The horse’s mouth that couldn’t keep a secret

 Finally, Clifford D. May has let his mouth tell it like it was and still is. The reality is that throughout his careers as a lawyer, a journalist and propagandist for Israel, May refrained from revealing where he stood sentimentally in relation to what he was doing. He simply went about executing the tasks he was handed to fulfill by Jewish Central, and he completed them as well as he knew how.

 

And then, deliberately or by a Freudian slip of the tongue, Clifford May opened the Pandora’s Box on his most secretive sentiment: It is that he admires the dictators of the world, and cherishes the fact that he served and continues to serve as adviser to the most savage of dictators, those who populate Israel.

 

May let it all hang out in a column he wrote under the title: “Yes, Xi Jinping is a dictator, and he should be proud of it.” He reinforced that point of view later in the text by explaining that “Mr. Xi should be proud to be recognized as a dictator — indeed, the most powerful dictator in the world today.” The article was published on June 27, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

Clifford May proceeded to highlight the accomplishments of Mr. Xi by pinning the appropriate medals on his chest. Here, in condensed form, is how he did that:

 

“He [Xi Jinping] is a Leninist, and it was Lenin’s achievement to establish the first dictatorship of the proletariat. Mr. Xi is also a Maoist, and when Mao founded the People’s Republic of China, he called it a people’s democratic dictatorship. [It is that] in the Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist-Maoist sense, a dictatorship is democratic because it empowers communists to do what they consider necessary to serve the people who matter: the proletariat, aka the working class. A priority task is to prevent the establishment of a liberal democracy, which would act in the interests of the bourgeoisie and counterrevolutionary classes”.

 

But according to Clifford May, Xi Jinping did not distinguish himself simply by choosing the political affiliations he felt comfortable with, and adhered to them in the abstract. Rather, Mr. Xi allied himself with the most redoubtable of dictators alive today, helped them, nurtured them and propped them to do some of the dirty work around the world which serves the interests of China.

 

Here are the allies that Mr. Xi picked to work with directly:

 

“First, there is Ali Khamenei, supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, [who claims to] represent the Prophet Muhammad on Earth. Second, there is Mr. Xi’s pet bulldog, Kim Jong Un, the third generation of the North Korean dynastic dictatorship. Third, there is Mr. Xi’s most important ally, Vladimir Putin, who transitioned from Russian leader to Russian dictator. His rivals have ended up in prisons or graveyards”.

 

And here are the allies by extension that Mr. Xi may have to work with indirectly:

 

Fourth, Yevgeny Prigozhin whose checkered career has included serving time for robbery, running a hot-dog stand, and amassing a fortune as a caterer to the Kremlin. Fifth, the Wagner Group, a private military company run by Prigozhin who was loyal to Mr. Putin till he launched a mutiny complaining against Russia’s military establishment. Sixth, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko who brokered the truce that allowed Prigozhin to go live in Belorussia, away from Putin’s reach”.

 

This is what prompted Clifford May to point out the confusion that exists in and around the Kremlin. Here is what he said in that regard:

 

“Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Russian authorities had decided not to prosecute Mr. Prigozhin for his rebellion but to allow him safe passage to Belarus. Later, however, a Russian news agency cited an authoritative source saying that a criminal case against Mr. Prigozhin is continuing. Later still, Mr. Putin said Wagner fighters can join the Russian army, go back home, or go to Belarus”.

 

May then wondered what impact all this will have on Putin’s War in Ukraine. And he could not help but express the conclusion that Mr. Xi has been paying close attention to how his brother dictator copes with this crisis. He also drew the lesson that: “A shrewd dictator does not allow anyone to acquire significant power”.

 

Clifford May then exploited all that history and all those current events to predict a gloomy picture for the Western World that does not seem worried or aware of what’s percolating half the way around the globe, and preparing to confront and defeat the West, a surprise that the writer seems to think will come sooner than later.

 

To make that last point clear, reinforce it and urge the West to prepare for the upcoming confrontation, Clifford May zeroed in on the character of Xi Jinping, painting him as the genocidal dictator who single-handedly subjugated the peoples of Tibet and Xinjiang, that New Frontier which ultimately became an imperial possession, a fate that Mr. Xi reserves for the Western entities he plans to conquer and add to his possessions according to Clifford May.

