If there is any redemption in having someone like Benny Avni
write columns on Middle Eastern issues, his latest column made it clear there
is. It's the one that was written under the title: “No, America : Lebanon is not your friend,” and
was published on February 19, 2018 in the New York Post.
What Avni did unwittingly is confirm what this blog has been
arguing for many years, mainly that the numerous horrors unfolding in the Middle East and beyond are the result of two combatants
fighting each other: the Jewish establishment and the Muslim kids it stirred
up. In addition, as soon as the fight flared up, the Judeo-Israeli lobby in America dragged the Washington
band of reckless suckers into it, and started to suck America 's
blood.
The shooting war between the two combatants has been going
on-and-off for several decades, with interludes marked by a deluge of
propaganda conducted by each side to impress its rank-and-file. Benny Avni
being a cog in the Jewish propaganda machine usually deferred to headquarter of
the American operation known by the comical name: Foundation for Defense of
Democracies. It is both the face of the Judeo-Israeli lobby in America , and
the embodiment of the Jewish establishment.
It happened that when Avni deferred to the Foundation, he
revealed the truth about the identities of the combatants. He told that story
in two paragraphs.
First, he said this: “That – as the Foundation for Defense
of Democracies' Lebanon
watcher observes – is an assumption [that was] never borne out by the facts”.
He later said this: “No, Hezbollah isn't similar to the old
Irish Republican Army where distinct political and military wings existed.
Hezbollah's chief has clearly stated no such distinction exists”.
Benny Avni has thus demonstrated that the fight is between
the Jewish Establishment which combines all the elements of the worldwide
Judeo-Israeli criminal syndicate, battling the elements of another syndicate
made of angry kids stirred up and forced into action by the Jewish syndicate.
Because everything you do has consequences that you cannot
predict, Israel 's actions in
the Middle East, and Jewish lobbying in America have ramifications with a
potential to get out of hand. In a case like this, logic would dictate that
those who caused the nefarious consequences should stay out of the game and let
someone else fix the situation. The trouble is that Jewish logic looks like
regular logic turned on its head. For this reason, you find the likes of Benny
Avni make the effort to tell the Washington
band of suckers what to do next. The sad part is that the reckless characters
in Washington will listen to him and drag America into a
deeper hole.
If you want an example of the upside-down Jewish logic, Avni
has provided one. First, he said this: “After the discovery of oil and gas
reserves in the Mediterranean , the Lebanese
government argued that the exploration was done in Lebanese waters.” Moments
later, he said this: “When Israel
left Lebanon
in 2000, the UN drew a ‘blue line’ along the Israeli-Lebanese border. The
Lebanese government never accepted that line”.
The error of logic is that he said the Lebanese objection came
after the discovery of oil; and in the next breath said the Lebanese never
accepted that line even before the oil was discovered. Benny Avni made the
effect precede the cause – an absurdity acceptable in Jewish logic. That aside,
there are deliberate lies in those two statements, and there is confusion that
even he has not sorted out in his head.
The deliberate lie is that Avni made it sound like oil was
discovered in the disputed area between Lebanon
and Israel .
No. There has not even been exploration in that area as yet. It is a long
triangle with its apex at the point where Lebanon
and Israel
meet. To delineate its territorial waters, Lebanon drew a line perpendicular
to the shore at that point. It happens to be the way they did things since time
immemorial. By contrast, Israel
drew an oblique line tilted toward the north and into Lebanon 's territorial
waters. As to the UN blue line that Avni has mentioned, it is a land based
demarcation line that has nothing to do with the sea. It’s another story
altogether.
When Israel
will try to explain the reason for drawing an oblique line, there is invalid
argument it will most likely use. Because most maps do not show an area as
small as that part of the Mediterranean, I'll use another larger layout that’s
similarly configured to explain what Israel may be tempted to say.
Look at the map where Canada
and Alaska
(American territory) meet. You'll see that Alaska
is made of a large, almost square mass with a long narrow strip that extends
south along the Pacific Ocean , as if to
intrude into the Canadian landmass. To delineate the territorial waters of both
countries, you draw a line perpendicular to the shore at the point where the
Alaskan strip ends, and Canada 's
landmass begins. Above that line are American territorial waters; below it are
Canadian waters.
Look again at the map. Even though you have a long American
strip kissing the ocean, the vast landmass east of that narrow strip is Canada . This
prompts two questions. First, can a narrow American strip along the ocean
nullify Canada 's
right to the riches of that part of the Ocean? Second, will Canada have an
argument saying that to be fair, the line projected into the sea must not be perpendicular
to the shoreline, but must be drawn obliquely?