A Word about Human Peaceful Coexistence (HPC)

Things that suffer from a small superficial defect can usually be repaired with some ease. By contrast, things that suffer from a structural defect are harder to repair, if they can be repaired at all.

For example, a building that's hit by a tornado, and suffers a few broken windows, can easily be fixed, and will most likely withstand the next earthquake. By contrast, a building that was built deficient of steel rods, will most likely get demolished when the earthquake hits.

That principle applies to abstract institutions as well because they too can be built with solid ideas but small defects that can easily be fixed over time, or they can be built with a structural defect, thus get demolished every time that an earthquake hits, and they are rebuilt the same way as before.

If we consider Human Peaceful Coexistence (HPC) to be the ultimate institution we aspire to build, we'll find that of the three pillars upon which that institution is erected, there still remains a long way for humanity to go before we can say we have constructed a Human Civilization that will withstand any earthquake. The three pillars of HPC being (1) Scientific and technological progress; (2) Civic governance at the micro and macro levels; and (3) Religion.

When it comes to scientific and technological progress, we can be proud of our accomplishments. Despite the fact that we are deficient in other areas, our ingenuity has transcended the difficulties, and forged ahead with discoveries and inventions that are truly astounding. As to governance, most of us seem incapable of discarding enough of our evolutionary baggage to steadily give out instructions that carry no prejudice, or steadily receive instructions without being suspicious of their source. As to religion, we are in a mess that needs to be sorted out and redone from scratch, especially the one calling itself Jewish. This one practices what it says is Judaism, but may be compelled to redefine itself as something else.

In fact, two recent articles go a long way in clarifying what's wrong with Judaism. The latest of the two came under the title: “Bari Weiss Explains How To Fight The Rise Of Anti-Semitism,” and the subtitle: “New York Times columnist Bari Weiss's new book, 'How to Fight Anti-Semitism,' offers a trenchant look at an old evil that's on the rise once more.” The article was written by Melissa Langsam Braunstein and published on September 14, 2019 in The Federalist. Five days earlier, on September 9, 2019, Simon Butler had published an article under the title: “The US Must Institute Laws Against Antisemitism,” and had it printed in the Jewish online publication, Algemeiner.

Despite Melissa Braunstein's article that has a title which says: “How to fight anti-Semitism,” reviewing Bari Weiss's book whose title is: “How to Fight Anti-Semitism,” you'll find not a single word or a hint in Braunstein's article that tells how Bari Weiss proposes to fight anti-Semitism. Do you know why this is so, my friend? It’s because the Jews do not want to end anti-Semitism. They want to fight it but not end it.

The fact is that the Jewish leaders thrive on anti-Semitism. Any suggestion they offer on how to fight it, is designed to maintain anti-Semitism at a level that does not get out of hand. They have two reasons for wishing to maintain the prevailing state. First, they can play the victimhood card and milk the society that feels sorry for them till there is no more to be milked. Second, and more importantly, they can ask for laws that bestows on them a special status. This is what they have been craving for thousands of years. They began with the idea that they were God's favorite children. But as time moved on, they became convinced that God will not show up to embrace them for the whole world to see. And so, they began to look to various governments replacing God and giving them that special status. Right now, what they want are laws that will punish the public for not loving the Jews wholeheartedly.

But how do they do that? They do it the way that Simon Butler explains it in his article. It is the one that came under the title: “The US Must Institute Laws Against Antisemitism.” But do you know what that will do? It will increase anti-Semitism, which is what the Jewish leaders are hoping for.

So then, what's Melissa Braunstein talking about in an article that's more than a thousand words long? Believe it or not, she's talking –– not how to raise Judaism to the level of respectability but –– politics. It all comes down to this passage in her article: “As for politics, Weiss and I will have to agree to disagree that the political left is either the natural or better home for American Jews.” There is a name for this kind of give-and-take. It is called Jewish style haggling that floods the space with useless verbiage, yet leads nowhere.

