Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Second Obama And Romney Debate


President Barack Obama who is running to be reelected, and Governor Mitt Romney who is challenging him for the job had a debate last night, October 16, 2012 in a town hall kind of setting. Members of the audience asked the questions, the moderator Candy Crowley kept the encounter civilized, and the debaters fought a vigorous battle.

The difference between the two opponents being that the President has a record to defend while the Governor has a vision that needs to be explained, I expected to see Romney raise questions about the Obama record; and I expected to see Obama press Romney on the details of his plans for America. What happened instead was that Romney attacked the Obama record to disparage it and not to ask for clarifications. As to Obama's performance, he did press Romney to explain his plans but the latter did not respond in any straightforward manner.

The general thinking being that the world has gone through a turbulent time during which America was shaken by economic circumstances that began to unravel in 2008, I was hoping to see Mitt Romney speak more broadly about economic matters, especially in terms of the world economy and how America relates to it. This, in my view, is an important topic at this time because the consequences of what happened in 2008 are felt in the rest of the world, most notably Europe. As well, North Africa started to convulse shortly after the events in America, and that resulted in consequences which continue to influence the neighboring Middle Eastern region.

Events like these ought to have motivated someone aspiring to be in charge of the lives of others, to be serious when it comes to drawing plans for the future of the nation. But it seems that Mr. Romney failed to do so. He did not pause to give himself the time to think of a way to conserve and consolidate the gains that were achieved in the past. He did not reflect about what happened that led to 2008, or how to chart a way forward to get on the road to a more certain future and remain on it. And he did not reorganize his priorities to make sure that what he may do will result in creating the most good to benefit the largest number of people.

Having scored low marks in all these areas, I wondered why Romney wanted to be President of the United States in the first place. I grew up with the notion that there comes a time in the life of an individual when he seeks a moment of calm to collect his thoughts, rejuvenate his mind and renew his vision. And when the ambition is to lead the nation, renewing the vision becomes an important endeavor especially after an episode that put into question many of the old assumptions about the nation, and what needs to be done to get it back on track. I looked for a sign that Romney had undergone such a moment of reflection but found none and were disappointed.

And while I deemed that Romney had scored a failure, I could see that Obama had succeeded in avoiding the distractions that would have veered him away from the goals he envisaged for the future of America. He seemed to have developed the skills he needed to navigate his way through the mountain of noise that Romney was throwing at him. He stayed with what he knew was genuine stuff, and thus made his points with utmost clarity. And so I asked myself: What was behind Romney's performance, and what did he manage to achieve in the end?

Well, I have come to believe that the Romney distractions were generated because he has a cause that may well be his own, but a cause that is also of the people who bankroll his campaign. Their collective goal would be to harness the political, financial and military potential of the American nation, and make that potential work for causes which are not what the American people want for themselves.

May the people realize this truth before they go to the polls.