 

Be that as it may, even if future events unfold clearly in the imagination of Clifford May, he does not see President Biden being aware of what’s coming. Thus, Clifford May advises Joe Biden that the least he can do is not for a moment forget that the grand ambition of China’s dictator is to dictate to America and, indeed, the entire planet.

Master mainstreamers of the maelstrom

 Because it is a near universal desire that justice be delivered equally among all that deserve it, the firm belief that such delivery happens by itself, has imbued most human cultures. In some cases, the belief is created by the logic that nature always seeks balance. In most other cases, the belief is held as a matter of religious faith; one that promises justice will be delivered not in this life but in the afterlife.

 

Leaving the religious part to those who preoccupy themselves with religion, we look at the logical possibility of justice being delivered in this life, and ask how the mechanics of a natural system might work to fulfill that promise.

 

But as we study the existing situations, trying to develop insight on how nature’s property to seek balance ends up delivering justice to those that cannot wait for the afterlife to do it, we are surprised to discover that nature has gone a long way to fulfilling the promise — even if nature’s definition of “justice” differs slightly from what is normally expected. In fact, we discover that a system has been in place and has been delivering since the beginning of time.

 

The case that led us to this conclusion, has been unfolding in Canada for decades, and is coming to fruition just now. It tells of the country’s wish to appear as being the paragon of virtue, especially in the matter of human rights, when in reality Canada has been a symbol of depraved savagery in human rights. I know all about this case because it happened to me. It gave me the opportunity to live the horror I was studying, thus helped me derive authentic lessons that I hope will assist humanity in getting rid of the most destructive evil ever to plague Planet Earth.

 

It all started when the Jews who thought they had a monopoly on free speech threatened to make life miserable for me if I did not stop interacting with the editors of publications in Toronto, Canada. When I did not heed the Jewish threat, the Canadian Jewish Congress did two things to make life miserable for me as promised. They hit me with every means they had, and commissioned the Canadian Government to do what it does vigorously: Crush its own children to please the Jews.

 

To that end, the Canadian Government put the RCMP, which is the security apparatus of the country, under the disposal of the Jewish Congress. The combination of the national police force and the ubiquitous Jewish forces of sabotage you see in every institution, made it possible for Jewish Central to infect every aspect of my life with horror, while at the same time throwing a wall of silence around the savagery being committed in hiding. And it was this mafia-like “omerta” that kept the crime going.

 

Here is how I made that discovery. The Jews were able to maintain the wall of silence because they mainstreamed their crimes, thus normalized them as if they fit naturally into the discourses of everyday. In my case, they did so when they began the long process by using a harmless but false analogy about me. What they did subsequently was to gradually normalize the analogy and mainstream it into a criminal slander that no one objected to despite my protests.

 

The Jews achieved all that by relying on the fact that I espoused ideas different from theirs. At some point, they began to use the analog “bomb thrower” to characterize what I was writing — which happened to demolish their lies time after time.

 

In time, the Jews made it sound like the analogy was more substantive than it was analog. By the time that years and decades had passed, the normalized mainstream belief had falsely become that I did something horrible for which I was being punished. It solidified into an aspect of normalcy that reflected life on Earth, thus condemned me to a lifetime of suffering in silence; a situation what can only be viewed as the most horrific crime committed against a lone individual by a massive crime syndicate.

 

But little did the Jews know at the time that they were creating more than a situation to fit my circumstance. What they did, in fact, was create an entire ecosystem of normalcy that began to affect them as much as it did me. And it was in that ecosystem that began to develop the tendency to normalize talk about inflicting extreme forms of punishment on the Jews in return for what they were inflicting on the human race.

 

In time, the false paradigm that was fabricated by the Jews had shifted so much, it reversed itself. Instead of associating me with a horrible crime for which the public believed I was made to suffer and deservedly so, that same public began to see my innocence while at the same time thinking of the Jews as the recidivists who came back to beg being crushed once again the way that they were repeatedly crushed in the past.

