Here’s the story, and here’s the suspicion

 The leader of the Opposition expressed puzzlement as to why Justin Trudeau is adamant about keeping under wrap what came to be known as the “Lavalin Scandal.” This being the case, I have a real story and a suspicion to tell, that might shed light on the mystery.

 

Here is the part of the story that happened to me:

 

At the same time that I sent a copy of my invention for turning salt water into fresh water to McGill University, I had also sent a copy to Lavalin for appraisal and possible use. They summoned me to discuss the project, and we had a good discussion, at the end of which they seemed to suggest I should be the one to try selling the idea to the desert countries in need of such projects.

 

They told me that Lavalin was already doing power and water projects in Libya, and that I should have an easy time selling the idea to these people. But given my other involvements and obligations in Canada, I could not see myself take on a new responsibility and so, I turned down their offer.

 

Shortly thereafter, I heard rumors to the effect that Lavalin executives were nabbed by the RCMP for committing fraud. This being a pattern that was familiar to me, it did not move me. I lumped it together with the David Johnson development that was itself yet another proof demonstrating that Canada was a police state in the business of punishing the good people who would talk to me rather than persecute me.

 

And here is the part of the story that makes me suspicious about further machinations that must have unfolded then, and that Justin Trudeau would rather keep hidden from the public view:

 

There is the strong possibility that the documents which the leader of the Opposition wants to see, contain the name of the “invisible” man who must never be seen or talked about in public. That’s yours truly.

 

And this makes it interesting to see how the murderous government of Canada will resolve the challenge it is facing without blowing the case sky high.

Justin Trudeau’s antics expose a failed leader

 How do you think an aggrieved man in the past, sought relief for his ordeal, and if possible compensation for what he lost?

 

Well, you don’t have to go too far back tracing the early steps we, of the human race, took to that end, and now view as having been our early march into civilization. In fact, what was done in the past is done now under our noses, and we don’t even know what it is we’re looking at.

 

You might think of the relief and compensation which are dispensed in today’s underdeveloped societies by a village elder rather than a judge who serves as member of a government elected by that society, have changed—but you’d be making a mistake. The reality is that justice in a modern society is handed out in the same way today as it was in the past, and continues to be in primitive societies. We are all in it drinking from the same cup.

 

Whereas judges are expected to remain impartial in every case they preside over, thus rule in accordance with instructions set beforehand and applying equally to everyone, the paper trail and record of judges show they all have biases that affect their judgment. Worse has been the intrusion of Liberal-Democratic hypocrisy into the system of justice as can be seen to happen in the jurisdictions that tie Democracy with Human Rights, and pretend to champion Human Rights by the mere fact that they think of themselves as being democratic.

 

In fact, the notion of Human Rights was invented to signify that judges do not dispense a justice that belongs to them or to the state, but that it is inherent to everyone by right of birth. And this is what you cannot impress upon someone like Justin Trudeau who is currently Prime Minister of Canada, and believes that he owns the justice which everyone seeks. Consider his latest antic in this field.

 

Battered by criticism for the monumental failures he committed and neither enhanced his image nor helped Canada regain the stature it lost on the world stage due to his antics, Justin Trudeau arranged for taking a tour of the Western Democracies where played more of his antics, thus worsened all that he tried to ameliorate.

 

He held a news conference jointly with the Prime Minister of Poland during which time, Trudeau let his fondness for the word “Democracy” run to the limit of endurance. He did so without this time, mentioning the term: “Human Rights” that used to make the bulk of his verbal diarrhea. Why is that?

 

Being the copycat that he is, Trudeau used Democracy in the same way that those who cheapened it have been using it. And so, he did not see harm in him using it too. He just did not think of the countries that use the word in their name, thus managed to put Canada in their company. They are Yemen, Ethiopia, Somalia, Afghanistan and Vietnam.

 

When it comes to the use of the term “Human Rights,” however, Trudeau knows what will happen if he ventures into that territory: he’ll get battered again. It is that he knows he has no inkling what the term means to the Canadian citizens he relentlessly crucifies by violating their Human Rights to please his Jewish masters. He thus entered into the “once bitten, twice shy” mode and froze there where he’ll probably stay to the end of time. Good riddance.

 

Still unable to fulfill the duties of leader, Justin Trudeau chose to act the way that tin-pot dictators do: He turned the country he is supposed to serve into the country that serves him. Given that his ambition has always been to rise to the level of prominence to which his meritless father Pierre Elliott Trudeau had attained, Young Justin sought the leaders he identified as potential flatterers, and started listening to what they said they desperately wanted.

 

In possession of everyone’s wish list, Trudeau went on a tour that was perceived by the world in the style that cartoons are drawn and perceived. To imagine the scene, think of a left hand that’s holding a bag, itself emblazoned with the Star of David, and showing images of cash and weapons as well as the inscription: Goodies for everyone.

