When the Arabs erupted in anger at America, and when they
were followed by Muslims everywhere in the world in response to the trailer of
a film that insults the prophet Mohammed, Mitt Romney who is running for President
of the United States, said something to the effect that President Barack Obama
-- against whom he is running – has sympathized with these people which makes
it that he apologized to them for something that represents American values. A
number of what can be called mouthpieces of the Jewish lobby took their cue
from Romney and ventured the opinion that the Arabs and the Muslims do not
understand what freedom of expression means.
There are three concepts to discuss here. The first is the
meaning of freedom of expression. From the looks of it, Romney considers
anything that is said to be expression, therefore anyone and everyone has the
right to say anything at anytime and anywhere. Apparently, this man who wants
to be president of the United
States is not aware of the principle which
says: “You cannot shout fire in a crowded theater.” However, whether or not he
is ignorant of the existence of that principle, he must be aware that a number
of people – on whose side he firmly stands -- have advocated the bombing of
Iran for reasons which include the accusation (true or false) that the
president of that country has denied the Holocaust.
What we are talking about here is the bombing of a country
of nearly 80 million people because its president was accused of saying, among
other things, that he has doubts about a historical event. In fact, people go
to jail in Europe for that same offense, and
someone actually did serve time for that. As to America, if you deny the
Holocaust, you are as good as dead professionally and socially which is worse
than going to jail for a few months or a few years then be out and free again.
And yet, Romney has never advocated the bombing of say, the Jewish Anti
Defamation League in New York
whose purpose in life is to curtail freedom of speech in Romney's own country.
Why the double standard?
But in the end, does this mean that Mitt Romney and his
Jewish advisers are so hopelessly out of touch with reality, they can never be
made to understand the bitter truth that they have no clue what freedom of
expression means? Will these people ever realize that when Netanyahu guarantees
to his collaborators he knows “how to do these things” he means to say things
that have serious implications? It is that he knows how to mobilize his mouthpieces
in America and organize them to abuse the First Amendment past the limits of
what is reasonable, thus pressure and force any American in charge of anything
to hand them what they ask for even if that is the launch of a war against a
Muslim nation in which American boys and girls will die killing others. The
Arabs know this truth; the Muslims know this truth -- for God's sake why can't
Romney educate himself enough to know it also? If this can be done, would he
then do something to blunt it rather than fall prey to it?
The second concept has to do with the fact that the film in
question was not meant to be the free expression of someone. In case Mitt
Romney is ignorant of what a film is, here is a brief lesson. A film is a
collaborative effort that is realized when a script writer, a director, a
producer, a number of actors and a host of technical people come together and
work on a project. They all know what the work is about, and everyone plays
their part exactly right to transmit to the audience the exact meaning of what
they collectively wish to express. Yet, the truth came out early on that the
actors of that film, among others, were duped into believing they were
participating in one kind of film when in reality, they were deceived into
making another kind of film.
Given that Mitt Romney must have known about this, does it
mean he is telling the world that American values are a pile of fraudulent
pretenses? Does it mean that he considers himself to be an acceptable fraud and
a pile of delicious pretenses? Does he mean to say that President Obama has the
duty to read the Constitution the way that he reads it, and uphold fake
principles to satisfy the demands of Netanyahu and the Jewish lobby? What the
hell is Romney saying to himself, to his compatriots and to the world?
The third concept has to do with the fact that the maker of
that film is an ex-con who has been in and out of jail several times for
committing fraud among other infractions, and is now out on probation. Did
Romney see in this man values that make him an ideal American individual? Did
Romney raise his children on these principles? Will he exert influence to have
his grandchildren raised with the same principles? If not, then why the hell
does he want America's children to grow up and believe that this is the example
they should die for, and die trying to shove down the throat of the Iranians,
the Arabs and the rest of the Muslim world? Why do you want this Mitt, why do
you want it?
I'll tell you why he wants it. He wants it because he wants
to be president, and he believes that in America, the way to get to that post
is to prostitute himself to the fake organizations that call themselves Jewish
even though they could not deliver the Jewish vote. But they have gobs of
ill-gotten money with which to reward him if he plays the role of devoted
prostitute, or punish him if he fails to behave like the sissy boy who is
supposed to turn hot to trot at the sight of his sex master getting horny.
Romney gets hot enough, in fact, to maintain that his master has a culture
superior to that of the Palestinians then prove it by doing the political
equivalent of pulling his pants down and bending over to take in campaign
contributions from foreigners in a foreign land. This was a filthy act, Mitt;
it was filthy, filthy, filthy.
And this brings us to three of his surrogates. The first is
Jonah Goldberg who wrote a column published on September 14, 2012 in the
National Review Online under the title: “Misplaced Blame for the Embassy
Attacks” and the subtitle: “Are we really ready to throw out the First
Amendment to appease lynch mobs?” In it, he says this: “...the makers of this
film, who clearly hoped to start trouble.” Even this character Goldberg
understood that reality, but what is bugging him is that he watched a
television show in America which he describes as follows: “It's interesting to
see ... liberals in ... agreement with ... Egypt which implored the U.S.
government to take legal action against the filmmakers. Interestingly, not even
the ... Egyptian government demanded these men be tried for murder.”
