If you want to conquer America but don't
know how to do it, there is a lesson for you. It was given by Clifford D. May.
It is an article he wrote pretending to accomplish one thing, but accomplishing
something else.
The article came under the title: “Another
unhappy September 11 anniversary,” and the subtitle: “The United States
continues to fight erratically and without a coherent strategy.” The article
was published on September 10, 2019 in The Washington Times.
Clifford May's point is that a big event
(later named 9/11) took place 18 years ago on September 11, 2001, and all those
who were born in that year or thereafter, should know about it. But considering
that in his eyes, the American system of education is so bad it will not teach
the history of that event, he volunteered to give the lesson to America's young
all by himself.
The first thing that Clifford May did
after promising to give a history lesson on 9/11, is that he harked back to the
year 1930 at which time a severe economic Depression was taking hold. He also
harked back to the First World War that was supposed to end all wars but did
not. Thus, instead of talking about 9/11 as promised, Clifford May went on a
tangent, blaming the Depression of the 1930s, not on the undisciplined
borrowing and wild speculation that took place in an era known to have fostered
Savage Capitalism, but blamed the Depression on Socialism that was known then
as well (or as badly) as Quantum Symmetry is known today.
But what is it that motivated Clifford May
to do that? He did it because there is an ongoing political campaign in America
where Socialism has become an issue that Clifford May and his kind are trying
to denigrate. So, he used the occasion to play partisan politics. Only then,
did he turn his attention to the 9/11 issue.
And this was the moment when Clifford May
began to dig a grave for his own silliness. Like every student of history
that's familiar with the interaction between Christianity and Islam –– knows,
the way to bury yourself in a cesspool of frivolity, is to refer to the
utterances of Bernard Lewis, the so-called Jewish historian. It is what
Clifford May did, quoting Lewis as having said that “our enemies” are Islamic
supremacists fighting a long war against the West, against Judeo-Christian
civilization, against Crusaders and Zionists. But the truth is that the Jews
played a role in the Christian/Islamic relationship only twice in history.
These were the Medieval times and the modern times. Here is how it happened:
Centuries ago, after the fall of the Roman
Empire, Europe started to slide into an epoch that came to be known as the Dark
Ages. Shortly thereafter, a new and vibrant civilization named Islam, arose in
the Arabian Peninsula. Imitating the ancient civilizations––including the Greek
and the Roman––of conquering the known world, the Muslims conquered the Middle
East and small parts of Christian Europe. What distinguished the relationship
that the Arabs had with those they conquered, from the relationship that the
Romans had with those they conquered, is that the Romans proved to be brute
savages whereas the Arabs proved to be highly civilized and noble humanists.
Three separate developments took place
almost simultaneously. One was the steady European descent into darkness,
including a morbid hostility to the kind of knowledge that could threaten the
authority of the Church. A second development was that the Muslim Arabs
rehabilitated the classics of the ancient civilizations while encouraging the
kind of research in physics and chemistry that have led to modern science. A
third development was that the Jews asserted their kinship to the Semitic Arab
race, and then attempted to impose Arab science (especially chemistry) on the
Christians of Europe. This caused the Europeans to believe that the Jews
brought “black magic” to destroy Christianity. It is how and why anti-Semitism,
encompassing Arabs and Jews, flourished in Europe, as exemplified by the trials
of the witches and the staging of the Spanish Inquisition.
As to modern times, the Jews played a role
in the relationship between Christians and Muslims when they tried to play
Sunni against Shia, siding with Shiite Iran against Sunni Arabs or vice-versa
depending on the direction of the diplomatic wind. The Jews also invented the
Judeo-Christian designation, and played to the hilt the game of motivating
America's Christians to hate the Muslims. The Jewish goal was to mobilize the
resources of the country, and have the Christians go after the Muslims at home
and abroad.
And this is what the Clifford May article
is still trying to accomplish. But after 18 years of Jewish inspired futility and
staggering waste, America said enough was enough. Clifford May and those like
him did not appreciate that rejection and so, they turned their attention to
the generation that's in school and prone to being brainwashed. The trick that
May and company are using, consists of enticing the young to love the Jews by
hating both the Muslims and their own parents who, according to Clifford May,
failed to start a hate-Islam campaign by associating Islam with terrorism. In
fact, this is how May ended his article:
“One American administration after another
has fought this conflict without a coherent global strategy to defeat or
contain [Islam.] If you're 18, you must be sorely disappointed by how much your
elders have not achieved since the year you were born”.