, trying to make dessert out of them. Alas, this desert turned out to be made of the prickly cactus fruit they could not swallow anymore than a snake could swallow a porcupine.

 

Except for the few gains they made in the Golan of Syria and the West Bank of Palestine, the Jews got bit in the mouth; were kicked in the pants and kicked out of most places where they tried to settle — thus changed their strategy. Instead of trying to beat the Arabs, they now tried to join them.

 

To that end, the Jews worked on two plans simultaneously. On the one hand they asked the Americans to do what the latter are known to do best; that of prostituting themselves morally while pimping for an Israel that keeps giving the middle finger to both the American flag and the Constitution.

 

On the other hand, the Jews recruited the Iranian dissidents operating in the West, and paid them to do what was necessary to disrupt the relationships between the Sunni Muslims and Shia Iranians. The aim of this work was to make the Arab countries fear Iran so much, they would ask Israel to protect them. But this turned out to be the move that resulted in the emperor being seen as naked.

 

In reality, no one knows the weakness of the Israeli military like do the Hamas fighters of Gaza. Time after time, they engaged their foes in ground battles and beat them the way that a storm hammers a neglected beach. In fact, the Palestinians discovered that the only gains the Israeli can score, are those during which they come flying warplanes for which the Palestinians have no defense. But when it comes to engagement in a man to man combat, the Israelis show that their spine is made of marshmallow.

 

It now seems that the clock has been set back several years for the Jews and their American pimps thanks to the action that Hamas took on October 7, 2023.

 

It is now difficult to project how events will develop next except to say that the Arabs will continue to reject instituting another regime of Sykes-Pico in the Middle East.

David Johnson is a man of solid integrity

 I never met Professor David Johnson or communicated with him verbally or otherwise. But as fate would have it, our lives crossed twice. When this happened the first time, I learned what a highly moral man David Johnson was. Before the crossing of our lives happened the second time, I feared that David Johnson will be punished for his integrity by those whose motivation is generated by immorality.

 

Here is the story behind my first crossing with David Johnson:

 

It was about 20 years ago that I got an idea about turning sea water into fresh water using a very economical method. I was in Montreal at the time, thus sent my invention to McGill University for testing and appraisal. This gave me the opportunity to communicate with the head of the Department in charge of such matters. The woman liked the idea so much, she promised to start the testing soon and let me know how to proceed from there.

 

When she failed to contact me for a number of days, I called her department only to be told that she was transferred to another post. I called her there and had a discussion that turned out to be the antithesis of the enthusiastic way by which she had greeted the invention when she saw it first. A few days after that, I heard in a news broadcast that David Johnson was no longer Chancellor of McGill.

 

Immediately, the rumors began to swirl among the academics of the nearby Concordia University as well as among the English speaking lawyers of Montreal, to the effect that David Johnson was pushed out. Nobody said why but I knew why. It was that the Canadian Jewish Congress, joining hands with The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and others, had formed a crime syndicate that made it their business to make life miserable for me.

 

Fast forward 20 years, a time when I already had a blog for a decade and a half which I deliberately and consciously did not use to tell my story. I did not, so as to establish myself as a writer first and foremost; one who thinks and writes about a variety of issues. I made that choice lest I be considered an operator that’s wielding a cudgel and using it to hammer his audiences.

 

But then, on December 24, 2022, I published the first article in which I began to tell my story. I mentioned the fact that I will soon turn eight years of age, and hinted that I was not doing well health wise. Thus I asked to be compensated for the 55 years (20,000 days) of terror that my persecutors inflicted on me. To my surprise, I discovered that the audiences liked this personal kind of articles more than they did the previous kind. But that was not the response of the Canadian Government, now in the hands of Justin Trudeau, head of the Liberal Party.

 

As if owned and operated by the Canadian Jewish Congress whose sole purpose in life is to convince the feeble minds in power that only Jews can suffer persecution, the Trudeau government refused to see the enormity of the crime that was inflicted on me by non-other than the Jews and their feeble minded lackeys who are nevertheless in high positions.

