How To Liberate Jewish Dominated America

There is soon going to be an election in America, and except for two thirds of the members in the United States Senate, the job of everyone else is up for grabs. It is expected that many of these people will be re-elected because the odds have always favored the incumbents, but some members will be replaced by new faces because they did not want to run for the office again, or because they ran and were defeated by someone new.

Most of the newly elected members if not all of them will have already encountered the subtle and the not so subtle hands of the lobby groups that will seek to infiltrate their offices if they win the election, intrude on their legislative work if they will have it, and dominate them for the period of their tenure if they will be so lucky as to get it. But the intensity of the meddling exerted by the lobbyists on the candidates during the campaign while running for office will pale when compared to what the lobbyists will exert on the newcomers when the latter will finally move into their offices and begin to exercise the powers vested in them by virtue of their electoral win.

The two most active and most demanding lobbies that the new Senators and new House Representatives will encounter when they start working will be the Gun lobby of America and the Jewish lobby of everywhere else. Members of the first lobby will seek to put a gun in every American hand claiming this to be necessary for the purpose of hunting animals of the tame variety and the wild one, and for the purpose of protecting the self from human beings who may look tame on the surface but are very much on the wild side under the skin. The lobby characters will also claim that military guns used in wars would be perfect to hunt tame animals and wild humans. Go figure.

As to the members of the second lobby, they will seek to put an American made bomb in every Jewish hand claiming this to be necessary for the purpose of defending their most cherished values. They will assert that such values do exist but will not spell out exactly what they are. The lobbyists will also seek to put a bank account full of donated American money – spirited out of the country through the loopholes of the tax code – in the hands of every Jew who happens to live somewhere, anywhere and everywhere on planet Earth. And they will claim that such action is necessary to promote the aforementioned cherished and still mysterious values.

As to the incumbent legislators who will be re-elected, they know all about the monkey business that goes on to make up those realities because they lived with them in the years that they sat in the House of Representatives or the Senate. They are familiar with the tricks employed by the Jewish lobby in particular because these are the sort of tricks that no one ever forgets. What is clear-cut about them is that the lobbyists who pull them start by deceiving the intended victim. To do this and succeed, they begin the game by acting softly while flashing a big smile. And like the fox that comes dressed in the clothes of a lamb, they fool the unwary and start their long journey of deception at this point.

The foxy characters will maintain their soft posture as long as they will get what they ask for. But if and when this will come to an end, the Jewish lobbyists will switch to the next stage of the game which is to sting the American legislator. There are many ways to execute this treacherous act, but the way they prefer the most is the way of the scorpion. It consists of the lobbyists flipping allegiance and working toward the goal of getting rid of the American legislator. Calling him or her uncooperative, the lobbyists will seek to have them booted out of office and replaced by someone new, someone who will be more pliant to the dictates of the Jewish lobby and be more sympathetic to the never ending demands of Israel.

On the other hand, most of the re-elected American legislators who were uncooperative during the time that they were in office and have managed to avoid being booted out, will have been subjected to another kind of treatment at the hands of their apparently friendly Jewish handlers. They will have been beaten into a zombie-like state of existence by insidious psychological methods employed by those same handlers. The legislators will return to the House of Representatives or the Senate, and will act without thinking to rubber stamp and approve every demand that is made by an agent of the Israeli government or by a local Jew.

What is disheartening to learn about this whole sordid mess is that the returning legislators will not warn the newcomers of what has been happening to them, and what is about to happen to all the newly elected members. Some of the veterans may even collaborate with their Jewish handlers and with those handling the newcomers to mollify the latter, thus prepare them to quietly accept what is about to hit them. They will be made to think that what happens here on the Hill is the way that things ought to happen because this is what passes for normal in this greatest and most magnificent of legislative bodies despite the gridlock it is famous for.

What this means – when all is said and done – is that the old timers will work like a bunch of aging prostitutes to have the newcomers accept, even welcome being dominated by an American Jew or an Israeli intruder. These will have come to tell the novices what to think, what to do and how to help the various causes that serve the Jewish and Israeli interests without questioning the premise of what they are asked to do because the gridlock must never happen when it comes to Jewish or Israeli issues.

To do the thing as well as they can, the newcomers will be told how to engage in the moral equivalent of having a value based cerebral intercourse with their Jewish masters. They will be taught how to lie passively on their backs or their bellies and enjoy taking in what is given to them. They will be shown how to fake a heavenly sort of ecstasy at the end of each exercise. And they will be shown how to let out an orgasmic outburst that will shake the earth with the energy they discharge as they praise Israel and everything Jewish.

It is for these reasons that we must warn the newly elected American legislators of the realities that exist on ground zero of the American political, military and economic life. These are the reasons why we must counsel the newcomers to watch for and be careful about the insidious tricks that the Jewish leaders and the Israeli intruders will employ to deceive them right at the start. These people must realize that if they let themselves be influenced at this point, the chances are that they will remain under the influence till they leave office on their own, or they are booted out of it having outlived the purpose of slavishly serving their Jewish masters.

Our aim must be to diminish the chances that the legislators will end up serving the Jewish and Israeli causes like devoted hookers whose interest will be to please the moral pornographers who come to dominate them and impregnate them with the demonic seeds that seek to teach the young generation of young Americans all about the new normal. They are here to teach America’s young that the God they need to worship is not in heaven with a name like God the Father or Jesus the Son, but that the gods are numerous and they live among us bearing names that sound very much like Jewish names.

To this end, the newcomers to the Congress must be made to understand, and they must constantly be reminded that if they discard their state of vigilance, they will be reduced to a state of existence as described above rather than left alone to work for the country whose people elected them to serve it, serve them and serve no one else – especially not Israel or the Jews who have been served way more than they deserve already.

Thus, it is imperative that the newcomers be made to understand that the best way to avoid becoming an American congressional prostitute in the service of World Jewry is to reject the advances of those who will come and tell them how to do things they know little or nothing about.

They need to be warned that when they hear someone whisper in their ear: “You can't go wrong doing this or that,” they should take it to mean they are being set up to do something contrary to the interests of America; something that will benefit a Jewish cause or an Israeli one.

Avoiding that approach, the way for the American legislators to proceed when something needs to be done, is to conduct their own research so as to better understand the subjects they are tackling. If they need advice from someone, they should seek it from people who are far removed from the Washington Beltway and from the circle of professional lobbyists – especially those who work for the Jewish causes.

Finally, it must be said that it will take time for America to extricate itself from the snare now gripping it, but the country still has the chance to liberate itself and be saved from the Jewish influence that is known to be so toxic, it has managed to destroy many a country throughout history.

You do not wish this fate upon yourself, America. You must, therefore, never tempt a fate of this power and virulence. Instead, you should avoid conjugating with those who come loaded with moral syphilis and seek to ejaculate it into the skulls of the young and vulnerable among you.

Good luck to you and to the world.

Imagine If Mitt Romney Wins This Thing

To imagine what it would be like if Mitt Romney won the election, you'll have to think the unthinkable. Start with this analogy: Visualize a teenager in a wealthy home where the parents constantly tell him or her they cannot befriend this boy or that girl, and they cannot see this movie or attend that concert. You will have a constant hell in that home where the teenager will forever do what the parents have forbidden, because breaking the rules and maintaining a hellish home is what teenagers are genetically predisposed to do.

Imagine now the teenager discovering that the father is having an affair behind the mother's back, and that the mother is having an affair behind the father's back. Being a snoopy twit, the teenager that knows his or her way around the family computer, discovers those two realities at the same moment. Being a smart aleck and an opportunist, he or she uses the discovery to turn the table on the parents. In fact upon the discovery, the teenager puts together a strategy built on blackmail by which it tells each parent – just for fun – who they can and cannot talk to, and where they can and cannot go.