So, we go over the Simon Butler article to see if he is shedding more light on the subject. We find that he begins his presentation with this suggestion: “I believe that we must ask whether the American principle of freedom of speech should be re-fitted to address today's social media climate”.

So you ask, what's wrong with that? And you discover what's wrong from what he says his suggestion entails. Parse his words and judge for yourself:

“As long as there is no direct incitement to violence, people are free to say what they want. Unless an individual threatens another person, expresses a desire to harm people, or urges others to do the same, his or her rights to freedom of speech are fully protected. I think we should revisit this mandate”.

That's it, my friend. Simon Butler wants to lift the current protection on freedom of speech because he wants it so that if you dare to exercise your freedom, you should be left at the mercy of every little Jewish fart who will charge you with a crime, and have you punished.

These horrible creatures have already destroyed many lives and careers over the decades, now they want to send you to jail because a word you might have uttered made one of them uncomfortable. You know what! Screw these disgusting little pukes.

Yes indeed, Israel does nothing but dirty Work

There used to be a lag time between the moment that the Jews used to try something unethical in the Middle East and their adaptation of it in America.

For example, it took several years between the time that the Jews used to complain about the system of education in the Arab and Muslim worlds for not being pro-Jewish enough, and the time that it took the Jews to bring that same sort of complaint to America regarding a system of education that's not pro-Jewish enough. For this reason, the saying among the Arabs and the Muslims who knew about the Jewish habit, went like this: Today they do it to us, tomorrow they'll do it to you.

And then, America allowed itself to be so imbued with the Judeo-Yiddish culture, and two developments took roots in that country. First, the lag time between the Jewish idiosyncrasies manifesting themselves in the Middle Eastern arena, and the same thing happening in the American arena, shrank so much, the two events now unfold almost simultaneously. Second, whereas in America, the implementation of a Jewish habit used to be carried out strictly by Jewish journalists, contributors and pundits, the implementation is now carried out by their gentile admirers, disciples and lackeys as well.

You can see an example of that when you study an article that was written by Steven A. Cook or watch Fox News or read the rightwing print publications as they “Rambonize” the foreign exploits of Donald Trump. You’ll find that they constantly try to make the public believe that Trump brought Iran and China, not only to their knees but to their bellies, begging face down, the mighty Rambo-Trump for pity and relief.

As to the Steven Cook article, which is of a kind that inspires the likes of Fox and the rightwing publications, it came under the title: “Israel Is Doing All the Dirty Work Against Iran,” and the subtitle: “The United States came up with 'maximum pressure'––but the Israeli government is the only one carrying it out.” It was published on September 12, 2019 on the website of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Readers who are familiar with Jewish idiosyncrasies, know that when they see the adjective “ONLY ONE,” inserted into a sentence, they are in for a ride that will take them, not into a simple rabbit hole here on Earth, but a cosmic wormhole that leads to a parallel universe where Jewish termites are the size of houses, and Iranian warriors look like demons. Here is how the Steven Cook article reads in condensed form:

“There was a T-shirt depicting weapons systems that the United States had provided to Israel against bold letters declaring, 'Don't Worry America … Israel Is Behind You.' The Israelis are the only ones applying 'maximum pressure' on Iran. When American officials next meet the Iranians, it is because the Israelis made it possible. In August, the Israelis were pounding the Iranians and their allies. They hit a base in Syria, destroyed a weapons depot in Iraq, and undertook drone strikes in Lebanon. They had detected an effort to supply advanced weaponry to its allies. Their sense of threat is heightened by Trump's penchant for speaking loudly but carrying a small stick. The Israelis are taking serious risks that could result in another war in Lebanon. Israel's strikes in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq made an impression on Iran's leaders. Now they are inching toward talks with the United States. It was the Israeli military prowess that cowed the Iranians into talks. The trajectory for US-Iran relations is renewed negotiations. For that, supporters of engagement have Israel to thank”.

