Anyone that is moderately familiar with science would have
heard of the perpetual motion machine; something that can never be built
because it would violate one of the most fundamental laws of physics. But for
several centuries before the principles of thermodynamics were formulated at
the end of the nineteenth century, the idea of a perpetual motion machine
preoccupied many minds as well as their time. But now that the idea has been
discarded, and no one tries to build such a machine, the concept has
transformed into a metaphor that is used to describe the never ending efforts
of someone that never stops doing the useless thing.
An example of that is the effort of the Jews to gain control
of all of Palestine
by sabotaging the moves made by the Palestinians to bring an end to the status
quo. So far, the Palestinians have tried to come to an equitable arrangement
with the Israelis or, failing this, to take their case for arbitration before
an international body that would be free of direct Jewish influence or the
influence of America
which is shaped by the Jewish lobby.
And so, having exploded a thousand volcanoes of the belly as
they howled their outrage at Secretary of State John Kerry for trying to revive
the peace process in a way that is even-handed, you see the Jewish leaders come
around and say that the peace process need not end here. They came up with
suggestions that basically say to America: use your power and influence to (1)
freeze the Palestinians where they are, (2) fend off the other powers,
especially the Europeans, who will surely try to interfere, (3) supply Israel
with money and weapons, (4) make Israel's talking point your own and run around
the world amplifying them, (5) put pressure on the Palestinians to hand
Palestine to the Jews, and (6) put pressure on the Arab countries to pressure
the Palestinians to accept the new “old” Jewish suggestions.
You can see all this in two recent articles, one written by
an Israeli; the other by an American Jewish leader. The first came under the
title: “A New Plan for Peace in Palestine ”
and the subtitle: “Dismantle the security barrier in the West bank. Let most
Palestinians who live there govern themselves.” It was written by Naftali
Bennett who is Israel 's
minister of the economy. It was published in the Wall Street Journal on May 21,
2014. The second article came under the title: “Open a Middle Road to Mideast
Peace” and was written by Dennis Ross who once pretended to represent America's
views while negotiating peace in the Middle East, but was in reality more
Jewish than the Pope is Catholic. His article was published in the New York
Times on May 23, 2014.
Bennett calls his concoction “Stability Plan” which he says
can be achieved when “Israel
allow[s] Palestinians complete freedom of movement, which requires removing all
roadblocks and checkpoints in the West Bank .”
Not realizing what he is divulging, the Israeli minister is saying that in Israel ,
they always knew what the world has been telling them mainly that the
roadblocks and checkpoints are a major source of instability in the region.
But that's not all because there is also the matter of what
he calls the security barrier; a construction that the world has called the
“apartheid wall.” Of this, Bennett says: “In particular, Israel should
dismantle the security barrier erected throughout the last decade.” So you want
to know why the Israelis erected it in the first place, and what they think of
it now. Bennett speaks his mind on both these issues in a roundabout way that
betrays the true motives of the Israelis.
He says that the excuse at the time was to “defend against
Palestinian attacks during the Second Intifada.” But the Intifada took only
days to exhaust itself whereas the building of the apartheid wall took a decade
to complete. And this says that the Israeli minister is now admitting what the
world has been saying, mainly that the wall was erected to separate the peoples
and to render impossible the creation of a viable and contiguous Palestinian
state. This means they were planning to maintain the Palestinians in a walled
ghetto as second class citizens in what used to be their own country.
If this was their excuse then, what is the excuse they
prepare for the future? Bennett tells what that is: “Many Israelis credit the
barrier with the dramatic increase in security over the past decade … The
remarkable drop in terror happened thanks to high-quality intelligence coupled
with Israel 's ability to
conduct targeted military operations in the West Bank .”
In other words, he says that Israel
will want America
to keep supplying it with helicopters and smart bombs to continue bombing
Palestinian families as they sleep in their bedrooms at night. And to be sure
that the military operations will be conducted without opposition, they want a Palestine that remains
demilitarized, which means undefended, innocent and helpless.
He goes on to say: “Israel can now stay secure without
the barrier.” But being the Jew that he is, he must get paid for suggesting he
would reduce the savagery of his never-ending rape of the defenseless. How does
he do that? This is how: “This will prove especially true if the Israeli
government works with the international community to promote Palestinian
economic development.” In other words, he says the world must pay the Israeli
government that will then pretend to use the money to promote Palestinian
development.
This is the new Israeli plan that Dennis Ross has seconded,
sitting as he does in the Washington ,
D.C. area. He begins his article
with this: “the administration should declare that it is not walking away from
the conflict.” To this end, John Kerry should declare the following: “I will
focus on conflict management, instead of conflict resolution.”
In other words, he says let the Israelis maintain the
perpetual wheel of misfortune in motion, and use America's power and influence
to (1) freeze the Palestinians where they are, (2) fend off the other powers,
especially the Europeans, who will surely try to interfere, (3) supply Israel with
money and weapons, (4) make Israel's talking point your own and run around the
world amplifying them, (5) put pressure on the Palestinians to hand Palestine
to the Jews, and (6) put pressure on the Arab countries to pressure the
Palestinians to accept the new “old” Jewish suggestions.