More than that, the teenager manages after a while to get the two parents to constantly seek currying favor with him or her by praising it no matter what it does – be it good, bad or indifferent – and by criticizing the other parent for not doing enough to tend to the needs of the offspring. Still more than that, currying favor by the parents includes the urging of neighbors, friends and relatives to constantly praise the teenaged son or daughter, and to always acquiesce to their request no matter what it may be, with the understanding that the parents will pay the cost no matter what it comes to.

And because, the neighbors, the friends and the relatives relish the idea of being reimbursed by the wealthy parents for what they do to please the capricious teenager, they always welcome what he or she asks for, so as to promptly acquiesce to the request and then rush to ask for a reimbursement that they know the parents will not question no matter how exorbitant they make it to be.

This, my friend, is what the relationship between America and Israel will look like if Mitt Romney wins the election, and he moves into the White House as President of the nation and Commander-in-Chief of its armed forces. The executive branch of the homeland will play the role of one parent that is under Jewish blackmail the same way that the legislative branch is now playing the role of the other parent which happens to be already under the same sort of blackmail.

This will happen because the Jewish leaders who have forever lived like parasites feeding off the gullible that they managed to pilot in the direction of subservience are eying America, hoping to make it their next victim. They see Romney as the perfect example of someone they can blackmail given that his religion has treated the Jews in a manner that is not politically correct in this day and age. These people who call themselves Christians when other Christians question the claim, have been baptizing dead Jews posthumously to make sure that they go to Heaven whether or not they would have liked it; whether or not their relatives would permit it.

And it will happen because the two houses of the U.S. Congress are already under the control of the World Jewish Congress and of AIPAC because many members of the American legislative body are under blackmail because of sexual misconduct they are committing now or have committed in the past. As well, there are the members who have a thing or two which may not be of sexual nature that they wish to keep under wraps but that the Jews know about and dangle in their faces to extort concessions from them.

The one difference between the reality in America today and the analogy of the teenager in a wealthy home is that America is no longer the wealthy nation it used to be. Whatever concession it makes to placate Israel and world Jewry, comes at a high price because America borrows the money to pay for it. As to the reputation and the prestige that the superpower loses every time it stands in Israel's corner – well, this has always been a loss that cannot be calculated or replaced.

Allow Romney to get into the White House, and the crumbling of America will accelerate.

The Choice Cannot Be Clearer

When President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney had their third presidential debate on October 22, 2012, Romney said a few things that should be looked at closely. In response to the first question posed by moderator Bob Schieffer, the Governor gave a long response, part of which went like this: “With the Arab Spring, came a great deal of hope that there would be … opportunity for greater participation on the part of women in public life, and in economic life in the Middle East.”

And right there; right off the bat you could tell that this was the mouth of a dumb and ignorant puppet that is animated by strings pulled by the hands of his Jewish handlers. You know it is Jewish because the Jews are the ones who harbor among them groups that want to become “Dear Abby” and “Ann Landers” to the rest of the world. Their aim would be to turn everyone into good little boys and good little girls that worship the Jews as the gods who chose to live among us here on good old Planet Earth.

And you know he is dumb and ignorant because he failed to make the connection inside whatever stuff he has in his skull – that many of the women in the Middle East have made the same choice that his wife made when she decided to raise her kids at home rather than participate in the life of the nation by taking part in “public life” or what he calls “economic life” which presumably means outside the home.

The fact of the matter is that families in the Middle East are on the whole large ones because the transformation from a rural existence to an urban one is not yet complete in that part of the world. But where the transformation is happening at a steady pace in a country like Egypt, for example, the younger generations are changing the composition of both the workforce and the student body. In fact, the workplace is now 25 percent female while the percentage of women going to college is outpacing that of the men. There are more women going on to university in Egypt at this time than there are men. You dig that Mitty boy?

And when someone is dumb, ignorant and manipulated by the self-designated gods, he makes statements that give out the signature of the hands pulling on the string. Here is one such statement: “We have – in Egypt, a Muslim Brotherhood president.” He does not say what is good or what is bad with this development because he hasn't got a clue, and his handlers did not dare telling him what they meant. They did not dare because they knew he will be up to his eyeballs in dog manure trying to explain that a democratic act undertaken in Egypt, while good in itself, may turn out to be bad for the bloodsucking entity they call Israel.

But what do the Jewish terrestrial gods, the Abbys and the Landers want to do with the Middle East? Here it is (not out of the horse's mouth but out of the idiot's mouth): “We're going to have to put in place a … strategy to help the world of Islam … reject radical extremism.” He later elaborated this way: “My strategy is broader than that … the key … is a pathway to get the Muslim world to be able to reject extremism on its own.” Where did that come from? you ask. Well, it came right out of the Jewish propaganda machine.

The fact is that when these people decide on controlling something, they begin their blitz with what you may call an assault by verbal barrage. That is, they start telling everybody what to say, when to say it and how to say it. They do this because they know from experience that when a critical mass of people get to say what they want them to say, their lie becomes the accepted truth – at least long enough for them to accomplish what they aim for. When this is done, they take what gains they can lay their hands on and run, leaving behind a mess that someone else has to clean up.

Here is a perfect example of that: “We don't want another Iraq, we don't want another Afghanistan ... The right course for us is to ... go after the ... various anti-American groups and the jihadists, but also help the Muslim world.” Thus, having made a mess of the relationship between America and the Muslim world with their cry: “Zey know nossing about za damacracy,” they now leave it to someone else to clean up the mess, and try something else. They leave it to Romney to ask the obvious question: “And how do we do that?” And he answers: “A group of Arab scholars came together … to look at how we can help ... And the answer they came up with was this: ...”

 He enumerates what the Arab scholars came up with, which is the usual you find anywhere in the world.

But this is not the important point in that passage. Look at this portion of it: “to look at how we can help” It is this “WE” that should tell you the Jewish gods, the Abbys and the Landers are still hungry to control the world. And the way they want to do it in the Middle East is the way they did it in America. Like parasites they want to latch onto something good they see happening there, highjack it and pilot it to serve their interests. Nothing can be more Jewish than to pretend the Arab scholars came together and came up with a set of recommendations to hand to that “WE” which presumably includes the idiotic puppet known as Mitty boy.

The trouble is that the Jewish leaders tried for centuries to control the Arabs but failed because the latter would not let them get out of line. And so, they turned their attention to what used to be a gullible Europe where they had it their way for a while till the Europeans discovered what they were up to and dealt with them via the pogroms, holocausts, gas chambers and incinerators.

So now, they want to use the power and prestige of America to do to the Arabs what they could not do on their own. If you're an American and you think about it, you will know that you have one of two choices: either you let them manipulate your system, the result of which will be that you will respond in a way similar to what the Europeans did. Or you put those troublesome Jews in their place before they get any further, and live free of their tricks like the Arabs did for centuries without as much as laying a finger on them.

The choice is yours, America. It is either Romney and the inevitable American holocaust. Or it is the status quo and a steady – albeit a slow progress – toward a more desirable world.

Smart Alec Romney Has Done It Again

He has done it again. Romney has played the game his Neocon bosom buddies know well, and use all the time. They took over America by pulling a Smart Alec trick that suits every moment, but has one and the same purpose each and every time. It is to reserve for themselves the right to exercise free speech while denying it to others. The Neocons did it to America and took it over; Romney tried it on Obama and failed miserably.

As he did many times before, Romney told the President, yet again, that attacking him was not a strategy while he was himself attacking the President with unprecedented viciousness. Nothing could be more Jewish than that, except maybe the Fox News Network where there are more than Jews running the joint. But whatever their creed, most of them look and sound like a sewer pipe that never stops flushing.

