If you ever wondered how a handful of Jews can infiltrate a society and, working inside it, make it serve their agenda — you now have a Don Feder article that explains it all with exceptional clarity.
What happened to Don Feder is that he got angry at
Jonathan Greenblatt who heads the Anti-Defamation League, and published an
article, thus took public the feud that must have been ongoing between these
two for some time now.
This being an internal Jewish matter, I shall not take
the side of one or the other of the combatants. What interests me in the Don
Feder article is that he inadvertently lays out in great detail what Jews such
as himself do to paralyze the normal unfolding of a society. When this happens,
he works to conquer the society, makes it work to serve the Jewish causes, and
ultimately destroys it before discarding it.
What you need to do to see that scenario play itself on a
planetary as well as a small scale, is think of the thousands of Jews who
infiltrated the Western so-called Liberal Democracies, doing inside them what
you’ll see Don Feder do to expose and defeat the various stances taken by
Jonathan Greenblatt on behalf of the Anti-Defamation League. To be sure, whereas
Greenblatt is working to ascertain the survival of the League by hitching it to
the rising Democratic Party of America, it is obvious that Feder is working
towards the implementation of a grander but more sinister goal.
Once an anti-war activist, Don Feder who now professes
his dislike of the Democratic Party, gives strong hints to the possibility that
he is a fanatic member of the Republican Party, which makes him a turncoat
neocon and a lover of wars. As such, he mixes religion and politics, and he
views everything through the prism of what is good for Israel without so admitting
outright.
You will detect most of these threads when you read the
article that Don Feder wrote under the title: “Anti-Defamation League is
defaming Judaism,” and the subtitle: “Its positions are as kosher as scallops
wrapped in bacon.” It was published on June 9, 2022 in The Washington Times.
Look how Feder started his conversation: “If you’d like to know the Anti-Defamation League’s
position on any issue, check with the Democratic National Committee. Under
former Obama official Jonathan Greenblatt, the group rarely deviates from the
left’s agenda.” This is vintage neocon-speak.
The writer goes on to show his attachment to Israel by issuing
the following statement: “While it opposes the boycott, divestment
and sanctions movement, the ADL supports Black Lives Matter, which
supports BDS. BLM is rabidly anti-Israel across the board.” You cannot get a
stronger statement of support for Israel than that even if Feder did not want
to show his colors.
And there is more to the statement than
meets the eye. What it shows is the technique of assigning guilt by
association, a powerful tool used by the likes of Don Feder to discredit those
whom they hate. Look how Feder did it: “the ADL supports Black Live Matter, which
supports BDS.” Even though he is saying that the ADL supports Israel by
opposing BDS, he consider the ADL to be as guilty as hell because it also supports
Black Lives Matter.
This is what produces the principle of “if you’re not
entirely and explicitly with us, you are against us.” It is the bomb that the
Jews have thrown in the middle of the American political system, splitting it
into a couple of enemies who cannot agree on anything despite the fact that
they are compelled by their Constitution to work together for the good of
America and the American people. But instead of doing this, the relationship of
America’s politicos with the Jews compels them to work for Israel and only
Israel.
This was not the first time that Don Feder contradicted
himself in this article. He did it again while showing his allegiance to Israel,
something he did without being as subtle as the first time. Here is that double
whammy passage:
“In 2016, the ADL said it was
‘disappointed’ by delays in implementing the Affordable Care Act. Apparently,
state-run health care is another Jewish value”.
Don Feder seems to want to say that state-run healthcare
is not another Jewish value. In so doing he rebukes the Israelis that have been
using that system since 1995. But look what Feder did. He wrote that the Anti-Defamation
League is defaming Judaism because it takes positions that are as kosher as
scallops wrapped in bacon. Does this not mean that Israel cooked the scallops
and bacon which Don Feder ate in gulps?
And so it goes with the Feder article that eventually reaches
this conclusion: “Under Mr. Greenblatt, the ADL has
abandoned its mission to fight antisemitism and become the Court Jew of the
Democratic Party.”
In trying to fight the “leftist”
positions taken by the Anti-Defamation League, Don Feder has unveiled the weapons
which the neocons use to paralyze a society as small as the ADL and as big as
the world.