The one thing that Mitt Romney does not seem to understand
is that he cannot scare people by barking at them and yet, barking is what his
Jewish advisers are telling him to do. If he has any wisdom at all, he would
know that the worst thing a superpower (or a has-been superpower) can do is get
into a fight it cannot win because this would be the best way to lose what
little respect it may still have in the world.
The truth is that since WWII – aside from the incursions into the Dominican Republic and in Panama – America has been defeated on the
battlefield everywhere it ventured without being asked to participate by the
Europeans or by the Arabs. It was defeated in Korea ,
Vietnam , Lebanon , Somalia ,
Iraq 2 and Afghanistan where
it went on its own. It was victorious in Iraq
1, the Balkans and Libya
where it was invited to participate.
Romney may think that barking is an electoral ploy he will
not have to honor after the election. Fair enough or maybe not so fair, after
all. But if the people to whom he panders by the fact that he barks at the
Arabs and the Muslims – will not be bothered by a broken promise, the Arabs and
the Muslims will not forget what he tried to do. And they will react in their
own funny way. That is, they will send him a big dose of contempt; a message
that will dare him to show off his big manhood rather than his big mouth.
Don't forget, dear reader, that since Vietnam , the
image that the world has had of the American soldier is that of a proud man
when he is bombing you from the air, but that of a child crying for his mommy
when he is captured. No, nobody is going to tremble in their boots or their
sandals or their bare feet because Romney is barking at them. But if he starts
a fight, they will give him one that is so asymmetric, he will never forget it,
especially that every soldier they capture will risk having his manhood chopped
off and sent to his commanding officer. This will be done in retaliation for
Abu Ghraib and for the pissing on the bodies of dead Afghan soldiers. You see,
these people too believe in an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and a dick
for a dick.
If you want to see how dumb Romney's Jewish advisers are,
read the article that came under his name in the October 1, 2012 edition of the
Wall Street Journal. It has the title: “A New Course for the Middle East” and
the subtitle: “Restore the three sinews of American influence: our economic
strength, our military strength and the strength of our values.” Of course, you
meet the sentence making up that subtitle later in the article, upon which you
immediately understand that the article was written by advisers who first
consider themselves Jews working for the benefit of Israel ,
and then consider themselves Americans who are given the opportunity to exploit
America for the benefit of Israel .
This reality becomes apparent because the article is not
about America or about America in the world; rather it is about America in the Middle East .
As the title suggests, what you see everywhere from the first paragraph to the
last is a discussion that concerns the diminishing influence of America in the
Middle East, and the effect this has on the security of Israel. Thus, when the
Jewish speechwriters say that America
must restore the sinews of its influence, which they identify as being the
economy, the military and the values, they indicate that they want the
restoration to work for Israel
first and foremost. Only if there is a leftover, will that go to the American
people.
You may think they would want to make a big effort to hide
the truth about their allegiance but they don't. They only make a small effort
that leaves them as transparent as an open book. They do so by first stating
the following: “Disturbing developments are sweeping across the greater Middle East .” They enumerate those developments then say
this about them: “They are major issues that put our security at risk.” Here,
the speechwriters count on you to think that when they say “our security” you
will take it to mean America 's
security when, in fact, their only concern is the welfare and the security of Israel .
And you notice this fact right away because you see them
lament that: “In Egypt , the
Muslim Brotherhood has come to power, and the country's peace treaty with Israel hangs in
the balance,” when in the subtitle they talked about strengthening American
values. Well, my friends, it was the Muslim Brotherhood that strengthened
American values in the Middle East by getting
elected through legitimate means. But now you see the Jewish writers lament that
the old regime in Egypt
– which they seem to have cherished without ever admitting it – is no more. So
you scream: How in Jewish hell do they propose to strengthen America 's democratic values in the Middle East ? Bring back the old regime in Egypt ?
Resuscitate Gaddafi and restore him to power? What in Yiddish hell are these
people moaning about?
But if they do not see a free election in Egypt as being
a step in the direction of American values, what do they see as being a step in
the direction of American values? What a question! What a question this is, my
friend! You really want to know what the answer is? Okay, I'll tell you what it
is but brace yourself because these people took a convoluted route before
putting the answer down. Look at this passage: “by stepping away from our
allies, President Obama has heightened the prospect of conflict and
instability.” You know what this is about?
I'll tell you what it's about. It's an endorsement of the
threat that Netanyahu has been making for a time, a threat to the effect that
he will launch an attack on Iran knowing full well that Iran has the
wherewithal to retaliate and cream him in the process. When the creaming will
start happening, America
will be forced to do what it has done before which is to come to the rescue of Israel .
Thus, to attempt suicide so as to pull America into a
war it cannot afford is what the Romney speechwriters call a step in the
direction of American values. Get it now? These characters are saying you must
forget about free elections in Egypt
because this is too girlish to be considered American values. Look instead at
the attempt to commit suicide which is so manly, it is American values through
and through.
And this is why Mitt Romney wants to be President of the United States of America ,
and this is why he wants the American people to vote for him.
Can you believe this?