Whether or not President Obama was aware of it, there remains the fact that when the editors of the Wall Street Journal (which is the printed sister publication of Fox News) critiqued the second presidential debate which took place on October 16, 2012, they concentrated on the points that were brought to the fore by the candidates with regard to the economy and to foreign policy. But the editors understood not a word of what the President was saying as demonstrated in the editorial they published under the title: “A President Without a Plan” and the subtitle: “A more spirited Obama. But he still has no agenda for the next four years.”

And what happened last night, October 22, 2012 in the third debate between the same two candidates is that the President hammered the points he made in the second debate with such vigor this time, he could not have failed getting through the thick skull of the editors. If they did not get it in the second debate, they should get it now. But if they don't, well maybe they should consider taking up another profession. And so, let us look at that infamous Journal editorial while discussing last night's debate.

At one point, the editors described Obama's plan with these words: “The paucity of this promise.” And this prompts you to ask what the promise was. Well, here it is as they enumerated it themselves: “He wants to hire 100,000 teachers.” And there is this: “He wants to invest in solar and wind and biofuels, energy-efficient cars.” And also this: “He wants to raise taxes on the rich.” And this too: “He wants to pass immigration reform.” And there is this as well: “He has a plan for manufacturing and education and reducing our deficit in a sensible way, using the savings from ending wars to rebuild America and pursuing the energy of the future.” Does this represent paucity? Of course not. And these were the points that the President made again last night while Romney was trying to silence him. No paucity last night either.

It is normal that when you see something like this, you wonder what would constitute abundance in the eyes of these people. But you do not have to go too far looking for an answer because the editors of the Journal inadvertently gave their own. Since they were discussing the debate between Obama and Romney, they were compelled to contrast the plans that were presented by each man. And so you look closely at what the editors of the Journal have called the Romney plan. After all, they complained that “Mr. Obama spent most of his time attacking Mr. Romney … his tax plan … or the statement he made last year.” And guess what, my friend; this is what happened again in last night's debate. It is as if the third debate was a carbon copy of the second.

You comb the editorial anyway and hit on this passage: “The Republican followed by reciting the economic failings...” and you let out a loud scream: Whoa! They say Obama attacked; and say the Republican recited? Is this what it comes down to? Are these editors – like their Fox counterparts -- unleashing on their President the set of words they were using to describe the Vietcong and the Taliban who always attacked and never defended? Are they reserving for “the Republican” the nice words they were using to describe America's friends and allies who democratically described and never attacked? Are the editors of the Journal implying that the Democrats are enemies of America; and the Republicans its friends?

This is so disconcerting, you ask yourself: Why did they see the need to resort to this kind of language? Do they think that Obama is this bad, and Romney this good? Or is it something else?  And you find the answer right away. It is that there was nothing else they could do to attack their President. In fact, here is what they said in this regard: “Mr. Romney could have done better making the case for his agenda.” As to the exchange over Benghazi, they had this to say: “We agree was Mr. Romney's weakest moment.” And they ended the editorial like this: “Mr. Romney will have a chance to do better … next week.” Well, guess what, he didn't last night.

Instead, what Romney did was deny that he vehemently advocated letting the car companies go bankrupt – having seen that Obama's decision was the right one for the country and for the American workers who are also voters. But then look what this incorrigible man did: He employed the same vehemence he denied he employed in the past to now attack Obama for assisting the companies that work to develop electric cars, and the batteries that power them. Well, let's call a spade a spade: this guy has a low IQ.

And yes, those editors of the Journal and their audio-visual clones should consider taking up another profession. As to Mr. Romney, he will do well to withdraw from the presidential race instead of seeking to make of America a mess as big as the mess that his surrogates have made of journalism.

The world yearns for a bit of quality time; something we can achieve by cutting and raking the weed.

Watch Romney Mutilate History Jewish Style

When President Ronald Reagan ordered the bombing of Libya in retaliation to the bombing of a nightclub in Germany in which American service personnel were killed, it was thought that Gaddafi will not be heard from again. But this is not what happened because the man himself or people representing him were heard from again and again, especially by the people of an airline company called Pan Am, and the people in a Scottish town called Lockerbie.

The reason why it is important to mention this historical fact at this time is that the warmongers in America and elsewhere who want to embroil the United States of America in a war without end are at it again making up the history that suits their current purpose even if it contradicts what they were saying a few days ago when they had a different purpose in mind and they needed to tell a different story.

The occasion this time is that Mitt Romney who wants to be President of the United States will soon be debating the sitting President Barack Obama, and the subject of the discussion will be foreign policy. It is expected that the Libya episode will come up, and to prepare for the event, Romney's surrogates are running around telling audiences that their man would know how to deal with foreign subjects because Reagan knew how to do that, and Romney will do likewise. They falsely claim that Gaddafi was never heard from after the Reagan response because the latter did not shy away from war. Thus, they conclude that war would be the appropriate answer to every unpleasant situation.

But the fact remains that unpleasant situations do not occur solely on the international stage, and the American people have learned this lesson over and over again. They understand that when someone kills a number of innocent people he may or may not know, or he kills a prominent person for no apparent reason, the true and hidden reason is that the person doing the killing is insane. The last thing you want to do in such cases is what the media used to rush doing, find out the name of the killer and repeat it endlessly in print and on the air. In doing so, the media gave the insane the reward he wanted most, his 15 minutes of fame. This encouraged the other borderline cases to copycat the act and get their reward.

The one thing that must be understood about insanity is that it can be motivated to go into action by a trigger that may sound meaningless to the rest of us but makes sense to the insane. We must, therefore, seek to identify those triggers and do what we can to avoid setting them off. This says that the first trigger we must avoid is the tendency to reward the killers by giving them the notoriety they crave. But while this is a universal kind of trigger common to most killers, every community would have a set of triggers peculiar to it operating at the local level. Thus, each community must look at itself and find out what motivates its people to act in a way that might be considered insane – and avoid promoting those tendencies.

And when a country like America becomes the target of an insane movement taking root somewhere else on the planet, the thing you must avoid doing is reward the potential offenders with the publicity they seek – the very thing for which they train and are prepared to die for. You especially avoid having the President of superpower America – such as a George W. Bush – publicly mention a name like Abu-Masaab el-Zarkawi. And you avoid parading the arsenal of weapons you are fielding in the conduct of what you call the war on terror. For example, bragging about the ingenuity it took to identify a culprit by the DNA in the saliva he left on a postage stamp, has proved to be akin to pumping high octane fuel in a high performance engine. Committing that mistake must have played a major role in turning the 1993 attempt on the World Trade Center into the 9/11 tragedy that was perpetrated eight years later on that same Center.

You can argue all you want who started the war that triggered the chain reaction which culminated in that tragedy, but the fact remains that regardless as to who the culprit was, the result has been that every action caused a reaction, and the ensuing sequence will continue to unfold till it dies by itself or keeps piling the tragedies on top of each other with no end in sight. For example, many young Americans enlisted in the military after the events of 9/11 because they felt that they and their country were attacked for no reason. In their view, they were enlisting to go fight against the people who attacked them.

But what happens in real life is that the people who live in those places and had nothing to do with the events that unfolded half a world away, view the Americans as invaders that have no business attacking them in their own homes in their country. And so, like their American counterparts, they respond by enlisting to fight against the Americans. But having no regular army in which to enlist, they train to commit what they view as the ultimate self-sacrifice; that which they call martyrdom they commit to avenge the death of their loved ones and protect those still alive.

It is extremely difficult to look at the amount of tragedy yielded by events such as these and remain unaffected. But to play the role of a detached observer, we must make the effort to look at the situation with a cold eye so as to see the internal logic by which each side rationalizes their responses. To this end, we cease to pass judgment as to who may be at fault but we do not avoid judging which side has the greater responsibility to take the first step that can lead to the breaking of the chain of reactions and counter-reactions. Like it or not, we find that responsibility almost always falls on the shoulder of the stronger side, especially in the cases where the dispute has lasted a long time, its origin has faded and has been forgotten.

