It takes a so-so to believe the dodo

 The bird known as turkey is thought to be a dumb bird. It is therefore used to analogize dumb humans. The now extinct dodo bird which used to live on the Island of Mauritius, was thought to be even dumber. It too is used to analogize dumb humans. Thus, it can be said that if someone believes the human dodo who tells him fantastic stories, that someone’s mental competence can only be rated as a so-so.

 

It happened that during the past three-quarter-century, the dodo operatives populating Jewish Central succeeded in transforming the American politico-journalistic crowd into a swarm of mental so-sos. And nothing is more representative of that crowd than the Congress. It is that every half-baked idea that was put forward by the dodos, was taken to heart and adhered to by the mentally enfeebled legislators. Two of those ideas are discussed here.

 

First, there is the idea of the influence which the donors of money have on the recipients of that money. To come out in an age when election time, looks more like feeding time at the zoo, and claim as do the Jews, that their money has no influence on the receiving politicians, is to play the role of dodo that’s taking advantage of the mentally incapacitated so-sos.

 

Not only do the Jews reject the idea that they donate to political campaigns with the intent to extract concessions that favor Israel, they go beyond it and accuse those who make the suggestion of virulent antisemitism. They explain that they donate because they love what the campaign is advancing, and further explain that the recipient votes the way that he/she does because they love Israel. It is how the dodo and the so-so fall into each other’s embrace.

 

Whereas it is easy for anyone sane to see the glaring link which exists between the Jewish money and the ensuing legislation that favors Israel, the Jews have a difficult time showing the link which they say connects the decisions taken by the administrators, faculty and students of a university with the money that’s donated by a foreign government – not to them personally but to the university.

 

So my friend, what do you think the never-relenting Jews are doing now? I’ll tell you what they are trying to do. They went to the soft underbelly of the American Democracy, which is none other than the Congressional swarm of so-sos, and started to work on those things. The Jews envisage that for valid or invalid reasons, the swarm will eventually destroy the universities of America, at which time Jewish Central will move in and feed on the spoils.

 

So much for the first idea. As to the second, it has to do with a cannibalistic horror that lasted more than half a century; a horror that the Jews inflicted on me, and maintained relentlessly during all that time. Here is what they advanced as excuse, arguing that they had no choice but to do what they did given the reality that I represented an existential threat to them.

 

But when confronted with the reality that I was alone in this world, possessing neither an army nor presiding over an empire, they said: so was Hitler before he managed to build the mighty empire that almost exterminated the Jews in a fiery Holocaust. But why is it important that I tell this true story?

 

It is important because the ideas and doings that go into its execution are not unique to this one case. They represent a game which the Jews play again and again when they have no good argument to advance. That is, they push forward a chain of false links that extend from a saying or an event, however harmless it may be, to the inevitable Holocaust.

 

The event and saying this time, consist of the Palestinians expressing the desire to live freely on their property from the “River to the Sea.” Because freedom for the Palestinians means Holocaust for the Jews, say the latter, it is antisemitic to utter the phrase: From the River to the Sea.

Bestowing grandeur where grandeur is not due

 Eric Severeid once reminded his listeners of the saying that goes something like this: when a small man casts a long shadow, you know that the sun is setting on someone’s radiance.

 

Well then, based on what Clifford D. May is saying, we can now report that because an impoverished population of two million crushed-to-the-ground paupers are casting a long shadow over Western Civilization, you must conclude that the Civilization is declining.

 

Clifford May made his comments in an article that came under the title: “Hamas vs. Western Civilization” and the subtitle: “Gaza is a significant battleground.” The article was published on November 7, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

You got to feel sorry for people of the Clifford May caliber who lack the intellect and/or integrity to tell the truth, or at least a bastardized version of it, and defend what they put out for others to consume. Here is what Clifford May did that sent him this time to the doghouse of feeble mental prowess:

 

“On Oct. 7, Hamas one of Tehran’s several pit bulls, demonstrated what such a policy looks like in practice: mass murder, rape, decapitation of infants. Hamas terrorists proudly recorded their barbarism on GoPro cameras (a Western invention) and posted the images on the internet (a Western invention)”.

 

Consider this now, my friend. Whereas Moses instructed the Jews to adhere to the command: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth,” the Jews stuck with the old habit of going for ten eyes or more, and going for ten teeth or more. When criticized for doing this, they lied saying that they consider one eye and one tooth as being the limits of how much they can extract from their foes.

