The first time that the Americans became conscious of the fact they are a polarized nation was during the election campaign that ended in George W. Bush taking office in the year 2001. What they have not come to grips with is that they did not get polarized overnight; they built up to this state over a long period of time not knowing what was happening to them or why. What happened, in fact, was not the natural progression of an evolutionary process; it was the deliberate doing of those who thrive by the conflict they create among other people.
You encounter individuals like these in every club and every office; in every neighborhood and every clan. But if this is all there is to it, the damage that these individuals may cause is restricted to the club, the office the neighborhood or the clan. However, if the malefactor is not just an individual but a culture that brings together a sufficient number of individuals all bent on transforming society, things will turn out very differently. The truth is that such culture will have both the wherewithal to transform the society in which it is injected and the will to exploit it. This, in fact, is what happened to America. It was done to it by a culture that caused it considerable damage and threatened the world in the process. The sad part is that the process is still ongoing full blast.
The offending culture adheres to a philosophy of life you may call Judeo-Yiddish. It was concocted in Europe at the start of the Third Century AD by a group of rabbi seeking wealth, power and influence. What they put together had faint roots in the mores of the ancient Hebrew tribes whose members adhered to a vanishing religion called Jewish. For this reason, the followers of the Judeo-Yiddish concoction still call themselves Jews and thus enjoy the protection that America extends to all religions. Being masters of ambiguity, however, these fabricated “Jews” have also managed to portray themselves as a multiracial group that is nevertheless ethnically homogeneous. Try to figure this one out. But, believe it or not, they have asked for and were granted extra privileges in gullible America because of their out-of-this-world classification.
Kicked out of Palestine which they stole once before, the people who started it all went to settle in Europe before coming to America. They found Europe to be a vast continent inside of which they remained a small community. To influence their surroundings at a level disproportionate to their size, the rabbis dug up the worst tools they could find in the ancient mores of the Hebrew tribes and used them against the Europeans who had no way of knowing what they were facing or what hit them. The preferred tool of the rabbis was the principle of “divide and conquer” which they used to seed discord everywhere they went and thus make headway in all spheres of European life. They created polarization among the people, the neighborhoods and the clans -- acts that allowed then to play one side against the other, exploit all sides and reap the benefits. Ever since that time and to this day, the Jewish leaders have been perfecting the techniques they still use everywhere they go.
They used the techniques in America, and they still do with devastating effect. First, they weakened the fabric of society by replacing the solemn with the trivial in the name of “lightening things up”. Then they tackled the cultural vehicles of the nation such as the entertainment and publishing industries, the media outlets and the venues where they got in whether or not they had talent. They managed to do so by crying discrimination and threatening to sue. Once in, however, they dealt only with their own kind -- hiring them, promoting them, quoting them and cooperating with them at the exclusion of most everyone else, especially those who would not toe the line. This done, the Jewish leaders moved to control the political system which they did with ease having control of the media and the means to demagogue the individuals who refused to genuflect to them, kiss their rings and lick their boots. Sadly, this is the state in which you find the American political apparatus today.
Where does that get them? Well, they now have a superpower to use as a platform out of which they can scheme to realize the age old dream of controlling the world. Viewed from any perspective, a scheme like this would be madness, of course, but they knew they could try because they had a pliant political system to play with and the cultural tools by which to manipulate the events. Thus, they could “normalize” madness in America and make it the acceptable norm by injecting hysteria into the society, and make it the everyday, normal state of affairs. The result has been that while the nation is going bankrupt -- being engaged in two hot wars and several cold ones – you still see the opportunistic rats get in line to genuflect, kiss a ring and lick a boot as they mumble the refrain: They will come to kill us; let's go bomb them instead and plan to bomb them for ever and ever.
The question now is this: how do they do it? The answer is that they create a bogeyman, call it Islam (radical, extreme, political or fundamental), attribute extraordinary powers to it and accuse it of planning to kill all those who will refuse to genuflect to it, kiss its ring and lick its boots. This done, the Jewish leaders call on the American people and the American leaders to arm themselves and arm the country to the teeth, attack Islam preemptively and prepare to engage it in a drawn out battle that will last till the enemy is wiped off the face of the Earth. But this is a tall order that will require proof to be convincing, say the people who still have the independence to think for themselves and the courage to stand up to the Jewish masters.
