March 13, 2015 is the day that gave us two examples showing
why it was never possible for the Jews to become a part of the human race, and
why they may never be. One example came as an article written by Jackson
Richman under the title: “Congress Takes Aim at BDS” and was published in the
Weekly Standard. The other example came as an article written by Rich Lowry
under the title: “Tom Cotton's Truth Bomb” and was published in National Review
Online.
The Richman article speaks of the worldwide movement to
Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) Israel
for the policy it pursues in Palestine .
Implemented in one form or another, BDS has been the peaceful way by which the
world has told regimes such as those of the former Rhodesia
and apartheid South Africa ,
that the world can no longer tolerate the way they treat the people they have
under occupation. BDS worked, and the regimes changed in such a way as to end
the occupation, and treat people decently.
Thus, when pressured, the regimes that were created in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe )
and in South Africa ,
dropped the trappings that kept them standing artificially, and so they became
eligible to integrate organically with the rest of the human race. Whatever
happens after that – good, bad or indifferent – will be no more and no less
than the natural unfolding of history.
Of course, people in Rhodesia
and in apartheid South
Africa resisted the boycott, the divestment
and the sanctions, as did other people outside of those countries for one
reason or another. But like the saying goes; the writing was on the wall, and
everyone knew that the end of those regimes was approaching. Thus, the choice
for a change was that of the apartheid leaders to make voluntarily, or to
hang-on and see the change forced on them in ways that could not be predicted.
Eventually, a mixture of internal and external pressures
forced these regimes to change. A similar sort of situation has been shaping
with regard to the Palestine-Israel case for a time now. But something
different; something bearing the Jewish signature is beginning to raise its
head. That something may grow so large as to halt the natural evolution of BDS
against Israel ; keeping the
artificial trappings in place … or it may prove ineffective, and wither away
with time, forcing Israel
to change for the better.
In either case, what will stand out as worthy of mention in
the history books, is the manner by which BDS against Israel was
countered. Here is how Richman began to tell of this event: “two congressmen
introduced a bill [that] is an effort to counter BDS, which is lamentably
popular in Europe .” Wham! Like a baseball bat
hitting you in the face, the Jewish signature “lamentably popular” is the only
reason for which the American Congress is being mobilized to defeat BDS against
Israel .
You see nothing in that expression or in the rest of the
Richman article that might hint at the sense of shame and contrition expressed
by the earlier apartheid regimes. There is nothing here like the excuse: “Yes,
the situation is bad but give us time, and we'll rectify it gradually.” No, the
Jews never admit they did something wrong in the past, or that they are doing
something wrong now. When opposed for what they do, or reminded of what they
are failing to do, they automatically look for a sucker to shield them. And
right now, they found an America
that may be willing to do just that.
As to the Rich Lowry article, it shows how else the Jews
fail to integrate in the organic fabric of the human race. Speaking of the Tom
Cotton letter – which is the formulation of what the Jews want with regard to
the Iran question – Lowry
rejects the idea that Cotton is allying himself with Iran 's hardliners. To buttress his
argument, he does something which tells the alert reader that these people
remain as hopeless as they have ever been.
Recall that since the start of their campaign to take over America half a
century ago, the Jewish leaders have been braying: “you can't compaaaare”
anything that is connected to Jewish or Israeli matters with something that is
non-Jewish or Israeli. This set them apart from humanity – which is what they
wanted – but did not prevent their organic integration had they wished to
mingle as separate but equal. What Lowry has done, however, shows why the Jews
never integrated organically, and why it may never happen.
Look at this passage: “Cotton wrote a letter [that is] a
trope among his critics that he is allying himself with Iran 's
hard-liners. This is a hilarious plaint after Obama went out of his way in 2009
to say nothing when the Iranian regime was crushing the country's moderates.”
This says that not only the Jews wish to remain apart from
humanity (given that no parallel can be drawn between the two); they wish to
remain apart because they view themselves as a different species. It is that
Lowry makes an argument to the effect that whereas a Jew and a gentile who ask
for the same thing may not be compared given the organic differences separating
the two – a gentile that writes a letter, and a gentile that does something as
different as to say nothing about an uprising in a foreign country, can be
compared given their organic similarities.