The wishful thinking that may yet backfire

 Just about two decades ago, Clifford D. May started a project that was meant to achieve one thing but succeeded only in achieving a lesser one – if at all.

 

To paraphrase the current trend of jargon, we may say that in the same way Putin is judged to have failed because he did not achieve all his goals in a few days, so did Clifford May who, in two decades of wishful thinking, failed to achieve a fraction of what Putin was able to.

 

You can tell what Clifford May’s original goals were by the name of the outfit he founded to realize his vision. He called the thing: “Foundation for Defense of Democracies,” but never did he – in twenty years of blather – discuss a single convincing example on how he defended a democracy.

 

Still, the signs being to the effect that crunch time has arrived for the democracies if not for the whole world, Clifford May instinctively felt the need to account for the billions upon billions of dollars, which his outfit and those like it, have cost the American taxpayers. Simply stated: What did these Jewish creations do for America in return for the shower of generosity that poured on them in good times and bad times?

 

What follows is a condensed version of May’s answer to that question. It is a compilation of excerpts from the article he wrote under the title: “Nikki Hailey’s approach to foreign policy not based in wishful thinking,” published on June 28, 2022 in the Washington Times.

 

When reading the passage, do not be distracted by the pleasantries these people seem to accord each other. Suffice it for you to know that in the absence of a tangible return they can offer to their funders, the bloated, buffoonish clowns have turned their outfits into societies of mutual admiration. All they do is pump each other with hot words by which to feel good, but no light by which to inform the public.

 

Here is that compilation … which speaks of Hailey’s address to a gathering of converts in search of a cause they can sink their teeth into:

 

“She began by reflecting on the worst war in Europe since the Second World War.’ A ‘total failure of deterrence’ by America and Europe encouraged Mr. Putin to believe that the time was ripe to make Russia a great empire again. ‘Putin and his cronies are neither dumb nor delusional,’ she pointed out. They knew full well that Ukraine was never on the verge of NATO membership. And they know full well that Russia has nothing to fear from the Baltic countries or Poland.” Mr. Putin also took note of the West’s failure to effectively challenge the Russian occupation of Crimea in 2014, the lack of an adequate response to Russia and its use of a chemical weapon on British soil in 2018. The larger lesson: Appeasement never satisfies the appetites of tyrants. It only makes them want more. Trying to be inoffensive only emboldens our enemies”.

 

This was Nikki Hailey’s way to describe the continued failure of May’s outfit – and all those like it – from detecting trouble aimed at the democracies before they materialize, and developing a workable plan to protect the democracies before they get hit with the inevitable.

 

But how can these people explain their unmitigated and continued failures to the public, and do it in such a way as to maintain the stream of cash that’s flowing non-stop out of the taxpayers’ economic arteries, and into the buffoons’ unbounded stomachs? Well, since you asked, you’ll learn that to do so, there is a method that was tried and proven to work.

 

It is a method that’s based on deception. What you do is break-up the subject under scrutiny into two parts. Call one part “developing the plan” and the other part “executing the plan.” Pretend that all you were doing was developing the plan. Assert as forcefully as you can that the development was flawless then, and remains flawless now. The reason why it failed, however, is that it was poorly executed by those who took the plan from you, and failed to treat it as instructed.

 

You may then go from there to suggest that you need to be put in charge of repairing what did not work. Those listening being as buffoonish as you are, will most likely hand the store to you, letting you run it anyway you want.

 

Is there a scheme similar to that being prepared at this time to blame the mountain of Jewish failures on someone else, thus get into the position of suggesting that only the Jews can repair what was broken? Yes, there is. And that’s what you’ll see in the following compilation of passages:

 

“President Biden has been engaged in international affairs throughout his career. Bob Gates, wrote that Mr. Biden has been wrong on every foreign policy and national security issues over the past. Charles Krauthammer had already observed that Mr. Biden holds the American record for [being] wrong on the most issues in foreign affairs. The late Sen. John McCain’s evaluation: Biden has been consistently wrong on every national security issue that ‘I’ve been involved in.’ Since moving to the White House, Mr. Biden’s foreign policy has been based on wishful thinking. Examples? He turned Afghanistan over to the Taliban and proclaimed mission accomplished. He insisted that Putin, if not provoked but cautioned about possible economic sanctions, would refrain from armed aggression. He continues to claim that Iran’s rulers will give up their nuclear weapons program in exchange for a fistful of dollars”.

 

Now watch the Jews maneuver as they get into position where they’ll politically kill the current king, and declare their hypnotizing collective as being the new king at the helm of America’s ship of state.

Roving the arduous path to a mutilated logic

 Morgan Ortagus (a former protégée of Mike Pompeo) wrote an article to make what must be until now the most bizarre set of nexuses connecting real people to unreal behavior.

