Enemies and adversaries created for convenience

 Clifford D. May says he is puzzled because many Americans do not see that when Iran says “Death to America,” it considers itself the enemy of America, not just its adversary.

 

He expressed this idea, after suggesting the weird notion that if you see the UN General Assembly as being a great deliberative body, you need to consult a competent ophthalmologist.

 

He argued those points in his latest column; one that came under the title: “U.S. enemies and adversaries reveal intentions at United Nations General Assembly,” and was published on September 26, 2023 in the Washington Times.

 

Obviously, it is unknown to Clifford May with any adequate level of clarity, that he naïvely put himself squarely at odds with the American public which believes otherwise. May fell behind, having revealed how wide is the intellectual gulf that separates him from what he considers to be his American kinfolks.

 

Moreover, having trashed most of those folks in what looks like a habitual and mechanical fashion, Clifford May went on to associate them with a world he says is full of adversaries and enemies of America. In fact, he believes that most if not all that make up the United Nations, threaten the security of America as demonstrated by the word salads which they served during the General Assembly meetings, he went on to explain.

 

Holding on to such beliefs with the firmness that he does, and declaring that dictators and elected leaders from around the world have descended upon New York City to deliver what he calls “mind-numbing speeches replete with misinformation and disinformation,” Clifford May revealed another aspect of his character. It is that he believes he is the sole custodian of truth, thus placed himself above the world and above his fellow Americans.

 

There can be no denying that Clifford May’s description of himself clearly indicates that he believes he is paranoid, being so fearful of the world by his own observations and by constantly admitting that life terrified him no end. Whether or not he is also schizophrenic (which would make a dangerous mix,) depends on the level of delusion he experiences when left alone to ruminate over his thoughts.

 

For his own good, therefore, he who recommended that those who do not see things eye to eye with him, should consult a competent ophthalmologist, must now take his own advice and consult a competent shrink — if only to ascertain that he is stable enough where he stands at this point in time, and will not deteriorate any further, at least not anytime soon.

 

The importance of taking such a decision will be appreciated when it is realized that Clifford May’s outfit known as Foundation for Defense of Democracies, has some influence among both the legislators and executives of the superpower known as America. If he goes totally bananas, so will heavily armed America because he’ll drag it down with him. And no one knows what will happen next.

 

For those reasons, it is important that we make a serious effort to understand the undercurrents which are viewed by him and viewed by those like him whenever such undercurrents play out between America and the rest of the world. Here, in condensed form, is a compilation of passages written by Clifford May on this subject:

 

“Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi flew to New York. His speech to the General Assembly was triumphalist. ‘The endeavors to universalize American ideals throughout the world have proven to be failures,’ he asserted. Translation: A growing number of regimes are rejecting the idea of fundamental rights and freedoms. The import of Mr. Raisi’s remarks is that a new international community is becoming dominant. He called it an emerging order of non-Western states. Expect more dictators to sign up in the years ahead. This developing axis of enemies and adversaries poses a serious threat to America’s national security. But until Washington policymakers and legislators connect the dots and take a hard look at the portrait that appears, they can’t begin to formulate a coherent strategy in response”.

 

So the question to ask is this: Is America endangered by the likes of Clifford May, or will it happen that America will be preserved by him? In other words, is he the devil that will sink America? Or is he the Guardian Angel that will save America?

 

We find answers to these questions in the article. Here is Clifford May’s formulation, giving clues as to how he may comport himself in the future:

 

“Vice President Han Zheng declared China a natural member of the Global South and noted that China’s Belt and Road Initiative has over 3,000 projects in Asia, Africa and Latin America. He called for global governance in a multipolar world. I’ll let you guess who would sit atop the tallest pole in the multipolar world that China envisions”.

 

That is, for once Clifford May refrained from trashing a suggestion that wasn’t his own — more surprising is the fact that the suggestion came from one of his archenemy, the Chinese Vice President.

 

When we take this development into account and when we mix it with what Clifford May has been saying throughout the article, we come out with the conclusion that there are reasons for us to be both optimistic and pessimistic about the future comportment of this man.

 

We can only encourage him to stay on the path that will maintain him respectful of other people’s points of view.

Experiments that may lead to spaceship engine

First, I explain my use of nomenclature. Speaking of the field that a magnet produces around itself, I say it is made of de Broglie matter-waves that exit from the output of the magnet and re-enter it at the input.

 

I thus avoid making reference to the North or South poles of the magnet so as not to repeat the confusion that was caused about the direction of electricity when it was discovered that the electron (carrier of electricity) was negative and not positive as originally thought.

 

Now, what about that engine for future spaceships? All I have in my head are notions as to how such engine should be designed and built. But of course, we won’t know the result of it performance till it is built, tested and shown what it will and will not do. Therefore, the description below is not that of the engine itself, or even that of a prototype, but that of the experiments that need to be conducted in the lab so as to determine what will work and what will not.