 

The idea behind the tour was to give each foreign leader the goods that made them heap praises on Canada and its Prime Minister. In fact, this is how the press conference session unfolded as Trudeau stood beside the Prime Minister of Poland while the latter was drenching him with the fake praises that aimed to make Trudeau look like an advance Liberal Democrat when in reality he has always been a Third World butcher of the most cowardly variety.

Malfeasance by the two half-brains of Sisyphus

 In Greek mythology, Sisyphus represents the ungifted brut who keeps on gifting the innocent with gratuitous hurts. To punish him for what he does, the gods devised a plan that forced him to push a boulder up a hill for all of eternity.

 

In addition, the gods made it so that when the boulder approached the top of the hill, it rolled back to the bottom – and each time, Sisyphus would have to start all over again.

 

Now my friend, imagine a Sisyphus that’s made of two half-brains, both doing the same thing but each doing it in its own way. What metaphor, would you say the scene alludes to when looking at analogs in what goes on in the good old Earth named planet of man?

 

Well then, representing one half of the brains, try Jake Tapper who anchors the cable TV station CNN. As to the other half of the brains, try Justin Trudeau who is Prime Minister of Canada.

 

Here is what Justin Trudeau does that earned him the contempt of humanity:

 

When the Opposition asks him a question in Parliament, he always responds by lying about the accomplishments he says he realized in the vein of that question. This done, Trudeau accuses the Opposition of playing political games rather than suggest solutions he can steal and use and take credit for. Finally, Trudeau ends his response by promising that in the Sisyphean pattern, he’ll continue doing what he’s doing — a fitting punishment for making himself a fake distributor of gratuitous hurts.

 

As to what Jake Tapper has been doing lately, his game proved to be a great deal more convoluted. To begin with, here is the situation that contributed to his exposition:

 

In the never-ending quest to pin on Hamas the crimes committed by the American equipped Israeli Terror Force (ITF), Jake Tapper has been implementing an agenda that was fashioned by Jewish Central. It consists of inundating every piece of truth about the evil doings of Jews, with a tsunami of lies representing the opposite of what the truth was revealing.

 

Choosing to ignore the logical process of presenting the victims of rape, and have them describe their ordeal as did the women who accused Clinton, Trump and other men, the Jewish Central’s agenda preferred to show the hearsay of fake witnesses who said they got their rumors, not from the victims themselves, but from the hearsay of other fakes that had come before them.

 

To tell the story where it all started, it must also be said that Tapper plunged head-on into the fabricated controversy which tried to exploit the apparent unpopularity of Hamas among the elites of America’s political operatives. To that end, a bunch of frustrated women that wanted to make big hay discussing the subject of rape but never succeeded, hit on the idea of associating what they may have been suffering in silence, to the lie that Hamas raped Israeli women … and they managed to drag Jake Tapper into their scheme.

 

To help those women give credibility to their diabolic plan, Tapper tried to pull a magical trick that backfired on the entire project, exposing it for what it was, and burying it once and for all. What Jake Tapper did was that he relied on the distraction of the audience as it tried to sort out what was true from what was false, and suggestively asked the second hand witness he was interviewing if Hamas deliberately raped Israelis in front of family so as to make the latter suffer more.

 

Fortunately, the interviewee did not get the hint of what he was trying to accomplish, thus responded in the negative. Still, this alone, proved that the Jewish aim from the start was to pin on Hamas the crimes of the Jews. So then, what was it that blew the big lie into a pile of trash?

 

It was that a truth which lasted thousands of years, proved impossible attenuate, let alone erase. It is that none other than the Jewish bible itself, has been telling of the Jews who tortured the children of their opponents in front of the parents to make the latter suffer more.

 

This is the eternal truth which the contemporary Jewish lies are designed to inundate. May the gods afflict them with failures that will last from now to all of eternity.

Unlike the Gulag, slow murder in Canada

 Is it possible for the maker of a message to botch his own work as he tries to embellish and purvey it? Well, two situations developed lately that have the potential to give some kind of answer to that question.

 

The first situation was generated by an encounter between the Prime Minister of Canada and the leader of the opposition. The second was generated by the arguments that Clifford D. May who wrote an article that was meant to be on a different subject, but got involved in this one.

 

Clifford May told what he knows about the Russian dissident Alexei Navalny whom he describes as being Putin’s only serious rival.

 

Given the amount of knowledge about Russia that Clifford May has displayed mastery of as shown in his past writings year after year, it is surprising that his current attempt at explaining who the Russian dissident is, and what happened to him, falls short of what’s expected of Clifford May. Of course, it could be that (a) dissent in Russia is of little concern to him, or it could be that (b) he saw in the current story, an aspect that’s more compelling than dissent in Russia.