There is proof, says the Jew, and he submits two recent documents that will eventually be added to the many flimsy proofs already littering the historical record. One submission is made by Daniel Pipes in National Review Online, published on April 3, 2012 under the title: “It's Not Road Rage, It's Terrorism” and having the subtitle: “Ignoring the religious and ideological roots of Islamist violence carries a heavy price.” Another submission is a letter to the editor written by the former mayor of New York City, Edward Koch, and published in the New York Times on April 4, 2012 under the title: “Rock Throwing by Arabs”.
The point made by Daniel Pipes is that there is a recurring problem which, he says, the politicians, the law enforcement and the press have with Islamist terrorism. It is “their unwillingness to stare it in the face and ascribe murder to it.” In fact, he takes more than half the article to describe a series of events which he says, prove that an act committed years ago and was called an act of road rage – for which the culprit was sentenced to 141 years in prison -- but was then reclassified as an act of terrorism. Pipes also mentions another incident; one that happened in the French city of Toulouse where it was thought that the culprit was a Neo-Nazi but then proved to be a French-born Muslim. This culprit was killed in a shoot-out with the police but this too does not seem to satisfy Pipes who does not venture to say what else could have been done to punish a dead body.
The author then does something you can ascribe to Jews and only the Jews because you can never go wrong ascribing it to them and only to them. What he does is rape history, ejaculate a load of Yiddish moral syphilism into it and mutilates it. Look what happened, the claim was to the effect that the war being waged by America was a war on terrorism and not a war on the Muslim religion. It was further explained that the war was made necessary by what happened in 2001 when 19 Muslim kids attacked America on 9/11. But it was later shown that America had launched a cruise missile at a hotel in Baghdad at the very moment that the hotel was hosting a Muslim Conference. This revelation gave credence to the argument that the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, followed by the 2001 attack on it, were motivated by America's own doing and in response to it. Thus, it was argued that despite the denials, the war of America on Islam does exist, and it was started long before it was disguised as a war on terrorism.
To respond to the new argument, Daniel Pipes mounts an intellectual phantasmagoria massive enough to blow the mind. He says that the example which was first classified as road rage, and the one that was first thought to be the work of a neo-Nazi “fit a much larger pattern … that I trace as far back as the 1990 assassination of Rabbi Meir Kahane...” He never mentioned this theory before, and he does not explain it now; he simply states it. But it is clear to any astute observer that the author came up with it just now because it occurred to him that he can make hay, and that he can add to the confusion by ending the article with a newly minted opinion, tailor-made for the occasion. Here it is: “not thoroughly investigating the Kahane assassination meant overlooking materials that could have prevented the World Trade Center bombing in 1993.” This is so very syphilitic and so very Jewish.
In any case, he has a paragraph before the last in which he says this: “Most disturbing is the tendency to ascribe Islamist terror to diminished mental capacity..” He then quotes someone who said that Muslims evade punishment by pleading insanity or mental incompetence. This being the central thesis of his presentation, you look for it in the two examples he discusses but find that one culprit was sentenced to 141 years in prison and the other was shot dead. Is this evading punishment? You wonder what kind of writer this guy is. But you still find him lamenting: “...indeed, defense lawyers routinely attribute acts of jihadi murder to insanity.” And so you ask him: Where is the beef, Danny Boy? And you ask yourself: If this is not the manifestation of insanity, what is?
What Pipes is trying to accomplish with this phantasmagoria is show that there is a direct nexus between Islam and violence without there being a diminished mental capacity coming between the two. It is as if he was saying that Muslims who are subjected to mental or physical torture cannot be broken or enfeebled mentally. It must be that in his eyes, all Muslims are superhuman beings who can withstand a pressure of any intensity, and still function normally. This is absurd, of course, but even more absurd would be to believe that there is nothing behind him or behind the people who push this sort of ideas as strenuously as they do.
Look closely and you will discover that these people are simultaneously whipping up the anti-Muslim hysteria on this continent – hysteria being recognized as a form of insanity. We already saw a flight attendant and a pilot break down believing that the planes on which they serve were going to crash, a belief that prompted them to mutter the sermons they often hear from pastors on television and hear in private. And this phenomenon can only suggest that there are other people close to the breaking point but are not showing it or are showing it in a different form such as fly a plane while drunk or being under the influence of another kind. And this reality jibes with the mistaken belief that it is possible for the American soldiers who go to war to suffer mental traumas but not for the Muslims who are subjected to the same war, be they warriors or be they civilians living in places like Afghanistan, Iraq or Palestine.
