Whether you love America or you hate it, set aside
your prejudices and answer a simple question. What is worse from the standpoint
of human morality: encouraging people to flock to your side, or the military
occupation of these people? Now take America
out of the question and replace it with Iran . Now do the same with Israel .
The fact is that people from Yemen
to Lebanon are flocking to
the side of Iran for anyone
of many reasons, whereas Israel
continues to maintain its long held military occupation of Palestine . There is no contest between these
two jurisdictions: Iran is a
true reflection of the historic evolutionary process that has characterized
this planet since the dawn of civilization, whereas Israel is the product of a scheme
that is beginning to fray.
With this in mind, look at the uproar that has erupted with
regard to the scheme which Netanyahu of Israel, his ambassador in America and
the puppet speaker of the House of Congress have cobbled together for a reason
that remains obscure. It is that Netanyahu will soon address said Congress to
reveal nothing that is new. This says that the intent of the address is to
arm-wrestle the American administration in America to prove something. But
what can that something be?
You may or may not find the answer in four articles written
recently by Jews on that subject. One was written by Charles Krauthammer under
the title: “The Fatal Flaw in the Iran Deal,” published on February 26, 2015 in
National Review Online. The other three were published on February 27, 2015 by
the following authors. William Kristol wrote: “Netanyahu's Moment,” published
in the Weekly Standard. David Harsanyi wrote: “Obama's Iran Obsession”
published in National Review Online. Matthew Continetti wrote: “Why Bibi's
Speech Matters,” published in the Free Beacon.
Here is what galls Krauthammer: “Iran would re-enter the
international community, as Obama suggested in an interview last December, as a
'very successful regional power.'” The fact is that the Jews never established
a successful nation, let alone one that became a regional power. When they
managed to get the former colonial powers to give them a piece of Palestine , they immediately started to scheme the demise
of their neighbors to make of Israel
a regional power. From getting America
to block the building of Egypt 's
Aswan dam and hydroelectric station to the
demand that America must
obliterate Iran , Israel has
worked to spread chaos where serenity used to dominate.
William Kristol admits to the practical uselessness of the
speech: “Netanyahu's speech … will make familiar arguments … like the vast
majority of speeches, it would soon be overtaken by events in Israel and the United States and the world.” This
done, he asks the question: “What is he [Obama] scared of?” And he tries to
answer the question: “The Netanyahu speech … will be a moment that could cause
us to reflect … with new leadership, what kind of deeds we might once again be
capable of. As it will be a moment of vindication for Zionism … On March 3,
something remarkable will happen. The prime minister of Israel , speaking on behalf of the West will
command the world's attention as he declares his refusal to appease the enemies
of Israel
and the West.” Get it, my friend? Kristol says Obama is scared that Netanyahu
will conquer the West with a useless speech, then turn around and kick Obama
out of the office to which he was elected.
As to Continetti, he has a more “high-schoolish” sort of
view on the subject: He tells not of what he knows with certainty about the
nuclear agreement with Iran
but of what an AP report says the agreement “might” look like. And based on
this, he concludes that Iran
will be free – not to legitimately attract people to its cause – but to
continue with “its campaign to co-opt Iraq ,
Yemen , Lebanon and Syria .” And that's what Netanyahu
will warn America
about, says Continetti, which is why “Barack Obama can't stand it.” High school
stuff.
As to David Harsanyi, he does not answer a question; he asks
one: “The problem … is that Netanyahu is going to make a powerful argument
against enabling Iran
to become a nuclear power. Americans will hear it. Many will agree. Devotion to
Obama is not loyalty to your country … Surely, hearing out the case of an ally
… doesn't need to come with this much angst from Democrats. But if it does,
it's worth asking why.”