 

Now my friend, recall that two magnetized bodies react toward each other by each sending some of its de Broglie matter-waves to enter the input of the other. Even though most of the waves – pointing in all directions – would have neutralized each other before leaving the magnet, some will have remained in-line and will have given the mass of the magnet a gravitational attraction in addition to its magnetic property.

 

It is that all bodies (magnetizable or not) produce a gravitational attraction by that same process. We can therefore think of the magnet’s mass in this experiment as representing the space engine of the future, seen here to interact gravitationally with the Earth.

 

Now, to leave the Earth and go anywhere in space without being hampered by the gravitational pull of the Earth and all massive celestial bodies surrounding us, we need to find a way to prevent the few de Broglie matter-waves which are attracted by the input of the engine, from reaching their destination. How to do that?

 

We can do it by adopting three approaches as outlined below:

 

Because the matter-waves of a body attract by the fact that enough of them are lined up in series as in output-to-input, we need to disrupt this arrangement to neutralize their effect. We do so by wrapping the magnet with eight (that’s 8) coils of copper wires laid on top of each other. Each being wrapped at a 45 degree-shift from the previous, they occupy the full 360 degrees of the circle.

 

Approach one: a generator of electricity will have its output controlled by the distribution of a random producing gadget. It will energize one or the other of the coils in an erratic fashion so as to disrupt the lining of the matter-waves. This alone should reduce the gravitational pull that the magnet is having on its surroundings—such as the Earth.

 

Approach two: to prevent the Earth’s matter-waves from being attracted by the magnet’s input — representing the spaceship in this experiment — we enclose the entire magnet in a non-magnetizable cylinder made of metal such as aluminum. It too will be randomly powered by the coils, and will thus disrupt the lining of the Earth’s matter-waves on their way to enter the spaceship’s engine.

 

Approach three: with those two steps shielding the magnet from being affected by gravity, we turn our attention to using magnetism — a trillion, trillion, trillion times stronger than gravity — to power the spaceship and propel it at high velocity throughout the galaxy.

 

The engineers can take these ideas, and whatever else will come from the experiments that succeed and those that fail, figure out the ways by which to build the space engine of the future and make it work.

 

This done, we’ll be on our way to cruising the galaxy. Well … if not us, our descendants will.

Wall of silence makes the police state horrific

 You probably remember the saying about the fellow who asked his friend: “How’s your wife,” and the friend replied: “Compared to whom or what?” That’s because a question of this kind does not have an absolute answer. To be appreciated, it must therefore be given a context, which is done by asking how the wife may be in relation to another situation.                                                                                                                                              

But does this settle every question of that nature? Far from it. In fact, it has opened the door for a whole new cottage industry to rise in the field of statistics manipulation, giving the Jews a modern kind of manna from the sky with which to shower themselves and claim a flood of compensation. Here are two examples on how the Jews manipulate the statistics to make false points and get paid.

 

In the first example, the Jews exaggerate the relevance of what financial aid America gives the Palestinians by comparing the aid on a per capita basis with what the Europeans received from America after the Second World War. Of course, what the Jews ignore is the inflated value of money today compared to what it was after the Second World War.

 

In the second example, the Jews understate the relevance of what financial aid America gives Israel by comparing it with the size of America’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) or the Federal budget or the Pentagon budget or what have you — and the list of grotesque comparisons goes on.

 

It is therefore proper to ask that the real and false claims made by Jews concerning the Human Rights record of Israel’s nemeses should be compared with the record of third parties. And there is no better way to do that than to compare the Human Rights record of the jurisdictions in which the Jews live and have a strong influence, where they never relent pressuring the local governments from punishing those whom they designate as offending players.

 

In fact, this is the subject that Clifford D. May chose to discuss in his current article, titled: “Newsmen Jimmy Lai and Dmitry Muratov put their lives on the line for freedom,” published on September 19, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

And this is to which I shall respond by making the relevant comparisons with my case — that which is hidden behind a wall of murderous Liberal Democratic silence as opposed to what has been unfolding in broad daylight under the benevolent patriarchal regimes of China, Russia and other similar regimes. Clifford May began telling the story he has on his mind with this introduction:

 

“I think plenty of people don’t give a fig about their own freedom, and certainly not anyone else’s. And I think there are those whose desire is to eradicate the freedom of others. But there is a moral elite so devoted to freedom they are willing to martyr themselves to prevent the future from becoming the Orwell nightmare: a boot stamping on a human face. Two such heroes — Jimmy Lai and Dmitry Muratov — are profiled in two documentary films. I recommend them’”.

 

And so, Clifford May told the story of Jimmy Lai with a narrative that went as follows:

 

“He endured an extraordinary struggle. As a child in China, he carried luggage at a railway station. One day, a passenger gave him a bar of chocolate. He asked the passenger where it came from. The man replied: Hong Kong. The boy knew that city must be heaven. Before long, a 12-year-old stowaway found work in a Hong Kong garment factory. Eight years later, he became the factory’s manager. He went on to launch Giordano, a Chinese clothing company. It became a spectacular success. He founded Apple Daily, which reported the news without fear, and in which he editorialized in favor of freedom and criticized China’s rulers. It soon became Hong Kong’s most popular newspaper”.

