The day the savages received a valuable lesson

 On the day that Clifford D. May was writing a column, which ended up showing him to be utterly confused as to what makes good history and what makes a pile of garbage, his savage brethren were being given a lesson on how to behave in a civilized manner. May’s article came under the title: “Hamas supporters’ ignorance is appalling,” and the subtitle: “Don't know much about Middle Eastern history.” It was published on November 14, 2023. Here is what happened on that day:

 

In keeping with the tradition of trying to reproduce what the non-Jews do, the religious honchos of the Jews called on their American flocks to gather in the Washington Mall, and stage a rally which they hoped will demonstrate to the world the civilized (real or fake) nature of their culture.

 

The difference between what the Jews did, and what humanity had done a day or two previous, is that the non-Jews acted spontaneously and naturally whereas the Jews performed artificially. The result was that humanity’s call to address the ongoing Gaza War, was replicated as poorly as a child would replicate the Mona Lisa.

 

Moreover, the lesson that the Jews learned on that day pertained to the subject of free speech, and the effect it has on those who practice this mode of communication. More specifically, whereas the rallies that developed around the world by non-Jews were disrupted by the enemies of free speech – the savage Jews themselves – the rally that was developed by the Jews in Washington, was left alone by the non-Jews. It proceeded as planned by the organizers, thus demonstrated to these people that you’re not free because you pretend to be free, you’re free because you let others live their freedom the way they see fit.

 

When it comes to telling history, however, the way that Clifford May has tried to do, what goes into judging a piece of work is more complicated. That’ because viewing history and explain it, depend on ideas that were often gathered and absorbed at the same time that the telling historian was undergoing a personal experience that matched the unfolding of the events. Thus, history can become the expression of an opinion more than the description of what happened in real life.

 

Honestly speaking, from the description of Clifford May’s own intellectual journey — from way back then, to the set of beliefs he now brings to the table — I cannot make out what exactly motivates this man. All I can tell is that he accumulated and has stashed in his toolbox, a set of debating skills that look professional on the surface but do him in when closely scrutinized. One of those skills has to do with the point at which a self-described historian begins to tell history.

 

Consider the following example, taken from Clifford May’s article, which I am telling at the risk of causing Fox’s Bret Baier to blow thick smoke at the ears:

 

“Start with this observation by the late Charles Krauthammer: Israel ‘is the only nation on earth that inhabits the same land, bears the same name, speaks the same language, and worships the same God that it did 3,000 years ago.’”

 

I have known about the work of Krauthammer for decades. The first time I saw him was on a PBS program where he sat on a panel with three other journalists, one being African American. Even though I disliked the Jewish attitude of treating the Black Man as if he owned him for no good reason than a Jew once got hurt defending the right of Blacks, I detected a high level of intelligence in Krauthammer and said so. Then, years later, I saw Krauthammer on the Bret Baier news hour as he outshined the other panelists, and wrote something to this effect. This is when Bret Baier went gung ho on the Jew where he remained ever since.

 

Meanwhile, Krauthammer’s telling of history is more rubbish than it is real history. It’s because the self-described historian skipped a huge chunk of the Jewish early history, a time when—as described in their book of history known as “Old Testament”—the Jews were nomadic tribes that lived off the work of those they raided, terrorized, robbed and maybe even fed on the blood of their young like pitiful cannibals.

 

From that point on, Clifford May’s article, especially as it related to the ongoing events of that day, has been nothing more than a downhill free fall. It is a rehash of what the writer has been saying repetitively and monotonously for years. If you haven’t read him before, you may even enjoy his fantasy.