Sunday, October 9, 2016

The Myth that perpetuates the Dependence

Once again the New York Times is showing the world how the American system of governance has been tampered with to the point that the mythological devil doing the tampering is using it as a storehouse of goodies to get into when he feels like it, take what he wants from it, and walk away unimpeded.

It is that the editors of the Times wrote a piece under the title: “At the Boiling Point With Israel,” and published it on October 7, 2016. In that piece, they state the following:

“[Israel's] decision was insulting, coming after the United States and Israel concluded an agreement guaranteeing Israel $38 billion in aid. The aid gives the United States leverage over Israel, but various administrations have been loath to exercise it; the first President George Bush withheld $400 million in loan guarantees from Israel in 1990. The move was later assumed to have been one factor in his re-election defeat”.

Did you get the last part? The Jewish chorus at the New York Times is saying that George H. Bush lost reelection because he withheld the loan guarantees in defiance of the Jewish orders. These people forgot one thing. It is that their columnist, Thomas Friedman did something similar in the early 1990s while in Israel. He stood on foreign soil, looked into an American Television camera and warned President Bush that if he does not invade Iraq, he will lose reelection. So this question: What do you think is the intent behind this bunk? There is only one answer. It is to remind the American political elite that their survival rests on obeying Jewish commands.

Besides that, why is it that various administrations have been loath to exercise the leverage America has over Israel? You'll find the answer right there poking you in the eye. It means to say that in the same way Tiger Wood and Donald Trump are addicted to sex, the media in America has been turned into a nymphomaniac that can't wait to hop into bed with its Jewish rapist; the infamous mythological devil.

However empty the threat of losing the election may be if the politician fails to fulfill the desires of Israel, the threat has become a mainstay of Jewish propaganda in America. Because politicians always look out for number one, they make America number two. And despite the fact that time after time, the election results proved the Jewish vote in America to be of negligible value, the media – especially the New York Times – have perpetuated the myth that the Jewish vote is hugely valuable. The media does that to keep the politicians permanently mindful that job one for them is to serve Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel. Just look at the Congress.

This is journalistic fluff of one kind but not the only kind. There is another fluff that proved to be just as bogus. Here is an example: “Netanyahu feels no pressure to halt the construction. Not from the Palestinians. Not from Arab states, which have shown little commitment to Palestinian statehood and are forging business and intelligence ties with Israel, a former enemy that is now a thriving economic and technological hub”.

What's that about? To tell the truth, it is nothing but hogwash. The fact is that the only leverage the Palestinians have over Israel is the intifada. But this is so drastic an event it comes rarely in full force, usually flaring up only in the slow burn mode. As to the Arab states, they offered a plan more than a decade ago and Israel rejected it. They know now there is nothing more they can do but rely on an America that unfortunately is incapable of getting out of bed.

What all this means is that the paragraph about Israel's new status was stuck there to propagate the fluff that Israel – which is boycotted by everyone in the world – has forged a new relationship with someone better than the world. Now Israel has the Arabs on its side, say the editors of the Times. But how and why did this happen? It happened, say the editors, because Israel has become a technological hub.

They don't say how advanced is the hub, but if the Jews were able to convince an older generation of Americans that they stuck their gold fingers into the ground and made the desert bloom, they will not convince the new generation they are anywhere near being technologically competent to hack Iran's nuclear installations without getting caught. They’ll do better if they hired kids from the Second and Third Worlds to do the job for them.

Given this mediocre journalistic performance, my advice to the editors of the New York Times is to stop writing editorials and do something more useful.