Something happened lately that reminded me of something I
heard some time ago. So let me tell you what I heard before I tell you what
reminded me of it. The occasion was the revelation that the Jewish/Israeli
propaganda machine is now justifying the building of Jewish settlements in
occupied Palestine with the argument that everyone knows this land will
eventually be handed to Israel in a final settlement agreement, so why not
accept the inevitable, and let Israel take the land now, and do with it what it
wants. It is going to happen anyway so why not let it happen now?
This being the most authentic kind of Jewish mentality you
will find anywhere; it naturally provoked the most typical kind of human
response from one of the attendees. He said that by this same logic, we must
note that this sort of mentality will lead the Jews to their next holocaust, so
why not accept the inevitable, and let some crazy maniac out there do what he
wants with the Jews, which is to gas and incinerate them. It is going to happen
anyway so why not let it happen now?
That's what happened some time ago, and what reminded me of
it was the reading of an article which came under the title: “The Exoneration
of Raphael Levy” and the subtitle: “The medieval myth that Jews slaughter
Christians for their blood remains a part of world culture today.” The article
was written by Edmund Levin and published in the Wall Street Journal on
February 3, 2014. That event came to mind because nowhere in the article does
the writer ask the question: What is it that Jews are doing wrong which prompts
the rest of humanity to respond the way that it does?
We know what Israel
is doing now, and we know what its supporters are saying to justify it, both of
which are horrible things. But humanity's negative reaction to the Jewish
mentality did not start now. In fact, long before the creation of Israel ,
something about the Jewish culture made those who convert to the religion
behave in such a way as to stir a violent response in the internal organs of
perfectly normal human beings. That response has a name; it is called visceral
hatred. And when enough people get exposed to the Jewish mentality, and when
they begin to experience similar responses, the stage is set for another pogrom
or holocaust to occur.
Edmund Levin tells the story of what Christians did to Jews,
going back hundreds of years, as a result of what came to be known as the blood
libel. It has to do with the “myth that Jews require the blood of Christians,
especially of children, and routinely slaughter them to obtain it.” Now you
ask: where and how would a myth like that originate, and why would it persist
for this length of time? Could it be that no effort was made to expose the myth
as being a lie? Or could it be that things are done by the victims themselves
to keep the myth alive, and lend it credibility?
Well, according to the article, efforts were made to educate
the public but despite them, more people in Poland today believe that Jews use
Christian blood for their ritual purposes. And there is also this: “Neither
papal bulls nor the proclamations of kings and emperors could put an end to the
blood libel.” So if you ask why that is, you cannot escape the conclusion that
there must be currents countering such efforts. And the first thing that comes
to mind is that the Jewish leaders have the bad habit of going to the people at
the top, and ask them to talk down to the people at the bottom, telling them
(or educating them) as to what ideas they must adopt and what ideas they must
reject. It's a futile effort that always backfires.
Instead of doing what is expected of it, that approach links
the Jews with the people at the top of society who are seen to exploit the
people at the bottom. In time, the average people begin to form an opinion to
the effect that the Jews are drawing into their cabal the influential big wigs
with whom they conspire to exploit them. This gives the Jews the image of
bloodsuckers and parasites. It may only be a metaphor, but it is not far
removed from the legend which affirms that the Jews feed on the blood of
Christian children.
But what else could there be that suggests calling someone a
bloodsucker and a parasite will transform the metaphor into reality in the
minds of people? Well, there is the story of King Herod who ordered the killing
of all babies below a certain age to make sure that Jesus – the heralded future
king of the Jews – will be dead before he can challenge Herod to the throne of
the kingdom. Is that it? Is that all there is to the story? No; there is more.
In fact, this is not the only time that Jews have been associated with the
killing of children.
Look at the Jewish bible, and you'll find it full – from
cover to cover – with stories that have to do with the killing children, and
the spilling of their blood. From Abraham whom God ordered to kill his own son,
to Solomon who wanted to cut a baby in pieces, to the warlords who ordered
their soldiers to kill the children of enemies in front of the parents to make
the latter suffer the most, the Jewish religion is soaked with the blood of
children. This is not a bible of religion; it is a book of blood.
But using the blood of children to make matzo? Where did
that come from? That, my friend, is none other than the story of Passover. It
is a story, according to which the “nation” of Israel came to be. This is the
bible story that tells how the Jews killed the first born in every Egyptian
family, robbed the place of all its treasures, made unleavened bread (the
forerunner of matzo) not to waste time waiting for it to rise, and ran out of
Egypt with the loot, and with blood on their hands if not in their stomachs.
What the Jews did next was to raid the land of milk and honey called Palestine , and looted its
inhabitants as well.
What happens to this day is that the Jews celebrate that
horror on the day of Passover. They celebrate instead of recognize that – true
or false – those stories must be condemned because they describe not a religion
but the kind of savagery that does two things. First, it makes ordinary people
view the Jews as being savage not because of their genetic disposition (they
are converts from all races) but because of their religious teachings. Second,
believing in those stories makes the Jews behave so badly, they stir the
internal organs of normal people who then develop a visceral hatred for the
Jews.