The American Constitution is based on the principle of
checks and balances. There are three branches of government––the Executive, the
Legislative and the Judiciary––and then there is the media, which is the Fourth
Estate that also enjoys independence granted by the First Amendment of the US
Constitution.
The way that the system of checks and balances is
practiced in America, is that each branch keeps an eye on the others. If one
branch sees that another is threatening to upset the balance of power by going
beyond the authority allowed by the Constitution, it initiates a well
delineated series of steps to bring the culprit back in line, thus restores the
balance of power between the branches.
The Americans pride themselves on the reality that
every decision of national or international consequence taken by America,
begins with a number of suggestions that go in all directions at first. The
suggestions get rubbed against each other and refined by the deliberations that
take place in the Congress and the media. Eventually, a final form is reached
that the majority can accept. It is a decision that's turned into law or an
executive order, and made ready for implementation.
This is the system that has allowed the Americans to
peacefully transfer power from one group to another, one party to another, and
one philosophical creed to another. It has served America well for about two
centuries, and then the Jews came into the country with an agenda of their own;
one that is thousands of years old. Soon the Jews discovered that their method
of governance, which is based on decisions taken by the Council of Elders
behind closed doors, was incompatible with America's Constitution that demands
open deliberations.
Instead of adapting to the modern American method of
governing now that they are in America, the Jews decided to adapt America to
their Stone Age method of governing, effectively turning the clock back as much
as thousands of years on America. How did they do it? The Jews have been around
long enough to know that humans are motivated by two opposite forces: Greed and
fear. You cater to greed with bribes and the promise of a reward, and you cater
to fear with blackmail and the promise of punishment.
Well versed in the art of dangling the prospect of
reward or punishment in the face of potential victims, the Jewish leaders found
enough trained individuals among their people to recruit and send inside the
corridors of American power, to lobby for the Jewish and Israeli causes. And
while these lobbyists were scoring big successes for the Jewish agenda, the
leaders formed the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to work on
permanently altering the American constitutional system of governance, making
it operate the way that the Hebrew tribes of ancient times used to govern. They
worked on turning American politics into a primitive tribal blood sports, and
then appointed themselves its referees.
After fifty years of spectacular triumphs at turning
America into a supplicant of Israel while Israel was leading a parasitic
existence entirely dependent on American largess, some grassroots in America
began to say that enough was enough, and started to work on changing the status
quo. One of these was Senator Bernie Sanders who is now running to be President
of the United States.
You can imagine that Jewish leaders such as Jonathan
S. Tobin did not like that idea one bit, and they started attacking it. In
fact, this is what Tobin did, making a recent contribution that came under the
title: “Sanders Would Radically Shift U.S. Middle East Policy for the Worse,”
published on February 28, 2020 in National Review Online.
What happened that motivated Tobin to write his article,
was that Sanders announced he would not attend AIPAC's annual meeting, and gave
his reasons, which were not flattering to AIPAC. This is what prompted Tobin to
begin his discussion with these words: “[Sanders's] attacks on America's
pro-Israel lobby [AIPAC] are an even bigger problem than they might seem”.
To explain that strange prologue, Tobin did not say
why AIPAC was so sacrosanct, it could not be reproached for anything; an idea
so strange, it would astonish any normal human being. But instead of explaining
his reasoning, Tobin latched on to the reality that, “Last week, the focus on
Sanders's past views on Cuba has intensified.” Acknowledging that Sanders was
not the one to start that debate, Tobin seemed to blame it on the Cuban
Americans who were so “outraged,” they must take responsibility for starting
that idle debate.
This done, Tobin turned to the core of his concern,
which is that, “By denouncing AIPAC, Sanders signaled that he was committed to
undermining the pro-Israel lobby whose main goal is to maintain bipartisan
support for the Jewish state.” And that's the most tacit acknowledgment made by
a highly placed leader in the Jewish establishment to the effect that to
maintain America's help for Israel, the Jews had managed to permanently undermine,
if not cripple, the American Constitution.
Thus, instead of allowing the system of checks and
balances to keep an eye on the branches of government, and restore the balance
of power between them whenever something went out of whack, Tobin has admitted
that the Jews succeeded in paralyzing that system.