 

Clifford May thinks this is extraordinary struggle. Well, if this is not the expression of an intellectual dishonesty as massive as the combined masses of Saturn and Jupiter — given that Clifford May knows what happened to me in so-called Liberal Democratic Canada — it must be that he has as much humanity in him as there is in a swarm of magots feeding on the dead corpse of a victim it ganged up on together with other magots and killed for the pursuit of pleasure and plagiarisms.

 

But what is it that happened to me?

 

It all began when in the aftermath of the 1967 Middle East War, the Jewish owned, Jewish influenced and everyone else’s publications started to represent the Arabs (especially the Egyptians) as sick dogs, wounded animals and cockroaches worthy of being exterminated with the leading insecticide of the time called “RAID”.

 

After a year of this kind of abuse, I wrote an innocuous letter to the editor of the Toronto Star which they published under the title: “Don’t listen to propaganda, Egypt is a civilized country.” The Canadian Jewish Congress responded by sending me a representative who warned me in my own home that if I do not stop talking to the press, the Jews will ruin my life. And that’s what they have been doing ever since, having recruited to their side the Canadian Government, the RCMP and everyone else that’s powered by the sick desire to engage in the moral gangrape of the innocent.

 

Done with the story of Jimmy Lai, Clifford May turned his attention to Dmitry Muratov. He told his story starting like this: “Mr. Lai has a kindred spirit in Moscow. He is Dmitry Muratov who founded Novaya Gazeta in a last-ditch battle to defend freedom in Russia teaming with former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev who donated some of his Nobel Peace Prize money to get the publication up and running”.

 

Read the rest of the story as written by Clifford May in the Washington Times, and marvel at the power of religious fanaticism that would turn a Cinderella story into a Pandora story … and turn the story of a stolen Palestine into a Jewish fairytale that’s drifting into the gutter toward the sewer of no return.

We need a better strategy for space conquest

 We, the human race inhabiting Planet Earth, have a looming problem that’s hanging over our heads but we choose to neglect addressing it with the required urgency because we have priorities that make no logical sense.

 

We live with a population that’s constantly increasing on a planet whose resources are being depleted just as fast. For this reason, we incomprehensibly devote much of our mental energies to forcefully and deceitfully grab what we can from each other, and do so at the same time that we protect what we hoard, which we keep in reserve to use on a rainy day.

 

This destructive tendency is the modern manifestation of the competition for food we inherited at the beginning of time and by which we ascertained our continued survival. Unfortunately, we saw the tendency write itself into our DNA, never to leave the core of what we’re made of despite the dazzling advancements we managed to score in other areas of knowledge — such as the discoveries we made in science, the designs we perfected in technology and the philosophical stances we developed to regulate our daily comportment.

 

Whereas silly kind of competitions are already maintaining us in a precarious state of existence on the one planet that’s capable of sustaining human life, the superpower states in our midst are thoughtlessly engaged in a mad competition to be first at reaching Planet Mars, a neighboring planet that may take a thousand years before it can be adapted to provide the resources that will sustain human life.

 

What is wrong about the competition for Mars is that it entails sending humans to that planet, and the promise to bring them back alive — all of that being a prelude to building permanent bases in a distant world. To be sure, the accomplishment is expected to add tremendous prestige to the superpower that will be first to get there. But what will be the cost of all this, not just to the winning and losing competitors, but to all of humanity?

 

The reality is that human beings are natives of Planet Earth. They came into being in a place that provides them with the necessities of life, among these water, food and a reasonably moderate temperature to live comfortably and develop the ability to work, produce more of what they need and thrive. When one or more of these ingredients is diminished, human life cannot be sustained for long, yet this is what the travellers to Mars will encounter and live with while travelling there, and what they must get used to when they get there.

 

To make sure those travellers will stay alive and be productive long enough to gather valuable information and send it to Earth, extra efforts will be mounted to provide them with the comfort to which they were used when living on Earth. And this is when the cost-and-benefit question pops up, injecting a dose of reality in the viability of that whole enterprise. Here is the biting question: What useful information can humans gather on Mars to send back to Earth that modern instruments cannot do cheaply, more efficiently and more precisely?

 

The answer to that question is: nothing. Thus, we must conclude that the reason why there is a stampede among the big powers to go to Mars, is for the prestige effect they expect will accrue to them by accomplishing such a feat. But the reality is that while they will gain something small, humanity as a whole, will lose a great deal. That’s because such efforts will put a strain on the resources of the Earth, diminish them at a time when the exploration of space could be refashioned to yield tremendous benefits for the entire human race.

