There is no idea you can come up with, that will be rejected by one hundred percent of humans. In fact, you’ll find that every idea, spouted by someone influential or by a nobody, no matter how outlandish it may be, will be adopted, adhered to and defended by devotees.
Being aware
of this reality, you’ll not be surprised to learn that in America, there are renowned
journalists and legislators who will look at the genocidal orgy which the Jews,
using American weapons of mass destruction, are inflicting on the Palestinian
people, and say this is a justified retaliation for what Hamas did to the Jews
when they attacked them on October 7. In any case, this was acceptable
collateral damage, say the Jews, because the destruction and looting that
ensued happened during a war that was fought by highly moral Jewish individuals
whose intent was to protect the sanctity of human life.
So, you
keep the debate going by pointing out that the action of Hamas was itself
nothing more and nothing less than retaliation for 56 years of murderous
treatment carried out by the Jews on Palestinians, stealing their homeland as
they did, and then unleashing cannibalistic settlers that may not have eaten
Palestinian flesh, but consumed every property the latter erected for
themselves by the sweat of their foreheads; by their blood and tears.
Whereas you
can see why some Jews will want Israel to continue fighting its neighbors even
though no result was given as being the aimed for endgame, you wonder why non-Jewish
dudes wish to see Israel continue the fight. Well, while recognizing that no
two people think exactly alike, which makes it so that everyone has his own
opinion, I did not have to go too far looking for an answer. The following is
what happened that brought the answer of one individual to me. Here is what
happened:
The year
was 1977, four years after the 1973 liberation of the Sinai by Egypt’s
military. Now confident that Israel will never again dare to attack Egypt as it
did in 1967 when it launched a surprise attack and occupied the Sinai – President
Anwar Sadat of Egypt decided, might as well replace the truce that governed the
relations between Egypt and Israel into a peace treaty. He travelled to Israel
and said so to its leaders and its people.
I was
working at the time in an office that was filled with colleagues from different
ethnic groups. One of those was a Pakistani who proved to be a bit more fanatic
than I expected him to be. It is that Sadat’s action in the Middle East
prompted this man to almost completely sever his relationship with me. He made
it clear he was doing it because Egypt had the opportunity to continue fighting
the Jews but made peace with them instead.
Curious
about this phenomenon, and wishing to learn more about it, I set out to conduct
a study that might yield some answers, and what I found was disturbing. People
of all races that believed the Arabs could annihilate the Jews, wanted the
fight to continue to the end. People of all races that believed Israel could
humiliate, and forever silence the Arab and Musim Worlds, wanted the fight to
continue till the latter fell to their knees and begged for mercy.
This tells
me that the phenomenon is so ingrained in our human DNA, it is widespread among
all kinds of populations, including the politico-journalistic crowd of America.
And this explains why in the Land of the First Amendment, a handful of Jews was
able to convince the defenders of Free Speech to stop defending it but stab it
in the back instead.
It all
started with the Jewish cancellation of people who refused to succumb to the
Jewish threats. It has now infested the American Congress where it is becoming
a habit to censure the members who disagree with the policies of a foreign
entity.
And it was simple to execute. All that a Jewish lobbyists had to do was warn every member of the politico-journalistic crowd in America that should Israel fall, he/she will be held responsible. They will be hunted down the way that the Nazis are today. What will the dodos come up with next?