 

This has been Israel’s policy in occupied Palestine for decades, and the number of killed and wounded victims on both sides speak for themselves—all the more so because Israel habitually assures it rank-and-file that it is doing well by bragging about the number of Palestinians it has killed in every clash.

 

And while this is the truth which can be verified by everyone, people like Clifford May and thousands more, repeat the lie that terrorism is conducted by the Palestinians and not the Jews. And when speaking in abstract terms, they can no longer sustain the lie, they think up incidents that never happened and attribute them to the Palestinians. That’s how the poisoned Jewish inventions of mass murder, rape and decapitation of infants, slipped into the current debate.

 

Another trick that the Jews pull off to confuse the audience, is that they play what can be termed the single-leg dialogue. That is, instead of letting the two sides of a give-and-take come through their description of how an incident unfolded or an idea developed, they only tell the one side that favors their argument. With that, they falsely let it be understood that the other side is not pushing back because he has no valid argument with which to push.

 

That trick is one that modern Jews inherited from their predecessors. It was used so openly and so shamelessly by them during the decades of the sixties and seventies when they had complete control of the media, you could get sick watching a panel of half a dozen Jews and not a single Arab, tell the audience both the Jewish side of the story, and the Arab side of the story as they saw it. So, you ask: What do we get from the Jews now? Well, this is what we get:

 

“Ghazi Hamad, a senior member of Hamas’ politburo, told a Lebanese television interviewer: ‘We will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated.’”

 

What’s missing here is the mention and understanding of the principle that when you give the other side a take-it-or-leave it proposition to choose from, you make the choice for yourself and make it for your opponent as well. This is what Israel has been offering the Palestinians for decades. It was to choose from total occupation and the pretense of independence.

 

This being the case, the people of Palestine chose to work on liberating their country rather than give it away while under duress. It is what Ghazi Hamad was echoing during the interview.

 

What he said, in effect, is that in the choice between Palestine or Israel being annihilated, they choose to annihilate Israel.

They want to see the Jews fight to extinction

 There is no idea you can come up with, that will be rejected by one hundred percent of humans. In fact, you’ll find that every idea, spouted by someone influential or by a nobody, no matter how outlandish it may be, will be adopted, adhered to and defended by devotees.

 

Being aware of this reality, you’ll not be surprised to learn that in America, there are renowned journalists and legislators who will look at the genocidal orgy which the Jews, using American weapons of mass destruction, are inflicting on the Palestinian people, and say this is a justified retaliation for what Hamas did to the Jews when they attacked them on October 7. In any case, this was acceptable collateral damage, say the Jews, because the destruction and looting that ensued happened during a war that was fought by highly moral Jewish individuals whose intent was to protect the sanctity of human life.

 

So, you keep the debate going by pointing out that the action of Hamas was itself nothing more and nothing less than retaliation for 56 years of murderous treatment carried out by the Jews on Palestinians, stealing their homeland as they did, and then unleashing cannibalistic settlers that may not have eaten Palestinian flesh, but consumed every property the latter erected for themselves by the sweat of their foreheads; by their blood and tears.

 

Whereas you can see why some Jews will want Israel to continue fighting its neighbors even though no result was given as being the aimed for endgame, you wonder why non-Jewish dudes wish to see Israel continue the fight. Well, while recognizing that no two people think exactly alike, which makes it so that everyone has his own opinion, I did not have to go too far looking for an answer. The following is what happened that brought the answer of one individual to me. Here is what happened:

 

The year was 1977, four years after the 1973 liberation of the Sinai by Egypt’s military. Now confident that Israel will never again dare to attack Egypt as it did in 1967 when it launched a surprise attack and occupied the Sinai – President Anwar Sadat of Egypt decided, might as well replace the truce that governed the relations between Egypt and Israel into a peace treaty. He travelled to Israel and said so to its leaders and its people.

 

I was working at the time in an office that was filled with colleagues from different ethnic groups. One of those was a Pakistani who proved to be a bit more fanatic than I expected him to be. It is that Sadat’s action in the Middle East prompted this man to almost completely sever his relationship with me. He made it clear he was doing it because Egypt had the opportunity to continue fighting the Jews but made peace with them instead.

 

Curious about this phenomenon, and wishing to learn more about it, I set out to conduct a study that might yield some answers, and what I found was disturbing. People of all races that believed the Arabs could annihilate the Jews, wanted the fight to continue to the end. People of all races that believed Israel could humiliate, and forever silence the Arab and Musim Worlds, wanted the fight to continue till the latter fell to their knees and begged for mercy.