 

What the big powers are missing is the fact that they have it within their scientific and engineering knowledge to bestow exponentially more useful benefits on humanity than they do competing to be first at reaching Mars and win the race. The reality is that the proof is already ln to the effect that our galaxy is filled with solar systems containing planets that can potentially be inhabited by us.

 

The problem is that these systems are lightyears away from us. Thus, to get there just to do as little as explore the neighborhood and send the information to Earth, will be impossible to accomplish in any reasonable amount of time, the way that things stand at this moment. And so we must think up solutions that now seem too difficult to pull off in space travel—all the more reason why we must start working on them as soon as possible—especially when we consider that the resources of Planet Earth are dwindling at a relentless pace.

 

What we need to do is concentrate on speeding up the kind of research that aims to invent and build a propulsion engine for the spaceships of the future. It’ll be an engine that will deliver speed, doing so using the resources it gathers from space itself wherever the ship will find itself.

 

The ship will travel at a speed that will reach at least one tenth that of light which should take it to our neighboring solar system Alpha Centauri in about 43 years, explore it for about 2 or 3 years, and send the information back to Earth in 4.3 years for a total of about 50 years. This alone should convince you there is no time to waste.

 

Thus, rather than engage in a cutthroat competition outdoing each other, the powers of Planet Earth (big and small) should get together and work at finding ways to go to the planets, all of which are out there begging us to visit them, colonize them and inhabit them.

Blind to the evidence, they reject its message

 Look how Jed Babbin shot himself in the foot at the start of a discussion he thought he could use to convince the audience that antisemitism exists, not because there are fundamental reasons for the sentiment to exist, but because vicious individuals create it and spread it willy-nilly according to him. As it happened, Jed Babbin did the self-shooting in two steps like you’ll see in what follows:

 

As a first step, Babbin wrote that, “Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas tried to justify Hitler’s genocide against Jews. He said, ‘They say that Hitler killed the Jews for being Jews and that Europe hated the Jews because they were Jews. Not true’”.

 

Even without looking at the second step, the first should strike you as an upside-down and weird statement. It’s because to claim that the Jews were not exterminated because they were Jews justifies their extermination, or that the Europeans did not hate the Jews because of who they were but because of another reason, need thorough explanations that Babbin did not provide in any adequate way.

 

Then came the second step in which Jed Babbin wrote that, “Mr. Abbas continued, saying, ‘Even Hitler said he fought the Jews because they were dealing with usury and money.’ He argued that for Hitler, ‘this was not about Semitism and antisemitism’”.

 

Looked at separately or when Juxtaposed, the sum total of the two sayings seems to be that Jed Babbin and those like him are desperate to make humanity believe it hates the Jews and has been exterminating them since the beginning of time, not because of what the Jews do – which they can change if they so decide and become like everyone else – but because of who the Jews are, which they cannot change anymore than a colored person can change the color of their skin. The ludicrous claim is that Jews are trapped in their Jewishness, unless and until they find a deep pocket to marry, at which time they’ll ditch their Jewish beliefs and start worshiping the greenback.

 

These are such clumsy and self-incriminating arguments, they give the vicious and the authentic Jew-hating people of the world an opportunity to argue that the Jews are complaining, not about being hated or exterminated, but about the way to interpret the act of antisemitism. The aim is to force the Jews to stop loving money, according to Jed Babbin — even change their names from the toxic Goldstein and Silverstein to names as innocuous as Blacksmith and Carpenter. In fact, the true haters will say that the Jews would rather end up in the crematorium as Gold than end up in a soup kitchen having a free meal.

 

Whereas to cement their arguments and render them relevant, people everywhere in the world engage in serious discussions, Jed Babbin approached the next phase of his debate with a nonchalant insouciance that allowed him to turn reality into a kind of monkey talk. The following is what he should have said while talking honestly but did not because distorting the meaning of what they say has been the stock-in-trade by which these people self-incriminate again and again. Here is what Babbin wrote:

 

“As Palestinian Authority president Yasser Arafat preached peace, he signed the 1993 Oslo Accords under which the Jews agreed to end the occupation, which proved to be a false promise. The reason why the Jews didn’t keep the promise was simple. They could accuse Arafat and Mr. Abbas of rejecting the false agreements that Israel was ramming down their throats rather than adhere to those they had negotiated with the Palestinians”.

 

This done, Jed Babbin then engaged in the usual polemic that gives the impression the Jews went out of their way at least on three occasions, and tried to return to the Palestinians what they had stolen from them, except that the latter refused to take the deal. It is unclear why the Jews would come up with this kind of idea but it was said on several occasions by different people that the polemic carries within it the racist suggestion that the Palestinians have come to love living under Jewish occupation, preferring it to living in freedom or living under Arab rule.