 

But how did the mechanics of reversal work in the Jewish-created ecosystem? It worked like it does in everyday life: By relying on the universal desire that justice be delivered equally among all that seek it and deserve it — which creates a societal backlash of such force, it can move any immovable object, including the Jewish Central and Government of Canada crime syndicate.

 

The alter ego that betrayed its creator

 The one thing that identifies Clifford D. May’s style of writing is that he penetrates deep into the soul of those he dislikes, creates unlikely situations for them to wrestle with, and delights watching them perform under the worst possible of conditions.

 

When done with the reveries, May takes pleasure describing those ugly performances — moments of fiction he packages and presents to his readers as if they happened in real life.

 

This is what Clifford May did in his latest column. He wrote it under the title: “What would happen if Putin were to prevail in Ukraine?” And had it published on June 20, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

May begins the article by giving himself the exclusive authority to do what he is doing. He accomplishes this feat by starting the article with summarily dismissing the opinions expressed by everyone else on the subject. Here is how he did that: “Western leaders have long misunderstood Vladimir Putin.” And here is the evidence he offered to prove his point:

 

“President George W. Bush found him [Putin] to be very straightforward and trustworthy. Not exactly. President Barack Obama predicted that Mr. Putin would not get bogged down in a civil conflict in Syria. Later, Mr. Putin propped up Bashar Assad. Angela Merkel believed that Mr. Putin’s ambitions would drown in a river of euros. The chancellor was mistaken. After Mr. Putin dismembered Georgia, American and European leaders went out of their way not to provoke him. President Biden hoped Mr. Putin was planning only a minor incursion into Ukraine. [Not so]”.

 

This being the package of Clifford May’s total set of beliefs, how can he use it to paint the image of a Putin that’s so horrible, people will change their minds, hate the man, and be weary of him? Well, the way to do it, is for Clifford May to dig deep into his own imagination and identify those moments when he experienced the worst of sentiments as generated by extreme occurrences, and then use the broadest of brushes to paint the picture of Vladimir Putin.

 

In fact, Clifford May did just that, and the foray into the imagined journey prompted him to ask what would Putin do next with regard to the critical issues which are of interest to the West. And he answered the question by mentioning 5 countries that Putin will want to invade next so as to complete his plan and restore to Russia the greatness it used to have but lost, and deserves to have it back.

 

Those countries are Moldova, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, each of which has a murky history according to Clifford May, and has various unresolved bones of contention with Russia. But how would Putin begin action against those countries without mobilizing the  world, especially the NATO countries, prompting them to say enough is enough, and move forcefully to stop Putin?

 

In fact, it is in response to this question that Clifford May demonstrated once more the power of his imagination. What he did is write a scenario that Putin can follow and pull off his plan. It goes as follows:

 

“Mr. Putin could say to NATO: ‘I’m open to diplomacy — a land-for-peace deal. But if you’d rather wage war, you should understand that extreme measures will be considered’”.

 

Now ask yourself: which NATO members would be willing to risk a nuclear war with Russia over a ribbon of countryside in the southern Baltics? Turkey? Germany? France? Would most Americans support such a conflict?

 

Clifford May’s prediction is that no one will try to stop Putin. And this will have serious ramifications because “it’s tough to see how NATO could survive if it failed to defend one of its members as pledged in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.” And that’s not all because this will also mean the collapse of NATO according to May who went on to explain that:

 

“For Mr. Putin, NATO’s collapse would be a huge victory, one that his communist allies in Beijing and Pyongyang, and his Islamist allies in Tehran would regard as a significant battle won in their war against the West”. And in hose capitals, the lesson learned will be that the US and Europe cave in to nuclear blackmail.

 

There is more. May goes on to tell that two years ago, Russian and Belarusian troops staged a military exercise to practice attacking Lithuania. He guesses that perhaps you’ll say that, after the war in Ukraine, Mr. Putin wouldn’t have the resources and manpower necessary for such aggressions.

 

But Clifford May speculates that if Putin has been successful, Tehran and Beijing would be as helpful as possible. The morale of his troops would improve. And he’d have millions of Ukrainians whom he could draft and — with bayonets pressed against their backs — use as cannon fodder.

