On March 18, 2015 I read: “Netanyahu's Win, Obama's Loss,”
an editorial in National Review Online (NRO); and I felt uneasy about it
because it signaled the start of a trend that some of us had warned about long
ago. The next day, I monitored a number of the audio-visual media outlets, only
to discover that the trend has already taken roots, and was likely to entrench
itself at a faster rate with the passage of time.
To better understand the essence of that trend, we need to
look at several realities whose confluence gives substance to it. The first
thing we do is recall that apartheid South Africa and the former Rhodesia,
claimed to be democracies because they assembled a group of people from a
chosen ethnic composition, and allowed them to vote in what looked like a
normal kind of government. These people voted on matters of interest to them,
as well as matters relating to groups of other ethnic compositions who had no
vote and no say in the affairs of government or in the issues that related to
them.
Responding to this situation, a world that was led by
vociferous Canada , mouthy Britain , persuasive America
and finger-waiving Australia ,
recognized those two regimes for what they were – colonial, apartheid and an insult
to democracy. Not only did the world refrain from doing the things that would
have helped them survive, it applied sanctions against them to speed up the
process of their demise. The effort bore fruit when those regimes fell, and
were replaced by something better.
While the drama was unfolding between the world and the two
apartheid regimes in Africa, the Jews were creating an analogous sort of
situation in Palestine .
They colonized an indigenous population that is Christian and Muslim, depriving
it of any say in the way that it is governed. At the same time, they brought
more and more Jews from all over the world and gave them the right to vote on
matters relating to them and to the other groups.
Most nations of the world rejected that Israeli setup in the
same way that they rejected apartheid South
Africa and Rhodesia . But there were four
exceptions. Irony of ironies, they were the very same Canada, Britain, America
and Australia who not only refrained from criticizing Israel, but helped it
morally and financially to maintain its regime of apartheid. And that's a
regime which remains immeasurably more murderous than those of old South Africa and Rhodesia .
These being the nations that led the campaign against the
bad regimes of an earlier era, it became clear to some of us that the Jews who
convinced them to reverse their morality and adopt a stance contrary to what
used to motivate them – will go beyond what they have accomplished and do, at
least to America, what they did to Palestine. We deduced and we warned that the
Jews will set up a system under which the Israeli population will be asked to
vote on matters pertaining to America
without giving the American people the right to vote on those matters. We
thought that the Jews will sooner or later Palestinize America .
And that's what happened. The way to pull off such a thing
in real life is the way that the events were made to unfold during the month of
March in the year 2015. Netanyahu had the American Congress invite him to come
and tell it – and presumably tell the American people as well – how to use
their resources and their military power when dealing with the world,
especially with Iran .
And because Netanyahu's views stood in opposition to those of Barack Obama who
is the current President of America, it was necessary to take a vote and
determine who wins and who loses.
That's what they did, but there was one catch to the
process. Only the Jews of Israel got to vote on matters having to do with
American issues. It is a replay of what happens when those same Jews get to
vote on matters having to do with Palestinian issues, and the Palestinians do
not get to vote on them. This is why the editors of NRO and those that
pronounced themselves in the audio-visual media the next day, saw fit to celebrate.