 

In fact, a serious analysis of Clifford May’s article, which came under the title: “Murder in the Gulag,” tells more about the American messenger Tucker Carlson who brought the story to light, than the message of the Russian dissident who, according to May, was murdered in a Russian gulag precisely because his message offended the high and mighty of that unhappy place.

 

Reflecting the (a) possibility, it can be said that by the time we wrap your heads around all of that, and come to read the subtitle of the article, we get shocked by what Clifford May is trying to do. Look what the subtitle of the article says: “Alexei Navalny, Putin’s only serious rival, has been eliminated,” which means that May is tickled more by the entertainment value that’s displayed in the rivalry of two “political gladiators” — a rivalry that ended in the disappearance of one rival — than May is preoccupied with the ramifications of the message which the “eliminated” left behind.

 

Reflecting on the (b) possibility, it can be said that Clifford May concluded that telling the story of the living American Tucker Carlson, will garner him a bigger audience than that of the dead Russian Alexei Navalny. And so, May went all out to tell, dissect and criticize the dispassionate manner by which Carlson told a Russian story; one that should have awakened his patriotic sentiment and compelled him to show the many ways by which the American system of governance is said to be superior to the Russian.

 

Failing to do this, Clifford May only managed to produce yet another ho-hum article to add to his pile of boredom. As to the situation that was generated by an encounter between the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition, it shows clearly how a born loser draws defeat from the jaws of victory.

 

What happened that brought those two men into conflict, was the revelation by the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that he will table legislation in Parliament on Human Rights next week. This prompted the Leader of the Opposition to point out the irony in the violator of Human Rights pretending to protect what he violates. It is like the fox who sits on the eggs of chicken to incubate them. You know what happens next.

 

Still, Trudeau responded by saying that the Opposition did not read the legislation it is criticizing, and must wait till it is tabled before raising objections. Well, this is the kind of give-and-take that happens all the time between two who are at loggerhead. Understanding why they happen can be more beneficial than dismissing the arguments altogether.

 

Well then, when the Leader of the Opposition criticized the Prime Minister, he was saying that on the basis of the available prima facie evidence, a Prime Minister that lived in violation of Human Rights, is one that cannot protect Human Rights. In pointing this out, the Opposition gave the Prime Minister the opportunity to show regret, if not contrition for what he did in the past, and go on from there toward a future that will help him amend his prior failures.

 

The Prime Minster failed to do any of that in the distant past as well as the recent past, thus let stand the accusation concerning the slow-motion rape and murder to which he subjected and continues to subject his own citizens.

 

In fact, what Trudeau did instead, was that he wrapped himself with the customary defensive shield of accusing the Opposition of attacking him for being the least credible advocate of Human Rights to succeed at protecting Human Rights. And that did not sit well with the Prime Minister who believes he is so perfect, he cannot be criticized for anything.

 

The conclusion is inevitable, the Opposition is saying: Get out of this hypocritical mode, Justin; let someone else do the job you’re about to botch yet again; let someone credible fix what you never knew was so important, violating it as you’ve been doing, was sacrilegious through and through.

 

Step aside Justin, and let Canada start a new day in the glory of being a true defender of Human Rights.

Convincing arguments begin by telling the truth

 Clifford D. May says he has advice to give a Hamas leader, and proceeds to do so basing his counsel on what he says is the history of what transpired in the situation which unfolded in occupied Palestine and continues to unfold at the same furious pace.

 

To that end, May wrote a column telling in detail how each of the four instructions he gives the Hamas leader, relates to what he says is the history of a “The Gaza War” that has lasted more than four months already. The trouble with what May calls history, is that his narrative does not come close to being history. It is wishful thinking morphed by language to sound like history.

 

You can see how Clifford May uses his writing skills as he tries to transform the repugnant image of Israel’s performance that came out of the incident which started “The Gaza War,” in the column that he wrote under the title: “Hamas Leader Yahia Sinwar has four options” and the subtitle: “He can wait, go into exile, stop the fighting or become a martyr,” published on February 13, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

The reality being that Israel — which boasts it has intelligence capabilities that keep it safe as well as help America and the Western allies protect their homelands — has itself suffered a massive intelligence failure by all accounts on October 7, 2023.

 

Because the plan of the Hamas leaders was clearly designed to take live hostages for the purpose of trading them against the Palestinian kids whom Israel kidnaps regularly in the occupied territories and throws into prison, the Hamas commandos that carried out the raid into Israel on that day, made sure to protect Israeli lives as well as they did their own.

 

Despite all of this however, it happened that a thousand or so Israelis who were partying, were killed during an operation that was supposed to last one hour but took it eight hours to come to an end. But how and why did this happen?

 

The answer rests in the reality that the never-ending rhetoric of Israel and its Jewish and non-Jewish American mouthpieces, clashed head-on with what happened on the ground. The Jews were saying that Israel was the most efficient military in the world. It turned out that the Israeli military was shown to be the most incompetent ragtag army the world has ever seen.