 

Published on June 27, 2022 in the Washington Times, the title of the Ortagus article reads as follows: “The War against the children of Abraham,” and where the subtitle reads as follows: “Waged by China, Russia, and Iran".

 

Reading the article, you’ll realize that the author defines the “children of Abraham” as being those who believe there is just one God – as do the Jews, the Christians and the Muslims. But then, as a much delayed afterthought, Morgan Ortagus has added the Jehovah Witnesses to the mix.

 

The point that’s made in grotesque subtleties by the writer, leads to the conclusion that a bunch of people who either believe there is more than one god, or believe there is no god at all – woke up one morning and decided to wage a secret war against the children of Abraham. This is unlike Russia’s war in Ukraine which is public, even if Russia already belongs to the camp of the secret war. Go figure.

 

As if this were not enough to blow a fuse in the logical circuitry of your brain, Morgan Ortagus, borrowed a page from the Judeo-Israeli manual of turning your “friends into enemies” via the boring-to-death repetition of the mantra which conveys – among others things – that: Our gun wielding protectors of classroom baby killers, attest to our love of life more than do the people who protect their public from the demonic instinct of killers.

 

To lace such ideas into the tapestry of her logic, Ortagus has relied on the following:

 

“The new Axis of Terror wages this war. At the head is the Chinese Communist Party and its leader, Xi Jinping. What does Mr. Xi believe? Like all communists, he’s a Marxist and atheist. Though Mr. Xi does not support organized faith in God, he demands that Chinese citizens hold devout ‘faith’ in Russia. Mr. Xi wants to elevate Russia to higher than just a political philosophy. He seeks to place it as a dominant religion entirely”.

 

But what does that mean? Does it not mean that Mr. Xi wants to replace the “One God” of Abraham’s children with the one God of the Jewish Karl Marx? If such be the case, does he not believe in the theory of one God after all? If the answer is that Xi simultaneously does and does not believe in one God, how did the brain of Morgan Ortagus miss detecting her contradiction, having placed herself in the awkward situation of committing the Jewish thing of shooting herself in the foot trying to have it both ways?

 

It gets worse, my friend; it gets worse. Look what Ortagus did to start a new paragraph. She asserted the following: “Mr. Xi is Russia’s latest prophet,” which you gladly swallow given that in her mind, Russia is God who must have a prophet to run around and preach the gospel in his stead. But then, look what else Morgan Ortagus went on to say. She said the following:

 

“He [Xi] even has his own scripture that every student in China must study, called “Xi Jinping Thought.” He has become so powerful that, like the emperors of Egypt and Rome in the millennia past, he seeks to be treated as a god on Earth. He wants to be worshipped. The Chinese Communist Party seeks to eliminate religious competition and brainwash the minds of all those who don’t see Mr. Xi as a god”.

 

We’re back to the one God theory, except that this time, the god is not Russia but the Chinese XI Jinping. But what the heck! Everything has gone so screwy, why not turn the whole thing into one giant mishmash of a screwup that will forever occupy the most honored position in the pantheon of mutilated Jewish logic. Here is how Ortagus managed to do all that:

 

Once again, borrow a page from the Judeo-Israeli manual of flipping logic on his head by describing mutilated Jewish logic as being the epitome of perfection while describing normal human commonsense as being defective and deceitful logic. Here is how she did it:

 

“The CCP placed a million Muslim Uyghurs in reeducation camps. There, men, women, and children are brainwashed. For hours a day, they repeat slogans like “Long Live Xi Jinping” and “I am grateful to Xi Jinping for saving us from poverty.” The CCP forces them to give up their faith at the mere sight of prayer. CCP guards abort Uyghur women’s children, guided by the desire to eliminate Uyghur culture from the earth. One woman was six and a half months pregnant when she and eight other pregnant women were rounded up, forced to take pills, and had needles inserted into their wombs. [They were aborted]”.

 

Morgan Ortagus went on to opine as follows:

 

“When I was at State, I was pregnant. The thought that a government could come and kill the child inside me makes me sick. We had to fight against bureaucrats on this issue for a long time, but under Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, we called these crimes against humanity by their true name: genocide”.

 

So, here is a world where the Chinese who lived a century of humiliation and privation at the hands of depraved Western and Japanese colonial powers, rising like the phoenix bird from its ashes to roar in the face of its former tormentors: Your age of supremacy is over. Run along or we’ll run you off the planet to prevent you from imposing your murderous will on those who still cannot defend themselves.

 

It happened that the Chinese started their Cultural Revolution decades ago. They went into province after province re-educating their multi-ethnic mix of people, rendering each group so powerful as to contribute substantially in the building of what is universally recognized to be the perfect moral and material life.