 

As if this were not enough to put down a people that have become the most victimized in the history of the planet, Babbin attributed to the Palestinians the character that the Jews had proudly been attributing to themselves for thousands of years but has fallen out of style in these modern times. In fact, the Jews used to say it was the character that made them superior to the rest of humanity. That was the ability and will of the Jews to inflict terror on the innocent when they deem them ripe for murder and plunder. Here is how Babbin distorted reality and told lies using sanitized words:

 

“Three times Israel has tried to offer the ‘land for peace’ deal but the Palestinians rejected it. It would have established a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza as well as East Jerusalem. Instead, Arafat launched a terrorist campaign at the same time as he was urging his followers to violence”.

 

And then, not realizing that occupation is the ultimate form of terrorism, Babbin asked this question: “Why did Mr. Abbas choose to make that statement now?”

 

Because his country is under occupation, dodo!

Robots will simulate but never become conscious

If we accept the theory which says that before the Big Bang there existed a 50 percent probability that nothing will come into existence, and an equal 50 percent probability that something like the universe will come into existence—and then did, we begin to understand that while we had the power to accomplish the equivalent of self-creation by natural means and do so out of nothing, we cannot repeat the feat by duplicating ourselves artificially, doing it in the form of a conscious robot, even though we have the wealth of resources which are available to us now. Why so?

 

It is so because to be like us, a robot will need to develop consciousness — and to do that, it will have to undergo an evolutionary process that will stand as a solid legacy on top of a creation that’s comprehensive. This is what happened at the time of the Big Bang, a moment when no detail was left out of the accomplishment or the universe would have disappeared as soon as it appeared.

 

Nothing was left out means, among other things, that our evolutionary legacy, written in our DNA, was turned into the stuff that consciousness is made of. Inf act, as Rene Descartes asserted: “I think therefore I am,” he spoke for all of us, acknowledging that the conscious act of thinking is intertwined with our physical existence, so much so that we cannot separate the moment of creation and its evolution from the act of human thinking. We may not be conscious of it but the chain of our evolution, as recorded in our DNA, links our brain to the first moment of the universe’s creation, and the promise of intelligent life rising to wonder and puzzle about it al.

 

Lacking that kind of legacy, the robot shall remain just another glorified computer that can be programed, only to see it respond according to the saying: “Garbage in, garbage out.” But as history shows, the garbage may be harmless at times, but will be deadly at other times. Unfortunately tragic occurrences may happen inadvertently by people who do not know what they are doing, or may happen deliberately by people who know what they are doing, yet relish doing it for fun or by malice.

 

Incapable of giving the robot a spontaneous self-creation or an organic evolution in the hope that it will develop a level of humanity that would counter our moments of inhumanity, we stand as the species that cannot create its own clone or artificial rival. But because we can build robots that will simulate all aspects of our good, bad and ugly thoughts and sentiments, we should be careful not to repeat the mistakes we have been making since the time when we discovered that deadly weapons can be made with every new invention we come up with. In short, let us not employ the superior abilities of the robot and use that in the invention or the production of still more devastating weapons of war.

 

In fact, this has been the ongoing tragedy of our species; most likely the reason why we did not advance as far as we should have or could have in response to our eternal quest for exploration and discovery. To be sure, the universe has been begging to give everyone of us the material riches and territorial expanses we’ve been killing each other to take possession of and hoard rapaciously. It is that we chose to grab from each other what does not belong to us rather than take what was made available to all of us free of charge, free of sweat and free of spilled blood.

 

And so, I offer a suggestion that, if implemented, will reduce or eliminate the self-destructive tendencies which continue to linger in our DNA programing—that which maintains us in a state that remains as primitive emotionally as we were in ancient times, and doing so while advancing intellectually as we have proven capable of doing in science and mathematics but also in the invention of deadly weapons which comes to our unfortunate detriment.

 

I say let us create an institution that will produce a program to be included in every robot that’s made by any and every company in the world. The institution will also oversee and regulate the production of the robots, making sure that when the program is installed in them, it will function in such a way as to protect human life and will never disrupt the peaceful coexistence of communities that simply mind their own business and choose to live and let live.

Telling it like it is invokes hypocritical tears

 “Don’t kill the messenger,” the king was told; “he only brought you the bad news which he did not make”.

 

This is what the self-appointed Jewish kings are told everyday when it comes to revealing the realities that humanity has known about them for centuries. It is that their behavior is what ends us doing them in, which is what happens periodically. This happens when the Jews, led by their self-appointed leaders, get too far out of line, breaching all norms of what’s acceptable among human beings, as they seek to live among humans without trying to change any of their inhuman behavior.

 

One of those self-appointed kings is Clifford D. May who is out once again imploring humanity to try understanding the Jews who must live with the (real or false) promise that Planet Earth and its content were given to them by God, but that humanity is preventing them from exercising the right of ownership, even attacking them periodically in attempts to exterminate them.