 

And so, whereas the Palestinians were trying to save Israeli lives (if only because they were more valuable to them than dead Jewish bodies,) the delayed and disorganized response of the Israeli army contributed much to the number of lost lives.

 

These people died because they fought back alone against a disciplined Palestinian army instead of surrendering peacefully to it; they also died because the partying Israelis called on the army to come and help but were let down, perhaps deliberately by a Netanyahu and his coalition who almost lost the last election because they did not come hard on the Palestinians. The perception has now been established that the so-called guardians of Jewish security will trade Jewish lives for material gains that would enrich them personally.

 

In fact, it was thought that dead Israeli bodies coming home in body bags to be buried, would revive the popularity of Netanyahu’s coalition, but these people saw a contrary situation develop. The bloodthirsty leaders of Israel saw their ideas and actions repudiated by the Israeli masses as did the human masses everywhere in the world who hit the streets of their cities and towns in sympathy with their Israeli counterparts.

 

Seeing their invocation of the Holocaust — which they tried desperately to rhetorically if not morally associate with the October 7 event — fail to mitigate the world’s opposition to Israel’s unrelenting murderous crimes against humanity, the said coalition came up with a plan to win the propaganda war using demagoguery where, even the monstrous lies failed to produce results.

 

They said that the Hamas people; those whom the world has come to respect because of their honesty and intellectual integrity, raped Israeli women. But this is garbage that has been debunked on the pages of this blog. Instead of damning the innocent Hamas, the fake accounts of the Jews exonerated them by telling the readers that the rape has always been the Jewish attempt of injecting their moral syphilis into the hearts and souls of Westerners.

 

Please, my friend, go ahead and read the long and tedious Clifford May article to learn more about how a twisted mentality manages to twist the reality that is observed on the ground but then flounders upon further scrutiny, doing more damage to its causes and coming closer to convincing humanity that codling the Jews must stop, and harsh treatment for bad conduct must begin.

 

It is the only way the Jews will have security, and we’ll have peace in the world at long last.

Beware another Trudeau promising to investigate

 When someone suffers an injustice at the hands of what’s supposed to be a reputable institution, he/she petitions someone sitting at a high level in the institution’s hierarchy; usually an officer that has the authority to deal with the current injustice and resolve the situation that produced it once and for all.

 

To do this, however, the officer must have all the facts at their fingertips lest he/she act on ignorance and add to the injustice—rather than resolve the situation and give the petitioner their due. And so, the officer does what the norm specifies he must do. He promises to investigate, which reassures the petitioner, but then, the officer faces the choice of keeping his promise or neglecting to pursue the matter further.

 

This is where we see a bifurcation in the manner that different systems deal with similar matters. Because Democracies consider every situation a political toy meant to be played with, its adherents look for angles in the story they can use to upstage the competition, embarrass it or corner it. They do so by spinning the facts of the situation, arguing endlessly to make things look like they were doing the right thing all along whereas the competition was advocating the wrong approaches all along.

 

That game of the Democracies must therefore be recognized as the main source delaying the dispensation of justice, and so labelled. Also, it must be acknowledged that because justice delayed is justice denied, many in the Democracies that have not the means to secure their rights, live and die without ever hearing the sweet sound of “Justice served”.

 

So, the question to ask is this: What is there that shows to what level of depravity a Democracy can sink when faced with the choice of rendering justice to those who deserve it, or using the plight of the downtrodden they are supposed to help, to diminish their opponents and serve their own interest instead?

 

What we have is the case of the notorious Trudeau family. I know this case well, having lived for 56 years under the still ongoing persecution it is inflicting on me. It is that 56 years ago, I was handed leaks by insiders who were unhappy with a situation in which 300,000 Canadians were put under surveillance by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP.) I exposed the facts as I knew them, and pushed against the policy that allowed something like this to happen. I did so by emphasizing the value of Human Rights.

 

Pierre Elliott Trudeau, the patriarch of the family who was then Prime Minister, did what was customarily done in Canada at the time—what drew chuckles from the big and the small around the world. In fact, Trudeau appointed a Royal Commission to investigate the case and report to the nation, especially to those like myself, who were put under surveillance. Keenly aware that when the Government appointed a Royal Commission, the gesture meant that yet another book will be written and immediately shelved to gather dust for an eternity.

 

Having spent a dozen years or so writing about my ordeal, which I did by talking to the press and the members of Parliament who represented my district, I was given the answer which the Government hoped will allay my anxiety regarding the delay in resolving the case and doing me justice.

 

They said that the RCMP had just discovered the reality that its operatives were not responsible for what happened; it was the operatives of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) that did it. For this reason, the investigation was taken back to Square One, a move that started the process all over again.

 

Needless to say it was similar tricks—those like a poison pill that can cause the sudden death of an investigation—which helped the Government of Canada drag this case for decades, and expose the fallacy that the Liberal Democratic System is superior to all the others.

