Tuesday, November 21, 2023

The invisible meanings in heated rhetoric

 Look at the following two statements. What would you say they have in common?

 

First statement: We’ll do it again and again and again.

 

Second statement:  We don’t want to see hospitals become battlegrounds.

 

What the two statements have in common is that each came at the end of a long line of thoughts. Missing in their locution are the meanings that the debaters included in them either implicitly or explicitly at the time they pronounced them. These were substantial meanings that nevertheless remain invisible now. So, the question to ask is this: can we forensically restore to these statements their original full meanings?

 

The answer to that question is yes, we can. But to do so successfully, we need to identify the authors who spoke those words; also need to probe their previous sayings to see how closely they resemble or differ from their recent statements. To that end, here is what we know about the person who communicated the first statement. He is a Hamas official who must have been asked if his organization would respond the same way to the same provocations that led Hamas to respond the way it did this time. As can be seen, the Hamas answer was an honest and emphatic yes.

 

As to the person who communicated the second answer, it must be said that more than one did. Each represented the American administration of Joe Biden in one capacity or another, but could just as well have admitted they were all echoing the voice of the foreign entity calling itself Israel. Recalling the manner of speaking employed by the Biden crowd, a disturbing reality comes to mind immediately. It is that when it comes to the so-called defense of Israel, the demarcation line separating America from Israel, has been so blurred, it is impossible to clearly ascribe a statement to one entity or the other.

 

This makes it so that the statement, “We don’t want to see hospitals become battlegrounds,” is a dubious pronouncement that carries with it an escape hatch which can be used by the Biden administration in case the Jews of Israel do what comes naturally to them, which is to commit the war crime and stick the responsibility to the American administration of Joe Biden.

 

In fact, Biden and his crowd resorted to that manner of speaking because they found themselves caught on the horns of a dilemma. On the one hand, they don’t want to appear restraining Israel which would be disastrous for American politics if Israel lost the war to Hamas. On the other hand, they don’t want to take responsibility for the genocide they know has always been the Jewish intention to commit. Thus, the use of the  statement of infamy which carries with it the instruction: You have the green light to proceed with your genocidal plan to blow up the Shifa Hospital, but when you’ll do it, we’ll deny responsibility.

 

Neither the Joe Biden administration, which is the current governing body in America, nor the previous administrations going back several decades, can deny the role that each played in bringing the Middle East to the lamentable state in which it finds itself at this time.

 

That plan was implemented slowly but surely, one step at a time by following instructions that the Jews wrote about in the book they call the Old Testament, handed to them by one named Moses. Whereas many people were fooled into believing this was a book of religion transmitting the words of God to the human race, more and more people are coming around to the realization that God cannot be anything close to the way that the Jews describe Him.

 

Realizing that it was fooled excessively for too long by the most destructive force ever to plague Planet Eart, humanity is beginning to ascribe blame where blame is due. Right now, the blame is pinned on America, more so on the chest of Joe Biden who will not escape the designation: Genocide Joe.