To borrow a phrase from the decade of the Nineteen Sixties,
the editors of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) brought to the level of our
consciousness something that was heretofore submerged deep into our subconscious
minds. They did so in an article they titled: “The Not-Bluffing Bluff” and
subtitled: “Iran gains more
time to build nuclear weapons while the U.S. makes more concessions.” It
was published in the Journal on March 9, 2013.
By coincidence, the editors of the New York Times (NYT)
published an editorial the next day, March 10, 2013 that was not intended to be
a response to the WSJ but could very well have been. It was titled: “Repeal the
Military Force Law.” In it, the editors of the Times discuss a point of view
that seems on the surface to be unrelated to the WSJ editorial but is, in fact,
related to it at a deeper level.
Being in favor of seeing the United States embroiled in a
war under a flimsy pretext, the WSJ editorial ends this way: “If Mr. Obama really
weren't bluffing, we would be adding to our military … That we're doing the
opposite tells Iran [we're] bluffing.” As to the editors of the NYT who do not
favor seeing their country embroiled in “a war without end,” they end their
editorial this way: “...as Jeh Johnson … said in a speech … 'War must be
regarded as a finite, extraordinary and unnatural state of affairs' … The right
solution is for Congress to repeal the 2001 authorization … repeal it now.”
These are two diametrically opposed positions.
The Wall Street Journal makes no secret of the fact that it
is more Jewish than the Pope can be Catholic. If someone doubts this, the
editors of the Journal chose the week in which North
Korea threatened to engulf America
in a nuclear holocaust to badmouth not North
Korea but Iran
whom Israel
chose to be its enemy of the day. Thus, the clash we see between the points of
view of the Journal and that of the Times is really a clash between what America wants for itself, and what the Jews want
for America .
It is also what the Jews will want for the world when they will have secured America 's
submission, and have taken control of the superpower.
All of that prompts us to ask the following questions: What
is it that makes the Jewish leaders tick so incessantly? And what do they want
in the final analysis if there will ever be a finality to what they seek?
The truth be told that what the Jews want from the
relationships they forge with non-Jews is encapsulated in the story of God,
Abraham and his son. It is the story of a father who was asked to prove his
unconditional devotion to God by being ready to murder his own son because God
has so ordered. Likewise, the Jews expect their “friends” to be so devoted to
them, they would put the lives of their children in harm's way to please the
Jews and serve their causes.
Of course, people would be smart enough to avoid getting
into a relationship with a Jew if they knew at the start what will be expected
of them at some point in the future. This is why young Jews are taught at an
early age to hide their ultimate aim when approaching someone new with the view
of forging a relationship with him or her. The youngsters then spend the rest
of their lives training, rehearsing and implementing the art of attracting new
people to their never ending causes. They start the process with every new
catch by putting him or her at ease with a saying that goes something like
this: We are so much alike, I am certain we'll see eye to eye on every subject.
How that relationship evolves will then depend on the
individuals who will participate, the community where the interaction will take
place, the culture that will weigh down on them, and the country where it will
all unfold. But the one thing that will remain constant is that the end of every
run will be a horror story, as indeed it has been throughout the centuries of
Jewish history. The way that history has unfolded for these people everywhere
they went has been an endless replay of the same old sordid story.
History for them has been a series of backlashes taking
place each time that ordinary people were pushed to the limit of their
endurance, and were made so very angry at being so badly deceived. In everyone
of those instances, the people felt that they gave too much of themselves to please
the Jews, but the Jews never stopped insisting on getting more, and still more
after that. And what the Jews wanted more than anything was that their
so-called friends renew their love for the Jews each and every day by
proclaiming as loudly as they can their infinite hatred for those whom the Jews
have designated their enemy of the day.
This was the mentality that signaled to ordinary people
everywhere on the planet they had been feeding a monster who will feed on them
and their children no matter how much they gave it; no matter how much they
tried to appease it. And these were the moments when the backlashes were
triggered, and the people decided that the time had come to use against the
Jews the very weapons that the Jews had given them to attack the enemies of the
day. That was the power to hate, the weapon that no one designs and no one puts
together as effectively as do the Jews.
Hate is their stock in trade; hate is the sea in which they
swim like fish. They produce this weapon so effectively, and they make it so
deadly that even they cannot escape its aftermath once it has been activated.
This is the fate that the Jews have met everywhere they went every time they
exploited the people who took them in. They always came on the wings of hate and
they always perished by the force of that hate.
Moreover, the Jewish leaders have gone as far as to say:
There is room in this world for only them or us but not for both of us. Better
you and us without them, which means we must finish them off – something we can
do if you'll sacrifice your children for the cause. You will put the kids in
harm's way to fight the enemy of the day who has been my enemy for some time
and has become yours too as of this moment.
Unfortunately for America , the Jews had tackled
someone that was never easy to tackle, to chew on or to swallow. Yes, they got
superpower America
to fight on their behalf but the enemies they tried to beat up were the Arabs
and the other Middle Eastern nations. These people proved to be more than the
Jews could grind down even when the jaws they employed were those of America and a
number of allies who became so disgusted with the Judeo-American misadventures,
they dwindled down year after year to near zero ally.
Let us back off as well from these misadventures, say the
American editors of the New York Times. Keep fighting to the last of your
children, say the Jewish editors of the Wall Street Journal.
The tug of war has started between those two camps, and you
know which side I take.