If you want to understand history, you need to learn how to
spot and decode waves, trends and movements of forces. These would be forces of
ideas, beliefs and at times, even science and technology.
Most pundits have little or no understanding of that process
and yet, try to predict what will happen in the future based on what they say
is their understanding of history. Well, even if they did understand history as
well as they should, they could not predict the future as accurately as they
pretend they can. But not knowing how history develops, and trying to predict
the future based on such ignorance is truly an act of criminal charlatanism.
Criminal charlatanism is what the father and daughter team
of Dick and Liz Cheney have produced with the article they wrote under the
title: “Dangers Rise as America Retreats and the subtitle: “Fifteen years after
9/11, the next president will face greater risks and a weaker military to
combat them.” It was published on September 10, 2016 in the Wall Street
Journal. With this article, they establish themselves as illiterates in
history.
Looking back at history, it must be said that America acted
normally when it expressed misgivings about participating in the two world wars
of the twentieth century. It also acted normally and legitimately when it later
reversed the decision, and decided to participate. It did so in reaction to
acts of aggression committed against it with the sinking of the Lusitania during WW I, and the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor during WW II.
That's when two parallel trends began to take shape almost
simultaneously. One trend was America 's
inability to understand the difference between what motivated the Nazi, Fascist
and Japanese hierarchies to go to war, and what motivated the people who fought
wars of liberation … especially those that had previously suffered from imperialism
and subjugation. The other trend was the understanding that America 's
allies were gaining as they watched that country perform diplomatically and
militarily around the world. They were developing apprehension regarding what
they considered was America 's
penchant for adventurism.
In fact, the British were the first to take advantage of
that understanding. Even before the full synthesis of the trend, Winston
Churchill who witnessed America's performance during WW I, instinctively knew
he had a good shot at maintaining British relevance post WW II by pitting
America against the Soviet Union. He did so by convincing the American brass to
initiate a Cold War. The Americans did, and the war gradually intensified with
time to take on the character of a hot war.
The French were next to take advantage of what was becoming
an obvious American weakness of character. Bogged down in Vietnam trying to maintain a colonial rule where
people hungered for freedom, and convinced that they were about to lose
decisively, the French called on America
to take charge of the Vietnam
boondoggle. America
did, and suffered the first hot war defeat waged under the aegis of the Cold
War.
After Britain
and France
came the Jews. They did at a time when the Cold War between America and the Soviet
Union was getting hotter on another front. The Soviets had made
the colossal mistake of intervening in Afghanistan , and that's where a
battlefield sprung up to host a hot proxy war between the two superpowers. But
unlike the British and the French whose expatriates in America played no role in advancing the agenda
of the “old” country, the Jewish “Diaspora” played a major role in taking
advantage of the situation to advance the agenda of the nascent country of Israel .
The Jews got into the business of pitting America against the Arab and Muslim worlds for
the benefit of Israel .
Their gamble has paid off immensely up to now, but the well is drying up. This
is why prominent Americans that have a skeleton in the closet – hidden from the
public but known to the Jews – are being instructed to tell the public that America must continue to make itself useful for Israel .