 

This being an elaborate scenario, written in several acts that describe enough twists and turns to dizzy the readers, we ask: Where did Clifford May find the energy to put it all together?

 

The answer is that “fire in the belly” can become an unlimited source of literary energy. Clifford May tapped into it and gave Vladimir Putin an alter ego to imitate that is the image of every Zionist who dreams of a “Greater Israel” — such as Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, Clifford May and all the others.

Their social engineering of the world failed

 Confident that they have the sympathy of the human race following their Holocaust experience, the Jews set out to social engineer the world in a way that would make it safe for everyone of them to be anywhere they go to visit, live or work.

 

To that end, the Jews designed a two-pronged strategy they envisaged will implement the plan on both the macro and micro levels. This self-imposed task was not something new to them, however. In fact, they had been doing this kind of work during the centuries and millennia that they roamed the world in search of a place they could destroy and rebuild to suit their needs.

 

And whereas the Jews lost in a big way every time that the ordinary people discovered what they were doing at the micro level — thus pogromed them out of their communities — the Jews had a better luck working on the governing elites of the communities they infiltrated, and where they were able to instigate the wars between nations they have become famous for.

 

The Jewish strategy at the micro level consisted of forming “watch groups” and installing them in places such as the colleges, banks and politico-journalistic crowds where the watchers would spot the rising talents and report them to Jewish Central. This is when Central tailor-makes a plan to (1) recruit the willing and have them work for the Jewish causes, or (2) plot to ruin the life of the unwilling or (3) work to infiltrate the prominent families where they hope to find a match for their brood.

 

As to the Jewish strategy at the macro level, it consists of swarming with their volunteers every political candidate that’s running for an American office and offer to serve in any capacity that the candidates ask them to. But when they get in and feel secure in their position, the Jewish volunteers begin to work for the Jewish causes which now include Israel first and foremost.

 

Because Israel was started as a terror organization formed specifically to fulfill the predictions of the Apocalypse as described in the Jewish Bible known as the Old Testament, the Jewish volunteers in America spend most of their time, effort and genius on working to convince the political class they pretend to serve that the way to fix the world is to first annihilate it in a nuclear holocaust. They become hawks, warmongers and advocates for the military industrial complex.

 

Half a century has passed since Jewish Central embarked on such plan for America, and the Jews are beginning to feel the backlash they felt everywhere else and throughout the centuries. There is no doubt they lost the initiative at the macro as well as the micro level. The evidence to that effect is strong and playing out at the global level where humanity is expressing itself openly, in the social media, even in some of the mainstream media.

 

Given that a backlash brings with it a paradigm shift if not a paradigm reversal, what used to be a win for someone becomes a loss, and what used to be a loss becomes a win. In fact, this is what happened in the matter of Iraq’s invasion at the macro level where a brilliant military success proved to be America’s biggest mistake when analyzed from the strategic point of view.

 

What the paradigm reversal has brought at the micro level can be seen in the price that Canada was made to pay for persecuting me as ordered by the Jews. Considering the Canadian temperament as exemplified by the Trudeau family, refusing to grant Canada membership in the AUKUS group is considered a major blow. But unlike the time when an exception was made to grant Canada membership in what became the group of 7, today’s Australia, United Kingdom and United States are keeping Canada out till it ends its continued persecution of me.

 

A trend has started because those living by the norms of Western Civilization came to realize that the Trudeaus of Canada are taking not only their country down the Jewish sewer, but taking down the Anglosphere, the West and the entire Western Civilization. And so, they decided to throw the failed crew overboard in order to save the ship and bring it to the harbor of warm waters where it belongs.

The depraved Canada habit to rape its children

 No, this is not about ordinary Canadian families raping their children. It’s about the Canadian political family governing the jurisdiction that’s giving to foreigners what it takes to make them believe and falsely claim that Canada is a paragon of virtue. And when the demands of the foreigners escalated in the past, so did the Canadian giveaways to them. That included giving away the Human Rights condition of the country’s own citizens.

 

That reality became evident when several presidents of the United States of America — and perhaps others of the Western World as well who became embarrassed by Canada’s behavior — tried to pressure the Canadian government of the time to end its persecution of me. This had been a horrific punishment that Canada implemented at the request of Jewish Central because I refused to trash my own race as demanded, and praise Israel.