 

This tells me that the phenomenon is so ingrained in our human DNA, it is widespread among all kinds of populations, including the politico-journalistic crowd of America. And this explains why in the Land of the First Amendment, a handful of Jews was able to convince the defenders of Free Speech to stop defending it but stab it in the back instead.

 

It all started with the Jewish cancellation of people who refused to succumb to the Jewish threats. It has now infested the American Congress where it is becoming a habit to censure the members who disagree with the policies of a foreign entity.

 

And it was simple to execute. All that a Jewish lobbyists had to do was warn every member of the politico-journalistic crowd in America that should Israel fall, he/she will be held responsible. They will be hunted down the way that the Nazis are today. What will the dodos come up with next?

Crossing the ideological divide does not mean self-loathing

The trick known as Catch-22 is now understood to mean the formulation of a gimmick that aims to paralyze what someone is trying to accomplish. The way this is done, is to argue that you cannot proceed with Step A because B forbids it, and you cannot proceed with Step B because A forbids it. That makes the situation that’s at hand a mutually exclusive proposition.

 

When you spend time to study what the Jewish leaders do to their people and the societies they invade, you’ll find them give highest priority to the continuous creation of Catch-22 paralyzing bugs which they inject into the cultures that sustain them.

 

Every cycle that begins with the Jews running away from a society whose people discovered what they are up to — and made clear to them that Jews are no longer welcome here—started with them settling down quietly at first, but then quickly moving to work on bugging the society they just invaded. They do it to paralyze the society thus make it serve their agenda for as long as possible. But however long that service may have lasted, the welcoming societies got fed up with the Jews again and again, and told them off in no uncertain terms.

 

Despite the fact that Jewish history is replete with that kind of scenarios playing themselves out time after time as the Jews moved on from place to place, the rank-and-file remained unable to shake off the Catch-22 bugs that their leaders injected into them precisely to prevent them from moving on to serve “other gods.” This is what prompted an aging Jewish lawyer I became acquainted with — who used to live in Europe during the years when the Holocaust was being implemented — to angrily warn that the Holocaust will happen again, but with a difference this time.

 

Familiar with the geography which the Jews traced from where they departed to where they were slaughtered, the aging lawyer could see a steady westward movement that could no longer be sustained. He explained that such is the hard reality because Planet Earth is a sphere where the beginning and the end meet, rather than a never ending flat piece of real estate that goes on forever. The bitter point he was making was that the Jews have gone as far West as they can, from Asia to California. A further push westward will take them back to Asia where it all started. Thus, his dire warning to the effect that an American displeasure with Jewish trickery will lead to a swift holocaust that will be truly final this time.

 

So, the question that begs for an answer has come down to this: What’s wrong with the Jews that we should become aware of, and try to help them resolve?

 

What’s wrong with the Jews is the Catch-22 trick that’s injected into them with their mothers’ milk, and is constantly refreshed by their leaders as time moves on. The trick maintains them in a permanent state of paralysis, even when we treat them as harshly as the stubborn mule that budges only when hit with a two-by-four. It is that the Jews fail to get the hint where the mule does.

 

In fact, the trick consists of indoctrinating the Jewish children with the notion that they belong to two mutually exclusive human entities. One is that they belong to an ethnic group (whatever it is, Hebrew or otherwise) which makes of them an integral part of the human race. The other notion is that they belong to a religious entity which sets them apart from the human race, and places them—not alongside it but above it.

 

This leads to the deviously concocted belief that when an individual Jew decides to ditch the restricting religion and become member of the human race to live like everyone else, he is reprimanded by his peers who let him know that he demeaned all Jews by taking the step that paints him as a self-loathing Jew, therefore one who loathes all Jews.

 

In reverse, the non-Jews who are intrigued by Judaism and convert to it to become a part of the group that fascinated them no end for a time—well, these people are told they are not considered Jews because they have the wrong lineage.

 

What all this boils down to is that if you’re a Jew, you’re cursed when you leave the religion. But if you’re not a Jew and try to become one, you’re not welcome as a full member of the tribe. It is the case of A blocking B while B is blocking A … the full flowering of the Catch-22 syndrome.

 

What we can do therefore as human beings that want to help the Jews, is assure those who want to leave their demonic religion that doing so does not make them self-loathing. It makes them smart.

It’s mass shooting at home, mass bombing abroad

 Translated in a manner that better suits a North American audience, an Egyptian saying that’s used derisively when the circumstances warrants it, goes as follows: “This carpenter lives behind a broken door.” The intent here should be obvious to everyone: The saying points out the inherent hypocrisy in someone preaching a virtue they don’t have so as to make it look like they are endowed with it.