As can be seen, after spending half a century devouring everything in sight with the fires of defamation, succeeding at making the American political establishment believe that Israel is the ONLY ONE in the Middle East that's perfect in everything and imperfect in none, the Jews ran out of things to devour. So, they did what the offspring of scorpions do: they turned around and devoured their diplomatic, financial and military Alma Mater. They devoured America which gave Israel existence, and has been sustaining the thing till now.

There is nothing surprising about any of this. As predicted, because the Americans protected the Jews, allowing them to say anything they wanted about the Arabs and the Muslims without being rebuffed, the Jews turned around and started to talk about America the way they do about the Arabs and the Muslims.

And that's not all. Another and more telling analogy is that of the Americans rescuing the European Jews from the Nazi gas chamber and the incinerator. But instead of being thanked by the Jews, the Americans were accused of willfully abstaining from bombing the concentration camps.

The Jews continue to play up that false accusation decades later because it paints them as victims, therefore eligible for compensation that’s paid in currency named: Keep quiet about Jewish indiscretions, and pamper them with all that they desire. And that’s the dirtiest kind of work they know how to do so very well.

A dull Shout in the Wilderness nobody will hear

Aside from adhering to a couple of taboos that no Jewish pundit can contradict when writing about Israel, Robert Kagan wrote what amounts to an open letter to whichever group of leaders will win the upcoming election in Israel ... telling it like it is. He is warning those leaders, as delicately as he can, not to abandon the appearance of standing in the camp of liberalism.

The open letter came in the form of an article written under the title: “Israel and the decline of the liberal order,” and the subtitle: “The rise of nationalism around the globe may be reflected in the outcome of Israeli elections on Tuesday.” It was published on September 12, 2019 in The Washington Post.

The pitch that Kagan is making to the leaders of Israel is that the authoritarian world leaders Netanyahu has been meeting and taking pictures with, will prove valueless when push comes to shove as it is bound to happen now that anti-Semitism is rising throughout the world. Kagan is reminding those leaders that Israel was born in an age of liberalism and has maintained that posture ever since. The posture harmonized very well with the American tendency to favor liberal norms thus, it would be foolish for Israel to change posture.

Robert Kagan also went into great detail, reminding those leaders that Israel could not have survived the length of time that it did, were it not for the uninterrupted financial, diplomatic and military support it has been receiving from America during the decades. He also cautioned that there was never a compelling reason for America to be this generous. To emphasize this last point, he reminded the Israelis of how much American opposition to supporting Israel there was in the past. It is opposition that might come to life again if Israel were to upset America by choosing a path that appears incompatible with American interests.

What is missing in the Kagan advice to Israel's leaders is what concrete steps they must take to guarantee the continued survival of Israel. He did the right thing warning them of the reality that no matter what posture they take, the world will never be safe for Israel. He also did the right thing acknowledging that a rightwing posture will damage Israel's relation with “liberal” America. But he did not explain why a liberal posture will guarantee continued American support, given that a new generation of Jewish Americans is turning its back on Israel, not only because of its posture but because of the continued occupation of Palestine.

There is no doubt that Israeli leaders of every stripe are aware of everything that Robert Kagan has included in his open letter to them and yet, they do not seem eager to change course. So, what could he have said that would have brought them to change the current condition of paralysis in which they live, replacing it with one that has the chance of turning things around? This, would have promised a stable future for Israel's inhabitants, and satisfaction for Jews around the globe.

Well, it is simple. Since the occupation of Palestine is the source of Israel's continued anxiety about its own survival, the occupation must end. This is not happening, however, because the Jews have many false excuses as to why the occupation must continue. They also have no incentive or compelling reason to make the end happen. In fact, a good incentive would have been the certainty that Israel will survive, even exist as a normal country. Well, the truth is that such offer was made to them in the initiative of the Arab League that gave them everything they said they wanted in return for ending the occupation.