 

What’s known about the methods that the American Presidents used, is that they took advantage of the leverage they had in the ongoing talks that were held to resolve the various disputes concerning the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Instead of helping resolve the sticky points, the Americans hardened their positions, thus made the talks almost unbearable for the Canadian Government. The message to the Canadian political elites was to the effect that the American pressure on Canada will end when the Canadian persecution of yours truly will end.

 

It turned out that the punishment imposed on Canada had the same effect of punishments imposed on Third World governing clicks: It was zero effect on the governing band in Ottawa while having a devastating effect on the Canadian population. In fact, the punishment on the people who depended on the trade of soft wood lumber, agriculture, meat packing and dairy products, was so severe, many committed suicide. Others displayed their extreme frustration by shooting their herds in front of the television cameras.

 

Despite all of that however, and time after time, the Government of Canada took the punishment of its people in its stride, and refused to budge on the matter of my persecution fearing that a change of heart on this matter would upset the Jews.

 

So the question to ask is the following: Can there be a way out of this abomination? In fact, it seemed for a long time that there was no way. But then something happened lately indicating that there may be a way, after all. To understand what happened we need to go back to the beginning of the saga — that is, go back in time several decades.

 

That was the time when five countries with the largest economies — three winners of WW II, which were the US, the UK and France, got together with the two losers of the same war: Germany and Japan — all intending to regulate diplomacy and trade among themselves in an effort to bring stability to the world and improve the human condition.

 

Before they had done anything to help the human race, the five leaders heard a screaming voice howling repeatedly: Me too. Me too. It was the voice of then Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the father of the current Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

 

As it turned out, Pierre Trudeau was a quarrelling exhibitionist that had issues with his manhood. Everything he did was aimed at proving he would not submit to the will of someone else. In fact, he held on to that stance so firmly, he stood up to the Jews who asked him to expel suspected “former Nazis” out of Canada. He said no he will not do it, and that was that”.

 

As to his stance with regard to the newly forming G-5, he wanted to get into the club, seeing that Canada under his leadership was worthy of the honor. Because Canada’s economy was smaller than that of Italy at the time, the original 5 were compelled to invite Italy to join them as the 6^th member, making it possible for Canada to get in as the 7^th member. And this is how the G-7 came to be.

 

It looks now that Justin Trudeau is suffering from the same manhood issues that plagued his father. The Jews must have convinced him that to resolve the matter of my persecution in my favor, was to diminish his manhood. And so, he decided to stand firm on the “no” decision.

 

And yet, whereas you might have expected to see him stand up to the Jews the way that his father did, it seems that Jewish Central beat him to the punch. That is, the Jews were able to pull a W. Bush style “finish the job” trick on Justin Trudeau before he had the time to tell them off.

 

The result is that in the same way they got Bush Junior to do the job of destroying Iraq, a task that Bush senior had failed to do, they got Trudeau Junior to do the job of destroying an Arab life (that happens to be mine) and celebrate one more Jewish victory.

Crocodile tears for a new China Syndrome

 There was a time when nuclear power plants were reviled on Planet Earth because people thought they threatened life throughout the planet. It also happened that at the same time, Hollywood had gotten into the business of exploiting people’s anxieties by making movies that aggravated their worst fears.

 

And so, Hollywood produced “The China Syndrome,” a film that tells the story of an American nuclear power plant that melts down and threatens to tunnel its way to China — the other side of the world.

 

What’s known about Hollywood’s exploitative instinct, is that it builds on its successes by producing sequels to the movies that do well initially. But because Hollywood failed to do so this time, someone else  filled the gap.

 

Be careful, however, because that someone did not produce a movie. He simply produced a fictitious narrative as imaginative as any run-of-the-mill Hollywood script. It is the story of China tunnelling its way to Africa and gobbling the natural resources of that Continent, leaving little or nothing behind for other countries to buy and develop their industries.