 

To fully explain his theory, Cliford May wrote: “Why Mahmoud Abbas can’t make peace with Israelis,” an article that was published on September 12, 2023 in The Washington Times. In it, May tells what he believes is the full story of the Palestinian leader — a story he cannot imagine unfolded in response to the external forces that compelled the man taking the measures that he did. This ignores the reality that the story of Mahmoud Abbas unfolded parallel with and in opposition to the Jewish fantasy which has the Jews own the planet and its content.

 

And so, setting aside the fact that occupation is the ultimate form of terrorism, and that the Jews are the ones terrorizing the Palestinians not the other way around, Clifford May set out to paint an image of the Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas as being that of the bad guy who refuses to do the right thing. This being, in Clifford May’s opinion, to recognize the “God given” right of Jews to own him, his people, his country and the world, Mahmoud Abbas gave the Jewish demand not a moment of serious reflection.

 

The following is a condensed version of what Clifford May said about Mahmoud Abbas to cement the false impression that the solution to the impasse that’s paralyzing the Middle East, is in the hands of the Palestinian victims who refuse to be victimized even more, and not the hands of the Jewish leaders who continue to import more Jews from around the world to kill more Palestinians thus implement the perfect genocide — that which is done, not in one swoop, but done by exterminating the Palestinians in the style of the old saying: “death by a thousand cuts”. Here is that version:

 

“Once upon a time, Mahmoud Abbas inspired hope. He denounced terrorism ‘by any party.’ Ariel Sharon called him a responsible man. Turns out it was a fairy tale. Last month, Mr. Abbas asserted: ‘They say that Hitler killed the Jews for being Jews, and that Europe hated the Jews because they were Jews. Not true.’ The hatred that led to genocide, he argued, was that Europeans fought against these people because of their usury, money dealings, and so on. Even Hitler fought the Jews because they were dealing with usury and money. Mr. Abbas further claimed that David Ben-Gurion forced Jews to flee Arab countries by means of pressure, coercion, and murder. European Jews are not Semites, he said, citing the [reality] that Ashkenazi Jews are descended not from ancient Israelites but from Khazars, a medieval Turkic kingdom”.

 

Adamantly refusing to accept the screaming reality that he is himself more of a Turk who belongs in Central Asia than he does in Palestinian, Clifford May, pulled the trick that often saved the Jews from the embarrassing situations they put themselves in: He accused Mahmoud Abbas of thinking the way that Hitler did. Here is how he put it:

 

“Among the questions few in the media will ask: Has Mr. Abbas always seen ‘these people’ in the same light as ‘even Hitler’ did? Or have his views changed over the 18 years since his election”.

 

And this gave Clifford May the perfect opportunity to turn reality on its head, which he did with the subtle hint that it is Mahmoud Abbas the Palestinian, and not Clifford May the prominent member of Jewish Central, who managed to hypnotize the world. May said so by pointing out that Abbas maneuvered himself in such a position as to become the “only game in town” that can and does keep the redoubtable Hamas from grabbing all of Palestine and presiding over it.

 

Well then, what else do you think there remained to be said as a matter of repetitive routine, by a member of Jewish Central? Actually, there were two things to be said, and Clifford May said them.

 

The first was that they who stole Palestine, generously offered to return a piece of it to the Palestinians, but that the latter spitefully refused the offer. The subtle accusation here being that the Palestinians love the existing stalemate for whatever incomprehensible reason.

 

The second thing that Jews never miss talking about is the matter of money, money, money. Their plea is always two-pronged: Give us more money. Don’t give them any money.

 

Here is how May put it this time:

 

“One could hope that with American help — including more per-capita aid than Europe received under the Marshall Plan — the quality of life for the average Palestinian would improve, which would lead Mr. Abbas to conclude that coming to terms with Israel was in the Palestinian interest, not to mention his own”.

 

This ignores the reality that money going to a jurisdiction under occupation ends up in the hands of the occupiers. Clifford May is here playing the self-serving card.

Using deep space resources to sail deep space

 Ever since the beginning of time, from when we were no bigger than a bug, we used the resources made available to us by the environment to overcome the challenges that the environment itself was imposing on us. For example, we let the wind blow us from place to place, we floated on the surface of creeks to go far and wide, and we sailed the oceans to go discover what’s on the other side of the planet.

 

It is therefore in our nature that we should now be seeking to harness the resources made available to us in deep space to go discover what’s on the other side of deep space. The challenges are numerous but none will remain beyond taming if we learn to exploit and use the resources of space itself to overcome the scarcity that deep space is imposing on us.

 

The first discovery we made in this realm was the possible application of the Compton Effect. That is, it was proposed to build spaceships that will use the solar wind and the wind of every star we encounter in our travels to fly everywhere we need to go without the fear of running out of the fuel that will propel the ships taking us there. It was also proposed that the spaceships of the future should be equipped at the nose with a mile-wide dish that will scoop up the atom per cubic foot we know linger on loosely throughout space — and use the energy of those atoms to keep going.