It was made more than a decade ago but so far, the Jews have not accepted the offer because they want the land of Palestine more than anything else. And this is where Kagan could have made a difference. He can still explain to the Israelis that they will never get a greater incentive to end the occupation than what the Arabs have offered. They will not get it from America, from the world or from anyone else. This done, he should also explain to them that as a member of the American liberal crowd, he can report with authority that America is turning its back on Israel because the liberals and the moderates are losing patience with them.

In addition, because the Israelis do not care about losing the American public as long as they continue to have the support of the politicians, Robert Kagan can update them, explaining that they are losing support even among the politicians who can no longer go against the wishes of the electorate. He should be telling the leaders of Israel that sooner or later, the Jewish lobby in America will have been reduced to a dog that may still bark but will have lost his bite.

When this happens, the opposition to Israel will grow in America more than they see it operate anywhere else in the world. And anything can happen after that.

If this is not incentive enough for the Israeli leaders to change course, they should buckle-up and prepare for what's coming because we’ve reached that point in the cycle once again.

Behold the Fifth Column now in full Swing

Think about it. What could the early patriots of the American colonies, be wishing to accomplish when they were contemplating the start of a revolution?

Well, here are two ideas. First, they wanted to be independent of Britain, their colonial master at the time. Second, they wanted to establish a Republic in which the people will be absolutely free to choose those who will represent them in government.

Now think about something else. What would someone do a century or two later, if they were an organization that wants to turn America back into a colony –– not of Britain this time but –– of another foreign power, however small and insignificant it may be?

Well, here are two ideas. First, that someone will send Fifth Columnists who will infiltrate the American government, and work to advance the agenda of the foreign power while pretending to work for America. Second, they will interfere with the electoral system to deny the American people the freedom to choose those who will represent them in government so that they remain singularly in charge of the government.

Is this happening to America at this time? Have the strategic institutions of the country, such as the State Department, the White House, the Pentagon, the Treasury and others been infiltrated by Jews of dual loyalties or Jews who are singularly loyal to Israel? The answer to these questions is an emphatic yes.

In fact, dozens of these Jews had their works reviewed on this blog over the last decade. The inescapable conclusion has been that these works point to the reality that most of the authors spent their time, as they continue to spend it now, doing one thing only: advance Israel's interests whether they coincide with those of America or they contradict them.

There are more than 3,000 articles on this site, each reviewing between one and four pieces written by Jews, by their disciples or their sycophants. If anything, they show conclusively how the traitors of the Fifth Column work almost openly for Israel, sometimes to the detriment of America, while being paid by America. This is like paying a monster to come to your house and rape your wife and children. Nowhere can this happen but in America, and no one would do such a thing but a Jew.

This is how the Jews, who are foreigners-at-heart, yet carry American citizenship papers, infiltrate the American government and work from the inside to advance Israel's agenda while pretending to work for America, and getting an American paycheck for their troubles.

As to the way that the Jews interfere with the electoral system to deny the American public the freedom to choose their representatives, a recent article shows how the Jews pull this stunt in the open, and get away with it.

The article came under the title: “Warren Mimics Bernie's Promotion Of Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour To Campaign Surrogate,” and the subtitle: “Given Linda Sarsour's record, her claim that she supports Bernie Sanders because of rising anti-Semitism in America is irony thick enough to cut with a chainsaw.” It was written by Warren Henry and published on September 11, 2019 in The Federalist.

The following is a condensed version of what the author is saying:

“It is troubling that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are empowering people who support the BDS movement. Sanders identified Linda Sarsour as a campaign surrogate. She supports a one-state solution. She tweeted that nothing is creepier than Zionism. She was one of the first to meet with Rep. Ilhan Omar when the latter was sworn into office. For a candidate to make Sarsour a campaign surrogate represents a new low. Unfortunately, his chief rival is not doing much better. Elizabeth Warren has made Max Berger her campaign director. Berger was the co-founder of a group called If Not Now. He tweeted: 'Sometimes I feel the biggest obstacle to peace in Israel-Palestine is the bigotry of American Jews … I dare anyone to visit Hebron and tell me what's happening there doesn't look an awful lot like apartheid.' Berger also defended Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Linda Sarsour. The Progressive Zionists of California have written two letters to Warren's campaign asking that Berger step down from his position”.