 

That budding script writer is Clifford D. May who wrote: “‘Cobalt Red’: The price Africans pay so we can have better batteries,” a column that was published on June 13, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

Basing his arguments mostly on the writings of Siddharth Kara, Clifford May begins telling his narrative by shooting himself in the foot inadvertently. Here is how he did it while speaking of Kara:

 

“The author of three books on modern slavery, his most recent is ‘Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives.’ To research it, he made multiple journeys into militia-controlled areas of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the central African country where 75% of the world’s cobalt is mined”.

 

Intending to single out China for being the resource-hog villain of the planet — like he has been doing for years, and like he ended his current column — Clifford May weakened his argument by mentioning at the start that Kara:

 

“Made journeys into militia-controlled areas of the Democratic Republic of Congo where 75% of the world’s cobalt is mined. Cobalt can be mined using machines but Mr. Kara’s focus is on the more than 30% of cobalt mining in Congo that is artisanal — a euphemism for hundreds of thousands of people engaged in the feverish excavation of cobalt in medieval conditions”.

 

Thus, Siddharth Kara says he saw Congolese militia and not Chinese bosses control the mining of cobalt in their own country. So then, what is China’s role in this sordid mess? Here is how Clifford May answered that question:

 

“No one accepts ‘responsibility at all for the negative consequences of cobalt mining in the Congo,’ Mr. Kara writes, ‘not the Congolese government, not foreign mining companies, not battery manufacturers, and certainly not mega-cap tech and car companies. He’s not wrong, but I’d argue that he doesn’t sufficiently emphasize Beijing’s role in the exploitation of Congo’s resources and people”.

 

So, this is how Clifford May formulates the arguments which he hopes will convince audiences of his points of view. What he does, is “emphasize the nefarious roles” that the bad guys play in the exploitation of others, even if the bad guys are invisible. Still, China plays a somewhat meaningful role, he says; one that goes like this:

 

“Roughly 90% of Congo’s mining exports go to China, where they are processed and where batteries are manufactured for sale around the world. The energy source for this processing and manufacturing: mostly coal, the most polluting hydrocarbon”.

 

Because being someone’s client, and paying good money for the supplies he sells you, was never considered a sin, that part of Clifford May’s argument fell flat, and the author must have become aware of it. This is why he resorted to another method by which to stir the emotions of his audiences. He did so by asking the question: “How did China achieve its dominant position in Congo?”

 

And this is when and where Clifford May has shown his true colors.  Like the past performance of people like himself who wanted to ban the internal combustion engine because the Arabs had the fuel to power it, today, he wants to ban the electric car because the Africans have the resources by which to make the fuel that will power it.

 

Add to that kind of discourse a bucket or so of crocodile tears, and you have an old style argument that went nowhere then, and will go nowhere today. See for yourself:

 

“China has market dominance in all the strategic minerals necessary to produce EVs. It already has more market dominance in these minerals than OPEC has in oil. The national security implications should be obvious: The US is becoming more dependent on China for energy.  On top of that, the Western war on hydrocarbons is exacerbating poverty in the global south. More than 500 million people in Africa do not have electricity. In Congo, fewer than 1 person in 10 is rich enough to have an electric light or fan in his home, much less a computer”.

 

The way to help these poor people is not to get China out of Africa and replace it with “Trickle Down Economics,” it is to get in there, compete against China, and show that the Western system is superior to that of China.

 

Otherwise be quiet and learn from the Chinese.

Return to the same old, same old condition

 It is good to be back doing work again after a stay at the hospital. What’s not good, however, is to encounter the same old arguments, as they continue to be cogitated by the same people — boring arguments I am compelled to refute once more.

 

Worse, it is abominable to realize that my illness has caused the worldwide crime syndicate composed of the Canadian Government and World Jewry to wring their hands with glee that the day is coming nearer when they’ll be in a position to pocket the money they owe me, in the belief that I’ll no longer be around to claim it.

 

This, in fact, is the image that the latest Clifford D. May article projects. It came under the title: “Stalinist approach to peacemaking is homicidal logic: No Israel, no problem,” and was published on June 6, 2023 in the Washington Times.

 

Thus, having simultaneously pursued the contradictory discourses of “Israel will never die” and “Israel is in danger of being annihilated,” Clifford May is now rephrasing the same discourses so as to reiterate the same points and maintain the status quo that has served the Jews very well so far.

