If the editors of the Wall Street Journal could only see
past the fog of moral syphilis which they help generate in partnership with the
rest of the Jewish propaganda machine, they would be transformed into a force for
good instead of being the force for evil which they are now. This thought comes
to you clearly when you read their editorial piece: “Hamas's Gaza Victory”
which also has the subtitle: “The cease-fire leaves the terror group intact and
politically stronger.” It was published on November 23, 2012.
After overcoming your amazement at a title through which
they admit that Hamas scored a victory in its latest encounter with the Israeli
military, you feel let down by a subtitle in which they continue to call Hamas
“a terror group.” You then read the first paragraph of the piece in which they
quote Henry Kissinger who once discussed America 's
war in Vietnam
from the angle of a guerrilla group that takes on a regular army. And when the
editors of the Journal follow that quote by opining: “Regarding Israel 's latest
war against Hamas … the same considerations apply,” you get the feeling they
might be up to something that will redeem them after all.
Believing that the editors of the Journal are setting up to
draw a parallel between the North Vietnamese whose land was not occupied by
America yet fought to liberate South Vietnam that was, you expect to see them
opine at long last that Hamas in Gaza that won the election in all of Palestine
had the right to fight for the liberation of the West Bank which is still
occupied by Israel. But the editors disappoint you because it is not what they
do. Instead, they lament that when a Gaza TV station called the latest
encounter a victory for the resistance, it was not making an idle boast.
They go on to list the accomplishments of Hamas among which
are the following: “Gazans [are] relieved ... the leaders of Hamas emerged
politically intact and strategically stronger … suffered no military defeat …
dared Netanyahu to invade [which he did not] … Israel has agreed to launch no
ground attack or target killings … Hamas not responsible to enforce the
cease-fire on other organizations.” Thus, instead of going back to calling the
Palestinians the freedom fighters they used to be called, the editors of the
Journal continue to call them terrorists having degraded the designation from
freedom fighter to commando to guerrilla to terrorist.
And this is what tells you these people are still plagued by
the fog of moral syphilis they help generate in partnership with the Jewish
propaganda machine. Having looked at the parallel between the Vietnamese war on
the American occupier, and the Palestinian war on the Jewish occupier, they
deny to themselves what they see with their own eyes thus fall victims of the
fog they generate to blind themselves and their readers from seeing the truth
that the rest of the word sees so very clearly. And this is why they cannot
understand someone saying that the terrorist is not the Palestinian who fights
for his freedom but the Jew who kills the freedom fighter for refusing to
submit to his whims.
Having blinded themselves from seeing past the fog of their
own moral syphilis, they now spin the rest of the narrative in a way that is so
contradictory, it rises to the level of a paradox. Thus, to explain Netanyahu's
motives, they say this: “Mr. Netahyahu avoids a costly ground invasion shortly
before a January election.” And you ask yourself, why then did he start the
bombing campaign, sent 15,000 troops to the border with Gaza and mobilized
another 70,000 reservists? They don't answer this question but mention the
public protest in Southern Israel as well as the one texted by an Israel soldier, both of which “may spread in Israel as the
election nears,” they opine.
What's it all about, anyway? you finally ask. And the answer
is that Netanyahu is an out of control terrorist who cannot put a lid on his
violent impulses, or that he and his team have underestimated the force
underlying the cause of the Palestinian people regardless as to who is leading
them at any moment in time. And the truth may prove to be that both hypotheses
are correct. It may prove that Israel
is a terrorist state – as pointed out by many people around the world over the
decades – and that its leaders keep underrating the right of the Palestinian
people, something they do by habit and do it at their peril.
Failing to face this reality and to embrace it, the editors
of the Journal plunge head on into the cesspool of moral syphilis which compels
them to rattle off the worn out observation that “Israel lives in a bad
neighborhood” without admitting that where the Jews have gone throughout
history, they turned the neighborhood into such a bad place, the toxicity of
the culture they carried with them compelled the people of every race and every
creed to disinfect the place after them with gas and with fire.
Then comes the ending of the Wall Street Journal which
contains the obligatory lie that confirms what you have been looking at was
Jewish inspired through and through. The following is how the editors have
formulated the ending this time: “Iran … noticed that the Jewish
state had an opportunity to strike a decisive military blow but declined to do
so under world pressure.” No, you say
to yourself, Israel
did not decline under world pressure, it did this time what it has always done,
which is to bluff.
When on the
contrary, people are alert and the Jew bluffs, the people call the bluff at
which time the Jew chickens out like a Netanyahu.
That's what happened
this time and the world salutes the people of Palestine for their admirable tenacity.