 

Sadly, of course, this points at the people of Palestine who would consider heavenly the Chinese treatment of the Uyghurs. And this explains why in the true Jewish tradition of reversing reality, the Jews have taught the American politicos the fallacy that reeducating the Uyghurs to help them perfect their lives, can only be considered genocide, whereas slaughtering the Palestinians, harvesting their organs, stealing their homes and kicking them out of their inherited lands, are considered perfection.

 

Do you see why antisemitism has returned growling like a hungry tiger? It is that the Jews themselves have summoned it for the umpteenth time.

It’s nice to be home again. But for how long?

 This is an open letter to my American cousins.

 

I made a mistake, and I want you to avoid it when the time will come for you to be like us.

 

You see, my friends: I lived with our Canadian government “financed and operated” health insurance plan for nearly six decades, not bothering for a moment analyzing it in detail so as to make the best use of it.

 

I mistakenly believed that the money the government collects in the form of taxes to pay for health insurance, is like a premium that the government collects to pay for the policy. That is, the policy is the guarantee that should I or any citizen suffer a health “accident,” the policy will pay to make us whole again, and let us go when all’s well. All this being done in the same way that a car insurer pays for the repair of an old jalopy.

 

This being the colossal mistake – which I discovered the situation to have been as time passed – caused me the unnecessary damage I could have avoided if only I knew. The essential result of my mistake had been that every time I felt I suffered a small case of “disrepair,” I neglected to talk to my caregiver because I thought I had “better” things to do than run to a clinic to see a doctor or – heaven forbid – be sent to hospital for an extended stay.

 

Little did I know then that the cumulative effect of the little mistakes I neglected to take care of, will become one or more big mistakes that will eventually take a serious toll on me. That’s the regrettable result I have now reached, having thought of health insurance in the same way that I thought of car insurance.

 

Stated simply, I was proud of the Canadian System that’s protecting me – which by all accounts – amounted to being universally considered as one of the best in the world. And so, the truth was that I fell victim to my own smugness, waiting for something big to happen to cash in on my accident. In turn, this realization is what forced me to finally analyze the system in depth, and work to figure out where exactly I went wrong, as well as to what I can do to help others avoid my colossal mistake.

 

Here is the bottom line: The first thing we need to do, is avoid replacing one state of smugness by another state of smugness. Yes, we are not cars that can be repaired by “collision mechanics,” but are spiritual beings as well. In fact, for the purpose of clarity, even this reality can be viewed as beside the point for now – but only for now. The important part of this analytic exercise being that the emerging new point makes us realize that when we pay for health insurance, we pay for two components, not just one.

 

Like car insurance, a component of the premium we  pay, is strictly dedicated to making us whole if and when we find ourselves – suddenly or developmentally – incapable of performing at a high enough level. But unlike car insurance, another component of the premium is dedicated to doing periodic maintenance so as to keep the body and soul of the individual in a high state of performance. In fact, that’s where they need to be to fulfill our duty as human beings.

 

We were not designed as a piece of planned obsolescence – here today to fulfil a task and disappear tomorrow – thus be replaced by an identical piece or an improved one. No, that’s not what we are. We were designed with a physical body that can only take a certain amount of battering before succumbing to the ravages of time. But while fulfilling this task, the body sustains and nurtures an inventive spirit that’s intended to leave behind a rich legacy of creativity. It is one that connects our past ancestry to a future evolution that will maintain us alive all the way to a never-ending eternity.

 

When we forget this reality and neglect to take care of our little pains and sufferings, we risk catching the big ailment and losing our seat on the journey to the eternity that’s beckoning us.

 

I do not intend to lose my seat, and neither should you, my friend.

 

Like they say in the movies, you have only one life to live.

 

Like my mother used to say: No part of life can ever be squandered.

They call dead what they fear may kill them

 Clifford D. May pronounced international law dead then went ahead and proved that it was very much alive. He also showed how much it was scaring him and scaring those like him by its tenacious adherence to the principles of truth, honesty and justice, which are alien to his culture.

 

May did all of that in an article to which he gave the title: “Death of international law,” and the subtitle: “Flouted by despots and weaponized against small nations.” The article was published on June 14, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

Unless you take the title and subtitle of that article in a figurative sense, you will have to declare them contradictory, which would nullify the premise of the article, and leave you with nothing to which you would want to respond. And so, for the sake of saving the day, we shall consider the Clifford May article to be a rhetorical attempt at demeaning international law, a trick he used to escape resorting to the rigorous requirements of having to prove anything while giving himself the wide latitude of saying any nonsense that will advance the fantasy he is promulgating.

