Imagine yourself watching a National Geographic episode on
television, showing life in Africa's Serengeti
Desert
Just as you're about to turn off the television set, a flash
of light blinds you and causes you to fall back on the couch. The next thing
you know is that you're waking up from a deep sleep feeling dizzy. You're still
on the same couch but a few things have changed around you. For one thing, you
feel older than before, so you look at the television screen and discover that
you are watching a different episode of National Geographic. You know that time
has passed but you don't know how much time. You switch to the channel that
displays the time and date where you discover that a generation has passed.
You return to the National Geographic channel where you see
that lions – not jackals – have brought down a big wildebeest, not a small
antelope. They are feeding on it while a flock of vultures on the ground – not
eagles in the sky – are keeping themselves at a safe distance away from the
banquet of the lions. The vultures are motionless, waiting for the lions to have
their fill and move away so that they may go in and feed on the few morsels
that the lions may have left behind.
Being the intelligent person that you are, you recognize
this occurrence as being a metaphor representing the world in the way that it
has developed during the past generation. The games are bigger now, and so are
the hunters. As to the eagles of yesteryear, they have become the vultures of
today. They do not take what they want when they want it like they used to do;
they now scrounge in dangerous places looking for the leftovers that will
appease their hunger and sustain them till they find their next meal.
You think about it with a mix of sorrow and nostalgia, and
wish that everyone would see life the way you do now. But you realize this is
not what is happening because there are people in this world who still refuse
to believe that the world has changed. They do not know they need to adapt to
the new reality lest they be eaten alive, and so they sit like a prey waiting
to be hunted down. One of these people is Jackson Diehl who writes a column for
the Washington Post. He wrote one under the title: “Obama's myopic worldview”
and had it published in the Post on September 26, 2013.
It is obvious from the title that Jackson Diehl is
describing the quarrel he is having with President Barack Obama with regard to
the current state of the world. As you begin to read the article, you quickly
realize that this is a quarrel between Barack the man and Jackson the boy. It
is the worldview of an adult that is challenged by the worldview of a child who
refuses to grow up.
In fact, you get a sense that you are hearing a child say he
heard mom and dad say this and that the other day. But you know this cannot be
true because you know that adults do not talk like that. You realize there may
be some truth in what the child is saying but that his small mind and his
imagination have created an entirely new situation from the reality to which he
was exposed. Thus, you conclude that the worldview described by the boy Jackson
is nothing but a collage of stereotypes made up by the Jewish organizations,
and propagated by the active members of the various echo chambers in America .
But then the boy surprises you. Wham! He hits you in the
face with the following: “This [Obama's] definition of stability requires
ignoring all that would disturb it.” It is as if he did not believe a word of
what he was saying while saying it. He is now admitting that some form of
stability does exist, but it is one that he does not like. So then, what does
he do to attack it? He finds an angle to do just that. He says the stability
can be disturbed in the future by forces that are not here, but forces that can
materialize down the road. And here too, you realize that this is the influence
of the false prophets who predict future apocalypses when they fail to scare
you in the present.
But what is it that the boy Jackson wants from the man
Barack? Well, he begins by reminding him of the promise he once made: “He
[Obama] defined a new set of 'core principles' that the United States would defend in the Middle East , including free speech...” Hey kid, yes you
the boy Jackson, let me tell you what you need to do first. You need to work on
securing free speech in America
before trying to implement it where it is not hindered. Have you heard of
someone being blacklisted for half a century because he dared long ago to write
an article under the title: Don't listen to propaganda, Egypt is a
civilized country? This sort of thing happens here in North
America where the Jews are masters, and people like you are but
echo repeaters in the service of repeating every piece of crap they stuff into
your mouth.
Cover your nakedness, kid before you tell someone else they
need to wear different attire. And for God's sake, don't run around saying
things like: “As Egyptians and Syrians can testify...” These people will
testify to what they want when they want it. They don't need a loser like you
practicing your kind of fabricated hearsay in their name at their expense.
Get that, kid? If not, you better try hard because the next
thing you know is that you'll wake up from your sleep older by a generation,
and find that the lions are munching on you and those like you.