When you see someone showing signs of
illness, how do you know that he is suffering from a Jewish disease? You know
it when you see the self-designated experts consider every possibility except
that the disease could be Jewish. This being an analogy, let me give you an
example that's taken from real life.
When young women in North America started
wearing the burka, the media got filled with criticism to the effect that these
women were being forced by their male elders to wear the symbol of servitude
and inferiority to comply with their culture, a trait they imported to the
Continent instead of adapting to the culture into which they came, having fled
the system of oppression they could no longer stand.
But then, it was revealed that the young
women in burka were born in North America to mothers who never wore a burka
even in the old country, and did not like their daughters wearing that thing.
The truth was that the young women, who grew up in a culture that discriminated
against them for being who they were –– having associated them with the false
stereotypes that the Jewish media created about their elders –– decided on
their own to wear the burka. They did it to protest the ignorance and real
oppression that was brought to them by media screwballs, and taken up by a
society that was totally misled.
This is what happened a few years ago, a
situation that materialized due to the unrelenting Jewish portrayal of the
Arabs and the Muslims as oppressors of women. But having lasted long enough to
irritate many good people, the false criticism was debunked eventually.
Unsurprisingly, however, those same Jews have now organized themselves to pull
another trick, having put together a new plan to control something else.
Now, the Jews have their eyes on the
colleges and the universities. They began devising a scheme they hope will lead
them to the control of those institutions and so, they started to throw false
accusations to the effect that the students were going down the abyss, not
because of something they started, but because their elders –– meaning the
professors and the administrators –– are pushing them over the cliff.
You'll find an account of this nonsense in
an article that came under the title: “Killing free speech on campus,” and the
subtitle: “Why silencing students is a recipe for disaster,” written by Cliff
Maloney, and published on September 26, 2019 in The Washington Times. Here is
the passage that reveals the writer's state of mind: “If you ask an everyday
American to describe what they think when hearing the word 'censorship,' you'll
hear about college administrators using intimidation, tricks and managerial red
tape to silence students”.
To illustrate his point, Cliff Maloney who
is president of an outfit calling itself Young Americans for Liberty, cited the
example of Mike Brown who was, “dragged into the office of the campus police
chief” because he violated the Assembly Regulations section of the school's
handbook which “requires that students obtain administrative approval and wait
a minimum of three days before gathering for any purpose on campus”.
Guess who Mike Brown is? “He is an
activist with Young Americans for Liberty's National Fight for Free Speech
campaign,” says Cliff Maloney, president of that same outfit and author of the
article that's doing the complaining. And why is Maloney complaining? He is
complaining because, “Mike Brown was gathering and talking with other students
about criminal justice reform.” But why did Brown not follow the school
procedures by first obtaining administrative approval and waiting three days
before gathering on campus?
Neither Cliff Maloney nor Mike Brown gave
a good answer to that question. But a rash of incidents that happened almost
two decades ago –– a time when those two were toddlers –– can explain Mike
Brown's behavior. It is that right after the tragedy of 9/11, rules were
proclaimed that prohibited air travelers from carrying weapons and other such
items in their luggage. No regular passengers were caught violating those rules
at any airport, but a number of journalists were.
Their excuse was that being journalists,
they had the right to check the adequacy of the airport security, therefore
must not be punished for doing their job. And the response they got was that a
smart Aleck journalist can never be considered smart for breaking the rules,
and for hiding behind his profession. The same goes for Mike Brown and Cliff
Maloney who believe they did the right thing violating the rules of the school
for what they say were good reasons. Here is how Maloney put it:
“With half a million Americans
incarcerated for drug-related offenses and $47 billion spent every year in the
war on drugs, issues like this are what we should be encouraging young people
to talk about. The students of today will tackle these issues tomorrow, but
stripping them of the opportunity to have these conversations robs society of
the solutions that might one day come from them”.
And this is precisely why people like Mike
Brown and Cliff Maloney need to be kept under adult supervision. They could not
reason that they would have been better off respecting the rules of the school.
Had they done that, they would have accomplished all that they wanted three
days later, with the blessings of the school administrators who would have
contributed to their effort materially and a number of other ways.
Come to think of it, the editors of The
Washington Times, need someone to tell them they are contributing to the
unhealthy division on campus by publicizing only one side of the debate. This
is what scares the group of students on the other side, and the reason why they
want to be left alone, free from the harassment of the Browns and the Maloneys
who are rebellious ignoramus that believe they are the smartest thing to grace
the Planet since Moses, simply because they are encouraged by the Jewish
controlled media.
Brown and Maloney were the two who failed
to see that the rules of the school did not prohibit talking about the drug
problem in America; the rules only required that a permission be obtained three
days in advance so that the school may prepare for the successful and peaceful
unfolding of the event.