I need to make two quick observations before I proceed with the discussion that follows.
First, it has been informally agreed between the bloggers
who adhere to my worldview and those who adhere to the opposite worldview –
that when a Jew will accuse a Palestinian of being a terrorist, the Jew will
have exposed himself to harboring a Nazi mentality, thus begs to be considered
a virulent Nazi.
Second, the Jewish online publication Algemeiner is the
storehouse in which the Jewish Nazis store their revealing works. Most of the
time, the writers sign their works with their real names, but the publication
also has a column in which Jews that wish to remain anonymous share their
thoughts under the penname: “Elder
of Ziyon”.
What
happened recently was that Algemeiner published two articles – one under the
real name of Nan Jacques Zilberdik; the other under the assumed name of Elder
of Ziyon. In both cases, the writers have shown themselves to harbor the Nazi
mentality, thus deserving to be considered virulent Nazis.
The Elder of Ziyon seized on the story of the UN Mideast
envoy who reported that the year 2022 was on course to being the deadliest year
for Palestinians in the West Bank, thus called for action to renew the
negotiations between the parties and bring calm to the region. As shown in the
title of the article that was composed by the anonymous writer, he (she)
accused dead Palestinians of being terrorists. Here is that infamous title: “UN
Concerned About Number of Palestinians Killed This Year — Doesn’t Say That 95%
Were Terrorists,” published on November 3, 2022 in Algemeiner.
Even though the anonymous writer was aware, and has
reported in their article that: “mounting
hopelessness, anger and tension have once again erupted into a deadly cycle of
violence that’s increasingly difficult to contain, and that too many people,
overwhelmingly Palestinians, have been killed and injured,” the elder of Ziyon
dismissed the root causes of the deadly encounters, and concentrated the
attention on the effect of what happened instead.
This done, the writer has attempted — near the end of the
article — to commit a massive deception by spewing a massive lie. It is that he
(she) reported the following: “Israel has no need
to apologize for killing the terrorists before most of them manage to reach
Israeli civilians.” But the mention of Israeli civilians in this context is
proven to be false, as shown in the article that was authored by Nan Jacques
Zilberdik. Here is what Zilberdick has reported:
Uday Al-Tamimi killed an Israeli
soldier and wounded an Israeli security guard, in a shooting attack. Ten days
later, he attacked again, wounding another Israeli security guard before being
shot and killed by guards in the ensuing exchange of fire. Because of his
attacks, Al-Tamimi has already been featured in a question on a physics test in
a Palestinian school. Students were asked to calculate the path of the Martyr
from his home to his last attack”.
Zilberdick went on to give a few more examples which ran
in that same vein, but not before telling the readers that: “It is in this matter-of-fact way that the terrorist (Martyr)
attacks are glorified — and children are taught that killing innocent Jews was
something to be praised and lauded for”.
Note that even though Zilberdik began verbalizing her
dissertation by explicitly admitting that the Palestinians went after Israeli
soldiers, she could not maintain the honesty a few more minutes, thus succumbed
to the Jewish temptation of putting out a massive lie, and build on it. She
lied about the activities of the Palestinians, accusing them of terrorism when
the real terrorists are the Israeli soldiers and security guards who enforce
the occupation of a stolen Palestine.
What’s wrong with these people? Why can they not
formulate a coherent narrative, and stick by it whatever it reveals, then
defend it “warts and all” because of the merits they believe are entrenched in
it despite its shortcomings?
It seems the Jews cannot do that because of the way they
started their journey through life. The lesson here is that when someone sets
you on the wrong path by making an assertion that inflates your ego, the
chances are that you’ll never want to let go of the assertion. When you finally
realize that the assertion has been a disaster to your wellbeing, you’ll most certainly
hang on to it tighter than before because trying to part with it will afflict
you with unbearable withdrawal symptoms.
Afflicted with that predicament, you’ll want to alleviate
your pain by engineering a close substitute to what the assertion failed to
deliver. In the case of the Jews, the assertion was that God chose them to be
his favorite children, and will eventually hand them the Earth with all its riches.
When the Jews realized this wasn’t going to happen, they worked on making
something close to it happen. To this end, they went around the planet cornering
any big power (representing God) who would help them destroy lesser powers and steal
their assets (the riches of the Earth).