 

In that regard, Clifford May has used the saying of four professors to warn of the following:

 

“The professors would have the US pressure Israel to grant citizenship to Palestinian Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank. Jews would then become a minority in Israel, presumably living under the rule of Hamas or the Palestinian Authority. What would happen to them after that? The question does not appear to interest the essay’s authors”.

 

But then, right after he raised that warning, Clifford May, admitted to the following:

 

“Roughly 20% of Israeli citizens are Arab. 77% of them feel that they are a part of Israel and share in its problems. That percentage has been rising over recent years. Arab Israelis work as doctors, nurses, lawyers, judges, police officers, business owners and politicians. Some volunteer to serve in the Israeli army. Such facts should make clear why the charge that Israeli is an apartheid state is ludicrous”.

 

This makes you wonder what exactly these people wish to see happen before they can say that Israel is safe now and does not have to continually prepare for the kind of wars that only it has been instigating and blaming on others.

 

Studying the situation on Planet Earth, and drawing the logical conclusions from what you observe, you cannot dismiss the reality that the Arabs of Palestinian origin and otherwise, comport themselves in Israel the same way they do anywhere else in the diaspora. They remain loyal to the country that adopts them, even if the country is Israel.

 

In any case, this was never the concern of Clifford May. His concern had to do with these words: “The professors would have the US pressure Israel to grant citizenship to Palestinian Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank. Jews would then become a minority in Israel”.

 

Some people view this practice as being racial apartheid because they see no difference between religious separation and racial separation. On their part, Jews of the Clifford May mentality, latch on to that confusion and argue that because there may be a difference in name between being treated like a second class citizen because of religion, is not the same as being treated like second class citizen because of race, Israel does not look like South Africa, therefore Israel does not practice apartheid, and saying that it does is ludicrous.

 

But ludicrous resides in the expectation that someone who feels discriminated against because of his religion, must feel a lesser pain than someone that’s discriminated against because of his ethnic origin or color of the skin. And while this reality clearly establishes the inferiority of Jewish logic, there are many among the American political elites who do not realize that they diminish themselves by adopting it as a basis upon which to make decisions concerning the Middle Eastern situation. But how can something like this happen to a people who are supposed to be the brightest in the world?

 

The answer is that it can happen when such people are lied to. And here is the one lie said about the Palestinians that the Jews have repeatedly used on the Americans to hypnotize them and render them docile like a poodle in the lap of his Jewish master:

 

“Nor do they mention that Palestinian leaders continue to reject even the possibility of a Palestinian state (which would of course identify as Arab and Muslim) coexisting alongside the Jewish state — rather than replacing the Jewish state”.

 

When the Jews started putting out that lie, they formulated it differently. They used to say: “We offered them a good deal on several occasions, and they refused them all.” When impartial people looked at those deals closely, they found them to be of the kind that says “Heads we win; tails you lose.” So, the Jews changed the formulation by dragging into the conversation the Arab countries to make it look like they share in the responsibility of Palestinian intransigence. They then repeated the old formulation as did Clifford May who put it this way:

 

“Why do they never criticize Palestinian leaders for rejecting offers of two-state solutions in 1937, 1947, 2000, 2001 and 2008”?

 

Lies being the hypnotic nourishment that Jews feed to the legislators of the so-called democracies, I expect them to do just that to the political elites in Canada’s ruling party and the opposition. The result will be that they will all come to believe I forfeited the money owed to me, and that they can share it among themselves.

 

What can be more disgusting than this? What can be more Jewish than this?

Alternate order failing under its own absurdity

 The world has a view of itself with regard to the way it had been in the recent past, the way it stands today, and the way it will be tomorrow. By contrast, speaking for Jewish Central, Clifford D. May gives an alternative view that is the opposite of what the world envisions. Despite the differences between the two views, however, May has admitted to the following:

 

The world expressed itself: “at the conclusion of its summit in Hiroshima, Japan, earlier this month, the Group of Seven issued a communique calling attention to China’s ‘malign practices. That prompted spokesmen for the Chinese Communist Party to complain about the G-7’s Cold War mentality”.