Here you see Warren Henry, who is a cog in the gigantic Jewish propaganda machine, attack two candidates running to be President, because they hired outstanding American citizens to help them with their campaigns. Henry says he is disturbed because Sanders hired Linda Sarsour who supports a one-state solution in occupied Palestine. And he laments that she also met with the duly elected Rep. Ilhan Omar who supports BDS.

Warren Henry also says he is disturbed because Elizabeth Warren hired Max Berger who admits feeling at times that the biggest obstacle to peace in the Middle East is the bigotry of American Jews. Apparently, it is a crime to have such feelings.

For these reasons, the Jewish Fifth Column in America wants Linda Sarsour and Max Berger fired from their positions, or else Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will have to be considered candidates unfit to run for the presidency.

Well, you may or may not remember this, my friend, but there was a time when people in North America were not afraid to speak freely. And one of the things they were saying was that the Jews put themselves on a path to make it mandatory that you get permission from the office of the Jewish commissar before you can make love to your wife.

We're getting there, my friend. We're getting there.

They work hard trying to reconquer America

If you want to conquer America but don't know how to do it, there is a lesson for you. It was given by Clifford D. May. It is an article he wrote pretending to accomplish one thing, but accomplishing something else.

The article came under the title: “Another unhappy September 11 anniversary,” and the subtitle: “The United States continues to fight erratically and without a coherent strategy.” The article was published on September 10, 2019 in The Washington Times.

Clifford May's point is that a big event (later named 9/11) took place 18 years ago on September 11, 2001, and all those who were born in that year or thereafter, should know about it. But considering that in his eyes, the American system of education is so bad it will not teach the history of that event, he volunteered to give the lesson to America's young all by himself.

The first thing that Clifford May did after promising to give a history lesson on 9/11, is that he harked back to the year 1930 at which time a severe economic Depression was taking hold. He also harked back to the First World War that was supposed to end all wars but did not. Thus, instead of talking about 9/11 as promised, Clifford May went on a tangent, blaming the Depression of the 1930s, not on the undisciplined borrowing and wild speculation that took place in an era known to have fostered Savage Capitalism, but blamed the Depression on Socialism that was known then as well (or as badly) as Quantum Symmetry is known today.

But what is it that motivated Clifford May to do that? He did it because there is an ongoing political campaign in America where Socialism has become an issue that Clifford May and his kind are trying to denigrate. So, he used the occasion to play partisan politics. Only then, did he turn his attention to the 9/11 issue.

And this was the moment when Clifford May began to dig a grave for his own silliness. Like every student of history that's familiar with the interaction between Christianity and Islam –– knows, the way to bury yourself in a cesspool of frivolity, is to refer to the utterances of Bernard Lewis, the so-called Jewish historian. It is what Clifford May did, quoting Lewis as having said that “our enemies” are Islamic supremacists fighting a long war against the West, against Judeo-Christian civilization, against Crusaders and Zionists. But the truth is that the Jews played a role in the Christian/Islamic relationship only twice in history. These were the Medieval times and the modern times. Here is how it happened:

Centuries ago, after the fall of the Roman Empire, Europe started to slide into an epoch that came to be known as the Dark Ages. Shortly thereafter, a new and vibrant civilization named Islam, arose in the Arabian Peninsula. Imitating the ancient civilizations––including the Greek and the Roman––of conquering the known world, the Muslims conquered the Middle East and small parts of Christian Europe. What distinguished the relationship that the Arabs had with those they conquered, from the relationship that the Romans had with those they conquered, is that the Romans proved to be brute savages whereas the Arabs proved to be highly civilized and noble humanists.