Obviously, someone in Egypt knows more about the way that
the American system of justice works than does Jonah Goldberg who, perhaps,
never learned that Alphonse Capone was nailed -- not because of his Mafia
activities -- but for evading taxes. All of which says that Goldberg and Romney
need to learn more about their country, at least to sound better than a fart
each time that they feel the itch to open the mouth and compare themselves to
the boys in the back alleys of Arab capitals who prove each and every time to
have a better sense of where America stands than those who live inside the
Washington Beltway nourished only by the moral syphilis that is endlessly being
ejaculated in their ears.
The second article was published in the Huffington Post on
September 14, 2012. It was written by Sabrina Siddiqui about Michelle Bachmann
who is still out there running around and running off the mouth as she
campaigns for Romney. The article has the title: “Embassy Attacks In Libya And
Egypt Expose Obama's 'Genius' Foreign Policy.” In it, Bachmann is quoted as
saying the following: “This isn't just about a movie … This was an intentional
act that was done by radical Islamists who seek to impose their set of beliefs.”
Too bad, Bachmann does not read Arabic because one of the
signs would have given her a hint as to what the anger was about. The sign can
be translated into something like this: “Anything but the Prophet.” And this
would have told her that the demonstrators felt they had been at the receiving
end for too long already without responding to the malefactors and without
warning that a red line was about to be crossed. By insulting the Prophet,
someone crossed that line, and the time had come to tell America they
will from now on fight fire with fire. They don't do this to impose their set
of beliefs; they do it because they know that when America escalates the attacks on
them to this level, the next step will be to: bomb and bomb and bomb them
again.
These people feel they have been bombed long enough; their
governments have not protected them and so – like good militias -- they are
taking the matter in their own hands the way that UBL did, and they will fight
back. They don't just say give me liberty or give me death, they live the
concept because they know something that America forgot; they know what freedom
really means because no pastor ever got on television and told the to worship
the Jews because these are their gods. There is no God but God, they say, no
Elah but Allah. For those who do not know Arabic, the word Allah has no plural
thus, to speak of the gods of mythology, for example, the Arabs use the word
Elah which in the plural becomes Alehah. As to Allah, He is the God of the
three divine religions as well as everything else in the Universe.
Now to the next article which is about the bombing of yet
another Muslim country. It has the title: “The Abandonment” and the subtitle:
“Not since its birth has Israel
been so cast adrift by its closest ally.” It was written by Charles Krauthammer
and published on September 14, 2012 in the National Review Online. What is
remarkable about this article is that Krauthammer lives up to his reputation as
being more intelligent than the crowd in which he operates. This is why he can
learn from his mistakes when it is so impossible for the others to do likewise.
Talking about Iran which he recommended bombing
several times before, he now conveys the same old ideas but without actually
repeating them word for word. Instead, what he does is begin by clobbering
President Obama then letting someone else – an expert in the field – repeat the
old refrain. This is how he does it: “The Obama policy is in shambles. Which is
why Cordesman argues that the only way to prevent a nuclear Iran [is] U.S. red lines: deadlines …
benchmark actions that would trigger a response...” The response being the
bombing of that country.
And
bombing Iran
is what Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, has also been calling
for. It is something he has called for loudly and often. But so far, he has
failed to convince the American Administration to do it for him. When something
like this happens, the Israeli leaders who take America for granted but feel
they have now been rebuffed, become physically ill -- a condition that can be
detected in their demeanor as it has in Netanyahu, now showing clinical signs
of turning insane. In the meantime, what their propaganda machine does is put
on a make-believe game to project a brave face – if a fake one -- to the rest
of the world.
That is,
these people pull every trick they can to make the world believe they own America , and
can still get it to do anything they want because the press and the Congress
are a private urinal that is theirs and theirs only. And because the wish of
Netanyahu must be satisfied, they get the Romneys, the Bachmanns and a hundred
other hot to trot sissy boys and girls in the Congress and the media to push
Obama to say yes to Netanyahu, and meet him in New York as soon as possible to
show the world who is master and who is subordinate.
But
everyone involved in this scandalous act if it materializes, knows that nothing
will come of the meeting except the “symbolism” of it which is the way that
they put it themselves. And what would that symbolism look like? It would look
like a number of treasonous and filthy dogs will always be there in America to go
down on their knees and fellate a foreigner for a handful of campaign dollars,
then pressure their president to do likewise. This is the new morality in America , a
horror that was brought to them by the system of multi-Jewish gods preached on
television by pastors who call themselves Christian.
And
these are the values that Romney, Bachmann, Goldberg, Krauthammer, and a
hundred other snorts refer to as being true American values. To uphold them,
safeguard them, protect them and impose them on others, they demand that
American boys and girls be sent to kill and die trying to impose them on people
who are so self-respecting, it will take the crowd of snorts a million years of
evolution to understand the meaning of freedom the way that those other people
understand it, live it and enjoy it.
To these
people freedom is not simply talk; it is a real and tangible thing. May America
rediscover the old heritage it used to enjoy; that which the Anti-Defamation
League and AIPAC have quietly murdered over the decades.