Eric Severeid once reminded his listeners of the saying that goes something like this: when a small man casts a long shadow, you know that the sun is setting on someone’s radiance.
Well then,
based on what Clifford D. May is saying, we can now report that because an
impoverished population of two million crushed-to-the-ground paupers are
casting a long shadow over Western Civilization, you must conclude that the
Civilization is declining.
Clifford
May made his comments in an article that came under the title: “Hamas vs.
Western Civilization” and the subtitle: “Gaza is a significant battleground.”
The article was published on November 7, 2023 in The Washington Times.
You got to
feel sorry for people of the Clifford May caliber who lack the intellect and/or
integrity to tell the truth, or at least a bastardized version of it, and defend
what they put out for others to consume. Here is what Clifford May did that sent
him this time to the doghouse of feeble mental prowess:
“On Oct. 7, Hamas one of Tehran’s several pit bulls, demonstrated
what such a policy looks like in practice: mass murder, rape, decapitation of
infants. Hamas terrorists
proudly recorded their barbarism on GoPro cameras (a Western invention) and
posted the images on the internet (a Western invention)”.
Consider
this now, my friend. Whereas Moses instructed the Jews to adhere to the
command: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth,” the Jews stuck with the
old habit of going for ten eyes or more, and going for ten teeth or more. When
criticized for doing this, they lied saying that they consider one eye and one
tooth as being the limits of how much they can extract from their foes.
This has
been Israel’s policy in occupied Palestine for decades, and the number of killed
and wounded victims on both sides speak for themselves—all the more so because
Israel habitually assures it rank-and-file that it is doing well by bragging
about the number of Palestinians it has killed in every clash.
And while
this is the truth which can be verified by everyone, people like Clifford May
and thousands more, repeat the lie that terrorism is conducted by the
Palestinians and not the Jews. And when speaking in abstract terms, they can no
longer sustain the lie, they think up incidents that never happened and
attribute them to the Palestinians. That’s how the poisoned Jewish inventions
of mass
murder, rape and decapitation of infants, slipped into the current debate.
Another trick
that the Jews pull off to confuse the audience, is that they play what can be
termed the single-leg dialogue. That is, instead of letting the two sides of a
give-and-take come through their description of how an incident unfolded or an
idea developed, they only tell the one side that favors their argument. With
that, they falsely let it be understood that the other side is not pushing back
because he has no valid argument with which to push.
That trick
is one that modern Jews inherited from their predecessors. It was used so
openly and so shamelessly by them during the decades of the sixties and seventies
when they had complete control of the media, you could get sick watching a
panel of half a dozen Jews and not a single Arab, tell the audience both the
Jewish side of the story, and the Arab side of the story as they saw it. So,
you ask: What do we get from the Jews now? Well, this is what we get:
“Ghazi Hamad, a senior member of Hamas’ politburo, told a Lebanese
television interviewer: ‘We will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again,
until Israel is annihilated.’”
What’s missing here is the mention and understanding of the principle
that when you give the other side a take-it-or-leave it proposition to choose
from, you make the choice for yourself and make it for your opponent as well. This
is what Israel has been offering the Palestinians for decades. It was to choose
from total occupation and the pretense of independence.
This being the case, the people of Palestine chose to work on liberating
their country rather than give it away while under duress. It is what Ghazi
Hamad was echoing during the interview.