What adds appeal to that line of thinking is the fact that history seems to fortify the arguments often made in its favor. For example, fear in the form of a ghost called “domino theory” is what prompted the staging of a fake incident that led to the passing of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution by which the war in Vietnam was escalated, the result of which was that America's back was broken. And fear in the form of a fantasy called “Mushroom Cloud” is what led to the trumped up charges that Saddam of Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and the passing of a resolution authorizing the launch of a war against that country, the result of which was that Iran's back was strengthened. The lesson to learn from all this is that war does not produce fog but that the fog is produced by the warmongers who profit by the continued state of war.

But who is it that produces these ghosts and these fantasies? The answer is that someone weak produces them to incite someone strong like America to fight on their behalf a war they cannot fight themselves. This is why the fear of al-Qaeda is currently being turned into an illusion called “Radical Islam” and “Political Islam.” The idea behind it all is to embroil America in a never ending war against Islam, having accused it of fighting a “perpetual war against the West,” and warning that if America did not unleash an Armageddon against it, Islam will overrun the civilized world and take it back to the Dark Ages. This is how Romney put it: “I believe that if America does not lead, others will … and the world will grow darker, for our friends and for us.”

This being the background, we can now envisage how the upcoming debate will unfold between President Obama and challenger Romney. To help us do this, we have the speech on foreign policy that was given by Romney on October 8, 2012. In it he made the mistake of drawing a parallel between contemporary and historical events even though no resemblance exists between the two. He said that the “attack on our Consulate in Benghazi … was likely the work of forces affiliated with [al-Qaeda.]” He went on to say: “We have seen this struggle before.” And he explained it by drawing the parallel with WWII: “Statesmen like Marshall rallied our nation to rise to its responsibilities as leader of the free world … This is what makes America exceptional.”

If you are puzzled as to why he made a blunder of this magnitude, what comes next in the speech answers your question. Look at this passage: “The relationship between the President … and the Prime Minister of Israel, our closest ally in the region, has suffered great strains … Iran today has never … posed a greater danger to our friends, our allies, and to us.” In fact, the world is beginning to realize that a noise you may call “Jewish disease” seems to permeate every discussion carried out in America these days. It is the tendency to pick a historical incident, spin it in a way that buttresses the argument you are now making, then draw the conclusion that suits your current purpose however much it contradicts what you said before and exposes you as being a flip-flopper.

There is no doubt that these passages were written for Romney by his Jewish speechwriters, advisers and donors; the same sort of people who said that Gaddafi was never heard from after Reagan bombed him, who said that bombing the civilian nuclear power station in Iraq engendered no consequences, and said many other falsehoods considered to be the overt mutilation of history. It is something they do to make the events comply with the mythology of the Old Jewish Testament, and set the stage for Armageddon to happen thus bring to Earth the Messiah they are waiting for.

And to make it all sound reasonable, Romney will attack the President's position. You already see this tendency in his speech: “The President is fond of saying that 'The tide of war is receding' … but … with Iran closer to nuclear weapons capability … it is clear that the risk of conflict in the region is higher now … we are missing [the] opportunity to win new friends … in the Middle East … I will reaffirm our historic ties to Israel … the world must never see any daylight between our two nations … And I will roll back President Obama's … cuts to our national defense...”

And so you ask: Is this what the American people want? No, it is not, and he knows it too. In fact, he says this: “I know many Americans are asking a different question: 'Why us?' I know many Americans are asking whether our country today – with our ailing economy, and our massive debt, and after 11 years at war – is still capable of leading.”

He does not say whether or not America still has the wherewithal to continue assigning to itself the job it was not able to continue doing since the victories of WWII. And instead of adopting the kind of policies that President Dwight Eisenhower adopted and called on his successors to adopt as well, Romney chose to take the Jewish path of spreading fear and demagoguery. This is how he ended his speech: “I believe that if America does not lead, others will … and the world will grow darker, for our friends and for us.” A Jewish fantasy through and through.

But what if America continues to fail? Will this make the world grow brighter? Wake up, Mitt.

The Second Obama And Romney Debate

President Barack Obama who is running to be reelected, and Governor Mitt Romney who is challenging him for the job had a debate last night, October 16, 2012 in a town hall kind of setting. Members of the audience asked the questions, the moderator Candy Crowley kept the encounter civilized, and the debaters fought a vigorous battle.

The difference between the two opponents being that the President has a record to defend while the Governor has a vision that needs to be explained, I expected to see Romney raise questions about the Obama record; and I expected to see Obama press Romney on the details of his plans for America. What happened instead was that Romney attacked the Obama record to disparage it and not to ask for clarifications. As to Obama's performance, he did press Romney to explain his plans but the latter did not respond in any straightforward manner.

The general thinking being that the world has gone through a turbulent time during which America was shaken by economic circumstances that began to unravel in 2008, I was hoping to see Mitt Romney speak more broadly about economic matters, especially in terms of the world economy and how America relates to it. This, in my view, is an important topic at this time because the consequences of what happened in 2008 are felt in the rest of the world, most notably Europe. As well, North Africa started to convulse shortly after the events in America, and that resulted in consequences which continue to influence the neighboring Middle Eastern region.

Events like these ought to have motivated someone aspiring to be in charge of the lives of others, to be serious when it comes to drawing plans for the future of the nation. But it seems that Mr. Romney failed to do so. He did not pause to give himself the time to think of a way to conserve and consolidate the gains that were achieved in the past. He did not reflect about what happened that led to 2008, or how to chart a way forward to get on the road to a more certain future and remain on it. And he did not reorganize his priorities to make sure that what he may do will result in creating the most good to benefit the largest number of people.

Having scored low marks in all these areas, I wondered why Romney wanted to be President of the United States in the first place. I grew up with the notion that there comes a time in the life of an individual when he seeks a moment of calm to collect his thoughts, rejuvenate his mind and renew his vision. And when the ambition is to lead the nation, renewing the vision becomes an important endeavor especially after an episode that put into question many of the old assumptions about the nation, and what needs to be done to get it back on track. I looked for a sign that Romney had undergone such a moment of reflection but found none and were disappointed.

And while I deemed that Romney had scored a failure, I could see that Obama had succeeded in avoiding the distractions that would have veered him away from the goals he envisaged for the future of America. He seemed to have developed the skills he needed to navigate his way through the mountain of noise that Romney was throwing at him. He stayed with what he knew was genuine stuff, and thus made his points with utmost clarity. And so I asked myself: What was behind Romney's performance, and what did he manage to achieve in the end?

Well, I have come to believe that the Romney distractions were generated because he has a cause that may well be his own, but a cause that is also of the people who bankroll his campaign. Their collective goal would be to harness the political, financial and military potential of the American nation, and make that potential work for causes which are not what the American people want for themselves.

May the people realize this truth before they go to the polls.

Kennedy And Reagan Share The Blame Too

Without excusing their contemporaries, some people trace the roots of the economic difficulties in which America finds itself now to three decades ago; to the era of President Ronald Reagan. But I believe that the trouble began sooner than that; in the era of President Jack Kennedy. And the reason why it was difficult to notice the build up of the difficulties which led to the current condition is that mature economies doing well tend to do even better before they enter a dangerous period at the end of which the good times disappear. And when the good times are enjoyed here and now, people refuse to think that the bad times are lurking ahead.

