It is good to be back doing work again after a stay at the hospital. What’s not good, however, is to encounter the same old arguments, as they continue to be cogitated by the same people — boring arguments I am compelled to refute once more.
Worse, it is abominable to
realize that my illness has caused the worldwide crime syndicate composed of
the Canadian Government and World Jewry to wring their hands with glee that the
day is coming nearer when they’ll be in a position to pocket the money they owe
me, in the belief that I’ll no longer be around to claim it.
This, in fact, is the image
that the latest Clifford D. May article projects. It came under the title: “Stalinist approach to peacemaking is homicidal logic: No
Israel, no problem,” and was published on June 6, 2023 in the Washington Times.
Thus, having simultaneously
pursued the contradictory discourses of “Israel will never die” and “Israel is
in danger of being annihilated,” Clifford May is now rephrasing the same
discourses so as to reiterate the same points and maintain the status quo that
has served the Jews very well so far.
In that regard, Clifford
May has used the saying of four professors to warn of the following:
“The professors would have the US pressure Israel to grant
citizenship to Palestinian Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank. Jews
would then become a minority in Israel, presumably living under the rule
of Hamas or the Palestinian Authority. What would happen to them after
that? The question does not appear to interest the essay’s authors”.
But then, right after he raised that warning, Clifford May, admitted to
the following:
“Roughly 20% of Israeli citizens are
Arab. 77% of them feel that they are a part of Israel and share in
its problems. That percentage has been rising over recent years. Arab Israelis
work as doctors, nurses, lawyers, judges, police officers, business owners and
politicians. Some volunteer to serve in the Israeli army. Such facts should
make clear why the charge that Israeli is an apartheid state is ludicrous”.
This makes you wonder what
exactly these people wish to see happen before they can say that Israel is safe
now and does not have to continually prepare for the kind of wars that only it has
been instigating and blaming on others.
Studying the situation on
Planet Earth, and drawing the logical conclusions from what you observe, you
cannot dismiss the reality that the Arabs of Palestinian origin and otherwise, comport
themselves in Israel the same way they do anywhere else in the diaspora. They remain
loyal to the country that adopts them, even if the country is Israel.
In any case, this was never
the concern of Clifford May. His concern had to do with these words: “The professors
would have the US pressure Israel to grant citizenship to Palestinian
Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank. Jews would then become a minority
in Israel”.
Some people view this practice
as being racial apartheid because they see no difference between religious separation
and racial separation. On their part, Jews of the Clifford May mentality, latch
on to that confusion and argue that because there may be a difference in name
between being treated like a second class citizen because of religion, is not
the same as being treated like second class citizen because of race, Israel
does not look like South Africa, therefore Israel does not practice apartheid,
and saying that it does is ludicrous.
But ludicrous resides in
the expectation that someone who feels discriminated against because of his
religion, must feel a lesser pain than someone that’s discriminated against
because of his ethnic origin or color of the skin. And while this reality clearly
establishes the inferiority of Jewish logic, there are many among the American
political elites who do not realize that they diminish themselves by adopting
it as a basis upon which to make decisions concerning the Middle Eastern
situation. But how can something like this happen to a people who are supposed
to be the brightest in the world?
The answer is that it can
happen when such people are lied to. And here is the one lie said about the
Palestinians that the Jews have repeatedly used on the Americans to hypnotize
them and render them docile like a poodle in the lap of his Jewish master:
“Nor do they mention that Palestinian leaders continue to reject even
the possibility of a Palestinian state (which would of course identify as Arab
and Muslim) coexisting alongside the Jewish state — rather than replacing the
Jewish state”.
When the Jews started putting out that lie, they formulated it
differently. They used to say: “We offered them a good deal on several occasions,
and they refused them all.” When impartial people looked at those deals
closely, they found them to be of the kind that says “Heads we win; tails you
lose.” So, the Jews changed the formulation by dragging into the conversation
the Arab countries to make it look like they share in the responsibility of
Palestinian intransigence. They then repeated the old formulation as did
Clifford May who put it this way:
“Why do they never
criticize Palestinian leaders for rejecting offers of two-state solutions in
1937, 1947, 2000, 2001 and 2008”?
Lies being the hypnotic nourishment
that Jews feed to the legislators of the so-called democracies, I expect them
to do just that to the political elites in Canada’s ruling party and the
opposition. The result will be that they will all come to believe I forfeited
the money owed to me, and that they can share it among themselves.