 

Failing to see that playing the Jewish game was to commit crimes against humanity, Justin Trudeau responded to my postings by dancing the ritualistic body language that’s meant to tell everyone there was nothing I could do to offend him. Thus, I shall never be in a position to force him approving the release of the money owed to me. But how was the body language played?

 

The game was played by first pretending that China was spying on Canada, thus creating an artificial bogeyman meant to represent the alter ego, not of the criminal syndicate of Jews and their Canadian lackeys, but of China that was doing nothing more than mind its own business.

 

Thus, every time I wrote about my ordeal in a blog, Trudeau and his clique would rail against China to let the world know they sympathise with me even if they will not puncture the wall of silence that has been the most painful ordeal I was made to endure for decades.

 

When the game began to look silly, Trudeau appointed David Johnson as Special Rapporteur on Foreign Interference to give the game a modicum of respectability. But the highly moral Johnson refused to play the crooked game of the criminal syndicate and resigned.

Liars toxic as poison gas, contagious as Ebola

Finally, they produced the human-looking devil they spent 3 months training to tell the load of lies that missed its intended target for the long run but hit the human community like an Ebola infection that’s now trying to spread throughout the human settlements.

 

The story is that despite America giving them free of charge the deadliest weapons and ammunition ever invented, and despite promising to give them nearly a million dollars for killing any and every Palestinian man, woman or child — the Jews of Israel failed to accomplish the assignment that was handed to them.

 

In fact, they failed despite the effort they exerted to pave the way for the liar to succeed at spreading his vicious lies around the world. They tried and failed to mobilize both the  American media and government agencies, and failed to put them into a service that was aimed at framing the Palestinians by accusing them of crimes they did not commit. The biggest and most horrific false accusation was that Hamas had raped and killed an Israeli woman, maybe even 2 more women.

 

Now that the Jews of America and Israel have realized they will never succeed in eradicating the Palestinian people or the Hamas group that’s defending them, those same Jews began the process of backtracking. To do it they, at long last, produced the liar they trained to affirm that the rape was committed by Hamas. But what happened was that the liar changed his tune to now affirm that the rape was not committed by Hamas.

 

With that horrible accusation out of the way, the Jews of America lost the false excuse they had been leveraging for pushing the American government to give Israel the green light to go on and accomplish the full and complete genocide of the Gaza Palestinians. The sanitized and hypocritical expression they employed to tell the general public that what they were calling for was that “Israel must finish the job.”

 

Well then, had this happened, it would have made it easier for the settlers in the West Bank to slaughter the Palestinians and rob them of their lands as well as their other possessions. Instead of a free and democratic Palestine from the River to the Sea,” it would have been a restyled Jewish ghetto in the business of devising schemes by which to attract money from the rest of the world, and live well without having to work.

 

While that defeat of the Jews now seems a certainty, the damage they created trying to frame Hamas will continue to plague the human race for a long time to come. It is that the American propaganda machine in the hands of the Jewish American moguls and the Israelis, had managed to convince prominent American non-Jewish women to go on television and regurgitate the Ebola-like virus as well as the poison gas that was supposed to frame Hamas for crimes they did not commit. Here is how the propaganda was meant to work but failed to do so:

 

Using the two-step trick that the Jews developed over the centuries, the women were taught to begin laying out their accusation by first mentioning a video clip showing the initial contact between the rowdy Jews and the Hamas police force that went to arrest them. Even though the incident was no more violent than what happens in America when the police shoot people in the back for violating a traffic light, or for killing students demonstrating against the Vietnam War or for torching people wholesale the way it was done at Waco, Texas — the women tried to make it sound like Hamas was brutal when arresting the Jews. But the reality was that the rowdy Jews were the ones who used violent means to resist arrest.

