If you heard the expression “you can't make this stuff up”
but never seen an example it can describe accurately, there is one you may look
at. It came in two parts on two consecutive days in the same publication.
On August 16, 2017 the New York Daily News published: “New York has no place for Charlottesville-style hate,” an
article that was written by the governor of the state of New York , Andrew Cuomo. On the next day, the
editors of the same New York Daily News came up with a piece they published
under the title: “BDS on exhibit at the Queens Museum ”.
Andrew Cuomo wants you to believe that he had no reason to
write this article except that “in the wake of” what happened in
Charlottesville, he and his fellow New Yorkers have wanted to send a clear
message to the perpetrators of those events, and to President Donald Trump who
did very little to denounce them. This is how Cuomo sought to assure you he was
not pressured by a Jewish organization in New York
or anywhere in America or in
Israel
to write that article.
Of course, Cuomo wants you to believe him in the same way
that he wants you to believe he spends the time that he does in Israel to benefit New York
and not Israel .
He also wants you to believe he is not under pressure or compulsion to suck up
to his Jewish lobbyists or financiers. And he wants you to believe that he
feels Israel is his second home; one that keeps attracting him the way he was
attracted to the idea of saying an emphatic “no” to the perpetrators of the
Charlottesville incidents, and to the President that did not repudiate them.
Being the gentle and accommodating man that he is, Andrew
Cuomo did more than just say “no;” he explained his action for the benefit of
the readers. In fact, he went out of his way to give a blow by blow account of
his reasoning. He began by saying no to President Donald Trump because he knows
deep down, and he wants you and the President to know, that there is no
equivalence between nationalists of the white-skinned variety, and those who
protest against racism whatever the color of their skin. However, Cuomo said
nothing about religion because this is too sensitive a subject to tackle at
this point.
He goes on to tell six more “nos” that reject the idea of
supremacists being “very fine;” of Nazis marching through towns, and of cantors
chanting “blood and soil.” He also rejects the idea that stories could have
“many sides.” But having waited this long to write his own article, he chides
Donald Trump for “waiting days to denounce” the Charlottesville incidents. And he says he
cannot ignore the murder of Heather Heyer, nor can he accept Trump returning to
New York
where he reiterated his sympathy for the wrong people. And Cuomo promises not
to be pitted against someone else.
He then tells how distinguished New York has always been in the field of
human rights and equality between all the races and religions. He tells this
story without once denouncing the racial profiling that goes on in that state.
He tells the story without denouncing the New York House representative (former
enabler of the IRA) who wants to make it a crime being a Muslim in America . And he
tells the story without denouncing the idea of Jews stealing a country, killing
its people or pushing them out to form an entity for Jews only. In fact, this
is how Jewish racism is disguised as acceptable religious privilege, a point
that will be discussed further in a minute.
Even though Cuomo is not a Jew, he is welcome in Israel where he
often goes to relax and recharge his batteries. Israel
is after all his home away from home where he gets instructed on what laws he
must pass in New York
to impose the Judeo-Israeli agenda on its American citizens. In fact, Cuomo
describes a few ideas at the end of his article, for new laws he wants to add
to the anti-DBS abomination he already approved.
As to the piece in the New York Daily News, the editors of
that publication pick up the thread from where Andrew Cuomo left off. They do a
service to the American people by clarifying the idea that America 's federal and state tax collectors work
not for America but for Israel .
To wit, speaking about the Queens Museum
refusing an Israeli application to rent space, the editors say this: “The
institution, recipient of taxpayer subsidy, cited objections of the friends of
the museum ... Israeli Ambassador blew the whistle, at which point the museum
buckled.” What the editors did not say is that the friends of the museum are
themselves some of its biggest donors.
The situation, therefore, has come down to private American
donors being overruled by the Israeli ambassador who is de facto owner of the
money collected as taxes from the American public. And because it is
sacrilegious to forget and violate this fact, the collective punishment of
those responsible must be harsh and swift. And so, the editors of the New York
Daily News make the following demands:
“Ex-officio board members, City Council Speaker and Queens
Borough must discipline any and all members of the board who expelled a participant
from public property on the basis of religion. And find a new executive
director to boot”.
Did you see that? The editors have just reduced the dispute
to one of religious discrimination against what they call Jewish Israel.
Because America
adheres to the principle of religious freedom, the Jewish leaders have been
interpreting everything, either as a Jewish right or the denial of Jewish
right. This is how they get away with ethnic cleansing Palestine of its Palestinian population,
replacing it with Jews. And this is how they plan to get everything they want
in America
whatever the American public says.
Now you know why the Charlottesville
cantors who knew what happened to the people of Palestine were chanting, “Jews will not
replace us”.