Three separate developments took place almost simultaneously. One was the steady European descent into darkness, including a morbid hostility to the kind of knowledge that could threaten the authority of the Church. A second development was that the Muslim Arabs rehabilitated the classics of the ancient civilizations while encouraging the kind of research in physics and chemistry that have led to modern science. A third development was that the Jews asserted their kinship to the Semitic Arab race, and then attempted to impose Arab science (especially chemistry) on the Christians of Europe. This caused the Europeans to believe that the Jews brought “black magic” to destroy Christianity. It is how and why anti-Semitism, encompassing Arabs and Jews, flourished in Europe, as exemplified by the trials of the witches and the staging of the Spanish Inquisition.

As to modern times, the Jews played a role in the relationship between Christians and Muslims when they tried to play Sunni against Shia, siding with Shiite Iran against Sunni Arabs or vice-versa depending on the direction of the diplomatic wind. The Jews also invented the Judeo-Christian designation, and played to the hilt the game of motivating America's Christians to hate the Muslims. The Jewish goal was to mobilize the resources of the country, and have the Christians go after the Muslims at home and abroad.

And this is what the Clifford May article is still trying to accomplish. But after 18 years of Jewish inspired futility and staggering waste, America said enough was enough. Clifford May and those like him did not appreciate that rejection and so, they turned their attention to the generation that's in school and prone to being brainwashed. The trick that May and company are using, consists of enticing the young to love the Jews by hating both the Muslims and their own parents who, according to Clifford May, failed to start a hate-Islam campaign by associating Islam with terrorism. In fact, this is how May ended his article:

“One American administration after another has fought this conflict without a coherent global strategy to defeat or contain [Islam.] If you're 18, you must be sorely disappointed by how much your elders have not achieved since the year you were born”.

Knowing that the Jews never stop doing the wrong thing, did you think what might come next? If you didn’t here is a hint: They will unleash a full-blown propaganda campaign to take control of the schools so as to “educate” America’s youngsters the way that the rabbis educated the political elites of yesteryear, and had them turn the Congress into a graveyard for braindead zombies.

The moaning Voice of Defeat, Regret and Battle

If you're of an age that allows you to remember what the political situation was like half a century ago, and if you were attuned at the time to what the Arabs were saying to each other during those eventful years, you'll have to think that these people were a clairvoyant lot.

Those were the years when the political and diplomatic situations in the region engendered a great deal of what the locals saw as no more and no less than everyday balderdash, put out in the casual style of the Arab Street. But those who followed the discussions from afar, must have thought that the balderdash could have been prophesies with a real chance of coming true.

It is that the ordinary people of the Arab and Muslim Worlds were discussing America's decision to replace the old colonial powers for doing mischief in the Middle East. America did it to support the Jewish scheme of reviving and pushing forward the colonial project of slicing the Arab World, aiming to dominate its parts separately. Out of this line of Arab thinking, came the suggestion that the defeat of the Zionist scheme, as planned by the Jews, will happen only when America itself will have been diminished.

Little did these people know at the time, that they were foretelling what will happen half a century later. More than that, little did they know the reality that it will be the Jews themselves who will diminish America. In fact, this is what happened when the Jews sucked more out of America than America was equipped to give them.

You can get a glimpse as to how that sordid history developed over the decades when you read the article that came under the title: “Iran gives Hezbollah precision-guided terrorism,” written by Jed Babbin, and published on September 8, 2019 in The Washington Times. It is worth mentioning that Babbin was undersecretary of Defense in the Bush (41) administration, a time when the Jews were hard at work implementing their demonic scheme.

The best way to look at Babbin's article is through the lens of lamentations. Having done little to curtail the Jewish exploitation of America when he was in government, Jed Babbin looks back at those years when America was arming Israel to be more powerful than “all its neighbors put together.” Now my friend, try to imagine the man looking at the result of that policy, and asking himself: What were we thinking?