 

So then, what is it that Clifford May is saying tongue-in-cheek? He is saying the following: “Russia, ruled by Vladimir Putin, is waging a war against Ukraine; and China, ruled by Xi Jinping, according to the US and the UK, is committing genocide in Xinjiang.” To avoid having to prove anything, Clifford May has employed the trick of saying this is a self-evident truth. Here is how he put it: “These are, self-evidently, egregious violations of international laws. But despots with nukes know they can commit crimes with virtual impunity”.

 

Do you get the gist of what Clifford May has tried to do here, my friend?

 

If you don’t, you need to recall that immediately after the defeat of Israel in the 6-year war that culminated in 1973, Israel called on its mouthpieces in North America and everywhere around the globe to begin insinuating that Israel can and will develop an arsenal of nuclear weapons. The aim was to reassure the Jewish rank-and-file that Israel may have been defeated this time, but will not be in the future because it will have the means to defend itself. And this charade has been going on to this day.

 

What Clifford May could have done to gain credibility among his readers, was to tell the truth about the history of that charade, and gone on to explain that Israel wishes it could be in league with the despots that have nuclear weapons. Had this been done, Israel would have had no need for America to cover for it when it embarked on the commission of crimes like the West says Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping do. And Israel would have gotten away with such behavior with virtual impunity.

 

But nothing like that was done in real life, and Clifford May took a sharp turn in his article. Instead of staying with the subject of crimes committed by the two superpowers, he turned his attention to Iran. This being his favorite subject, he transferred the value of the mischiefs said to have been committed by Putin and Jinping onto the Iranian situation by asserting that “Iran’s rulers comprehend that, which is why they are working so hard to acquire a nuclear weapons capability”.

 

Clifford May began the new discussion by attempting to discredit President Biden’s effort to bring back the common sense that was injected into the Iran nuclear situation by former President Barack Obama, and Biden’s attempt to return to the deal that was nixed by Donald Trump. May attempted the discredit, not by discussing proof, but by relying on an old Jewish joke that goes like this:

 

“President Biden’s diplomats have been attempting to strike a deal that they claim will keep Tehran out of the nuclear weapons club. If you believe that, there’s a bridge over the Persian Gulf I can sell you at a discount”.

 

So much for the credibility that Clifford May has tried to bring to himself.

 

Despite his failure on that score, May launched the usual diatribe which the Jews launch against those they dislike, such as Iran. He scolded that ancient country for the mischiefs it is supposed to have committed without comparing it with Israel whose crimes of occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and genocide surpass anything this planet has witnessed since the beginning of time.

 

If you want to know what it is that gives the Jews the chutzpah to make a mountain out of an Iranian molehill, and make a small joke out of a Jewish horror story, you need to read the following passage in Clifford May’s article:

 

“Concerns about the capabilities of Iran’s rulers are especially intense here in Israel. That’s because Israelis know how extreme those intentions are — more so than even those of Mr. Putin and Mr. Xi. The former is using military force to compel his neighbors to think of themselves as Russians rather than Ukrainians. The latter is using ‘reeducation camps’ to compel Uyghurs to think of themselves as Chinese Communists rather than Turkic Muslims”.

 

Yes my friend, the Jews say they know everything, even what others think. And because they know everything, they are certain that Putin making the Ukrainians think they are Russians, is worse than the Jews of Israel making the Palestinians think that Palestine is not theirs. And because they know everything, the Jews are certain that Mr. Xi using redemption camps to compel Uyghurs to think of themselves as Chinese rather than Turkic, is worse than the Jews of Israel making the Palestinians think that Palestine never belonged to them.

 

Can there be something more horrific to plague Planet Earth? I don’t think so.

Two-state solution more promising than Zimbabwe

 Let me tell you a true story before I tell you another true story.

 

Here in Canada we have a weekly lottery called 6/49. That’s because when you buy a ticket to participate in the game, you choose 6 numbers out of 49. The choice for the 6 winning numbers is made by a machine that drops numbered balls, and the whole thing is shown on television. If you chose all 6 numbers correctly, you win millions of dollars. If you chose 5 or 4 or 3 correctly, you win lesser prizes.

 

Most people who participate in the game watch it play on TV, and know whether they won or lost. But if they don’t watch, they can go to any of the stores that sell tickets, and have the clerk verify if they won anything. Most of the time the store clerk would check the number and say, no luck this time, and throw the ticket in the trash can. This happened to a citizen not knowing that he had the winning ticket but that the store clerk cheated him.

 

Many things happened in the ensuing few days that alerted the citizen to the fact he had been cheated by the former store clerk who now lives in a luxury house and was leading an extravagant life. The citizen alerted the lottery commission as well as the police. It took very little to establish that the store clerk had stolen the winnings of the citizen. The clerk was confronted with the evidence, he admitted to his crime, and the authorities saw to it that justice was done.