In fact, it was not until the decade of the Nineteen Seventies that the price of copper cracked the one dollar mark per pound, a sign that the world economy was undergoing a serious transformation. But the phenomenon was not given the importance it deserved then, especially if you compare it with how we treat the fluctuations in the price of copper today. We now say that copper has a PhD in economics because it has earned the reputation of being the best predictor of where the economy will soon be going. Congratulation, Doctor Copper!

When in the Seventies copper cracked the one dollar barrier, people understood what the reason was; they could see that the war in Vietnam was making America buy copper like an alcoholic was buying his booze. But the connection was never made with the notion that – like Europe before it – America had exhausted its natural resources, and was now dependent on the rest of the world for what it needed to feed its war machine, and by implication run its industrial economy as advantageously as before.

And not too many people could see that this fact had fundamentally altered the world economic equation. To be sure, it was Jack Kennedy who got America into a war that turned out to be costly both in lives and in treasure, but this was erased from memory in favor of the one about the President who reduced the taxes, and thus spurred the economy to grow at a higher rate. The good times were here again and nobody cared about anything else.

What happened over the ensuing decades was that many nations in the world began to industrialize, and the hard working people that populate them made products that were cheaper than the products made in America. With time, those people improved on the quality of their products, thus made them better and cheaper still than those made in America. This has had the effect of putting factories in America out of business, and of putting Americans out of work.

However, the consumers that enjoyed having a high rate of consumption never lost their appetite to consume even when they were out of work. They maintained the old lifestyle, and bought the foreign products with the same enthusiasm they used to buy the locally made ones. The difference, however, was that they now bought on credit. They paid little of what they owed, and thus ran a huge tab as individuals and as a nation. It was the start of the troubles that plague America today.

What added to the problems that were started in the Kennedy era were the actions that were taken in the Reagan era. This American President also started a costly war, though it was a cold war and not a hot one. What the President did, in fact, was launch an arms race against the Soviet Union, forcing it to do likewise and go bankrupt in the process. The scheme worked in that the Soviet Empire collapsed but not the American Republic whose economy was more modern. It was also transformed into a war economy, and spurred further by the fact that President Reagan had reduced the taxes. As in the Kennedy era, the good times were here again and nobody cared about anything else.

But when you come right down to it, you see that the two massive wars – one hot and one cold – put an end to the American supremacy rightfully earned during the Second World War and for a period after that. Looking back, it can be said that the Vietnam war broke America's back and gave the Four Asian Tigers (as they were nicknamed) the opportunity to take its place as the preeminent industrial power.

As to the arms race against the Soviet Union, it did succeed in collapsing that empire, but did also plant the seeds for the hollowing of the American industrial economy in favor of China, India, Latin America and – surprise surprise – Russia as well; now free of the burden of its Soviet past.

Thus, it can be said that Ronald Reagan helped destroy the Soviet Empire by weakening its economy, but he also helped weaken the American economy; and the effect of that is beginning to be felt on the Republic.

Time will tell for how long the damage will be sustained and how far it will go.

Tale Of A Leader And A Lapdog

October 13, 2012 has been a good day to define two words: leader and lapdog. And lest we forget, we owe our thanks to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal for helping us do just that. So let's begin with the Journal whose editorial: “Biden's Intelligence” also came with this subtitle: “Nuclear Iran? Resurgent al Qaeda? 'Let's all calm down.'”

In their piece, the editors of the Journal use Vice President Joe Biden as a springboard to attack the President because Biden “shed newsworthy light on Obama Administration foreign policy.” They use the debate that took place between the V.P. (Veep as they call him) and the Republican challenger vying for his job, Paul Ryan to tell of their dismay that where Iran's nuclear program is concerned, America's red line “isn't the red line Israel's Bibi Netanyahu had in mind during the recent speech before the United Nations.”

In other words, the editors of the Journal which is majority owned by the Australian Jew, Rupert Murdoch wish to see America become a satellite of Israel, and see the American President become the lapdog of the Prime Minister of Israel. Not only must America subcontract its foreign policy to Israel, not only must America do what Israel says – more than that, say the Journal editors, the American President must faithfully follow everything that the Israeli Prime Minister says so as to pick up on what he has in mind at all time, thus shape America's policies accordingly. In short, Rupert Murdoch the Jew wants to see an Israeli lapdog in the Oval Office; one that is attentive to “His Master's Voice.” Which is why he wants to see Mitt Romney firmly installed in the Oval Office.

But how can someone come up with an idea as disgustingly preposterous as this and convince himself he can get away with it? Well, there is one very Jewish way to doing it. That is, you play God. To do this, you pretend to know what goes on in the hearts and minds of other people, and you pretend to know what the future will bring. Here is how the Wall Street Journal has played this game: “Turkey, Saudi Arabia and others … decide to go nuclear themselves. Iran becomes a regional nuclear power when it demonstrates its ability to get the bomb.” See how easy it is? You invent on the spot the consequences that reinforce your argument, and you warn about them with the confidence of and all-knowing God that never goes wrong. In other words, you be a Jew, and you Jew your listener.

Of course, Murdoch did not bother explaining why South Korea, Japan and the Philippines did not go nuclear when North Korea did; and this is because when you talk about Jewish causes, everything else becomes immaterial. But now that the editors have (in their mind's eye) a faithful lapdog in the Oval Office, might as well use him to the fullest extent. And so they rebuked Obama's policy concerning the Syrian crisis, Afghanistan, Libya, al Qaeda in North Africa, Vladimir Putin's increasingly anti-American policy, and China's muscular antics in the Pacific. They want to see the dog in the White House lick all the trouble spots in the world by implementing the instructions that come to him from Tel Aviv and the AIPAC's headquarter in New York. To this end, they will keep advocating till things happen the way they see them.

Unfortunately for them, Barack Obama occupies the Oval Office, and he turned out to be not that kind of a guy (or dog in their mind's eye.) Instead, he has shown them what a leader does, and how he handles the affairs of the nation. This is shown clearly in the article written by Graham T. Allisson Jr. and Shai Feldman, and published in the New York Times under the title: “Why Netanyahu Backed Down.”

They start the article like this: “For three years Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, seemed to be united in urging an early military attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. But last week that alliance collapsed, with Mr. Netanyahu accusing Mr. Barak of having conspired with the Obama administration, in talks behind his back.” Thus, Obama has shown that using quiet diplomacy – and not the barking of an attack dog, or the licking of a lap dog – he can get even a defense minister to abandon a sidekick pissing dog of the Netanyahu caliber. Thus, Obama has shown how to serve the 320 million Americans, not serve the likes of a Murdoch or a Netanyahu or the AIPAC characters in New York.

The article goes on to chronicle how the history of that episode unfolded. It is something that should serve as a model for future Presidents to follow provided they are made of the same steely material of which Obama is made, not the gelatin material that Rupert Murdoch is betting Mitt Romney is made of.

Paul Ryan, Neither A Guru Nor A Wonk

Paul Ryan debated Joe Biden and proved to be a dud. The encounter happened on October 11, 2012  because Mitt Romney who is running for President of the United States, invited Ryan to join the ticket and run to be his Vice President. The debate he had with the sitting Vice President Joe Biden unmasked him as being not the expert on the economy or the guru on the budget or the wonk on the deficit he was billed to be, but a run of the mill blabber mouth that is more susceptible to being programmed than to generating thoughts of his own.

When the moderator, Martha Raddatz asked the candidates to tell how they would fix the American economy, Ryan rattled off a litany of the symptoms affecting it without giving details of the plan that he and Romney have in mind to relieve those symptoms or even cure the illness they say is causing them. Instead, he described the economy as “limping along,” growing at only 1.3 percent and where the creation of new jobs is slow. He added that twenty-three million Americans are looking for work, that fifteen percent of the population live in poverty; and this means the recovery is not at the level where it should be in his estimation.