There is only one thing for him to think about now. It is to regret that America was hypnotized by the Jews so deeply, he and the rest of the American brass could not foresee that the Arabs and the Muslims will respond to America's moves of escalating the armament of Israel by accelerating their own armament. Not only did the Arabs and the Muslims buy the weapons where they could find them, they started to produce and develop the kind of weapons that would meet their specifications and fill their needs.

And that's what the Jed Babbin article is about. What follows is a condensed version of his lamentations:

“The war between Israel and Hezbollah is continuous. Israel has never succeeded in deterring Hezbollah, which has accelerated the conversion of its missiles into precision-guided munitions (PGMs), thus converting its arsenal to more effective weapons. It possesses at least 130,000 rockets, missiles and hundreds of short-range missiles that can be targeted with accuracy. Israel relies on two anti-missile systems that can be overwhelmed if the enemy launches large numbers of rockets and missiles at once. Hezbollah has shifted to a tactic aimed to do that. With PGMs, Hezbollah could destroy Israeli government buildings, inflict great casualties on Israeli reserves and damage on Israel's air force. [Hezbollah] may be betting that Trump will be defeated in 2020 and that a Democrat successor would be weaker on Israel's defense. If Hezbollah launches another war, the casualties and damage will be enormous. Hezbollah moves weapons around, and Israel can't locate them to prevent the mass launch of rockets and missiles”.

After a litany of this length and complexity, Jed Babbin could do nothing better than repeat the usual Jewish advice that––in fact––did more than anything else to diminish America in the first place. He recommended that America bomb Iran to deter Hezbollah, thus protect Israel.

But because the Jews know that the American people no longer tolerate someone advising their military to commit one more act of savagery to protect Israel, Babbin made his recommendation in the most subtle of manners. Here is how he did it:

“It's maddening that we have no way to influence Iran's decisions other than increasing economic sanctions against it. At some point, perhaps when Iran orders Hezbollah to war, we will have to conclude that economic sanctions just aren't enough”.

Translation: Bomb not only Hezbollah, but Iran as well.

And this is another chapter in the long history of the Jews––a history that's written in hundreds of chapters, each of them narrating the story of Jewish misery, but each telling it as a different version of the one and same story.

Rumbling from the deep warning of imminent Doom

America should know by now that nothing the Jews do or ask for, can be an isolated undertaking.

Even when one of them says or does something on a whim, a pundit of the mob will come up with a way to tie that whim to the ongoing debate. And he'll make the utterance sound like it was an expression of someone's stream of consciousness that just decided to burst out at the time that it did.

For this reason, it is important for the rest of us to read every article that's written by a Jew or a lackey thereof, as being indicative of the mosaic that the Jews are putting together with the aim of achieving whatever goal they happen to work on at the time. Their goal at this moment, being to take control of the American system of education from kindergarten to college, an article that was written by Chrissy Clark should sound the alarm among those who will read it.

The article came under the title: “Rashida Tlaib Poses For Pictures With Anti-Israel Group That Endorses Terrorism,” and was published on September 7, 2019 in The Federalist. Let it be known that Rashida Tlaib is an American of Palestinian descent that was elected to represent a district of some three quarter of a million Americans in their federal House of Representatives. And let it be known that the group which Chrissy Clark accuses of endorsing terrorism, is none other than the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM).

But the thing is that when you go over the Clark article looking for an explanation as to why she accuses PYM of endorsing terrorism, you find no more than a single regurgitation that's so disgusting, it would sicken even the stray dogs and alley cats of the neighborhood. See for yourself. This is how the Clark regurgitation went: “PYM, a group that has voiced support for terrorism, reported the Washington Free Beacon earlier today.” That's it, my friend. This is all that's needed in Jewish circles to convince the primitive mob of pundits and editors of rag-like yellow journalism, that something is true and fit to print.