 

Moreover, the Government of Justin Trudeau who is now Prime Minister of Canada, seems to be working hard on cementing the idea that the Trudeaus do more than carry the poison pills of infamy: they are themselves the poison pills.

 

And this is why I don’t believe a word of what Justin Trudeau is now saying about the RCMP investigating the embezzlement of millions of dollars by his friends.

 

Come see me 56 years from now, my friend, to tell me that I was wrong. And see me launch a celebration like the universe has never seen before.

Fish rot at the head and magots swarm to feed

 The modern way to organize an institution is to have it headed by one person. But if the institution is a country too large to be governed by one person, other individuals are called upon to help in the governance. In this case, the institution is divided into provinces, states, governorates or what have you, each of which is given responsibilities in the form of specific socio-political jurisdictions to manage.

 

Canada is an example of this kind of arrangement; governed as it is by a Federal Government aided by several Provinces and Territories that dispense much of the local services expected by the population. However, protecting the Human Rights of the entire Canadian population is one of the exceptions that the Federal Government has reserved for itself. And there lies the plague that is haunting, not just Canada, but all of its allies as well, ranging from its southern neighbor to the Democracies of Europe and Asia.

 

It all began nearly 6 decades ago with the advent of Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau whose antics convinced many that he was a dangerous radical. Of those watching him closely, was The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) that had already turned Canada into a police state before Trudeau came to power. Despite promising that he’ll fix the situation, he proved to be terrified of the RCMP thus remained paralyzed.

 

Pierre Elliott passed away some time ago, and his son Justin Trudeau later moved-in to wear the shoes of Canadian Prime Minister. What transpired throughout the decades has been amply chronicled on the pages of this blog, and there is no reason to rehash it all once again. Still, what comes out that account is a sordid reality that needs to be illustrated with examples of the Federal Fish rotting at the head, taking the country down with him and causing the magots to swarm and feed on the rotting Canadian carcass.

 

Example 1: During the time that Poland and the Jews were having a kafuffle about Poland’s responsibility in permitting the Holocaust to happen, a small newspaper that’s distributed in Mississauga, Ontario (near where live) in the Polish language, published an opinion piece that voiced support for the Polish side of the ongoing argument.

 

This prompted the Jews of Canada to ensnare a security official of the Ontario Government, and drag him to the office of the newspaper’s owner-editor, accompanied by a Jew, whereby the official threatened (get this: threatened) to charge the journalist with a hate crime if he ever again exercised his right to free speech, and voiced an opinion on this matter. The rotting head had transferred its disease to the Province of Ontario.

 

Example 2: I am told that a similar case took place also in Ontario, probably near the City of Kingston where the Jews shoved a security officer in their pocket and took him to threaten a journalist with a crime if he ever again exercised a right to free speech that did not glorify Israel or trash the human race.

 

Example 3: This is a part of my case I never discussed before. Well, the time to discuss it has now come; so here it is:

 

Briefly, a number of Jews descended on the Government of Ontario and demanded that I be silenced. The Attorney General at the time was Jim Flaherty. He considered a plan to pass legislation that would allow the Jews to finger undesirables who should be declared insane, kidnapped, sent to a mental institution and subjected to corrective action (another way of saying brainwashed).

 

Lucky for me, an election was called in Ontario, and the plan was shelved. But this did not happen before an actual plan to kidnap me off the street, and was “dry run” to test how it might be made to work. In fact, I was walking on the left side of Speers Road when accosted by a male that had driven his car up to me and left the passenger door open. He got out of the car and started to shove me gently toward the car while saying that he has a case with the townhall; one that only I can solve having the moral authority I built up by virtue of being a journalist.

 

The whole thing unfolded so bizarrely, I did not think it was worth pushing back — not knowing at the time that there was an actual plan to kidnap and silence me.

 

Eventually Jim Flaherty left Provincial politics and ran Federally whereby he won a seat, and was appointed Minister of Finance. By then I was deep into writing about economics, which he did not seem to appreciate at first. But having read a number of my articles, he reversed his opinion and became a fan of my effort to educate the public on economic matters.

 

Sadly Jim Flaherty passed away soon thereafter.

The second hearsay that buried the big lie

 Sheryl Sandberg did humanity, especially the women, a big favor by taking a film crew to Israel and recording on tape how “a lie for every occasion” is put together in that jurisdiction.

 

It is that she, and other women, were made to participate in an earlier lie about Jewish women being violently raped by Hamas soldiers, and when the truth was revealed, Sandberg was asked to backtrack and help uncover the full truth. She did that … but not because she wanted to.