 

But Clifford May was not satisfied with a mild rebuke of China’s stand as expressed by the G-7 countries, nor did he appreciate China’s response to the rebuke. And so, being the warmonger that he is, Clifford May engaged in lecturing to his audience the usual sermon. It is one by which the author tells the world what amounts to the following: We are good. They are bad. We must arm ourselves and beat them to a pulp before they get so strong as to be in a position to enslave all of us.

 

By contrast, the G-7 countries who are in a position of authority to render sound judgments given their power, spoke to the world assuring humanity that no one is so bad that we should fear them the way Clifford May says we should fear the Chinese. Nor is anyone so good, we should trust them the way that May says we should trust ourselves solving all of our problems — especially the cult of death which kills more Americans at the hands of Americans, than foreigners do or wish to do.

 

In fact, speaking of China’s Xi Jinping, Clifford May says the following — presented here in condensed form:

 

“He is the most powerful Chinese ruler since Mao Zedong, is building his military capabilities at breakneck speed. He formed a ‘no limits’ alliance with Vladimir Putin days before Russian tanks invaded Ukraine. He stripped Hong Kong of its freedoms. He persecutes Tibetans, Uyghurs and other minorities. He threatens Taiwan. He steals billions of dollars in American intellectual property, inserts malware into the computer systems of critical US infrastructure, flies spy balloons over American military bases, and helps traffic fentanyl into the US, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands. But he would have the world believe that it is the G7 — the US, Japan, Britain, Germany, France, Italy and Canada — that is bellicose”.

 

Clifford May seems to think that by drawing a list of what he says make Xi Jinping look bad, the man will look bad. But the reality is that every sentence in that passage, will cause the readers to wonder from which planet Clifford May has come. For example, people will want to know: What’s wrong with being powerful in one’s own country? They will recall Clifford May saying that Ronald Reagan was good because he built up the military. Why not the Chinese? As to stripping other countries of their freedom, and mistreating its people, if what China is doing in its own neighborhood amounts to a pound of evildoings, what Israel is doing in the neighborhood it stole from others, amounts to a ton of evildoings. And yet, Clifford May praises Israel and condemns China. This is a case of double standard that’s so absurd, it sinks the argument it is trying to make.

 

And there is more that’s absurd in what Clifford May is saying to convince the world the Chinese are so bad, they should be checked before they get too strong and become immune to being contained. It is that in his eagerness to prove that accommodating the Chinese request for a thawing of relations with the West, and President Biden echoing the same sentiment, Clifford May has turned virtue into sin and turned sin into virtue.

 

The following passage, presented in condensed form, shows how Clifford May is doing it:

 

“President Biden predicted there will be a ‘thaw very shortly’ in Sino-American relations. A spokeswoman for Beijing’s Foreign Ministry said that’s not happening so long as the US is ‘resorting to any means to suppress and contain China.’ But how is China being suppressed and contained? The G7 communique stated: ‘Our policy approaches are not designed to harm China nor do we seek to thwart China’s economic progress and development. Nor has there been any serious effort to curtail Beijing’s growing influence in the  rest of the world”.

 

Anyone that is familiar with the way negotiations proceed between two powers, will recognize the give-and-take that took place between President Biden and Beijing’s Foreign Ministry, as an honest attempt by both sides to reach an accommodation that will satisfy not just the West and the East, but also a world that yearns for the kind of stability which will allow every nation on Planet Earth to develop to a higher standard of living for its people.

 

But instead of accepting the exchange between Biden and the Chinese Foreign Ministry, as being a harbinger of the good things that can develop from such a trend, Clifford May does his part to muddy the situation, undoubtedly in the hope of maintaining the status quo which he always hoped will lead to the following situation:

 

“In this new world order, Beijing’s junior partners will do what they please. If the leaders of the G7 recognized this reality, their top priority would be to increase their military. No other policy can maintain deterrence and preserve freedom for the next generation. But they don’t recognize this reality. They lack the imagination to think as Mr. Xi thinks and see the future as Mr. Xi sees it”.

 

Speaking in the name of Jewish Central, Clifford May expresses only war in his discourses. And when someone points that out, the Jews cry out: Antisemitism.