But what will he and Romney do that is different from what is being done now? To answer this part of the question, Ryan mentioned the five-point plan that Romney discussed before he chose him to be his running mate. The first point is about getting America energy-independent by the end of the decade which is something that has been talked about since the early Nineteen-Seventies – four decades ago. The second point is to help the people get the skills they need to get the jobs they want which is something that has been talked about since the Seventeenth Century – four centuries ago. The third and fourth point have to do with getting the debt and deficit under control which is something that has been talked about since the beginning of time – more than four millennia ago.

As to the fifth point, it is about not raising taxes on the rich to reduce the deficit because these are the people who create jobs, says Ryan. To answer the question that was raised on taxes: “If your ticket is elected, who will pay more in taxes? Who will pay less?” Ryan repeated the old talking points of his campaign unaware, apparently, that the discussion had progressed beyond them. Here is where he was stuck: “If you taxed ... businesses making over $250,000 at a hundred percent, it'd only run the government for 98 days.” Thus, he offered what he said was a better solution: “lower tax rates across the board and close loopholes.” But the idea that closing the loopholes will generate more in taxes than the entire taxable income is worth, has created the image of a hole that is bigger than the doughnut – an intolerably absurd view.

For this reason, the Wall Street Journal – which is a mega surrogate for the Romney-Ryan campaign – ran an editorial on the same day under the title “Obama's Disappearing $5 Trillion” and the subtitle: “The President's advisers concede 80% of Romney's tax-cut math.” In it, the editors tried to smooth the absurdity not by acknowledging its existence but by laying the blame on the beholder.

They did so as can be seen in the subtitle by saying that the President's advisers were the ones to concede 80% of the math. Hey guys, nobody outside the Romney campaign made it sound like the doughnut was one big hole and no dough. Thus, by accusing the other side of conceding 80%, the editors of the Journal have, in fact, conceded the 20%. And this is to admit that under the Romney-Ryan plan, the middle class will pay 20% of the 5 trillion dollars in extra taxes; something that was vehemently denied by the Romney campaign since the start. And this is what the debate was about in the first place.

Instead of being “with it” and picking up the debate from this point to advance it further, Paul Ryan did the following: “let me tell you about the Mitt Romney I know.” He went on to tell a personal story of kindness. But what was conspicuous by its absence were the charitable donations that Romney has been making over the years to a church in which he is a bigwig; so big in fact that he has the biggest say if not the only say as to how the tax free money that comes in is spent. This is called serving the self through charitable donations that are tax exempt to the donor, and tax free to the recipient, both of which are one and the same. The wealthy Jews who donate to the local Jewish charities or to Israel, operate on that same principle, and they are doing very well at the expense of the other American taxpayers.

Other than that, the tape and the transcript of that debate are out. When you go over them, you are hard pressed to find anything that Paul Ryan has said to indicate he knows enough about the economy, the deficit, the debt or the budget that will help pull America out of its current predicament.

The Quicksand Of A Bogus Promised Land

Mitt Romney who is running to be President of the United States of America gave a speech on October 8, 2012 on the subject of foreign policy. In the eyes of a sane person anywhere in the world, a speech like this would be regarded as a strange thing because of what it contains. But this is what passes for normal in America these days as it has been for a number of decades. To understand how this situation came to be, we need to review the historical background that led to it.

It has always been understood that where foreign relations are concerned, the prime obligation of a government is to protect the nation when threatened by an outside force. But if no threat exists, the role of government is to promote the interests of the nation abroad by seeking to establish the sort of commercial relations which benefit as many of the local population as possible. Besides that, other kinds of peaceful relations are pursued by governments, among these the bilateral exchanges in the cultural and scientific fields which satisfy the curiosity of ordinary people on both sides, and help develop the bonds of mutual appreciation and friendship among ordinary people.

Well, the above was nothing more than the description of an ideal situation. But the reality is that the world is a diverse place containing thousands of entities grouped in some two hundred nations and territories where each is motivated by more than those considerations. Yes, there exist small nations not burdened by the memory of past hardships, and they follow an ideal model that may be called the Swiss model of a neutral foreign policy. There are also bigger powers enjoying a period of relative calm for now, and they too follow that ideal model but with a slight deviation. For example, before dealing with someone, Britain, France and other middle powers look ahead and forge relationships with nations with the view of turning them into military alliances for mutual defense in case the world turns nasty again someday.

And nasty was the state of the world at an earlier time. The unfortunate part is that the history of the world after the two Great Wars of the Twentieth Century, unfolded in such a way as to make superpowers the size of America and the former Soviet Union, act so strangely it was never easy to understand them; and their actions were never possible to justify. For, having the might, the security and the self assurance to remain what they are and let the world come to them seeking to establish relationships that would benefit everyone, the superpowers acted instead like mortal rivals. They behaved as such, and in the process dragged the world along as they tried to dominate it, suspecting that the other superpower was trying to achieve that same end. It was mutual distrust pushed to the limit of absurdity.

This opened the door for other entities to take advantage of the situation and play such roles as the prevailing conditions allowed them to play. What those entities did, in fact, was to play games – some of which were deadly ones – because the entities could align themselves with one of the superpowers and be protected while doing the things they would not have done on their own. For this reason, it can be said with certainty that the histories of Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East would not have unfolded the way they did had it not been for the rivalry between America and the former Soviet Union.

In the midst of all this, Israel was the entity that gained the most from that rivalry having played a consummate game. It is that a number of Jewish individuals and institutions helped it play the game and in turn, benefited from the successes that it scored. Those beneficiaries included the World Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defamation League, AIPAC and the affiliated organizations – all of which ended up grabbing the various levers of real power in America and held on to them tightly. By the time they had achieved this, America was doing for their causes what no gentile or non-Jewish institution could get their own country of America to do for them. And this happened despite the fact that the causes of non-Jews were by far more legitimate and more meritorious than any Jewish cause.

When you look at the situation now, you find that the political leaders in Israel and the Jewish leaders in America are still trying to make Israel look like a normal country. What the world perceives, instead, is an illegitimate entity that acts like an American military base which happens to be situated in the Middle East. It is, however, a base that is not under the control of people in America but the control of people in Israel working hand in hand with prominent Jews who could be residing in Israel, in America or anywhere else in the world.

For a situation like this to be maintained, Israel receives economic aid that keeps it alive thanks to an American Congress that acts like a rubber stamp to every Israeli request and every additional Jewish request. Moreover, Israel receives the kind of advanced weapons from America that allow it to create trouble wherever it can, whenever it wants. And what Israel loves to create all the time is nothing less than deadly mayhem because this is how it keeps matters on edge, a situation that lets it sponge on the taxpayers of America, a nation that is increasingly being impoverished by the direct association it has with Israel, and the indirect consequences that flow from that weird relationship.

Which brings us to the Romney speech. He started the discussion by describing the lamentable situation in which America finds itself. But instead of describing a strategy by which to free his country from the absurd relationship it has forged with Israel, he did what is referred to in today's vernacular as “double down.” That is, he revealed a strategy that will maintain America in a perpetual state of war on behalf of Israel. This being the apocalyptic vision that forms the heart and soul of the Jewish religion, he used a Jewish approach to justify the plan. He did so by accusing someone of doing the thing he plans to do himself. That is, he promised he will engage those “who seek to wage perpetual war on the West” when perpetual war is in fact what he seeks. The truth goes like this: Perpetual war, perpetual war – how sweet the sound! How Jewish the sound!