 

To illustrate how lies are fabricated in Israel, I first need to tell the real story of what happened when I was taking a course in practical filmmaking, and the professor had asked that each of us make a short student film based on an idea. One of the students made what was considered the best film. Here is what he did:

 

He chose to illustrate the idea that when you have a mishap and get hurt, the memory of what happened plagues you for a time after that, forcing you to live in fear. To that end, the filmmaker began telling a fictitious story by showing a boy who was skating normally, suddenly trip and fall flat on his face.

 

For a time, the boy in the film, developed a condition that made him see a monster attack him — every time that he looked at a skateboard. To emphasize this point, the filmmaker showed the boy trying to live a normal life, while reminding the audience that all was not well with him. The filmmaker did that by returning every minute or so to showing the scene of the skateboard becoming a scary monster.

 

Well, my friend, you see the use of a similar trick in the story that Sheryl Sandberg had been propagating till she shot herself in the foot thus opened the can of worms that killed the big Jewish lie once and for all. To see how this happened, we first look at the false accusations that the Jews leveled against Hamas weeks ago. It all began with the testimony of a Jewish male who said he saw a Hamas soldier rape one Jewish woman and kill another. Call this, the first hearsay account of what did not happened.

 

Their plumage now ruffled by so amateurish a performance, the Jewish dodos of America and Israel, called on the best in filmmaking they had, and asked them to rescue the big lie from going the way of the dinosaurs. They stitched together a false account that was also based on hearsay and no showing of a victim.

 

Gripped by the idea that their solemn duty was to give Netanyahu an excuse to complete the genocidal plan of exterminating the Palestinians and taking their land, the dodos made of “Hamas Violence” the central piece of their falsification.

 

Like the skateboard in the fictitious story becoming a monster every minute or so, to say that all was not well with the boy, the dodos had the narrators of hearsay repeat, every once in a while, that the Hamas soldier raping the Jewish woman had a gun in his hand at all time.

 

It is that if you take the Hamas gun out of the story, it would be near to impossible justifying, even by Jewish logic, the killing of a hundred Palestinians in their schools and refugee camps — which is what Netanyahu does every time that the Israel Terror Force (ITF) loses one of its butchers to a friendly fire or loses them in a legitimate combat.

 

What may be proven someday is that a sexual encounter of some kind took place between a Palestinian male and a Jewish female. This can be brought to light by showing the woman that made the allegation telling her own story. In any case, the indications so far, are to the effect that the encounter was not sexual by Bill Clinton’s definition of the word.

 

As to the amount of violence that was said to have been involved, the lack of sadism and masochism would bring tears to Donald Trump who is used to a different kind of sexual encounters.

 

The reality is that Sheryl Sandberg has managed to portray the Hamas soldier as being a model of self control and restraint even when facing a situation that would drive other men to the limit of madness such as those that used to haunt The Marquis de Sade.

Don’t shoot the messenger bringing you bad news

 Historical indications exist to the effect that superstition was rampant in ancient times — even in more modern times — to the effect that the landlords and rulers of powerful jurisdictions, believed in the myth that the messenger they send to observe a situation and report, shaped the reality on the ground to such an extent, he could turn an anticipated victory for the one that sent him, into a disaster instead. And so, the latter killed the messenger, and looked for another dodo to replace the dead one.

 

It was also a reality at the time that, lacking the medical and scientific knowledge of today, life expectancy was “short and brutish” even for the rich and powerful. The result is that many of them died before they could transfer ownership of their jurisdiction to offspring that had matured enough and was capable enough to handle matters of state.

 

The remedy for such a situation at the time, was to appoint a regent who ran the affairs of the jurisdiction, waiting for the offspring to grow enough and mature enough that he/she demonstrated the ability to assume the duties of a full-fledged ruler. Much drama and palace intrigues were generated in this kind of environment among the immediate siblings and those of the extended family, each vowing to position the self for taking over the jurisdiction and run it. The outcome of the brawl was usually chaotic.

 

That sort of situation gradually became rarer with the passage of time. It was replaced by elaborate systems that were more sophisticated, that relied less on the will of individual rulers, and that depended more on the collective wisdom of institutions. Thus, the transfer of power from one individual to another, and from one group to anther, now takes place in a more orderly and quieter setting.

 

But human beings have not changed since ancient times. What motivated them then, motivates them now. It is that the desire of the powerful parents, remains to bequeath the jurisdiction they control to their offspring. And the desire of the offspring, is to walk in their parents’ shoes as well as sleep in their “royal” bed. The question, therefore, is this: What might flow out of this new situation? Well, there is a case we can study; one that’s suited to yield the answers we seek.

 

It is the real story of the Trudeau family whose patriarch Pierre Elliot started a trend by governing the country of Canada in the capacity of Prime Minister, during the decade of the 1960s. Six decades later, it was thought that his son Justin Trudeau was mature enough and wise enough to assume the duties of Prime Minister, and was installed as such. He governed, and the result of his work proved to be nothing but a series of unmitigated disasters.

