It is one thing to delegate the power to make a few decisions to a co-worker at the office; it is another to delegate the baby sitting of your children to a convicted pedophile out of jail. It is one thing to subcontract some work you do at the firm to another firm; it is another to subcontract the impregnation of your wife to the neighborhood womanizer. Yet, this is exactly the sort of thing that Dennis Ross and David Makovsky are asking America to do in the article they co-authored: “The U.S. can meet Israel halfway on Iran” published in the Washington Post on March 30, 2012.
At a time when the Israelis are weeping lamentation to the effect that they cannot leave decisions relating to their security in the hands of the Americans, they ask America to delegate its own security to them. This is what Ross and Makovsky are advocating on behalf of Israel in the article whose title seems to promise that the pedophile will not fully rape the children but rape them only half the way; and that the womanizer will not fully impregnate the wife but only give her half a pregnancy. The two authors try hard to tell how this can be done in practice, and more than that, they ask the American government to inform the Iranians that the Israeli stud was invited by Uncle Sam himself to half-screw his wife and half-screw his children. Two halves make a full screw, you see – It seems these jokers can count after all.
The two authors then use several paragraphs to prepare the reader psychologically for what is to come, and they unveil a fully developed plan near the end of the article. It is made of four major points, the first three having to do with Uncle Sam calming the nerves of the nervous Jewish stud, and the fourth having to do with Uncle Sam letting the world know who is injecting the family with moral syphilism of the Yiddish kind. But they could not have come to this end had it not been for the beginning of the article where they assert right off the bat that: “There is no daylight between the United States and Israel...” The significance of this lies in the subtle suggestion that because there is no daylight between the two, it follows that to come halfway closer still, will necessarily mean that one must penetrate the other. Now guess who is meant to penetrate who.
This done, Dennis and David find themselves compelled to respond to something out there, something that hinders their ability to proceed with the presentation. It is a series of known facts and the question that flows from them. The facts are that America is keeping Israel alive with food, fuel, finances to build accommodation on stolen land, weapons to kill Palestinians and a veto to protect Israel from a worldwide disgust. The question seeks to clarify where America's interests are to be found in getting closer still to Israel, and getting screwed in the process. No, no, there is no question, say the authors; it is that Obama and Netanyahu: “Both agree that … a nuclear Iran could set off an arms race … why Obama has indicated that the issue is in the 'American national interest.'” The convergence is already here, they add. Oh yes, you sigh, it seems that the screwing of America has already begun.
They now say something inadvertently which clearly demonstrates why it is dangerous to start any type of relationship with these people that is more than arm's length. It is the fact that anything which gets you closer than that is seen by them as being the extension of an umbilical cord connecting Israel to America where the baby gets to control the mother. The old saying was to the effect that if you give them a finger, they will take the arm. It is worse with these people because when you give them a finger, they reach out to the umbilical cord and they pull till they get the arm, the shoulder, the torso and the whole body. This done, they attract the spouse, the children, the extended family, the tribe and the nation. If you're a superpower and your influence extends around world, they will scheme to grab the whole world as well.
How do they do it? There are many approaches to doing it, and our two authors are the most effective at this game because they are the smoothest operators in a world that is full of brash and loud-mouthed Yiddish-cultured retards. Thus, you see Denis and David begin their presentation with a move that puts you at ease, something they accomplish by reiterating that: “The two leaders agree that a peaceful solution … is preferable.” And they go on to assure you that there is really nothing new in what they are about to propose because: “Iran faces sanctions [already] giving diplomacy a chance to succeed in a way that it has not.” This calms your nerves and puts you at ease.
In fact, you are so relaxed by now; it is like being drugged and resting comfortably in a soft bed. But what you thought was a doctor standing nearby to help you, turns out to be a rapist who begins to undress you. This done, he massages you with a surprising revelation about which you can do nothing in your current state. It is that he informs you there is a difference between America and Israel, a difference that stems from a basic reality: “The United States … can afford to wait longer than Israel … From Israel's perspective … there will come a point when … the Iranian nuclear program will force Israel to forgo its military option.” So what? you ask with a feeble voice that is barely audible.
Well, my friend, you made a mistake asking because the answer will most certainly cause you pain in the ass. Here it is: “Forgoing the use of force … would be a historic decision [that] goes against that country's ethos.” Get it? It is all about Israel and its ethos; not about America or its national security or the fact that its people have had it up to here being dragged into foreign wars that serve nothing but the ego of the leaders in Israel and the ego of the henchmen in New York and Washington. And you realize you've been subjected to an indecent assault.
