The Jews have different kinds of swords to behead different
kinds of regimes. In 1956 they used the Anglo-French economic sword to behead
Egypt of Nasser's economic plan which was to use the Suez Canal revenues to
build the Aswan
reservoir and hydroelectric station. They thought their plan would topple Nasser but what they got instead was the strengthening of
his regime.
After that, the Jews pulled all sorts of tricks on almost
every nation in North Africa, East Africa and the Middle
East in their continuing effort to topple this regime or that one.
Most of the time, they used American resources; the most effective being
rulings by the Congress of half-wits to economically or militarily punish the
nations whose chiefs refused to worship the Jews the way that the American
Congress did then and still does.
The Jews failed in most places, though they managed to
create a great deal of hardship and disruption in some of them; places where
they used Israel 's
military to destroy the infrastructure of the country and disrupt life. For
example, they succeeded in the defenseless nations of Palestine
and Lebanon but failed in a Syria
that could defend itself. Unfortunately, however, they had a few spectacular
successes in places like Iraq
and Libya
where they commanded the American military to do the dirty work for them. It
was there that they toppled the existing regimes, creating the hellish
situation that's affecting the entire region today – a condition that is the fulfillment
of their religious duty.
Having gone too far already to be left with an argument by
which to convince the Obama administration to do more for Israel and for the
Zionist movement, the Jews prepared a suitable sword to use for the
decapitation of the American nation itself ... decapitate it of none other than
the Obama regime. Not only that, but they also sought to erase every vestige
that his administration could possibly leave behind when a new administration
will be elected to take its place.
What the Jews did in that regard was to design and carry out
a massive campaign of lies, deceptions, false spins and defamation, unleashing
the horror on Barack Obama personally, doing all of this by using the classic
method of character assassination. This being the method which normally
precedes a coup d’état whose endgame is to topple a duly elected President, it
was the caper that the Jews brought to America in the hope of installing a
puppet in the White House; one who will serve them as well as did the
Rove/Cheney administration. So far, however, they had less of a good fortune
than in the past ... but they remain undeterred.
In fact, they are now trying to pull the same caper on the
United Nations, the very organization that created Israel but has since developed a
buyer's remorse, realizing that humanity and Judaism do not mix any better than
water and fire do. You can see what the Jews are doing in this regard when you
go over the article that came under the title: “An unhappy United Nations birthday”
and the subtitle: “After seven decades, the U.N. is not what it was intended to
be,” written by Clifford D. May, and published in The Washington Times on
November 3, 2015.
After mocking the United Nations for what it's doing to
promote its own activities, Clifford May sets out to explain why the world
organization deserves to be treated like say, Libya
or Iraq .
He says it is because the UN is not doing its job right. To back this claim, he
cites the UN's own charter which promises to “reaffirm faith in fundamental
human rights,” and to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.”
He then gets specific and names Saudi
Arabia , Russia ,
China , Cuba and Venezuela as members of the UN
Human Rights Council who are violators of human rights, and should not be on
that council. He also says that the UN has not prevented any of the wars that
have erupted since the Second World War. For example, he says that “a broad
swath of the Middle East is in flames” at this
time.
Aside from those two considerations, he also charges that
the UN has had its share of corruption, being the large organization that it
is. So the question to ask: what to make of all that? And the answer to give is
the following:
Until someone finds a way to eliminate corruption in a large
organization, we must learn to live with the UN's corruption and do the best we
can. As to the question of human rights, ninety percent of this problem will be
eliminated if and when the murderous apartheid regime of Israel is
toppled. As to the elimination of wars, especially in the Middle East, this too
will be achieved when America
will stop feeding and arming Israel .
Instead of calling for those things, however, Clifford May
advises the next President to at least regard the UN differently. He elaborates:
“The next administration might consider developing an alternative international
organization, one that would include only nations sincerely committed to
freedom, democracy and human rights.”