Thursday, October 6, 2016

Falling into the Grave they dig for others

With a history that goes back nearly 4,000 years, never has it been more fitting to tell someone “you dug your grave” than it is telling it to the Jews. Believing they can benefit from every ruse they pull on someone, they did it to themselves again and again everywhere they went, every time they had the opportunity to do it, which was all the time.

They are now hollering their morbid fear even as they continue to dig a deeper grave. Two articles shed light on this most freakish of phenomena; an occurrence the likes of which you'll never see again in the compendium of human behavior. Both articles appeared on October 4, 2016.

One article came under the title: “A strategic mistake in counterterrorism” and the subtitle: “The Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act entails steep costs and few benefits,” written by Clifford D. May and published in The Washington Times.” The other article came under the title: “Why Iran Is still dangerous,” written by Moshe Yaalon, an Israeli who served as Minister of Defense, now in America doing God knows what. His article was published in the Pittsburgh Tribune.

There is much that can be taken away from these articles, but two points are most fitting for the purpose of this discussion. The first point is illustrated in the Clifford May article. It goes as follows:

“In order for the claims to prevail, the plaintiffs would need to show that Saudi Arabia was directly responsible. But three investigations found no evidence of any direct Saudi role.” Despite this admission, May goes on to say: “I believe the Act [named JASTA] is well-intentioned. The families of the victims want mass murderers and their backers held to account. There is no denying that Saudi Arabia has spent billions of dollars spreading ideas that have justified and driven terrorism”.

The second point is thoroughly illustrated in the Moshe Yaalon article, and alluded to in the Clifford May article. Here is how the entire Yaalon article can be condensed:

US leaders argue that ISIS is America's top priority. In reality, it's not as important as confronting Iran. In negotiating the nuclear agreement, the P5+1 nations benefited. Tehran won latitude to advance its influence in Israel's neighborhood. Nations need to work together to prevent Iran from capitalizing on the region's instability. They need to enforce UN Security Council resolutions. The West views Iran as part of the solution to the problems of the Middle East. The struggle between Israelis and Palestinians persist. President Obama or his successor should lead a campaign to pressure Iran”.

And here is the allusion that appeared in the Clifford May article: “Allies such as Israel will be at risk because JASTA provides potential plaintiffs a useful argument to justify suing Israeli government personnel in a foreign court. Such potential plaintiffs are numerous”.

What does that mean? It means that Clifford May holds Saudi Arabia responsible for what happened on 9/11, not because the Kingdom had a direct involvement in that event but because “Saudi Arabia spent billions of dollars spreading ideas” that were used by others to commit terrorism. He thus admits that what he has is only a tenuous association by which to lay guilt on someone, but he establishes the link anyway.

This being the case, we have no alternative but to deduce that Clifford May is acknowledging in his own subtle way the culpability of Israel and the Jews everywhere who lobby for their causes. It is that they do more than just spread ideas in the abstract as did Saudi Arabia; it is that they incite and blackmail governments – especially the American Congress – to commit crimes against humanity, commit them repeatedly and commit them systematically.

To him, all of this says that the system is broken. So he suggests a course of action. It is this: “If members of Congress are to fix what's broken, they'll need to get started ASAP. We should understand that success requires careful strategic thinking – not least on the legislative battlefield”.

It is easy to see that Clifford May has suggested nothing specific; and that's because the Jews never do. They only incite others to charge ahead without a plan B or an exit strategy, and hope that the ensuing fracas will produce something precious they can grab and run. But time after time, what resulted were the graves that swallowed them.

It may be the time to pity them and give them compensation. Or it may be the time to shrug and walk away unaffected by a spectacle that was too predictable.