NOTE: Before I get into today's discussion, I would
like to respond to queries I received with regard to the article I published
two days ago under the title: “Orin Hatch flunks Test for SCOTUS Appointment”.
One query dealt with what appears to be a contradiction. I
said that “groups never took their case to court,” and later said they wanted a
level playing field when “challenging opponents in the courts of law or the
court of public opinion.” What I meant is that––unlike the Jews who constantly
ask the State and Federal Governments in America, to pass laws that favor
them––the groups in Canada only wanted financial aid to argue specific cases
such as someone trying to put up an English only sign on his store in Quebec;
or a native community that wanted financial aid to deal with a police
detachment treating its members with brutality.
The other inquirer wanted to know what I meant by: “If the
students made full use of the twitters, going against each other, they will be
left with nothing to tweet home about.” What I meant is that rather than the
government trying to regulate freedom (an oxymoron), the students should settle
their disputes among themselves, which they will via the tweeter, and most
likely keep their parents abreast of what’s happening. But at some point, one
group will get tired and raise the white flag. That's when they will all stop
tweeting home about this matter.
NOW, TODAY'S DISCUSSION:
Do you know why it is a good idea to examine, re-examine and
cross-examine a witness when you seek to administer justice? Because the story
you get at first is a beautiful facade of lies hiding the ugly truth behind it.
When you do discovery and cross-examination, you pierce the facade and get to
the truth inside.
Even more rewarding than that is what you get in a written
testimony if you're lucky enough to get one. What you get is not only a facade
with the truth between the lines begging to be unveiled; you get a glimpse of
the mentality that ties all the elements of the lie. And when you have that,
you have certainty that the truth you have established will not be impeached
because you failed to show motivation behind what's happening.
A written testimony that's good to probe is that of a pundit
named Benny Avni. His latest article is a testimony that contains the elements
of the story he is telling as well as the mentality that ties those elements
together. Think of the written story as something that is more elaborate than a
simple facade. Think of it as a beautifully decorated Easter egg. Whereas the
outer shell looks attractive, you don't know what's inside it till you conduct
the examinations. When done, you'll find that you either have an edible egg, or
one that wasn't boiled. It has gone bad, and now that the shell was pierced, it
is discharging an odor to make those in the room faint.
Here is the outer shell of Avni's Easter egg. It comes at
the start of the article: “It turns out trying to stay on the sidelines of the
Syrian civil war may be the very thing that drags us into it.” The false
message here is that America
is not involved in the Syrian war. Because of this, we (Americans) will be
dragged into that war.
And here is what's inside the shell. It comes at the end of
the article: “Unless America
flexes diplomatic muscle, Russia ,
Turkey and Iran will settle Syria 's future according to their
interests. The division of Syria
is all but inevitable. Those with a stake in the future of the country must
assure their interests are maintained. For years, America sat out the Syrian war.
We're playing catch-up now”.
The message here is a lamentation to the effect that we
(Americans) are involved in the Syrian war, after all, but not enough to settle
the future of Syria
according to our interests – chief among them the division of Syria . What was
that again? Did he say “our” interests? Who is that supposed to be? America ? What's
America 's interest in seeing
that Syria
is divided? Well, maybe Avni meant someone else. So we cross-examine the
witness – which in this case means probing his written testimony – and discover
the following:
“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu popped up in Moscow to deliver a warning to President Vladimir Putin: Israel , he made clear, will prevent Iran from
establishing a beachhead near its border –– by force, if necessary. But UN
Syria's envoy told me Israel 's
concerns aren't being considered in the peace process established by the UN
Security Council”.
So that's the rotten truth. When Benny Avni says “we,” he
means: “We, the Jews whose spiritual country is not America
but Israel .”
And yet, it is clear that Avni desperately wants America to get involved in the
Syrian war. Why is that? Well, according to his testimony, Israel is
treated by those involved in the peace process as no more than a little nothing
that commands zero consideration.
And because nobody treats American power with that level of
contempt, Avni has summoned America 's
elites to get involved on the side of Israel . Lucky for him, the American
Congress structured the governance of the ship of state in a way that turned America into an
Israeli colony. Thus, in the way that there was a “New England” which used to
be a British colony; and the way that there was a “Nouvelle France ”
which used to be a French colony, there is now a “New Israel” which is America , the
current Jewish colony.
This is why, Benny Avni who is Israeli at heart, speaks of America the way that the Brits of a bygone era
used to speak of the American colonies; and the way that the French of a bygone
era used to speak of Algeria .