 

Demonstrably incapable of taking a decision on important matters, morally stunted Justin Trudeau freezes when he encounters issues that require a mental acuity surpassing his own. His automatic response is to turn to those who appointed themselves his guardians, and seeks from them instructions on what to do.

 

Unsurprisingly, their responses have always been to maintain him in his frozen state so as to keep him dependent on them in the same way that the juveniles of old, used to rely on their regents. In addition, the advice they give him are always made to serve their causes rather than those of Canada.

 

Bombarded with criticism that started to be thrown at him from every direction, Justine Trudeau began to lash out at the media. It is that he has been reduced to mimicking the mentality of rulers that used to shoot the messengers who brought them bad news.

 

In the end, it can be seen that the Trudeau family was instrumental in helping contemporary Jews turn Canada into a fiefdom modeled after the ancient attempts of Jews to build a primitive kind of society.

 

The Jews did it this time by appointing themselves undisputed regents of Canada, and by turning the palace intrigues they used to play in the past, into a frivolous game they now call the Game of Democracy.

 

That is the domain where nothing useful happens except for what serves to perpetuate a situation that should never have been.

Study the symptoms, discover the deficiencies

 It can only be frustrating for the parents of a toddler as well as the doctors who seek to determine what ails someone that’s too young to tell where it feels the pain.

 

Most certainly therefore, this situation would drive the adults into thinking it would be a great help if they could establish contact with the mind of the child, and read what it is processing at the time. So then, can this be done? If yes, how? Well, the answer is that it can be done, but done in a roundabout way.

 

In fact, a situation is now unfolding on the world stage showing promise for the development of a method by which to establish what may be called an “Empathy Bank” where adults with the mentality of a child are tested for their viability, and if suitable, registered as a potential empath to the mind of children.

 

The need for a system that will operate in this fashion, and the evidence that the operation can be done, are demonstrated by what is unfolding these days on the world stage. And the candidate for our case study is none other than Justin Trudeau the mentally dwarfed Prime Minister of Canada.

 

This kid who grew into the body of an adult, has constantly failed to exhibit a maturity that would match the size of the body. It is, therefore, possible to study what keeps it mentally arrested, and go from there to develop approaches that will help the parents and the doctors survey the brain functions of children who are incapable of communicating, and give them the proper care.

 

So, we ask: what are the most common annoying traits we notice in the behavior of children? Well, there are two of them:

 

First, for a reason not yet understood, children seem to be genetically wired to the idea of stubbornly hanging on to the early instructions that were given to them by adults. And no amount of nudging will convince them to reject or modify what they believe they are doing correctly now.

 

Second, giving the silent treatment to parents; to teachers and to adults in authority, adds to the difficulties that grownups encounter when trying to interact with children.

 

And as it happens, we notice that Justin Trudeau is driven by those same traits, lending himself to being studied as easily as adults can be — but then go from there to corelate the responses of what we know is happening to him, with what we guess may be unfolding inside the minds of non-communicating children.

 

So, we ask the pertinent question: What is troubling Justin Trudeau?

 

Growing in an environment that allowed him to observe the exercise of raw power which nevertheless pretended to operate in the realm of the delicate “Fine Linen,” young Justin Trudeau learned early on that what he sees is not necessarily what happens in real life.

 

When you add to all that, the disposition of children to believe they have become the undisputed experts of anything and everything they learn once — you create a monster that’s a brat as well as brainless. Call him Justin Trudeau.

 

Well, we have one now, and he is so prominent on the world stage, we cannot miss connecting the dots on the map which he draws while taking marching orders from his Jewish masters, and shoving their desires down the throats of his own people.

 

Unfortunately, these are the desires that pertain to the continued destruction of Human Rights in the country and around the world, and the obliteration of what used to be a functioning Democracy.

Diving deep down the cesspool of no return

 We, human beings of Planet Earth, being the expression of the highest form of evolution ever attained on the planet, are endowed with a gift never attained by the other species. This would be the gift of the spoken language that allows us to communicate complex ideas among ourselves.

 

We came to this level of achievement by gradually shedding the more primitive form of communication that nature had induced in most other species. This would be the body language that we ourselves used as tool to approach others and socialize with them, or warn them of the danger in getting too close to us.

 

However, because our genetic code has kept a meticulous chronological history of our evolution, every step of our development has remained functional and active to this day. This would be the kind of behavior we often recognize as being the animal side of our humanity.

 

In fact, the body language is the most common set of expressions from among the medley that we exhibit when we feel that “damn human reason,” the time has come to set aside our lofty morality, and emphasize the hypered state of our mind and our emotions by returning to the use of the more primitive and injurious form of communication.

 

So here we are, tens of thousands of years since the start of our ascent to the level of verbally communicating organisms — and we discover that many of those who supposedly took charge of our lives by acquiring both the right and duty to organize us into a functional society — cannot do without resorting to the primitive body language while discharging their duties, especially when it comes to telling what future plans they have for us, or what premises motivated them to concoct such plans.

