It happens at times that a pyromaniac gets a job as
firefighter and sets fire to many places without stirring suspicion. It also
happens at times that a pedophile becomes a priest or boot-camp manager and has
easy access to children he abuses at will. And it happens at times that
genocidal maniacs appear to advocate prevention of genocide by actually
inciting the feeble minds to commit genocide. Finally, it happens all the time
that the Jews keep inciting America
to become the foremost serial genocidal maniac of all time.
To advocate genocide has been the history of the Jews since
their beginning. It's what their religion – described in the Old Testament – is
about and nothing else. Were it not for the “Political Correctness” of our
time, every historian would now be writing about the work that the Jews have
done throughout history to pit people against people, and start the wars that
benefited their leaders. Needless to say that such benefit came at the expense
of much misery suffered by their own rank and file and by the rest of the human
race.
The biggest genocidal scheme they engineered after the
Second World War has been the Rwandan horror. They did it trying to get control
of the Nile River
They got the chance to pull off their trick when the Egyptian
diplomat, Boutros Ghali became Secretary General of the United Nations (UN). To
understand what happened there, we need to recall that tribal wars had been
common in Africa since the end of the colonial
era. The UN had been a big factor at mediating the underlying disputes; also
quelling the wars that erupted by engaging in negotiations, and positioning
peace keeping forces between the combatants.
Seeing the possibility of killing two birds with one stone,
the Jews pitted the Rwandan tribes against each other, and pitted the American
Congress against the UN of Boutros Ghali. They ignited the Rwandan genocide,
and got the American Congress of low-life dogs and diseased cockroaches to
accuse the UN of being inefficient.
They used that fake accusation as an excuse to turn the
Congress into a beast of burden dedicated to the realization of the
Judeo-Israeli agenda. And they worked like animals to make sure that Boutros
Ghali does not serve a second term at the UN. To this end, they barked that the
UN must not intervene in Rwanda
despite the ongoing Jewish-engineered genocide. And Ghali was unable to stop
that tsunami of Jewish hate and incitement.
The Jews have, since that time, continued to use America 's money, power and prestige to pit the
tribes of the Nile Basin against each other, especially those in the Sudan . It is
that – true to form – the Jews have not lost hope they will someday get lucky
and set the region on fire the way they did in Iraq
and Libya .
To this end, they are scheming to topple the existing governments, expecting
that a civil war will erupt in each country. They believe that when this
happens, Israel
will automatically become the local hegemon.
You get a sense of how the Jews play that game when you
parse the article which came under the title: “Bystanders to genocide” and the
subtitle: “President Obama and his team promised to do better,” written by
Clifford D. May and published in The Washington Times on February 16, 2016.
Note that May calls himself president of the Foundation for Defense of
Democracies. This is an appellation that has come to mean the foundation
serving as pyromaniac for Planet Earth, and pedophile for humanity.
Note also the shamelessness with which the writer flatters
Obama of the US , Cameron of
the UK and Sarkozy of France
for turning Libya
into a genocidal arena of the kind that only a Jew can love. And note how he
chastises Obama for not repeating the performance in Syria when he had the opportunity.
May also chastises the US
President for the “precipitate withdrawal from Iraq ,” contending that the war in
that country continues to this day because Obama withdrew American forces from
there. Of course, he does not realize that someone with an IQ equal to that of
a monkey will see that the war in Afghanistan
started well before Iraq
and continues to this day.
Instead of securing order and stability for that country,
the deteriorating situation compelled even Obama, the peacemaker, to send
additional troops in an effort to counter an insurgency that never goes away.
It stands to reason, therefore, that a situation of the same kind would have
prevailed in Iraq
but with a difference.