 

Things become even murkier when the scenario changes from that of the carpenter giving a take-it-or-leave-it advice, to that of using the sort of coercion which leaves no room for the client to say no and walk away from what he determines is a bad deal.

 

Whereas you may not find a real-life situation that runs as shown here, you’ll discover situations that come so close, they’ll shake you just as much. In fact, America is a prime example that stands as a case study. Plagued with mass shootings at home that run at the frequency of at least two a day, America still runs around the world proclaiming that it has the best system of governance because it values human life more than anyone else, and this gives it the right to impose its system—erroneously called democracy—on others, and do so by force of arms where necessary.

 

The use of Israel in the Middle East and Taiwan in the Far East, shows a situation in which America lost control over its Israeli proxy, and another situation in which it shows no confidence that when the time comes, it will control its Taiwan proxy any better than it does Israel.

 

But how did the government of Israel, backed by Jewish Central, as it always is, manage to work things in such a way as to suck out of America more than it needed in financial and military aid? Even more stunning is the situation that developed when the time came to show respect for America’s guidance as to what Israel can and cannot do with that aid while using it to inflict destruction on someone else. What happened in reality was that America got nothing less than Israel’s middle finger telling it to buzz off.

 

All of that was made possible to benefit Israel, and may be repeated again and again in the future because there is no sign that America will change or that it can change if it wanted to. It is that the system of Liberal Democracy which served the Western nations well during two or three centuries, has been infiltrated by the Jews who mangled it badly to benefit their causes even at the expense of those that help Israel for legitimate and illegitimate reasons.

 

Because Taiwan does not control a Jewish Central kind of syndicate, it will not attempt to duplicate what the Jews did for Israel. But Taiwan has a financial clout it can use to make America respond favorably to its demands. That clout comes in the form of a highly advanced collection of chips that have become indispensable for running a modern economy. Those chips are devices that Taiwan produces in abundance at a time when no one else has even setup as yet to begin catching up with Taiwan.

 

What does all this say about the possible fate of America as we move on into an era where hypocrisy will be quickly detected by the public and rejected vehemently the way that the commoners of the entire Planet demonstrated to show their anger at the genocidal orgy that Israel has unleashed on the people of Palestine using American weapons of mass destruction.

 

Because those weapons could not have been made without the use of chips made in Taiwan, will Taiwan wake up to the idea that it has the means to make the world love and respect it by slapping a chips embargo on America, thus force it to end the Jewish orgy whose intensity has already sicked all of the human race?

I do not like saying it, but I told them so

 Time after time, occasion after occasion, I told the Jews – as I did decade in and decade out – on the pages of this blog and elsewhere, that what they do to the world today, will be done to them, to America or to both simultaneously tomorrow.

 

And time after time, talking to these people, even to do as little as warn them of the danger they are forgetfully inviting to befall them, befall their families and their so-called friends, was like whistling Dixie watching a just painted wall as it refuses to dry up or release you from your trance.

 

I lived on campus for a while during my college years, and these were the years during which I spent a great deal of time going to the library to read up on the subjects related to the courses I was studying, and read up on any and every subject that might have intrigued me in the interim.

 

I saw something then, but being naïve at the time, said something, not to the right people, but said it to the wrong ones. What I saw was the desecration of books, done by hands that could not be anyone’s but those who today continue to mess up what they touch with their blighted hands.

 

These were the Jews to whom I complained that some users, most certainly people of their kind, were “correcting” by hand with a blue pen, the content they did not like to see in books that seemed to deprive the Jews of the supremacy they crave, talking about them instead as if they were comparable to the rest of the human race.

 

As time passed, I saw more of that kind of behavior, and saw more of the fanaticism that motivated the Jews to do what they do both consciously and forgetfully – and was horrified. I began to realize that something in the human family was not compatible with the rest of us, but could not make out if the Jews were a stink bomb or a doomsday bomb that can explode at any time.

 

While still working for a living and living at home, I had already received an envoy sent to me by the Canadian Jewish Congress, warning that I must never again contact the media, or the Jews will ruin my life. That’s the encounter which later added to the decision at becoming selective in my reading habits. In fact, from then on, I used to go to the library to search for and read the books and articles that would tell me all that I needed to know about the Jews.

 

During moments of intense reflection, I fell back on my Egyptian culture as modified by my French education, and came to the conclusion that what the Jews were doing to the world today will be done to them tomorrow. I said so to the Jews in as friendly a manner as I could, but they ignored me, thus left the supposed drywall as wet as it ever was … But I’m not waiting for it to dry.

