“Jihad Will Not Be wished Away” says Andrew C. McCarthy in
his latest anti-Muslim diatribe. But unlike the previous diatribes in which he
never made clear what he wanted, he finally gets to say what his point is and
has been all along: He wants to see Jihad go away, he says. In fact, the quote
with which I start this discussion happens to be the title of his latest
article. It also comes under the subtitle: “But willful blindness remains the
order of the day,” and was published on April 20, 2013 in National Review
Online.
To begin with, it is universally acknowledged that when
someone wants something, it helps if he explained how he imagines obtaining it.
It would help even more if he had a detailed and concrete plan on how to go
about doing that. The trouble with McCarthy, however, is that he never did
anything of the sort, and he is not doing it now even though he makes one minor
point in that direction he never made before. Otherwise, he acted this time the
way he always did which is to present his views in the manner of a lawyer who
litigates a case in court then leaves it to the judge and the jury to decide on
a remedy.
There is no doubt that Andrew McCarthy is smarter than this.
So why is he taking that approach? The answer is that his goal is not to reach
an immediate workable solution; it is to score the ultimate grand solution when
all will have been said and done. You reach this conclusion when you read the
entire article but more specifically three of its paragraphs. Each one of these
begins with a sentence that leads to the next and to the conclusion that he
wants the “West” to get engaged in a fight to the death with Islam. The
sentences are these: (1) “So will we be roused to meet the challenge?” (2) “We are in a war driven by ideology.” (3) “You do not defeat
an ideology by hoping it will change or disappear.”
The question now is this: What role will his latest diatribe
and the entire anti-Muslim campaign he has been waging, play in the grand
scheme of things? Well, his goal has now been made clear, and it is to the
effect that he wants to see Jihad defeated and removed from the scene. As to
the immediate objective of the campaign, it is what he says it is in sentence
(1), to rouse the public. And he goes about doing this the old fashioned way.
That is, in his attempt to demonize the Muslims, he uses lies, spins,
distortions, insinuations, false interpretation of the events, and non-existent
associations.
He uses the tragic event that took place at the Boston
Marathon to argue that “The bombs … won't kill thousands or even hundreds ...
but the goal is to instill terror into the flow of everyday life.” But instead
of suggesting that people not allow themselves to be terrorized – a suggestion
that is usually made when a mass killing takes place in a movie theater or a
school, for example – McCarthy links the 2013 event to the 1993 bombing of the
World Trade Center, and from there to what is happening elsewhere in the world.
Not only does he make that linkage but he also uses the
occasion to beat up on those who may hold a different point of view, accusing
them of “willful blindness.” To this end, he provides the readers with an
internet link to an article written the day before by Kevin D. Williamson under
the title “An Answer to Liberals' Prayers.” In it, Williamson makes the point
that because the brothers responsible for the bombing turned out to be: “a pair
of Chechen Islamists” they did not exactly fill the bill of those who wish they
were “White” and non-Muslim.
And there lies a big long story that neither Williamson nor
McCarthy fully explore. It is that Chechnya lies at the heart of the Caucasus
mountain range where the White “Caucasian” race originated. This is the place
where, according to Hitler, the Aryan master race took roots and made of the art and science of war (therefore all
forms of violence) the supreme expression of civilized behavior. Thus, faced
with the fact that the brothers who committed the Boston act were Muslims,
satisfies the likes of Williamson and McCarthy. But being of the Aryan race
demolishes their argument that Islam was out to destroy a “West” they have
always associated with being white skinned.
So then, what to do under such circumstances? Well, instead
of saying they had a problem, they flipped the coin and said that the
opposition had a problem. They explained that yes, the prayers of the
opposition were answered but only partially. And this is because what turned
out to be more lily white than many a European skin, also turned out to be more
Muslim than many of the darker skin types.
But wait a minute … wait a minute. That may be a problem but
there is a solution for it. Why not take advantage of the confusion and the raw
emotions to put out the lie that the culprits have been apprehended, and that
they turned out to be dark skinned? Yes, this is a great idea but what happens
when the truth will be revealed and the world will know that the culprits are
of the Aryan master race? No matter, the Jews always put out a lie that serves
them for a day or an hour or even a minute. But they always survive to lie yet
again, confuse again and take advantage of the raw emotions again. The truth is
that if no one calls you to account for what you do while hiding under the
principle of “freedom of speech” you go right ahead and be free to lie and lie
and lie. And the Jews are never called to account for what they do or fail to
do – so they lie and lie and lie, and they get away with it each and every
time.
Okay, this is a good plan, but how to implement it? Well,
the CNN network has a worldwide audience, and the Jewish Wolf Blitzer happened
to be anchoring the special report on the Boston event. So why not call his
colleague John King, himself a convert to Judaism, and tell him that a dark
skinned individual was apprehended. This done, watch the lie spread around the
world like a disease that may or may not have a serious side effect. But who
cares about side effect – serious or not – when the satisfaction that results
from spreading a lie is as good as having a Jewish orgasm; however long that
may last.
And that's exactly what they did. Those who watched this
part of the CNN broadcast tell me that the two and the few others who joined
the conversation, repeated the lie at least a dozen times. Will someone now be
held accountable for this deliberate act? Are you kidding! There will not even
be an investigation to determine how the lie started and how it spread. They
would fire an old Lebanese woman or a Latino man for expressing an honest
opinion but they will not investigate a lie whose possible side effect may have
been to delay the apprehension of the culprits thus allowed them to commit more
violence before being apprehended.
None of this concerns Williamson or McCarthy because their
ultimate aim is to trigger a war called Armageddon between the religions. It
will fulfill the prophecy of the Rapture according to which the Jews believe
the Messiah will come for the first time and bestow on them the mantle of
master race, and let them rule the world. By contrast, some Christians believe
that this will be the moment when Jesus will come for the second time, and
convert the Jews and everyone else to Christianity. Like two scorpions, these
two face each other, waiting for the other to drop its guards so as to strike
and win the grand prize.
No, Andrew McCarthy is too smart to believe that the Boston
event expresses the wish of a couple of brothers to take over the world armed
with a pressure cooker and a pipe bomb. He must have already determined in his
mind that the older brother developed a personal vendetta against a society he
feels has rejected him because of his religion despite the fact that he married
one of their own. He then dragged his younger brother into a scheme that ended as
tragically as many other events in America.
Thus, McCarthy has joined the Jewish lobby in America and
the influential pastors such as Mike Huckabee, to create and maximize the
discord between the religions, especially the anti-Muslim sentiment, to accomplish
an end they are too cowardly to admit to it right out.