But checking your sources and ascertaining the veracity of what you're saying, especially when it comes to accusing someone of terrorism, is such a fundamental requirement of journalism in civilized societies, you wonder how it happened that American journalism sank to that level of mediocrity. In fact, the situation is so bad now, a new term must be added to the English language: criminal mediocrity.

What happened to American journalism is so drastic a development, the baffling question is this: how did it happen to America? Well, it was the Jews who brought the tendency to America at a time when the country was so naive, it did not realize what the Jews were doing to it. And you don't have to be a historian to ponder that question. The dirty tricks of the trade are all there, in Chrissy Clark's article, and you can go over them yourself. It is that Clark seems to believe the American public continues to be as naive as it was half a century ago. And so, she dumped her verbal manure into the lap of that public the same way that the rabbis used to do things half a century ago.

You'll find that Clark has revived the dirty tricks which served the rabbis well in times past. She did so by duplicating their method of insidiously permeating the marketplace of ideas with concepts that have the effect of sneaking into the vault where the advanced concepts of Civilization are preserved, and setting the place on fire. Here are a couple of examples:

When two groups are fighting –– be they two armies, two militias or one army and one militia –– the worst that can happen is the killing of a soldier that has surrendered. By contrast, the highest form of civilized conduct is to advocate taking enemy soldiers as prisoners rather than killing them. But instead of citing this article of Civilization to praise members of the PYM, Chrissy Clark chided the Palestinian youngsters for advocating what she called “kidnapping” Israeli soldiers rather than killing them. This woman is so backward, she qualifies being categorized as criminally mediocre.

Look what else she wrote: “A pole of Palestinians found that half believe the goal of intifada is to end the existence of Israel, publicly recognized as the homeland of the Jews.” The truth is that no such pole exists. But you'll find poles that say the racist regime calling itself Zionist is unsustainable. It will be a good thing if the intifada defeated it and replaced it with a more civilized form of government.

And look what else she did. She said that Israel was publicly recognized as the homeland of the Jews. If you're puzzled as to how a homeland can be recognized publicly, don't be hard on yourself believing that you're missing something. You're not. It is the Jews who are missing something. These people don't just bite the hand that feeds them, they chomp the head that saves them. But guess what. In so doing, they chomp their own heads as well.

Here is what's behind that satanic form of Jewish communication. The United Nations (UN) is the only world body that has the power to legally give the Jews a homeland, and it did. But the moment that the Jews got there, they armed themselves and went after the disarmed indigenous Palestinians, and robbed them of their lands.

Now the Jews occupy more than ten times what the UN had given them, and no one at the UN likes it. So the Jews developed the habit of attacking the UN, denying that it gave them a homeland. Imagine the people that blow their entrails out of their bellies crying “holocaust denier,” when someone questions a story about the Holocaust, turning around and denying that the UN gave them a homeland in Palestine. Whose head will they chomp next?

The Jews believe they are the smartest thing in the Universe for being the “only” ones capable of pulling a stunt like that. But you know what, my friend? They have proven themselves to be the dumbest thing in the Universe. And here is why:

The Jewish homeland that's confined within the 1948 border is owned by the Jews legally. Thus, no matter what happens, they can always count on the world to stand with them if someone tried to push them out of it. But now that the Jews are denying that the UN gave them that piece of property, they are forfeiting their legal right to it. This being the case, the next time that Israel gets into a serious fight with a neighbor, and America does not come to the rescue, the enemy will have the right to end not only the Zionist regime, but the entire Jewish experiment in Arab Palestine.

Now that America knows how and why its journalism became debased to the extent that it did, it should be able to work out a way to get it back in shape. Not only that, but neglecting to oppose the rabbis “educating” the American public about Jewish sensitivities having led to mediocrity, America will never want to hand the Jews control of its educational system where they plan to “educate” America’s children all about the Holocaust so as to produce backward primitives of the Chrissy Clark variety.