 

Now, my friend, let me ask you this question: Would you have believed me if I said that when the police showed up at the door of the former store clerk, the latter admitted he stole the citizen’s money, admitted he now lived the good life, but there was no logical reason why he should relinquish the house or the remaining cash to the citizen because — get this now, my friend — we don’t know what he’ll do with the house or the money. Does that blow your mind or what?

 

But why am I telling you this story? I’m telling it because something like it happened, and the thief behaved in the manner you would agree is mind blowing. You can get the true story from the horse’s mouth when you read the article that came under the title: “Three Tough Questions About the Two State Solution,” written by the shamelessly mind blower James Sinkinson, and published on June 12, 2022 in the despicable Jewish online magazine Algemeiner.

 

Here is a condensed version of the preamble with which Sinkinson started his discussion:

 

“Pundits and politicians have called for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. What would ‘Palestine’ look like? We don’t know who would negotiate a Palestinian state or who would be in charge of it. We don’t know what the terms of that state would be—like borders and peace agreements with Israel. We don’t know what the vision would be for the new state’s political, military and economic structure. We don’t know these characteristics of a future ‘State of Palestine’ because none of its proponents reveal them. We don’t know what the United States or European Union envision. Likewise, we don’t even know how the Palestinians imagine their new state. Yet the answers to these questions—and many others—must be provided before rational people can embrace the concept of a two-state solution”.

 

This is the first time in the history of colonialism that the colonial power put down conditions for the occupied to fulfill before promises are made to end the occupation. This should not have surprised anyone given that the colonists are Jews, and these people are the only ones in history to steal the land, and immediately go on a never ending spree to slander their victims.

 

And if you think that’s bad beyond comprehension, consider the following:

 

First, James Sinkinson says he is President of a Jewish outfit calling itself, Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME), which offers educational messages to correct lies and misperceptions about Israel and its relationship to the United States.

 

Second, this is the kind of logic that Jews wish to impose on the schoolchildren of America. They are working relentlessly to take over the schools at every level, and they are doing it in the same way that they successfully took over the levers of decision making in the journalistic and political arenas.

 

Let’s see what else that Jewish logic has produced. Here is another condensed passage from the James Sinkinson article:

 

“While Abbas theoretically holds power in the West Bank, he is currently serving the 17th year of a four-year term. West Bank Palestinians have a bankrupt economy; they are propped up by financial contributions from Western nations. Most analysts agree that if Israel did not assist in the Palestinian areas, Hamas would take over. Did we mention that Abbas is 87 years old and has no heir-apparent? Thus, it’s entirely possible that when Abbas dies, Hamas will simply start ruling the West Bank’s 2.7 million Palestinians as a thugocracy, just as in Gaza”.

 

The truth is that none of what Sinkinson implies ought to be conditions that the Palestinians must fulfill before Israel would consider ending the occupation — was asked of anyone else. It wasn’t asked of the Mau Mau rebels in Kenya. Nor of the Algerian Resistance that fought the French, nor of the African National Congress that struggled to end apartheid in South Africa nor of the Zimbabwe African National Union who fought the Ian Smith forces … and many more such examples around the globe.

 

Only the Jewish leaders could come up with a cockamamie basket full of what sends the rank-and-file to the undesirable places that makes the latter wish it would happen never again, and yet keeps happening again and again.

He shows how to paralyze and conquer a society

 If you ever wondered how a handful of Jews can infiltrate a society and, working inside it, make it serve their agenda — you now have a Don Feder article that explains it all with exceptional clarity.

 

What happened to Don Feder is that he got angry at Jonathan Greenblatt who heads the Anti-Defamation League, and published an article, thus took public the feud that must have been ongoing between these two for some time now.

 

This being an internal Jewish matter, I shall not take the side of one or the other of the combatants. What interests me in the Don Feder article is that he inadvertently lays out in great detail what Jews such as himself do to paralyze the normal unfolding of a society. When this happens, he works to conquer the society, makes it work to serve the Jewish causes, and ultimately destroys it before discarding it.

 

What you need to do to see that scenario play itself on a planetary as well as a small scale, is think of the thousands of Jews who infiltrated the Western so-called Liberal Democracies, doing inside them what you’ll see Don Feder do to expose and defeat the various stances taken by Jonathan Greenblatt on behalf of the Anti-Defamation League. To be sure, whereas Greenblatt is working to ascertain the survival of the League by hitching it to the rising Democratic Party of America, it is obvious that Feder is working towards the implementation of a grander but more sinister goal.

 

Once an anti-war activist, Don Feder who now professes his dislike of the Democratic Party, gives strong hints to the possibility that he is a fanatic member of the Republican Party, which makes him a turncoat neocon and a lover of wars. As such, he mixes religion and politics, and he views everything through the prism of what is good for Israel without so admitting outright.