 

A notorious family of humans calling itself the Trudeaus, appearing in a place called Canada, became the symbol of what must have gone wrong during the trial and error phase that nature has used in the attempt to put together what we eventually became. It is that the foibles of this family left little or nothing to the imagination when it came to doing the wrong things while trying to reach the correct goals. The Trudeaus backtracked to try again and again but failed. Nature tried and finally produced us, “warts and all”.

 

Decades after Pierre Elliott Trudeau had messed up a Human Rights case, his son Justin Trudeau took up the tradition and added to the mess. But how did he do that? He did it by communicating the need for silence which he imposed on Western Civilization, having embraced the Jewish method of pretending to protect Democracy and Human Rights when, in reality, he and they spend their time raping Human Rights, killing them and feeding on the dead corpses like magots feed on a rotting cadaver.

 

But rest assured, dear friend reading this, that neither Trudeau nor the Jews are coming out of the experience unaffected. Being Jews or steeped deep into the Jewish tradition, they tried to pull themselves out of the corner in which they painted themselves previously. They did so by repeating the very Jewish thing that kept pushing them deeper into the cesspool of no return: they shot themselves in the foot.

 

It is that on the advice of his Master’s Voice, barking Justin Trudeau adopted the body language of running around and promising that he will block the Rights of every Canadian citizen who will dare to avoid the bandwagon of reciting a real or phony hatred for Hamas.

 

What the kid has not been told, is that the trick has been tried again and again but failed each time to win sympathy for the Jews, who remained as unpopular then as they are today. They failed when they started a program to impress the world by calling the Palestinians “Gorillas,” and sending tanks to blow up their homes in full view of the world.

 

They failed when a tragic incident happened in Montreal whereby a gunman massacred women at a university, and Leslie Stahl of CBS, who was stabbed in the back by her fellow Jew, Daniel Shorr,

tried to make a haystack out of the Montreal incident, pinning it on “terrorists” before that word had taken on the allure it has today. And so, she bombed like a dropping out of an elephant’s rear end.

Breaking men to repair a broken window

 Has Western Civilization been so debased, it can no longer see the folly in seeking to repair a broken window by trampling over the Rights of Humans?

 

This was shown to be the case twice by the Trudeau family and their entourage. The first time it happened, Jean Chretien was the one in charge of carrying the message to the public. The second time it happened, it was Justin Trudeau that rushed to confer the honor on himself.

 

Jean Chretien’s suggestion was to the effect that robbing a citizen of $20 million dollars — which the government and other entities owe him — was kosher. He offered that the money can be used to repair the broken windows at the Prime Minster’s residence.

 

As to Justin Trudeau’s suggestion, it seems to revolve around the idea that regardless of the principles which may be broken, shifting material gains from the hands of the few to those of many — was kosher. He seemed to suggest that grabbing what’s available in whatever fashion, and giving joy to a large number of people — was ethical therefore acceptable.

 

Yes, what’s involved here are principles, not least of which those pertaining to Human Rights. So, we must ask: What gives any principle the force it may have acquired? Well, as the name implies, the principle stands as the rock from which all laws, rules and regulations are derived. When you diminish or take away the principles by which a society is governed, replacing them with “feel good” notions, you invite lawlessness to reek havoc into that society. And the exchange always proves to be ill-advised in the long run if not the short run as well.

 

A real case of this kind engulfed me at the start of my adult life 56 years (more than 20,000 days ago.) It is that I dared to write to the editor of a Toronto newspaper saying that Egypt, where I was born, was a civilized country. Fearing that my telling the truth will expose the thousands of lies which the Jews had been propagating about Egypt at the time, the Canadian Jewish Congress sent me an envoy to warn that if I did not stop contacting the media — which they considered to be their monopoly — and trashed Egypt instead of praising it, the Jewish Congress promises to ruin my life. And they kept their promise when I refused to heed their warning.

 

What those realities demonstrate, is that the Jews — who used the Canadian Government and its institutions as weapons to silence me, thus maintain their anti-Egypt hatemongering — did nothing better than pit their feel-good robin hood-ish notions which advocate havoc, against my principles which advocate the orderly unfolding of life under the protection of Human Rights as formulated during several conventions held since at least the Second World War.

 

Well then, what is there which says adhering to Human Rights rather than the hastily and conveniently adopted feel-good notions put on the table by the Jews … the people whose speciality has always been to create the noise that distracts from the substance of the real issues under discussion?

 

The answer to that question is revealed when you realize that the way the Jews were able to maintain the horror they have been inflicting on me for more than half a century, is that they hypnotized the entire Western Civilization, and led it to believe that telling the truth will spark the next Holocaust.

 

Thus, according to them, Justin Trudeau should feel good because he robs me to give to others (including Jews) and he prevents the next Holocaust from happening.