What can Daniel Pipes or the Jewish organizations that think like him do with any of this? In fact, we already see what they are doing. Here is one idea: If the enemy is always portrayed as being deliberate and calculating in what he does, and if it is okay for America to do the things that would be called insane if they were done by someone else, the Jews will be justified to tell America to do anything crazy they wish to see it do. And the bet is that when this happens, neither they nor America will have to face a push-back by someone because very few, if any at all would bother to stand up and tell the asshole it is an asshole right in its face.
Moreover, several American states have enacted a version of the “stand your ground” law whereby you can kill someone you imagine in your screwed up mind is about to attack you, call this self-defense and walk away like nothing happened. Translated onto the world stage, this form of insanity would give every nation the right to launch a preemptive strike on someone they don't like and claim self-defense. You can see, therefore, that if the religion you follow is blood soaked such as it is in the Jewish bible, you will love a planet that will end up floating in human blood instead of floating in the ether. What Daniel Pipes and his cohorts are doing for America and the world is one and the same thing; it is blood, blood, blood ... blood everywhere.
As to the Ed Koch letter, it was a response to a column written by Tom Friedman in which the latter mentioned the recent Palestinian decision to unwind the escalation that took place between them and the Israelis over the past two generations or so, and go back to the days when they resisted the occupation without the use of firearms. The rock was the only weapon that the Palestinians used against the Jewish settlers who patrolled their towns and villages while armed with machine guns and being protected by the tanks of the Israeli army. At a time when the world was saying to the Israelis that the writing on the wall was telling them to do something before the situation blows up, the North American media were spewing rivers of venom about the terror they said was unleashed on the “young and innocent” Israeli soldiers of occupation in their tanks, and the gun toting “rugged” Jewish settlers who patrolled the occupied lands of Palestine.
The reporting on American television of the situation in Palestine included people in New York being asked their opinion about the rock throwing phenomenon. A few responded with the advice that the Palestinians should be shot on the spot. There were also cries like this one: “It's a pity they throw stones at our soldiers” which other people mocked: “They throw stoooones at our sooooldiers, oh pity me, piteeee meeee.” Too bad there was no social media at the time or this thing would have gone viral. But this was not the whole story because the soldiers and the settlers were not the only people to violate Palestinian territory. Tourists were brought from afar to be shown what Israel did to the heritage of another people. Among the tourists was Ed Koch who was hit by a rock while there. His response was to call the Palestinians the scum of the Earth.
In the end, the inevitable happened and the situation in occupied Palestine blew up as predicted by the world. The result was that thousands of people died on both sides for the sake of an accomplishment that included the immediate termination by the Israeli army of the protection it used to extend to the gun-toting settlers, and to the subsequent evacuation of the Gaza Strip. But now that the Palestinians plan to never again resist the occupation using firearms, and now that people like Tom Friedman are beginning to understand them if not welcome them, you get a thing that walks on two legs, looks human and calls itself Ed Koch opining that the issue boils down to the following: “We may disagree on borders, settlements, refugees or other contentious Arab-Israeli issues. But can't we all agree that in the English language, the terms 'nonviolent' and 'rock throwing' are mutually exclusive?”
This tells you that you can no more teach Ed Koch a concept you cannot teach to a dog. For example, you can teach a dog words like “jump” and “catch” but you cannot teach it a concept like: “When you see me throw the Frisbee in the air, wait till it reaches its expected apogee then jump and catch it on its way down.” And this is why Koch wants to be addressed in simple terms, not in concepts. It is that he could never grasp a situation in which a gang of terrorists from South American backed by the Mexican army invaded the small towns of Texas. It would be impossible for him to understand that patrolling the streets of Texas by such a gang would not be a disagreement about borders, settlements, refugees or other contentious issues; it would be a war that the people of Texas will have the right to resist by throwing rocks at the invaders – and not be called scum of the Earth by a thing that is not worth the poop of a dog.
Shooting a teenager to death who is out to buy candy for his kid brother is a right, say the Jews. But throwing rocks at the soldiers of occupation and the terrorist settlers that they protect makes you a scum of the Earth, according to them. This is the mentality that comes into play when America is asked to embroil itself in a never ending war against the Muslim World.
There are about 60 countries classified as Muslim, and these people will not rest till America has a shooting war with each and every one of them.
Brace yourself, my friend, for this is a mad world already.