 

There remain more abundant and still more potent resources in space which we can use to accomplish even more than sail the solar wind or scoop stray atoms. The most important resource being that of the magnetic force which is available everywhere in the universe, it is where we should turn our attention, and study the subject as diligently and as urgently as we would if we discovered we were about to be hit by an asteroid that’s big enough to wipe life on Earth.

 

Thus, to hurry and get going, the first thing we need to embrace is the theory which says that the universe came into existence when an Alpha (A) particle exploded into a self-duplicating mode that has been repeating itself for nearly14 billion years. From that particle came the electron which is a magnet whose force almost equals that of the strong nuclear force. It exercises its force by radiating de Broglie matter-waves which are infinitely smaller.

 

This says that magnetism is the resource we should study diligently and without delay. We must also be mindful that it may be the only means available to us by which we’ll be able to propel our future spaceships. Well then, what we have with regard to the de Broglie wave-particles, is a theory which says that they make up the bulk of every electron in the universe.

 

Electrons that exist in matter, point in every direction thus cancel each other’s force — the reason why most objects are not magnetized. But when the electrons are made to line up, the object they are made of becomes a magnet, and radiates a magnetic field that extends to the end of the universe. What this reveals is that when electrons line up, their magnetic strength is added the way that the voltage of batteries is added when the batteries are placed in series. That is, when they are connected positive to negative, thus allowing the closing of the circuit.

 

But whereas electricity remains in the circuit because the electrons cannot escape the wires in which they travel, magnetism radiates out because it is made of waves that go past obstacles by getting around them as if tunnelling their way through a high barrier.

 

The theory pertaining to this phenomenon is that masses (metallic or not) which have not been magnetized, do produce a force that may not be detected as magnetism, but one that’s detected as the infinitely weaker gravity. This happens because two masses, which are near or far from each other, do exchange particle-waves as if their “magnetic batteries” were placed in series. That is, they make up a circuit which closes when the de Broglie waves of each mass exit the output end of their particle, and enter both their own input and that of the other particle. This causes the ubiquitous gravitational pull, a characteristic of every mass in the universe.

 

To design and build a propulsion engine for the spaceships of the future, we need to learn how to manipulate the de Broglie wave-matter in such a way as to reduce its attractive force. Concurrently, we should also investigate the possibility of adding to the engines of the future the ability to generate a repulsive force that will neutralize the effect of gravity on the spaceship. But how to do that?

 

Mindful that electronic oscillations and/or physical vibrations produced to match those of the de Broglie matter-wave, can create the resonance that will disrupt those waves — we should immediately start a comprehensive program to study all aspects of knowledge that may be related to this subject.

 

Whenever we believe we have accumulated enough knowledge to build a prototype and test it, we should do so, thus add to our knowledge whether the test proves to have succeeded or failed.

 

We’ll get there eventually because it feels like this was the destiny of our species, ordained when the universe banged the big order: Let them be and let them have it all.

To communicate with our future selves

Is there a way to establish a 2-way communication with ourselves in a universe that may have been created at the same time as ours but got ahead as we lagged behind for some reason? Increasingly accepted scientific indications are to the effect that such occurrence is plausible, therefore the theory merits being tested. But how to do that?

 

Well, if there is a way to test that theory, the only approach we have, involves the use of the de Broglie discovery which says that when a particle that’s made of matter moves, it does so as a wave. In fact, we even have the de Broglie equation that expresses this reality. It is written as follows: L = h/mv where L (Lambda) is the wavelength of the particle, h is Plank’s constant which is valued at 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴, m is the mass of the particle, and v its velocity.

 

Since it is more convenient in communication to work with the frequency of a wave than its length, we make the conversion by using the principle which says that wavelength and frequency are the inverse of each other. Expressed mathematically, this is written as L = 1/f, also f = 1/L. Thus, we can rewrite the de Broglie equation as 1/f = h/mv. Inverting both sides to this equation, we obtain: f = mv/h.

 

We now make an assumption that is perfectly acceptable in science. It is that subatomic particles, which are infinitesimally small (in the order of a neutrino), travel as waves at the speed of light without being hindered by the effect of Relativity.

 

This allows us to plug c (speed of light) where there is v in the above equation, thus obtain: f = mc/h. Rewriting this equation, we obtain: fh = mc. Multiplying both sides of this equation by c, we obtain: cfh = mcc. But mcc is the energy of the wave according to Relativity. Thus, we can write: cfh = e. Rearranging this equation, we obtain: f/e = 1/ch = 1/ 300,000,000 X 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴  = 1/1,987821x10⁻²⁵ = 5.030634x10²⁴. And this says that the frequency of the wave is very high whereas its energy is very low.

 

So then, how do we detect this high a frequency? Well, we can measure the energy of the de Broglie particle-wave with the KATRIN installation in Karlsruhe Germany, a piece of equipment that had a remarkable success measuring the mass of the neutrino. From there, we can obtain the frequency of the communication signals which may now be exchanged between the universes and we don’t know it.