 

You will detect most of these threads when you read the article that Don Feder wrote under the title: “Anti-Defamation League is defaming Judaism,” and the subtitle: “Its positions are as kosher as scallops wrapped in bacon.” It was published on June 9, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

Look how Feder started his conversation: “If you’d like to know the Anti-Defamation League’s position on any issue, check with the Democratic National Committee. Under former Obama official Jonathan Greenblatt, the group rarely deviates from the left’s agenda.” This is vintage neocon-speak.

 

The writer goes on to show his attachment to Israel by issuing the following statement: “While it opposes the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, the ADL supports Black Lives Matter, which supports BDS. BLM is rabidly anti-Israel across the board.” You cannot get a stronger statement of support for Israel than that even if Feder did not want to show his colors.

 

And there is more to the statement than meets the eye. What it shows is the technique of assigning guilt by association, a powerful tool used by the likes of Don Feder to discredit those whom they hate. Look how Feder did it: “the ADL supports Black Live Matter, which supports BDS.” Even though he is saying that the ADL supports Israel by opposing BDS, he consider the ADL to be as guilty as hell because it also supports Black Lives Matter.

 

This is what produces the principle of “if you’re not entirely and explicitly with us, you are against us.” It is the bomb that the Jews have thrown in the middle of the American political system, splitting it into a couple of enemies who cannot agree on anything despite the fact that they are compelled by their Constitution to work together for the good of America and the American people. But instead of doing this, the relationship of America’s politicos with the Jews compels them to work for Israel and only Israel.

 

This was not the first time that Don Feder contradicted himself in this article. He did it again while showing his allegiance to Israel, something he did without being as subtle as the first time. Here is that double whammy passage:

 

“In 2016, the ADL said it was ‘disappointed’ by delays in implementing the Affordable Care Act. Apparently, state-run health care is another Jewish value”.

 

Don Feder seems to want to say that state-run healthcare is not another Jewish value. In so doing he rebukes the Israelis that have been using that system since 1995. But look what Feder did. He wrote that the Anti-Defamation League is defaming Judaism because it takes positions that are as kosher as scallops wrapped in bacon. Does this not mean that Israel cooked the scallops and bacon which Don Feder ate in gulps?

 

And so it goes with the Feder article that eventually reaches this conclusion: “Under Mr. Greenblatt, the ADL has abandoned its mission to fight antisemitism and become the Court Jew of the Democratic Party.”

 

In trying to fight the “leftist” positions taken by the Anti-Defamation League, Don Feder has unveiled the weapons which the neocons use to paralyze a society as small as the ADL and as big as the world.

 

We are indebted to him because we can now take the measures that will do more than defeat the neocons; we can work on building a world that will withstand the evil schemes of their satanic collaborators.

Realities Force America to Grow up for Now

 The one thing that children do which puts adults on the horns of a dilemma — if not put them into outright trouble — is that the children demand to be accorded contradictory things. The children don’t ask for everything at the same time, an act that would have alerted the adults to the contradiction in their demands.

 

Rather, the children ask for one thing today, and another thing at a later date while the adults are still working on fulfilling the previous demand. As it often happens, however, the two demands would be in conflict with each other, putting the adults into a dilemma of contradictions, and not realizing what they are facing.

 

You don’t have to be young in years to behave in such manner, as destructive a habit as it is. In fact, you could have lived as long as 4,000 years, and still behave in that manner. An example of this, are the people who call themselves Jews, which they do by virtue of the fact that they would have converted to the Stone Age way of life that goes by the name Judaism.

 

Throughout the centuries, the Jews have tried to adopt as parent one country or another. The pattern associated with their game has been that they did well at first, but when the parents discovered what the child was trying to accomplish, they punished the Jews and kicked them out of their embrace as well as their country.

 

Each time that this happened, it did not take the Jews long to find another country with which they tried to pull the same stunt, only to be treated in that same manner. At present, the Jews are lodged in America where they are pulling the same old tricks. But while the rulers of the federated Republics are oblivious to what he Jews are doing, the American population is not, and neither is the rest of the world.

 

You get a sense of the moral disorder that’s plaguing the American public, as well as the confusion through which the rest of the world must navigate to make sense of what is going on in the Federal as well as the State capitals of America — when you read some of the articles that deal with the important subjects facing the country and the world today.

 

One such article came under the title “Every president before him” and the subtitle: “White House defends possible Saudi visit,” written by Naomi Lim, and published on June 7, 2022 in The Washington Examiner. Look how the writer was inspired to start her article: “The White House has iterated that Saudi Arabia is a ‘strategic partner’ when needled on whether President Joe Biden still believes the kingdom should be a pariah state”.

