They live and work in Buenos Aires
which is in Argentina , and
they write to a publication in New York which
is in America
to say how displeased they are about the way that the Europeans are governing
themselves at this juncture in human history. Who would that be? A couple of
Jews, of course; no one else would do a thing like that. This time it was
Federico Finchelstein and Fabian Bosoer who wrote an article under the title
“Is fascism Returning to Europe ?” and had it
published in the New York Times on December 18, 2013.
Just think about it, whether they converted to the religion
known as Judaism only now, or they are third, fourth or tenth generation
converts, they all assume the responsibility of fixing the world, and make it
safe for Jews to live in because they automatically become imbued with the
belief that humanity is plagued with a genetic defect called antisemitism. They
are further instructed that antisemitism does not necessarily mean being
hostile to the ethnic group designated as Semitic – which includes the Arabs –
but means being hostile to Jews of any and every ethnic background, be they of
Hebrew descent or any other descent.
And so, they keep an eye on everyone in the world for two
reasons. The first is to identify the individuals they can recruit to do the
work they cannot do themselves. Usually they find this sort of people in the
nations that have reached their economic and military apogees, and are
beginning to decline culturally, morally or both. The second reason for which
they keep an eye on the world is to identify the individuals, groups or nations
they would classify as being at variance with their agenda of a world that
should be safe for Jews to live in.
In the example we are facing, the American Congress is a
place that is full of individuals who are ripe for recruitment to do the dirty
work for them. And Europe is the place where a
number of nations contain individuals who are at variance with the Jewish
agenda. Hence, the article in the New York Times that is meant to impress the
Senators and House Representatives of the United States Congress, thus prepare
them to receive further instructions later on as to what they should do to fix
a situation they will undoubtedly call existential.
What they see standing in their way at this time is none
other than the President of these same United States . They know he has the
power under the Constitution to determine the foreign policy of the country.
And so they use every parliamentary trick in the book to usurp these powers and
transfer them to the Congress which they have already determined is so rotten,
they will bring under their control with a song, a little bribe and a blackmail
that will be as big as it will take to convince the key members it is in their
personal interest to follow the wishes of the Jewish lobby than follow those of
their President.
And so, the first thing they do is launch a campaign of
denigration against that President, which is what they did a day before on
December 17, 2013 in the Washington Times. It was on that day that the
notorious John Bolton published an article under the title: “Nero in the White
House” and the subtitle: “The president fiddles at his domestic altar while the
world burns.” And this is where you see in stark terms how the dirtiest of the
Jewish game is played. It is a game that is sometimes called “the clarity of
Jewish ambiguity,” and sometimes called “the ambiguity of Jewish clear
thinking.”
It is here that you see them do two opposite things at the
same time. On the one hand, they try to wrest the power to conduct foreign
policy from the hands of the President and transfer it to a Congress that is
under their control. On the other hand, they get John Bolton to assert that
domestic affairs are none of the President's business because his only concern
should be foreign policy. To reinforce this point of view, Bolton accuses the
President of doing what Nero did which was to play the fiddle while Rome was burning. With
this analogy, he asserts that the World (foreign) is to Obama what Rome (domestic) was to
Nero. What can be clearer than this? Jewish clear, that is.
So then, what is it that these people want? Well, the Bolton
article tells you they want to take full control of America so that they may have
control of its military. The Finchelstein and Bosoer article tells you they
want to use what is left of America's standing in the world to steer the
Europeans, if not the whole world, to adopt the Jewish agenda of a “Liberal”
world that will be dominated by a “Militaristic” Israel-America axis. What can
be more ambiguous than this? Jewish ambiguous, that is.