 

The tomorrow I talked about then to the Jews and to all my readers, has come. It is now called today. And what we see today is that the prediction I made long ago, has been realized. In fact, the Jews who did not want anyone being exposed to ideas that do not glorify them while trashing Israel’s foes, now see their message ripped and discarded as if written on a toilet paper.

 

A similar kind of scenario played itself out when leaders of the American Jews, whose empty skulls were filled with false statistics about their popularity, felt super-confident that America had finally been turned into the toy they can play with and use as a weapon with which to bring the American public and the world, in line with the undercurrents and above currents meant to serve them immediately and serve Israel in the long run.

 

They set-up watch groups to monitor what was happening in America, especially on the college campuses, but also in the classrooms where they harassed the professors that did not praise them and praise Israel enough, or that did not trash their opponents. And they ran to the Jewish owned and Jewish inspired media to complain that they were made to suffer antisemitism by the fact that they were treated as equal to others instead of recognizing that no equivalence can be drawn between Jews who are a breed apart, and anyone who may only be a commoner adhering to an inferior religion.

 

Well, my friend, look what the world, including the American public, are telling the Jews now, amid the President and Prime Minister of Israel asserting publicly that all Gazans deserve to be slaughtered (which Israel is doing) because they voted for Hamas.

 

And the world has replied: You may be a breed apart but you’re not towering above our heads. Instead you proved to be droppings, sitting on the ground under our dogs’ bums where you whine about your fate and serve as fertilizer.

Justifying the inscrutable doing the unthinkable

Because it is more clarifying to discuss the following set of ideas by incorporating them into a fictitious story, here is the one that will do the job. Imagine an encounter between an American leader (US) and a Jewish leader (JEW). They are having an off-the-record conversation:

 

JEW: Have you ever seen a Palestinian kibbutz?

 

US: No, I never did. That’s because as far as I know, only Jews build kibbutz. But I always wondered why they build these things?

 

JEW: I’ll tell you why. If you’ve been following the news relating to the currently raging war between Hamas and the Israel Terror Force (ITF,) you’ll know that we’ve achieved great success getting you Americans to take the blame for the Holocaust we’re in the process of inflicting on the Palestinians.

 

US: I don’t understand. Where is the link between building kibbutz and inflicting genocide on the Palestinian people?

 

JEW: The link is a deviously conceived, tortuous set of steps that rely on the weaknesses we’ve been injecting into your culture over the past half century. We did so to make you believe that when you hear us say “Hamas terrorists,” you think that the money and weapons you give us free of charge, are used by the Hamas freedom fighters — not to defend themselves — but to wipe Israel off the map whose span extends from the River to the Sea. And so, we engage in the practice that Hitler dreamed of but could never achieve. It is to get the American dodos to help us justify the inscrutable by doing the unthinkable.

 

US: I still don’t get it. Where is the link that connects the act of building kibbutz only meters away from the demarcation line that separates Gaza from occupied Palestine — and inflicting genocide on the indigenous people of that land?

 

JEW: I don’t blame you. So, think of a 4-step process. Step 1, we provoke Hamas into defending themselves. They do so while respecting the strictest laws of warfare. Step 2, we accuse them of terrorism, and con your highest honchos into going public with the lies we stuff into their mouths. They regurgitate the false accusations without acknowledging that the kibbutz adults were hiding behind the children as they have been doing sine the 1940s. In any case, nobody who is not of the American politico-journalistic crowd, believes the regurgitating zombie-like mouthpieces. Step 3, the politico-journalistic crowd spews out a sea of lies and swims in it like fish swims in muddied water. Step 4, the zombies steal the money which belongs to the American people and give it to the Jews who use it to kill the Palestinian people. Do you, brainless American honcho, now understand how the Kibbutz is used to justify the holocaust to exterminate the Palestinian people we’re in the process of implementing at this time?

 

US: Do you know what you just did, my Jewish interlocutor — which I am sure you did, not knowing the consequences that would result from your explanation? You just helped me jump intellectually — in a single step — as much as millions of years of evolution. From the level of “monkey see, monkey do” and the level of “monkey hear, monkey repeat,” where I was stuck, I now appreciate the human method of bringing together the pieces that belong to the same story, and repainting and projecting the full canvas of what happened. It is like rising 30,000 feet up in the air to look at and judge the entire landscape rather than pass judgement on a mile-wide case based on what I see in the one inch scrap with which you’ve been constantly feed me during the decades.

 

JEW: Once again I, the depraved Jewish liar have managed to shoot myself in the foot as I was trying to have it both ways.