 

How did it happen that a superpower the size of America became so confused about its relationship with a country (Saudi Arabia) that is this important to its security? To answer this question we need to go back a few decades, to a time when the Jews were allowed to monopolize the media outlets in America, something they were able to accomplish by implementing a system of censorship that would have made the likes of Hitler and Pol Pot drool with envy.

 

A notable example of how the Jews used their power to begin the process of confusing America about its relationship with Saudi Arabia, came when the Jews imposed their will on the CBS network, and zeroed in on its popular public affairs program 60-Minutes, forcing its crew to produce a show that appealed to a large segment of the American population; one that was itself going through a difficult time, not knowing what to make of its raging Women’s Liberation Movement.

 

What the producers of 60-Minutes did was find an American woman soldier who went to do a job in Saudi Arabia. She was told that because these were the exigencies of the Saudi culture, she must wear a robe and must cover her head. If you want to know how the produces of the show handled this segment, you’ll have to imagine the sorrow that would be expressed by a mother whose son got killed with a bullet in the back while boarding the plane that was to bring him home to get married the next day.

 

This is how the Jewish hate machine began the campaign of turning America against the Arab and Muslim Worlds. The machine went on to speak of the oil companies that conspired with the Arabs to blackmail the American government, forcing it to pay a high price for the oil. The machine also accused the oil companies of playing the role of tax collectors in the business of fleecing the American public to enrich the Sheikhs of Arabia.

 

Parallel to that, look now what America was really thinking about Saudi Arabia for 80 years:

 

“‘The president considers Saudi Arabia an important partner on a host of regional and global strategies, including other efforts to end the war in Yemen, contain Iran, and counterterrorism,’ White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Tuesday of the 80-year U.S.-Saudi relationship.”

 

Do you, my friend, see now why the American public and the rest of the world are confused about America?

 

If you still haven’t figured it out, let me give you one good reason. It is that America’s leaders readily go with the flow, and the Jews happen to be the flow.

Get this: A new Layer of Lies more Stunning than the Iron Dome

 Now that the Israeli leadership has come to believe that not only has the world become convinced the Iron Dome fantasy has been a cruel hoax perpetrated on humanity by unscrupulous and shameless operators trying to deceive especially the Jewish rank-and-file in Europe and America — that Israeli leadership has come up with a replacement fantasy that’s even grander than the first.

 

What happened with the Iron Dome was that people, both in Israel and America, began to see through the layers of lies when (1) in Israel people called each other up across the country, and discovered that nobody was protected anywhere by anything like an Iron Dome; and when (2) in America, even the useful idiots of the Congress of uselessness became convinced that the story of the Iron Dome was created to establish a stream of cash meant to get American money to finance the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, and populate the land with Jews brought from around the world, paid for by the stream of money that used to be approved by the zombies of the Beltway.

 

What made the matter even worse for the Israeli “gimme money” crowd was the event in Ukraine which prompted America to appropriate billions of dollars to that country as a way to help it fight the Russian invasion. This will be the nail in the coffin of American financial charity to Israel for a long time to come, a reality that did not escape even the forever hungry for money leaders of Israel.

 

These developments alerted those leaders to the reality that the Jewish rank-and-file both in Israel and abroad will realize that Israel has nothing to defend it against a determined enemy that would want to crush its military and hand the country back to its rightful Palestinian owners. Moreover, with no money coming in, those leaders could not pretend to have invented another Iron Dome that will protect the country. Faced with this harsh dilemma, what could those leaders do to prevent the Israelis from emigrating back to where they came from? And what could they do to keep the wealthy Jews of the Diaspora from losing interest in Israel, or abandoning the Zionist project altogether?

 

There was only one answer to those questions, and it turned out to be a new layer of lies that’s more stunning than the Iron Dome. How about a Laser Missile Shield that’s nearly free to operate? And why not? If the dumbos bought the story of the Iron Dome previously, they will just as well buy the story of the Laser Shield today. And that’s what the Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet gave them. He fabricated a new lie that’s meant to spin heads more than the Iron Dome could ever do.

 

You can read this story in an article that came under the title: “Bennett: Laser missile shield to cost $2 per interception,” and the subtitle: “‘This is a global game-changer for Israel and the free world,’ said Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.” It was published on June 3, 2022 in Jewish News Syndicate.

 

What’s wrong with all that?

 

What’s wrong is that practically speaking, the idea is not workable given the state of science we know of today. Unless someone discovers a way to make particles lase as do the waves, there will never be enough energy in a beam to bring down a rocket. Even if you can invent a particle laser, look at the defenses that can be added to a rocket to protect it:

 

First, because the beam has to hit the rocket on the same spot for a few minutes before it can destroy it, the designers of the rocket will make it rotate, thus nullify the effect of the beam.

 

Second, the rocket can be covered with a silver-like paint that will deflect the beam.

