The Kama Sutra is an ancient Indian work that started as a written text
discussing love, sex, and the good life. Later, the sex part of the work was
depicted in paintings and sculpture. They exhibited the variety of sexual
positions that a couple can adopt to derive maximum pleasure from the act.
The reason why I mention this subject is that the Italians have a milder
version of the Kama Sutra and, in the eyes of some people, has caused an
international incident. These are nude sculptures meant to celebrate the beauty
of the human body. Made hundreds of years ago, they are kept in Rome 's Capitoline
Museums.
On his visit to Italy ,
the Iranian President Hassan Rouhani was taken on a tour of the museum
containing, among other works of art, those nude sculptures. Not to offend his
sensibilities, the Italians covered the private parts of the human anatomy
displayed by those sculptures.
Up until the moment that the Jewish hate machine began to grab every
incident that came its way and spin it into a reason to hate the Muslims – the
chosen enemies of the day – that incident would have meant nothing. It still
means nothing everywhere in the world, including Europe and America too.
Everywhere that is, except the places where the Jewish hate machine has a
presence.
Numerous Jews and their Christian barking dogs wrote about it, one Jew
being Clifford D. May who penned: “The Islamist wears Dolce & Gabbana,” an
article that also came under the subtitle: “Haute couture headscarves won't
counter violent extremism.” It was published on February 2, 2016 in The
Washington Times.
Before getting to the museum incident, Clifford May discusses the
subject of the Italian designer who came up with a line of Muslim headscarves.
According to fashion historian, Kimberly Chrisman-Campbell whom Clifford May
has quoted, the “announcement comes at a critical time, making the statement
that Western fashion and Islam can make an aesthetically compatible and
socially productive union.” How Scandalous!
That's what blew the Jewish mind of Clifford D. May. Can you believe it?
Can you imagine someone trying to make the West and Islam aesthetically
compatible and socially productive? What's this world coming to? “Let me be
clear,” he begins to say, and goes from there to give a lecture on the
relationship that exists between fashion and the human rights of women.
At this point, Clifford May gets into the subject of the nude
sculptures, and quotes Suzanne Maloney whom he calls a left-leaning scholar. She
is not happy, he says, because the Italians “jettisoned their values and
historical legacy” to kiss-up to the Iranian leader. As if this were not
enough, May adds that “the Italians found an additional way to bow to Mr.
Rouhani's religious sensibilities: At an official dinner, they served no
alcohol.”
Okay. Let's see now. What's the Jewish rage about? It is about the
reconciliation of the West and Iran
which, in the eyes of the Jews, presages a reconciliation between the Christian
World and the Muslim World. Since the Jewish strategy for taking control of
America and the whole world is based on the attempt to spark a war between the
Christians and the Muslims, that reconciliation will come like a stake in
Dracula's heart.
To prove that I am wrong in what I'm saying, Clifford May will have to
do a number of things.
First, he can go to places in Asia
where they eat monkey brains, cats, dogs and cockroaches, and have plenty of
those on the table as he eats a kosher meal free of pork.
Second, he can go to the public relation firms that instruct businessmen
on how to behave when traveling to places where the customs are different from
those in America
– and tell them to get out of business.
Third, he can go to Donald Trump and tell him to beg the American people
forgiveness for kowtowing to Gaddafi the day that the Libyan leader insisted on
spending the night in his tent, set-up somewhere in a New York Park
Fourth, he can ask the women of America to denounce the movement
that brought about “Prohibition” and the one known as Mothers Against Drunk
Driving (MADD).
Fifth, he can go to York University in Ontario ,
and ask them to apologize for refusing – some four decades ago – to show to
film students a Quebec
production considered soft pornography, named Kamasutra.
And when he has done
all that, he should bloody well explain to the world why it is that the Jews
believe they have the right to constantly criticize someone for responding to
their situation when they must, and for changing their mind when it is time to
do so.
This done, he can bloody well pledge to mind his own business so that
everyone else do likewise, and not have to tell the Jews what they think of
them – sometimes harshly.