 

This done, the regurgitating prominent non-Jewish American women moved on to the second step. It was to repeat the depraved accusation that Hamas raped Israeli women. The accusatory women did their deed by speaking in such a way as to intertwine the false accusation and the reality of Hamas who did nothing more and nothing less than a professional job arresting a bunch of drunk and rowdy Jews. Still, by intertwining the reality with the fantasy, those diminished women made it sound like the reality and the fantasy were one and the same event. 

 

This makes it imperative for the rest of us to let these women know they created a condition by which future rapists will deny that they raped and be believed. In turn, this will give the defense attorneys the legitimacy to grill the accusing women, doing to them what the women have complained about for decades: Being raped once by a lowlife, and a second time by the system.

 

The best thing the foolish women can do now is to go on television and retract their lies. To be forgiven by the public, they will have to show remorse by speaking with an intensity of locution that equals the intensity they displayed when making their false claims.

But who’s the genie that’ll deliver all that?

 Imagining a being that possesses superior abilities which he/she uses to grant the human that imagined it almost everything it asks for, is a universal trait that is shared by all human beings regardless of their ethnicity or religious affiliation.

 

Thus, from the gods of the ancient world who may not have always been cooperative to the more modern genies who proved to be models of obedience and cooperation, human beings created the perfect or near-perfect companions who travelled with them through the thick and thin of life’s joys and travails.

 

In time, most societies were able to differentiate between the mythologies they inherited from the ancients, and the religions that were revealed to them by individuals who apparently came out of nowhere. These newcomers convinced the multitude around the globe that there was only one all-powerful being called God, and explained that He selected them to preach His gospel to the human race.

 

However, despite the tracing of a demarcation line between mythology and religion, some people seem to confuse the two while others believe in the literal expression of the religious or mythological texts. Aside from that, no one that was given a religious upbringing can make the claim they are completely free of the religious influence in which they were steeped when growing up.

 

You can detect this reality when studying the article which came under the title: “Restoring deterrence should be America’s most urgent task in 2024,” written by Clifford D. May and published on December 26, 2023 in The Washington Times. What follows is a passage in the article, here reproduced in condensed form, telling much about what motivates the author. Here is the passage:

 

“A lesson Americans should have learned: It’s perilous to underestimate the capabilities of your adversaries and overestimate your own. If we’d learned this lesson, our most urgent priority now would be to restore deterrence. That would require not just maintaining our military and economic powers but increasing them to the point where our adversaries cannot hope to match them. In other words, there’s no substitute for Pax Americana. It’s that for which we should hope, pray and vote in the new year”.

 

As can be seen, while acknowledging that America is facing adversaries, Clifford May goes on to ignore the way they will most certainly react to his recommendation that America “increase its military and economic powers to the point where our adversaries cannot hope to match them.” Well then, this is how religious devotees think, and what they murmur when they get down on their knees and pray to the Almighty that they be granted a miracle.

 

And if the Almighty does not respond to the prayer, will a genie that was kept in a bottle for centuries come to substitute, and grant America the military and economic powers she will deny to the adversaries? This being the scenario that Clifford May seems to suggest can be realized, is he out there combing the beaches of America looking for the bottle that’s housing the genie of his imagination?

 

Whatever the case may be, to end his article, Clifford May leaned once again against his religious upbringing and wrote the following:

 

“If history teaches anything, it’s that peace is not the natural state of humankind. It can be achieved only when a greater power deters bellicose actors. In other words, there’s no substitute for Pax Americana. It’s that for which we should hope, pray and vote in the new year”.

 

Having ignored the reality that America’s adversaries will respond in kind when they see America increase its military power, Clifford May repeats the same suggestion, but says it using different words and a different approach. Here it is:

 

“Peace is not the natural state of humankind. It can be achieved only when a greater power deters bellicose actors”.

 

That is, he reiterates that to have peace, America must produce the weapons that will deter its adversaries, even if that will continue to trigger the wars that happened—as they did—every time that an abundance of weapons accumulated in the hands of someone.