You see my dear friend, it is not his fault he says; someone made him want to do so – and no excuse can be more Jewish than that. It is as if a Jewish writer had written the speech for Romney. Thus, the notion that being in a perpetual state of war will bring about “a freer, more prosperous, and more peaceful world.” Get it? It's a perpetual state of war that looks like a perpetual state of peace – nothing more serious than that. But considering that America was dragged by Israel and its American lackeys in the kind of wars that rendered it poorer while the rest of the world was becoming freer, more prosperous and more peaceful, you ask if there is here a cause and effect relationship. Did America suffer because Israel and the Jewish leaders used it to try and sabotage the progress that was being made in the Arab and Muslim worlds? Was America the destructive hammer in the hands of the Jewish devil?

There is no doubt that America lost a great deal due to its association with Israel. And so, the next question concerns the state of mind of the leaders in Israel and among the Jewish Americans who engineered that situation. And so this is the question that comes to mind: How much did these people know of the nefarious consequences that their pursuit of Israel's interest will affect America? To get a sense of what the answer may be, look at this passage: “...it is the responsibility of our President to use America's great power to shape history – not … leaving our destiny at the mercy of events.”

Well, whether it was Romney or a speechwriter who wrote these words, that person could not have heard of Chaos Theory. This is the one that says a butterfly fluttering its wings can cause a hurricane thousands of miles away, a long time after that. This will happen because the random laws and not the butterfly will have so prescribed. By the same token, no human can shape events or make things happen exactly as he desires, not even someone in control of “America's great power.” Simply put, to believe that America can make things happen exactly as you want them to happen is to engage in useless self-delusion.

And useless self-delusion is exactly the culture that the Jewish American leaders and the agents of Israel have been fostering in America for several decades now. The passage in the Romney speech expressing that reality is this: “The relationship between the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Israel, our closest ally in the region, has suffered great strains.” This is like saying the closest friend of the family is the pedophile that comes to visit day in and day out because he likes the kids so much, he constantly makes love to them. The truth is that under the prevailing conditions, Israel can never be the friend of anyone. It is shunned by the whole world like normal human beings shun a leper with pedophile tendencies.

But while the world knows what lurks behind the activities of Israel and its American lackeys, a potential new recruit like Mitt Romney is being “educated” on how to construct yet another Trojan Horse by which to sabotage something, somewhere in the world. Look what they do to pull a devilish feat of this magnitude. First, they get Romney to say the following: “Across the greater Middle East … the painstaking work of building capable security forces, and growing economies, and developing democratic institutions, the President has failed to offer tangible support that our partners want and need.” Then, they decide for him who the partners ought to be, and what they should want and need.

And so, they get Romney to enumerate what he will want to do in Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya and other parts of North Africa. And they get him to chide the current President for saying that: “The tide of war is receding.” No, says the Jewish speechwriter who put the words in the mouth of the wannabe President: “it is clear that the risk of conflict … is higher now.” And what would be the solution? you ask. And the speechwriter responds, it must be a greater defense spending by America to back more robust deeds that would be the following: “I will reaffirm our … ties to Israel … And I will roll back President Obama's … cuts to our defense … And I will call on our NATO allies to … devote 2 percent of their GDP to security spending.” Perpetual war, perpetual war – a Jewish song so sweet to their ears. And now sweet to Romney's ears as well.

These being his newly acquired values, Romney tells what he will do with them: “I will support friends across the Middle East who share our values, but need help defending them … In Egypt … I will urge the new government to ... maintain its treaty with Israel.” And that's what the whole effort is about, my friend. It's about embroiling America militarily in the Middle East and elsewhere to advance the never-ending causes of Israel and of World Jewry. As they see it, only a state of perpetual war can achieve all this, hence the quicksand into which they are dragging America.

And while the American people are literally going bankrupt paying for the Jewish adventures that were promised to be a trek to the Promised Land, the people in the places most affected by those policies say this to America: “We used to love you, America; we want to love you again but you are behaving like someone possessed by the Jewish demons of destruction. We are sorry but until you exorcise the demons out of you, we want you to stay out of here.” The people of Egypt, more than anyone else, made this point clear over and over again.

They know that America's obligation to them is labeled “aid” while their literal aid to both Israel and America is not mentioned at all. They also know that America spends hundreds of billions of dollars on its allies to share in the defense of their mutual interest worldwide. Of this, only a meager 1.3 billion go to the Egyptian military in the form of weapons and not cash. They also know that to be fair, America's contribution to Egypt should be 5 times as much – made in weapons and in cash because this is how much Egypt spends to do the job.

Moreover, the people of Egypt are fed up giving Israel a billion dollars worth of food aid and fuel aid every year without even getting a thank you in return. And they are fed up running a 7 billion dollars trade deficit with America every year to offset America's own deficit with Israel in that same amount.

Enough is enough is what the people of Egypt are saying to America; pick up your marbles, get out of here and stay out till you exorcise the Jewish demons that possess you.

And we shall reassess the situation after you have been cleared, they tell America.

Romney's Mantle Of A Male Bimbo

Romney gave a speech on foreign policy he titled: “The Mantle of Leadership” then described what the mantle of a male bimbo looks like and feels like. This is what he has come to believe leadership means. To understand how he got to this point, look at the following two passages:

First there is this passage: “The relationship between the President [Obama]… and the Prime Minister of Israel … has suffered great strain. The President … put 'daylight' between the United States and Israel.” Second there is this passage: “I will reaffirm our historic ties to Israel … the world must never see any daylight between our two nations.”

But what is it that prompted Romney to come out now and talk like this? you ask. Here are the reasons as he stated them: “The attacks ... were not an isolated incident. They were accompanied by anti-American riots in nearly two dozen other countries ... in the Middle East Africa and Asia. Our embassies have been attacked. Our flag has been burned. Many of our citizens have been threatened and driven from their overseas homes by vicious mobs, shouting 'Death to America.'”

Does that mean he believes he can appease these “vicious mobs,” get them to stop shouting “Death to America” and get them to love America again by sucking up to the Prime Minister of Israel? Apparently yes, because it seems that two Arab women and a handful of Iranian rioters (he described as millions) managed to send him a message each informing him of same. Here is what he says about that: “As one Libyan woman said,” We are not going to go from darkness to darkness.” And this: “As one Syrian woman put it, “We will not forget that you forgot about us.” And this: “Millions of Iranians … cried out, “Are you with us, or are you with them?”

How does he hope to appease the Middle Eastern, African and Asian mobs by sucking up to the Prime Minister of Israel or by doing worse than that? Actually, Romney was made to believe that the mobs love America but that they were driven by individuals who “seek to wage perpetual war on the West.” But why is it that sucking up to the Prime Minister of Israel will drive the mobs away from those who seek to wage war with the West and get them to love America again?

Good question. But Romney's answer is long and convoluted. Here is how he understands this issue: “This is the struggle that is now shaking the entire Middle East to its foundation. We have seen this struggle before ... In his time, in the ashes of world war, another critical part of the world was torn between democracy and despotism.” This is where you are hit with the hard reality that this man, Romney, is as ignorant about history as W. Bush (43) was. To say that the struggle of the Arab masses to get rid of the leaders that ceased to serve them well is akin to the struggle of the French and Polish people who battled the Nazi occupation, is to show how much his skull is full of Jewish syphilis. Get it through to your head, Mitty boy, the resemblance exists only between the Zionist occupation of Palestine and the Nazi occupation of Europe.

What this means, therefore, is that the masses of the Middle Eastern nations are not looking forward to seeing a Romney as President in a permanent state of sucking up to the Prime Minister of Israel or doing worse than that. Correct? Of course, they are not looking forward to that. But the occupation of Palestine is not the only issue that these people are concerned about. In fact, when their memories begin to fade, and they tend to forget that the Palestine issue is a small part of a broader one, the Jewish propaganda machine manages to explode the big issue wide open again.

And the Jewish leaders always find a disgusting character like Mitt Romney to have him mouth-fart this reality to the masses in the Middle East and beyond. Look at this passage: “In Egypt, I will use our influence – including clear conditions on our aid – to urge the new government to represent all Egyptians, to build democratic institutions, and to maintain its peace treaty with Israel. And we must persuade our friends and allies to place similar stipulations on their aid.”