 

The technology developed for quantum computing can then be used to build an oscillator that has a matching frequency. Operating an audio buzzer using the oscillator will resonate with the incoming signal and cause it to vibrate at a higher amplitude. It will be high enough to overcome any restriction our evolution has put on us detecting the premonition signals that would be coming from a universe that’s ahead of us in time.

 

What we do in this regard will most certainly be duplicated in the next universe. And if the experiment unfolds as we believe it should, it will have established the expected 2-way communication between the universes.

 

If this happens, we’ll move as a species to a level of existence we never dreamed possible. But if it does not happen, doing the experiment will nevertheless yield valuable knowledge that can be used in different scientific inquiries, also used to further develop this experiment and try to get it right.

 

But who is he talking to?

 When you have something to say, usually you have a specific audience in mind to which you want to say it. And when the message you have in mind is of utmost importance, the audience you seek most likely turns out to be significant.

 

With that in mind, you go through the article which came under the title: “Imperialism returns to Africa” and the subtitle: “New colonialists are Chinese, Russian and Islamist,” and wander to whom the writer is reaching out, or what he is trying to convey to them. That writer is Clifford D. May who published his article on September 5, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

To have a better view of what transpires on the diplomatic stage at this time — that to which Clifford May is trying to bring the change which suits his ideology — we need to know about the struggle that’s gripping those who stand on one side of the political spectrum, call themselves Western Democracies and call their opponents dictatorships.

 

Following its World War triumphs battling the forces that sought to dominate the world at the time, America teamed up with its old allies (Britain and France) as well as a number of its former enemies (Germany and Italy), and formed a group that calls itself North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

 

It is worth noting that Britain and France were at the time the colonial powers that dominated most of the world, and were mercilessly exploiting their possessions whereas Germany and Italy were ignored even as they begged to participate in the feast. When the latter got no response to their pleas, they decided to fight and secure a piece of the action for themselves. This is what rendered them evil dictatorships in the eyes of the Western Democracies.

 

Things have changed considerably since the days of the wars, and the Western Democracies do not have to fight traditional enemies or compete against each other anymore. So, they looked elsewhere for new enemies against whom to do battle. They found them in the eastern hemisphere of the globe, and called them the new dictatorships. They accused them of plotting to dominate the world, and started a campaign they claim is aimed at protecting humanity from those who seek to dominate it.

 

One of those active in the effort to denigrate the so-called dictatorships is Clifford May. As shown in his latest article he sees absolutely nothing that’s wrong with the Western Democracies, and sees absolutely everything that’s wrong with their enemies. The following, expressed in condensed form, is how he articulated his bewilderment at the situation:

 

“Tehran’s supporters interpret Africa’s coups as evidence of waning Western influence in favor of Moscow and Beijing, allies of Iran. In Mali, French troops were replaced by paramilitaries of the Wagner Group, a criminal organization. Fighters of the Islamic State doubled the size of the territory they control in Mali. Wagner troops have been a major force in the Central African Republic since 2018. In African countries, Wagner’s deal is the following: They provide the dictator with security in exchange for the country’s natural resources. Regimes hosting Wagner also side with Russia at the UN and other international forums. In Sudan, Wagnerians assist the forces deployed against the military. Gold is the resource they take. The most successful imperialist in Africa is Xi Jinping. He is less interested in exporting communism to Africa than in importing mineral wealth from Africa”.

 

But sensing that bewilderment alone will not solve the difficulties that the Western Democracies face in Africa, Clifford May was compelled to come up with a workable solution. He looked around and found one that proved to work like a Swiss Watch. It was none other than the method used by the Jews to take control of America and keep it under Jewish bondage for decades. Thus, Clifford May decided to begin a new narrative with a false description of what goes on in Africa at this time. Here, in condensed form, is what he said:

 

“How did China manage to achieve its commanding position in a long list of African countries? Largely by rewarding the host countries’ elites. Apologists point out that roads, bridges, ports, government buildings, and other infrastructure are built in Africa. True, but these projects are overseen by Chinese managers using Chinese engineers and even Chinese labor. Financing involves loans that host countries may find difficult to repay. Beijing then makes demands to settle the account. Control of ports is useful given that China has the world’s largest navy. These and other manifestations of contemporary colonialism have not received the attention they deserve from international organizations, the major media, or university departments of postcolonial studies”.

 

Fortunately for humanity, especially the Africans who suffered so much for so long already, Clifford May knows he lost the battle. He is now left with the only course to take under the circumstances; to lament as he did in the following statement:

 

“The Economist saw the new scramble for Africa as a positive development. ‘This time, the winner could be Africans themselves,’ the British weekly newspaper enthused. How so? Because the new scramblers want a stake in what Africa is trying to build — the economy and the growing stature of the continent, poised between two great oceans. Western policymakers should assign themselves the task of developing new strategies to help Africans become free and independent of these evil empires”.

 

Is there anyone out there listening?