 

Third, the rocket can be covered with a coat such as that used by the re-entry cone of a space capsule.

 

Fourth the rocket can be made to move toward its target while constantly engaging in evasive maneuverings.

 

One or more of these technics can be used to render useless even a particle laser, such as those you see in science fiction movies. But does Prime Minister Naftali Bennett of Israel know this? He must have an inkling because his underlings would be remiss if they did not tell him. So then, why did he go ahead and made the statements that he did?

 

The short answer is that he could not help it because he is Jewish. He surely knows that America has been trying to produce such a gun for ages and has been failing. And so, in a typically Jewish fashion, he wanted the world to believe Israel tried its hand at producing in a day what America could not in decades, and succeeded.

 

Having accomplished this feat, Israel has contributed the following, according to Bennett: “This is a global game-changer for Israel and the free world”.

 

And that says it all: Jewish to the core; liar to his bone marrows.

When an Authoritarian Jockey Owns a Stable of Democratic Horses

 Think in terms of the relationships that may exist between a jockey and a stable of horses he raises, trains, rides and looks after. He thinks of and treats each horse according to what it can and cannot do when taken out for a leisurely ride or a race to compete against other horses.

 

You’ll find that whereas the human is capable of developing a unique kind of relationship with each horse, each one of them will respond in kind to what they get from him. But what the horses will not do, is develop a unique relationship with each other. That’s because each of the horses will be preoccupied with its daily living, and if or when the occasion arises, with the relationship it has with the human jockey.

 

Now think of a cabal of human beings made of several organizations, all working to serve the same goal, but each taking a different approach to get there. Such cabal would operate like the jockey who develops a different kind of relationship with each horse. It will be an authoritarian cabal that will live its best days when immersed in a democratic society that is so innocent and gullible, it knows not what the cabal is scheming for the long run.

 

In fact, whereas each part of the democratic society will be working to fulfill the requirements of the day, the various parts of the cabal will work in unison to fulfill the one and same destiny. It is a destiny they all view as being the ultimate triumph of their ideology over the entire human race.

 

Is there such a thing among us, human beings of Planet Earth? To begin the process of understanding the seriousness of this question, consider the following passage:

 

“Originally, a group of ethnic-studies experts was brought in to form the Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum Advisory Committee to create the model curriculum. The first draft of the committee’s work caused an outcry in the Jewish community, the California Legislative Jewish Caucus, Jewish Federations of North America, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Community Relations Council, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and other groups”.

 

This is a passage that was reprinted verbatim from an article which came under the title: “Ethnic studies continues to boil melting pot as lawsuit is brought against LA school district,” written by Dmitriy Shapiro, and published on May 21, 2022 in The Jewish News Syndicate.

 

Because this is a long article, it is helpful to show the summarizing blurb that serves as subtitle. Here it is: “The Liberated curriculum violates state and federal law by discriminating against Jewish residents of California—namely, ‘Americans and Middle Eastern American Jews who embrace the religion’s foundational belief in Zionism,’ according to the complaint”.

 

This is about the cabal that Shapiro calls Jewish community. It is made of organizations that spring up to handle every occasion, with all the organizations making up the single mind of a jockey. He would be in charge of the horses, each of which is preoccupied with its momentary needs and nothing else.

 

As can be seen from the passage that’s reprinted above, the government of California did its job the way these things are normally done. It brought in the experts who created a model curriculum. The Jewish cabal went up in arms, and demanded change. The government asked the experts to do the changes that should have satisfied the Jews, but they were not satisfied. And so they did what Jews always do, which was to go whine to a higher up. In this case, higher up meant going to court and sue the various “horses” implicated in the designing of the first and second curriculums.

 

This is the pattern that the Jews have followed in more than half a century, at the end of which they managed to cultivate an American Federal Congress and State Governments which have become as useful to serving America’s needs as a diabetic dog is useful to a lamp post. And so, the question we must ask is this: Why is it that the Jewish method has succeeded so brilliantly in turning America into a colony run by happy-go-lucky braindead zombies?

 

The answer to that question comes down to this:

 

Living under the most autocratic rule known to humanity since antiquity, the Jewish rabbis were intrigued by the Liberal Democratic rule that began to take shape in Europe around the nineteenth century. The rabbis realized that an open system can deliver for the masses more than any autocratic system can. But the trick is that such a system can only function when there is trust between its practitioners.

 

With this in mind, the rabbis started coming out of the ghettos to do two things simultaneously. First, they played the role of saints, thus made the Europeans tolerated them if not love them. Second, they went to A and badmouthed B behind their backs. They also went to B and badmouthed A behind their backs. This made A and B enemies of each other, with each becoming friends with the Jews.

 

The Jews never discarded that method. They use it today, which is why the Federal Congress and the State Governments in America have gone to the dogs.