But there is a problem in the fact that the rapist has bitten more than he can chew, so to speak. It is that he did this same thing to so many so often, he is becoming impotent. Lest this truth come out in the open, he wants to do something unusual. While going through the motion of the screw to appear like being a well endowed virile stud, he wants Uncle Sam to do the actual screwing and thus attain the explosive orgasm that will do away with the Iranian nuclear program. To hide this deception, the authors of the article suggest that there be “efforts to synchronize the U.S. and Israeli clocks.” But realizing that this will come as a shocker to the readers, they seek to calm them, and also try to have it both ways – which is how they operate.
They first say what you want to hear: “Israeli military action need not be imminent or inevitable.” Then they mention that Netanyahu put the time frame for military action at between a few weeks and a year or so. And they quickly add that Obama also said the window for diplomacy is closing but there is still space for it to work which makes it that both the United States and Israel have limits. To them, this indicates that there is “more convergence than divergence” in the points of view held by the leaders of the two countries. What can be more reassuring than that, and more inviting for your acceptance of the rape that is about to be committed!
Now that they have Uncle Sam where they want him and have the observer positioned at the best angle from which to witness the deceptive performance, they try to motivate the Uncle enough to get him excited and start the motion. To this end, they give him a political aphrodisiac of the demonic kind. Here it is: “...the issue of Iran's nuclear program is a global responsibility … any military action [will be] a direct consequence of Iran's intransigence …” They are so certain this will work as planned, they start to pull on the umbilical cord: “...it is far more likely that after the strike the world will ... preserve the sanctions … These are crucial if Iran is to be prevented from reconstructing its nuclear program.” Already, they dream of getting to the finger, the arm, the shoulder, the torso, the body, the spouse, the children, the extended family, the tribe, the nation and the whole world -- an old Jewish dream that never gets fulfilled.
They believe they are half-way there by now, and what more they need to do is make sure that the world is absolutely convinced that what it sees is Israel doing the screwing, not America. If you're not convinced of this, my friend, just look at the Yiddish style hubris they throw at you: “With negotiations among Iran and the (P5+1), there is a need to assuage the Israeli fear … Several actions could reconcile the U.S. and Israeli timetables with the ongoing diplomacy.” And this is where they come up with the four points mentioned earlier about Uncle Sam calming the nerves of the Jewish stud and letting the world know who is injecting the family with moral syphilism.
And what would be a Judeo-Yiddish presentation if there were not a blackmail accompanying it! This is how they put it: “The more Israelis feel their views are being taken into account, the more inclined they will be to give diplomacy a chance to work before resorting to force.” In other words, they tell America it must inform the world that Israel is running the show, or Israel will resort to the force it does not have. This is known as the blackmail of eunuchs.
But how do they get to this point? They begin with a lie: “Because Israel is the only country that Iran has repeatedly threatened to 'wipe off the map,' it is reasonable for it to have some input into the objectives and the timetable for progress in negotiations.” But there is nothing reasonable in believing a lie that is known to be a lie even when it is uttered by smooth talking Jews. What is reasonable, even imperative, is that Israel remain off the stage, and that the blabber mouth idiots in New York and Washington -- be they smooth talking or brash – keep quiet. If they don't know what this means, it means shut up so that the negotiations may reach a satisfactory conclusion.
And now comes the obligatory piece of reverse psychology: “Israel should also understand … a strike on Iran is likely to be limited in value if it is not followed by a sustained international sanctions effort...” But this is the pulling on the umbilical cord which is very much a part of the Judeo-Israel character. Having lied to America and to the World about Iran's pronouncements, the two authors make it look – in the name of fairness and balance – that they are forcing Israel to “understand” what in reality is what Israel craves. And this is to see an eternal conflict between the nations, something it can exploit and benefit from now and forever.
Having thrown all of this nonsense at you, they close by repeating the point that is most salient to them in case you got so dizzy, you forgot what it is: “It is possible to synchronize the U.S. and Israel clocks … the better these timetables are aligned, and the more Teheran understands this reality, the more likely the Iranians [will] take advantage of the diplomatic out...”
How dare they do this? you ask. They dare because having used reverse psychology; they believe they have inflicted upon you a kind of moral dyslexia that must have rendered you comfortable seeing the world they just painted upside down.
But the truth is that you do not threaten an ancient civilization and see it capitulate. Threaten the Iranians and they will become more resolute.