This is a mouthful of Jewish syphilis that Romney is spitting shamelessly. It must have given Netanyahu a hell of an orgasm. Let us look closely at the last part of it: “And we must persuade our friends and allies to place similar stipulations on their aid.” You know when was the last time that America did something like this at the behest of the Jews? It was in 1954 when America put pressure on the World Bank and the “friends and allies” to make it difficult for Egypt to build the Aswan dam, a major economic project at the time.

This act turned the march of history upside down in the region, and the effect is felt to this day. Yet, Egypt still managed to build the dam and do a great deal of good for millions of Egyptians over several generations. If the Jews have convinced Romney that the Egyptian people will love him when he tries to repeat that history, he is a mental case.

As to the part where he says: “...to represent all Egyptians, to build democratic institutions, and to maintain its peace treaty with Israel.” He got an answer for that but his head is so full of Jewish syphilis, he doesn't get it. In fact, the message he seems to miss was given to America many times by all the political parties in Egypt, by the women's groups and by the Coptic groups. It was to keep his snorting nose out of their affairs.

This guy needs new advisers and new speech writers.

A Hole Bigger Than The Doughnut?

On Sunday October 7, 2012 something happened that changed the Universe in which we live. Believe it or not, someone has been saying that small can be bigger than big (and the other way around) that big can also be smaller than small. Do you know who was responsible for this? It was none other than the indomitable Mitt Romney who is running to be president of the United States. Wouldn't you love having a president like that running your country for you?

Yes, my dear reader, Mitt Romney sent his surrogates onto the circuit of the talking heads which runs on the boob tubes of the ether – sometimes called television – to talk their heads off trying to explain that the hole in a doughnut can be bigger than the doughnut itself. And this will happen, they assure you, without the hole engulfing the entire doughnut and becoming one giant hole in the middle of nowhere.

If you don't get it, my friend, maybe you ought to read up on those things they call black-holes in outer space. These things have been out there since the beginning of time, and they are down here now courtesy of the incomparable Mitt Romney and his entourage.

Here is how the thing works according to Romney and his politico-scientific surrogates. They say that the very wealthy in America make money but not so much of it that if you take all what they make – even by raising the taxes on them to the 100% level – you still cannot reduce the deficit of the nation enough to make a dent in it. The way they put it is absolute as you can see; no wiggle room here.

So then, does that mean the deficit cannot be eliminated without raising the taxes on the middle class? you ask. Oh no, no, say Romney and his surrogates, you can still reduce the deficit if you close the loopholes in the tax structure, which is a structure everyone agrees is an awfully big and awfully bad thing.

What loopholes are these, Mr. Romney, Messrs surrogates and Company? you ask. Are they the mortgage deductions that the middle class is benefiting from? Or is it something like that? Oh no, no, says he and they: “like we said before, there will be no raising of taxes on the middle class. None whatsoever. Get it? None because we say so, and that's definitive.”

So then, what loopholes are these, Sir, Ladies and Gentlemen? And they all respond in unison: “These would be the loopholes that the wealthy use to reduce their taxes, and only these loopholes.”

Whoa! Let's pause here for a minute. Are you suggesting that the money the wealthy deduct using the loopholes is larger than the money they make on which they take the deductions? Are you saying that the hole in the doughnut can be larger than the doughnut itself? What Universe is this?

Is Mitt Romney for real or did he take math lessons in the belly of a black-hole at the hands of a magician called Abracadabra?

Maybe he'll soon make an announcement in that regard and put an end to the suspense.

We can't wait.

Romney Eats The Pie Other People Bake

Would you hire someone to be your cook if you knew he never cooked a meal? Would you be reassured if he said the only knowledge he has of food is how to eat it? Well, my friend, this is what Mitt Romney wants the American people to do, asking them to elect him and let him run their GDP kitchen where they need someone to make the economic pie grow at a faster rate.

The reality is that economies exist because people make goods and render services, both of which are referred to as wealth. The people who contribute in the making of that wealth are also the people who consume it. Thus, every able individual gets into the kitchen and participates in making the pie that everyone shares at meal time. Because as a species we are no less noble than the animals, we too feed our young before they can participate in the production of the wealth. And because we are more noble than the animals, we share the pie with those who can no longer help produce it.

But like the scavengers in the animal kingdom who are too lazy to hunt, there exist human hoarders who enter the kitchen by stealth and get a free meal. When caught and proven guilty, these people are dealt with according to the law. Other people develop the kind of greed that makes them covet more and more of the pie they do not participate in producing. What they do instead is develop the tricks and the sophistication by which they freeload as much of the pie as they can without appearing to break the law. They do it with the help of collaborators who bless them with a stamp of approval and let them get away with it.

What makes it possible for these people to do what they do is that the GDP kitchen of a modern economy requires all sorts of natural resources to produce the goods and the services that people buy. For this to happen, a modern economy requires an additional ingredient called money which is also referred to as liquidity. The source of money is the central bank, out of which liquidity flows and moves through conduits to make its way to every nook and cranny of the economic pie where it becomes an inseparable part of it.

Financial institutions were created to serve as the network of conduits that move the money throughout the economic kitchen. What the human hoarders do when bent on scavenging what belongs to others, is make themselves a part of that network of conduits. Once they sense they have been firmly installed where they need to be, they pretend to let the money flow unimpeded to where it is going but in reality, retain as much of the liquidity as they can get away with. Thus, they become fabulously wealthy in the process without ever stepping into the kitchen or help bake the pie.

But for them to succeed in doing the work of the devil, these people recruit and keep on their side the individuals who are supposed to police the network and guard it against theft. These would be the regulators who make the rules as well as the inspectors who enforce the rules. The hoarders – now in the role of conduits – make those individuals collaborate with them for a few pieces of the pie they kickback to them at the appropriate time and in the appropriate manner – all in accordance with the rules they shape together to make all moves look legitimate. In return, the hoarders receive the blessings of the regulators and the inspectors, something they get in the form of an official stamp of approval for the unethical if not illegal activities they perform day in and day out.

Financial institutions come in many forms, one of which being the private equity firm where people like Mitt Romney invite other portfolio managers to come invest in their operations. These would be the managers in charge of endowment funds of all sorts, retirement funds of every kind and pools of money that seek a return on the savings of their members. Romney and those like him take that money and do the things that the other fund managers would fret doing. What they do is act like vultures that feed on wounded enterprises they take over, and do the things that give them a high return while taking the smallest possible risk if no risk at all.

They pull this sort of tricks by maximizing the pain they inflict on others, especially the workers they often dismiss without adequate notice or compensation. The vultures also take maximum advantage of the laws they helped formulate in the first place. These would be the laws in which the loopholes were carved to help them avoid paying the tax where they should be paying it. To this end, they would have set up multiple corporations which are nothing more than shell corporations created for the purpose of playing the shell game by which they spirit the money out of the country and hide it in offshore tax havens as well as secret personal accounts.

So now, this Mitt Romney who never entered a kitchen to bake a pie but ate from them all, wants the people of America to hire him thus make him the chief law enforcers in charge of upholding the laws and the loopholes that made him the successful vulture he has become. And he wants to get there even before he has had the time to digest the flesh of those on whom he has been feasting.

He promises to make the American GDP grow faster than it is growing now not because he knows how to bake the pies that go into the GDP but because he knows how to eat from those pies and enjoy them all. And the proof of this, he says, is that he is one of the fat cats populating not the street they call Wall Street where all the saints live and work but the alley they call Alleycat which exists nowhere except in the imagination of the 47% losers that make up the American population.

Way to go America, way to go!