How do you know that the self-appointed leaders of the Jews
are losing influence, wealth and power?
You know it when you see them go back to the pretense of
protecting the Jewish rank and file from a society that is trying to harm them.
You'll also know they have reached a desperate level when you see them throw
the antisemitic accusation at someone.
And this is where you'll find the editors of the New York
Daily News at this time. You can see how they are trying to weasel their way
back to the center stage position with the editorial they wrote under the
title: “An education in tolerance that CUNY must end anti-Jewish agitation on
campus,” published on February 25, 2016. Once they are back in that position,
they'll re-conquer America
the way they did at the start of the cycle.
Before we proceed with a discussion of that editorial, let
me tell you a true story. It must have been in the late 1960s or early 1970s
when a young Australian Jew went to occupied Jerusalem and set fire to the Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Luckily the fire was contained before causing too much damage. The Israelis
attributed the crime to the eccentricity of the young man, and closed the file.
Unhappy at the haste with which the Israelis treated the
subject, a couple of Palestinian Arabs – not prominent by any means – asked
that there be an investigation. They did not ask for a “full investigation”
mind you, just an ordinary one. They argued it would do a great deal of good to
air all the facts, thus put to rest any suspicion that may be out there. The
Israeli authorities took a little time to respond to that, but not the North
American Jewish leaders – those in Canada – who responded immediately.
They said over and over that the Arabs had no idea how a
civilized system of justice works. So they set out to “educate” the Arabs. In
reality, however, what they did was “educate” the Canadian public since the
Arabs in Palestine and elsewhere were unaware of
what the Jews were saying or doing in North America .
What follows is the kind of education that the Jewish
leaders gave us … we, the Canadian public: If the Arabs have a suspicion, like
they seem to say they do, it means they have evidence. Before they open their
mouths again, they should reveal that evidence or keep their mouths shut
forever.
And that, my friend, was my first lesson … not on how the
system of justice was meant to work, but on how ignorant the Jewish leaders
were, and how poorly their minds operated. The reality is that a young man does
not normally fly from Australia
to Jerusalem
where he sets fire to an Islamic holy place just because he is eccentric. Thus,
the abnormality of the act was sufficient to rouse suspicion. An investigation
would have confirmed or rejected any such suspicion; and that's all what the
Palestinian Arabs had asked for.
Look now – five decades later – what the editors of the New
York Daily News say about the situation at CUNY: “a pro-Palestinian group [SJP]
has created a climate of fear for Jewish students … demands full
investigation.” Note that they say “demand” and “full investigation.” Like the
Arabs of half a century ago, do these editors have any idea how a civilized
system of justice works? Or do they need to be “educated” as to how it works?
Look what else they are saying: “protests have included
anti-Semitic rhetoric.” Well, seeing that anti-Semitic accusation, you know
these people are desperate. Furthermore, before the investigation has even
begun – if there is going to be one – they are championing the call “on the
CUNY administration to determine, among other things, whether to revoke SJP's
status as a student organization.” Not only they are suspecting something, they
are using the suspicion as a stepping stone to tell what the punishment should be.
They go on to do what is known as trying the SJP in the
media. Is that how they understand a civilized system is supposed to work?
Coming to the end of their presentation, they say this: “As loathsome as the
SJP message is, the First Amendment grants its members the right to speak … At
the same time, Chancellor James Milliken is obligated [that's OBLIGATED] to
take action – including expulsion”.
They want to see all this done before there has been an
investigation … if there is going to be one at all.